• L'Osetinskaya KV 491

    From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 16 04:21:33 2023
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sNeOJOL9eU

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Thu Mar 16 09:12:45 2023
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 11:21:36 AM UTC, Dan Koren wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sNeOJOL9eU

    dk


    I quite enjoyed it. But there's something about her music making which brushes me up the wrong way. It's somehow slightly too heavy, too perfumed, not really impish enough. The only other thing I've heard from her was Shostakovich op 34 preludes, and
    at the time I reacted the same way -- worth a listen but I won't go back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Thu Mar 16 09:14:22 2023
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 4:12:48 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 11:21:36 AM UTC, Dan Koren wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sNeOJOL9eU

    dk


    I quite enjoyed it. But there's something about her music making which brushes me up the wrong way. It's somehow slightly too heavy, too perfumed, not really impish enough. The only other thing I've heard from her was Shostakovich op 34 preludes, and
    at the time I reacted the same way -- worth a listen but I won't go back.


    I haven't listened to the Bach concerto you posted, by the way, I'm just not interested in baroque concertos much at the moment.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Thu Mar 16 14:22:12 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Donnerstag, 16. März 2023 um 17:12:48 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 11:21:36 AM UTC, Dan Koren wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sNeOJOL9eU

    dk


    I quite enjoyed it. But there's something about her music making which brushes me up the wrong way. It's somehow slightly too heavy, too perfumed, not really impish enough. The only other thing I've heard from her was Shostakovich op 34 preludes, and
    at the time I reacted the same way -- worth a listen but I won't go back.

    Ya, I very much agree that it's not impish enough (which is why I love Gould here). Too heavy? Maybe... I don't know, would have to listen again and think about it. I thought it worked, and was really great. Not many who are better... maybe Gieseking?
    Maybe Schnabel. Bashkirov maybe, but not so sure... Richter... hmmmm I was not too impressed with him here.

    Maybe Radu Lupu (NDR-Sinfonieorchester and Dohnányi)? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuMCa-6gNJQ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Thu Mar 16 14:28:36 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Donnerstag, 16. März 2023 um 17:14:25 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 4:12:48 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 11:21:36 AM UTC, Dan Koren wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sNeOJOL9eU

    dk


    I quite enjoyed it. But there's something about her music making which brushes me up the wrong way. It's somehow slightly too heavy, too perfumed, not really impish enough. The only other thing I've heard from her was Shostakovich op 34 preludes, and
    at the time I reacted the same way -- worth a listen but I won't go back.
    I haven't listened to the Bach concerto you posted, by the way, I'm just not interested in baroque concertos much at the moment.

    I think I remember reading a post of yours on tc that you liked the Richter version... everytime I tried it, I thought it was bad...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Thu Mar 16 14:24:30 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Donnerstag, 16. März 2023 um 17:12:48 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 11:21:36 AM UTC, Dan Koren wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sNeOJOL9eU

    dk


    I quite enjoyed it. But there's something about her music making which brushes me up the wrong way. It's somehow slightly too heavy, too perfumed, not really impish enough. The only other thing I've heard from her was Shostakovich op 34 preludes, and
    at the time I reacted the same way -- worth a listen but I won't go back.

    Too perfumed? Maybe... but sometimes it was also quite dirty.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Thu Mar 16 19:46:59 2023
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 9:12:48 AM UTC-7, Mandryka wrote:
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 11:21:36 AM UTC, Dan Koren wrote:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sNeOJOL9eU

    I quite enjoyed it. But there's something about her music making
    which brushes me up the wrong way. It's somehow slightly too
    heavy, too perfumed, not really impish enough. The only other
    thing I've heard from her was Shostakovich op 34 preludes,
    and at the time I reacted the same way -- worth a listen but
    I won't go back.

    Thanks for listening. I found it interesting enough to mention.
    As you say, worth hearing once. Very clean, and appropriately
    serious (whether historically accurate or not). Just a smidgen
    too stiff rhythmically to make it into my top KV 491 selections.

    My current favorite is this one:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/r9ex6rubyxyhso2/Mozart%20KV%20491.mp3?dl=0

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Thu Mar 16 19:47:54 2023
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 2:22:14 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Richter... hmmmm I was not too impressed with him here.

