Blacks Aren’t Human
Rosemary Pennington Rosemary Pennington · March 14, 2015
ACCORDING TO Rushton’s Race, Evolution, and Behavior fully modern Homo >sapiens emerged in Africa 200,000 years ago. 100,000 years ago, a small
group of Africans had a sudden urge to head north. This small group
inhabited the rest of the world, with minimal contact with the rest of
the Africans who stayed in Africa. Forty thousand years ago, the
Caucasoid race broke off from the Mongoloid race.
This means the entire world outside of Africa is largely related,
descended from one small tribe of perhaps a few hundred or a thousand.
This tribe was obviously already unique, in that it alone had the
intrepidity and determination to head north and conquer the world. We,
the descendants of this unique tribe, have afterwards been evolving
under extremely different, more challenging environments for the last
100,000 years apart from the African race we left behind. 100,000 years
under dramatically different environments from a dramatically different >founding stock is a long time. Compare it to dogs:
Dog Domestication and History
“Dog history has been studied recently using mitochondrial DNA, which >suggests that wolves and dogs split into different species around
100,000 years ago…”
Another recent study suggests that the entire population of dogs today
are descended from three females near China about 15,000 years ago.
So, I’m going to stick my neck out and use the 13,000 year BC date as
the probable date of domestication.
This is a convenient parallel. Dogs also come from a bottleneck, they’ve >also been genetically separate from wolves for 100,000 years, and
they’ve also undergone different environmental pressures than their wolf >counterparts. Just as the northern latitudes presented a unique
environment for non-Blacks to grow up in, dogs were domesticated and
evolved towards suiting human needs instead of wolf needs. No one on
earth says dogs and wolves are the same species, even though it is
possible for dogs to mate with wolves and have fertile offspring. The
genetic differences are vast enough, the phenotypic differences in
looks, behavior, and personality are great enough, that everyone >instinctively recognizes dogs and wolves are different species now.
Why then are Blacks considered human? Why are Blacks and non-Blacks >considered part of the same species? We could not look more different,
act more different, or have more different personalities than them.
There is a vast genetic divergence between Blacks and non-Blacks dating
back 100,000 years. And even though Blacks and non-Blacks can have
fertile offspring, biologically that has never been used as the
exclusive standard for whether you belong to the same species or not.
Phenotypic Variations Between Blacks and Non-Blacks
Blacks have wide noses, kinky hair, black skin, high waist-to-hip
ratios, prognathic jaws, long arms, and soulless, vacant eyes.
Everything about them is ugly.
Blacks have the lowest IQ in the world (ignoring the equally disgusting
and black-skinned Australian aborigines for convenience’s sake). The >Bushmen clock in at around 50 IQ, the average Bantu achieves the
mentally retarded level of 70 IQ, and the highly cultivated, well fed,
well cared for, partially White African-Americans reach 85 IQ. IQ has an >enormous impact on lifestyle, achievement, and behavior. IQ correlates
to poverty, crime, mortality, and broken homes on one side — and
education, wealth, human accomplishment, long life and stable homes on
the other. According to IQ and the Wealth of Nations, a country must
have a minimum average IQ of 90 to run a technological civilization. It
is not a far cry to say it is IQ that makes humans better than the
animals, and it is IQ that makes some humans better than other humans.
That’s not all though. Blacks are unique in that when we arrived, they
had no written language, no wheel, no architectural works, nothing at
all that would indicate they live a human existence. Whereas literature
and palaces and cities existed in almost every corner of the earth, from
the Incas to the Indians to the Persians to the Chinese to Stonehenge to >Ankar Wat in Cambodia — nothing existed in Africa. For the past 100,000 >years non-Blacks have been spreading across the globe, building pyramids
and cities, developing new technology, domesticating animals and crops, >covering themselves in finely decorated clothing, and living essentially >human lives. Blacks, meanwhile, stayed nearly naked, self-mutilating, >technology-less, with no domesticated animals, no written language, no
wheel, no stone buildings, no metalworking, nothing.
Virtually every other non-Black group came up with an admirable or at
least interesting religion or philosophy which was recorded and taught
to a priesthood. Indians had the Vedas and the Upanishads, Chinese had >Confucianism, Daoism, and various sects of Buddhism. Europeans had
Virgil, Horace, and Homer to write down their pagan religion, with
Plato, Aristotle, and numberless other greats to record their
philosophy. Even the Aztecs had a corpus of literature which was, >unfortunately, burnt and destroyed by the Spanish invaders. Shintoism
was developed in Japan, the epic of Gilgamesh was recorded in ancient >Babylonian times, and Egypt authored the Book of the Dead. Only Black
Africa (and assorted primitives in Australasia) hadn’t recorded or
created any official religion or philosophy. Blacks still rely on
voodoo, witchcraft, black magic, and animism with no particular pantheon
of Gods, no priesthood, no anything that could develop them past
superstition and barbarism.
Today it is questionable what Blacks could achieve on their own, without
the intervention of others giving to them all the things they could
never produce or maintain themselves. Though we see Blacks walking
around in business suits, speaking English, shooting guns, and making
use of all sorts of non-Black generated goods and services and
inventions and ideas and discoveries — none of them originate from the >Black man. Without the continuous intervention of charity into Black
Africa, it’s unknown whether they could even maintain what they have, or
if they would simply regress back to mud huts the moment we left. All
current Black civilization is in fact transplanted non-Black
civilization. There is not as yet a single Black civilization on Earth
that has independently developed and maintained its own technological
and philosophical way of life. No Blacks have won any Nobel prizes in
the hard sciences, Fields medals, or gotten any spot on a list of human >accomplishment that would represent some major scientific or
technological advancement for the world.
Geography can be no excuse, because Blacks today live all across the
world. Blacks in France, the UK, and the USA are given preferential
treatment and access to college educations, and yet they still produce >nothing. At the same time, Whites who lived in South Africa and Zimbabwe
made them into decent, First World nations without a problem. There is >nothing about the African continent inimical to modern life, it is
simply the fact that it is populated by Blacks.
Nor can some strange combination of bad luck and being separate from
other civilizations explain Black underperformance. After all, Blacks
have been connected to the outside world since the 1400s. They have had >centuries to modernize and improve themselves in Africa with full access
to modern knowledge and technology. In contrast, it took Japan about
twenty years to modernize from a feudal Samurai culture to a fully
modern industrial state which then took on and defeated Russia in 1900
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 286 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 84:25:02 |
Calls: | 6,495 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 12,097 |
Messages: | 5,276,895 |