    Not his cup of tea.

    Maybe Radu Lupu (NDR-Sinfonieorchester and Dohnányi)? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuMCa-6gNJQ

    Try this one:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/r9ex6rubyxyhso2/Mozart%20KV%20491.mp3?dl=0

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Fri Mar 17 03:12:52 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 03:47:56 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 2:22:14 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Richter... hmmmm I was not too impressed with him here.
    Not his cup of tea.
    Maybe Radu Lupu (NDR-Sinfonieorchester and Dohnányi)? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuMCa-6gNJQ

    I had not listened to this one by Radu Lupu when I posted the link. Listened to the first movement today (and the last variation in the 3rd movement) - I was not impressed. Radu Lupu is just a bit dull imo... he always disappoints me. (Maybe - as you
    once declared - there is a great recording of the Prokofiev PC 2 with him from some competition, but as I'm not interested in the piece I don't care).

    Try this one:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/r9ex6rubyxyhso2/Mozart%20KV%20491.mp3?dl=0

    Just listened to the first movement and the last variation of the 3rd movement.

    I did not know who this pianist was; I had a feeling it was Lang Lang (touch and because I sort of have a feeling for pianists you like) and it seems it was indeed him (just checked yt).

    Very good, much better than the last one you uploaded with him I think (I am really not too sure though - maybe my taste changed; the other one seemed more innocent and playful maybe, not as dark and serious).

    But I think... Gould and Gieseking are just way better - next up is Schnabel, then probably Bashkirov and then maybe Osetinskaya and Lang Lang. The others are mostly very dull... and even Osetinskaya and Lang Lang don't really do it for me thinking about
    it. Screw Zacharias, Brendel, Lupu, Haskil, Kissin, Rubinstein, Richter - maybe I would rate Kempff and maybe even Buchbinder above or around the same as Osetinskaya and Lang Lang - to be really confident I would have to check again though.


    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Fri Mar 17 03:34:00 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 11:12:55 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 03:47:56 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 2:22:14 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Richter... hmmmm I was not too impressed with him here.
    Not his cup of tea.
    Maybe Radu Lupu (NDR-Sinfonieorchester and Dohnányi)? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuMCa-6gNJQ
    I had not listened to this one by Radu Lupu when I posted the link. Listened to the first movement today (and the last variation in the 3rd movement) - I was not impressed. Radu Lupu is just a bit dull imo... he always disappoints me. (Maybe - as you
    once declared - there is a great recording of the Prokofiev PC 2 with him from some competition, but as I'm not interested in the piece I don't care).
    Try this one:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/r9ex6rubyxyhso2/Mozart%20KV%20491.mp3?dl=0
    Just listened to the first movement and the last variation of the 3rd movement.

    I did not know who this pianist was; I had a feeling it was Lang Lang (touch and because I sort of have a feeling for pianists you like) and it seems it was indeed him (just checked yt).

    Very good, much better than the last one you uploaded with him I think (I am really not too sure though - maybe my taste changed; the other one seemed more innocent and playful maybe, not as dark and serious).

    But I think... Gould and Gieseking are just way better - next up is Schnabel, then probably Bashkirov and then maybe Osetinskaya and Lang Lang. The others are mostly very dull... and even Osetinskaya and Lang Lang don't really do it for me thinking
    about it. Screw Zacharias, Brendel, Lupu, Haskil, Kissin, Rubinstein, Richter - maybe I would rate Kempff and maybe even Buchbinder above or around the same as Osetinskaya and Lang Lang - to be really confident I would have to check again though.


    dk

    Maybe I am wrong about it being Lang Lang... maybe I should have compared directly, instead of just listening to a snippet of it and thinking it is Lang Lang. But I got other things to do as well.

    In any case... I think Gould and Gieseking are the best; after them there is sort of a gap, after which comes Schnabel, after him there is a gap as well, a bigger one, and this is where it becomes more difficult for me... I am very sure about my
    dismissal of Lupu, Haskil, Zacharias, Brendel, Rubinstein and Richter though - Kempff and Buchbinder I listened to ages ago and thought they were quite good (Kempff being more lyrical if I remember correctly); maybe I would think differently today (I
    would also have to listen to Richter again and compare him to Kempff and Buchbinder. And compare these three to Osetinskaya and Lang Lang(?)).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 17 05:13:02 2023
    Or Anderszewski with Cambreling (I like the recording where he conducts it from the piano)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8j-m0Ctn8&ab_channel=JAPAN1913

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to Marc S on Fri Mar 17 05:08:12 2023
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 10:34:03 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 11:12:55 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 03:47:56 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 2:22:14 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Richter... hmmmm I was not too impressed with him here.
    Not his cup of tea.
    Maybe Radu Lupu (NDR-Sinfonieorchester and Dohnányi)? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuMCa-6gNJQ
    I had not listened to this one by Radu Lupu when I posted the link. Listened to the first movement today (and the last variation in the 3rd movement) - I was not impressed. Radu Lupu is just a bit dull imo... he always disappoints me. (Maybe - as you
    once declared - there is a great recording of the Prokofiev PC 2 with him from some competition, but as I'm not interested in the piece I don't care).
    Try this one:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/r9ex6rubyxyhso2/Mozart%20KV%20491.mp3?dl=0
    Just listened to the first movement and the last variation of the 3rd movement.

    I did not know who this pianist was; I had a feeling it was Lang Lang (touch and because I sort of have a feeling for pianists you like) and it seems it was indeed him (just checked yt).

    Very good, much better than the last one you uploaded with him I think (I am really not too sure though - maybe my taste changed; the other one seemed more innocent and playful maybe, not as dark and serious).

    But I think... Gould and Gieseking are just way better - next up is Schnabel, then probably Bashkirov and then maybe Osetinskaya and Lang Lang. The others are mostly very dull... and even Osetinskaya and Lang Lang don't really do it for me thinking
    about it. Screw Zacharias, Brendel, Lupu, Haskil, Kissin, Rubinstein, Richter - maybe I would rate Kempff and maybe even Buchbinder above or around the same as Osetinskaya and Lang Lang - to be really confident I would have to check again though.


    dk
    Maybe I am wrong about it being Lang Lang... maybe I should have compared directly, instead of just listening to a snippet of it and thinking it is Lang Lang. But I got other things to do as well.

    In any case... I think Gould and Gieseking are the best; after them there is sort of a gap, after which comes Schnabel, after him there is a gap as well, a bigger one, and this is where it becomes more difficult for me... I am very sure about my
    dismissal of Lupu, Haskil, Zacharias, Brendel, Rubinstein and Richter though - Kempff and Buchbinder I listened to ages ago and thought they were quite good (Kempff being more lyrical if I remember correctly); maybe I would think differently today (I
    would also have to listen to Richter again and compare him to Kempff and Buchbinder. And compare these three to Osetinskaya and Lang Lang(?)).

    What about Kempff with Maderna?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 17 05:14:07 2023
    Or Casadesus and Eugéne Bigot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3o3JN2EwVY&ab_channel=gullivior

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Fri Mar 17 05:15:17 2023
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:08:15 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 10:34:03 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 11:12:55 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 03:47:56 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 2:22:14 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Richter... hmmmm I was not too impressed with him here.
    Not his cup of tea.
    Maybe Radu Lupu (NDR-Sinfonieorchester and Dohnányi)? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuMCa-6gNJQ
    I had not listened to this one by Radu Lupu when I posted the link. Listened to the first movement today (and the last variation in the 3rd movement) - I was not impressed. Radu Lupu is just a bit dull imo... he always disappoints me. (Maybe - as
    you once declared - there is a great recording of the Prokofiev PC 2 with him from some competition, but as I'm not interested in the piece I don't care).
    Try this one:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/r9ex6rubyxyhso2/Mozart%20KV%20491.mp3?dl=0
    Just listened to the first movement and the last variation of the 3rd movement.

    I did not know who this pianist was; I had a feeling it was Lang Lang (touch and because I sort of have a feeling for pianists you like) and it seems it was indeed him (just checked yt).

    Very good, much better than the last one you uploaded with him I think (I am really not too sure though - maybe my taste changed; the other one seemed more innocent and playful maybe, not as dark and serious).

    But I think... Gould and Gieseking are just way better - next up is Schnabel, then probably Bashkirov and then maybe Osetinskaya and Lang Lang. The others are mostly very dull... and even Osetinskaya and Lang Lang don't really do it for me thinking
    about it. Screw Zacharias, Brendel, Lupu, Haskil, Kissin, Rubinstein, Richter - maybe I would rate Kempff and maybe even Buchbinder above or around the same as Osetinskaya and Lang Lang - to be really confident I would have to check again though.


    dk
    Maybe I am wrong about it being Lang Lang... maybe I should have compared directly, instead of just listening to a snippet of it and thinking it is Lang Lang. But I got other things to do as well.

    In any case... I think Gould and Gieseking are the best; after them there is sort of a gap, after which comes Schnabel, after him there is a gap as well, a bigger one, and this is where it becomes more difficult for me... I am very sure about my
    dismissal of Lupu, Haskil, Zacharias, Brendel, Rubinstein and Richter though - Kempff and Buchbinder I listened to ages ago and thought they were quite good (Kempff being more lyrical if I remember correctly); maybe I would think differently today (I
    would also have to listen to Richter again and compare him to Kempff and Buchbinder. And compare these three to Osetinskaya and Lang Lang(?)).
    What about Kempff with Maderna?

    Forgot the Kempff / Maderna link, sorry

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LpbkpZNDG4&t=517s&ab_channel=cismoll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Fri Mar 17 05:16:03 2023
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    Or Casadesus and Eugéne Bigot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3o3JN2EwVY&ab_channel=gullivior

    And there's Parahia

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETrXJ7wJ6eA&t=29s&ab_channel=MrPalika123

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Fri Mar 17 05:18:00 2023
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    Or Casadesus and Eugéne Bigot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3o3JN2EwVY&ab_channel=gullivior

    And Curzon and Giullini -- but I can't see it on youtube.

    I think Richter and Muti is well worth keeping in touch with by the way -- it's clearly an original interpretation but when it can be satisfying to hear when you're in the mood.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HT@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 17 06:31:48 2023
    Op vrijdag 17 maart 2023 om 13:14:10 UTC+1 schreef Mandryka:
    Or Casadesus and Eugéne Bigot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3o3JN2EwVY&ab_channel=gullivior

    Thanks! I didn't know this one, only the ones with Szell. Casadesus Mozart concertos are among his best recordings.

    Henk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HT@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 17 06:34:07 2023
    Op vrijdag 17 maart 2023 om 13:13:05 UTC+1 schreef Mandryka:
    Or Anderszewski with Cambreling (I like the recording where he conducts it from the piano)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8j-m0Ctn8&ab_channel=JAPAN1913

    A great performance. Thanks.

    Henk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 17 07:09:38 2023
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 6:34:10 AM UTC-7, HT wrote:
    Op vrijdag 17 maart 2023 om 13:13:05 UTC+1 schreef Mandryka:
    Or Anderszewski with Cambreling (I like the recording where he conducts it from the piano)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8j-m0Ctn8&ab_channel=JAPAN1913

    A great performance. Thanks.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNmeVzu2W4Y&t=880s

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 17 08:44:01 2023
    Okay... I just listened to Buchbinder in KV 491 3rd movement again after ages... I remember that I was not really impressed back then (I only checked it out, it was never one of my faves), and the reason I mentioned him above is because I remembered him
    being not dull (like Brendel or Perahia, I think Zacharias and Curzon were also quite dull); well maybe it's not dull, but it pretty much sucks anyway... can't say it's better or worse than Perahia or Brendel, it just does not work for me, just like they
    don't. Too heavy in places, also too forced I guess, and often imo the phrasing does not work.

    My favourite is definitely Gould or Gieseking... leaning towards Gould. I should probably check out Solomon and maybe also relisten to Kempff and Richter. Not sure if Lang Lang or Osetinskaya are better than them (but if I remember correctly they are at
    least better than Brendel, Perahia, Zacharias, Curzon, Buchbinder, Haskil, Kissin etc - quite sure about this).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Fri Mar 17 08:49:37 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:14:10 UTC+1:
    Or Casadesus and Eugéne Bigot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3o3JN2EwVY&ab_channel=gullivior

    I'll check it out later.

    The recordings of Casadesus and Szell were actually one of the first recordings of the Mozart PCs I listened to and liked. But I always thought Casadesus was a little bit uninteresting here and I'm also not too fond of Szell (here and elsewhere).

    I remember comparing Ranki's KV 450 against Casadesus' and thought Ranki was much better.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Fri Mar 17 09:56:37 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 16:44:03 UTC+1:
    Okay... I just listened to Buchbinder in KV 491 3rd movement again after ages... I remember that I was not really impressed back then (I only checked it out, it was never one of my faves), and the reason I mentioned him above is because I remembered
    him being not dull (like Brendel or Perahia, I think Zacharias and Curzon were also quite dull); well maybe it's not dull, but it pretty much sucks anyway... can't say it's better or worse than Perahia or Brendel, it just does not work for me, just like
    they don't. Too heavy in places, also too forced I guess, and often imo the phrasing does not work.


    *too heavy in general (not in places)

    I think the main reason I thought of Buchbinder was because Mandryka mentioned Osetinskaya being too heavy, while I thought it was alright, this made me think of Buchbinder as I remembered him being heavy as well and that I maybe erred in thinking he was
    bad... Now I feel fucking bad that I mentioned him haha. Probably Brendel is better here.

    My favourite is definitely Gould or Gieseking... leaning towards Gould. I should probably check out Solomon and maybe also relisten to Kempff and Richter. Not sure if Lang Lang or Osetinskaya are better than them (but if I remember correctly they are
    at least better than Brendel, Perahia, Zacharias, Curzon, Buchbinder, Haskil, Kissin etc - quite sure about this).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HT@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 17 11:16:54 2023
    Op vrijdag 17 maart 2023 om 15:09:41 UTC+1 schreef Dan Koren:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 6:34:10 AM UTC-7, HT wrote:
    Op vrijdag 17 maart 2023 om 13:13:05 UTC+1 schreef Mandryka:
    Or Anderszewski with Cambreling (I like the recording where he conducts it from the piano)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8j-m0Ctn8&ab_channel=JAPAN1913

    A great performance. Thanks.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNmeVzu2W4Y&t=880s

    Interesting, but not a performance to revisit.

    Moving legs under the piano (stool) is new to me. I prefer high heels. They don't distract me.

    Was this Tao's own cadenza in the first movement? I hope not. Despite all the notes, there was not much going on musically.

    Henk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Fri Mar 17 11:17:07 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 16:49:42 UTC+1:
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:14:10 UTC+1:
    Or Casadesus and Eugéne Bigot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3o3JN2EwVY&ab_channel=gullivior
    I'll check it out later.

    The recordings of Casadesus and Szell were actually one of the first recordings of the Mozart PCs I listened to and liked. But I always thought Casadesus was a little bit uninteresting here and I'm also not too fond of Szell (here and elsewhere).

    I remember comparing Ranki's KV 450 against Casadesus' and thought Ranki was much better.

    Haven't listened to your upload yet. Just for fun I just compared Casadesus + Szell and Ranki again (just some parts out of the concerto and it's been probably around 4 years, maybe even 5 since I last compared them), and I would prefer Casadesus over
    Ranki today. Still not too impressed by his playing (except for the delicate touch), but much better than I remembered, and Ranki is just so much worse than I remembered. I can't stand his tone, and his playing...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Fri Mar 17 12:30:39 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:13:05 UTC+1:
    Or Anderszewski with Cambreling (I like the recording where he conducts it from the piano)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8j-m0Ctn8&ab_channel=JAPAN1913

    The pianist is not good. Reminds me of Brendel.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Fri Mar 17 12:36:48 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 20:30:41 UTC+1:
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:13:05 UTC+1:
    Or Anderszewski with Cambreling (I like the recording where he conducts it from the piano)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8j-m0Ctn8&ab_channel=JAPAN1913
    The pianist is not good. Reminds me of Brendel.

    Maybe a little more action-packed than Brendel. But I don't know his tone really reminded me of Brendel's. But after listening to Brendel + Marriner in Mov 3 I was wrong. I guess there are some similarities, but not really. Brendel seems to be legato
    more often.

    Anyway... both I don't like, that's at least sth that makes them similar (in my eyes).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Fri Mar 17 12:55:43 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 20:36:50 UTC+1:
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 20:30:41 UTC+1:
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:13:05 UTC+1:
    Or Anderszewski with Cambreling (I like the recording where he conducts it from the piano)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8j-m0Ctn8&ab_channel=JAPAN1913
    The pianist is not good. Reminds me of Brendel.
    Maybe a little more action-packed than Brendel. But I don't know his tone really reminded me of Brendel's. But after listening to Brendel + Marriner in Mov 3 I was wrong. I guess there are some similarities, but not really. Brendel seems to be legato
    more often.

    Anyway... both I don't like, that's at least sth that makes them similar (in my eyes).

    I don't know, most of "today's" pianists seem sort of restrained (say Brendel, Zacharias, Anderszweski). Gould does not, Gieseking does not, Schnabel does not, Bashkirov does not; it all seems more natural and free... not as strained and closed.
    Certainly Lang Lang seems more free than many of today's pianists as well, but sometimes his touch truly bugs me here; like there are parts for example where I would prefer legato and he makes staccato, and an ugly one - not beautiful like Gould. I haven'
    t listened to Bashkirov here in a long time, but I had similar feelings about him... I hated his tone (sometimes?) in this piece; Osetinskaya does not seem as free as Lang Lang (similar to her Bach - I guess Dan is right in characterizing her playing as
    a bit stiff, yet I think more open and natural than Anderszweski (in KV 491)), probably not even worth listening once thinking about it... I mean certainly some things were interesting... and she has a beautiful touch, but not a top performance indeed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Fri Mar 17 13:04:16 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:14:10 UTC+1:
    Or Casadesus and Eugéne Bigot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3o3JN2EwVY&ab_channel=gullivior

    no, very bad... no sense for anything?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Fri Mar 17 13:08:14 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 20:55:46 UTC+1:
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 20:36:50 UTC+1:
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 20:30:41 UTC+1:
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:13:05 UTC+1:
    Or Anderszewski with Cambreling (I like the recording where he conducts it from the piano)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8j-m0Ctn8&ab_channel=JAPAN1913
    The pianist is not good. Reminds me of Brendel.
    Maybe a little more action-packed than Brendel. But I don't know his tone really reminded me of Brendel's. But after listening to Brendel + Marriner in Mov 3 I was wrong. I guess there are some similarities, but not really. Brendel seems to be legato
    more often.

    Anyway... both I don't like, that's at least sth that makes them similar (in my eyes).
    I don't know, most of "today's" pianists seem sort of restrained (say Brendel, Zacharias, Anderszweski). Gould does not, Gieseking does not, Schnabel does not, Bashkirov does not; it all seems more natural and free... not as strained and closed.
    Certainly Lang Lang seems more free than many of today's pianists as well, but sometimes his touch truly bugs me here; like there are parts for example where I would prefer legato and he makes staccato, and an ugly one - not beautiful like Gould. I haven'
    t listened to Bashkirov here in a long time, but I had similar feelings about him... I hated his tone (sometimes?) in this piece; Osetinskaya does not seem as free as Lang Lang (similar to her Bach - I guess Dan is right in characterizing her playing as
    a bit stiff, yet I think more open and natural than Anderszweski (in KV 491)), probably not even worth listening once thinking about it... I mean certainly some things were interesting... and she has a beautiful touch, but not a top performance indeed.

    the problem with Lang Lang which I forgot to add also is: he has some weird "mannerisms" (phrasing) which seem unnatural; but he seems more free (than many/most others).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Fri Mar 17 13:21:53 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:16:06 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    Or Casadesus and Eugéne Bigot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3o3JN2EwVY&ab_channel=gullivior
    And there's Parahia

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETrXJ7wJ6eA&t=29s&ab_channel=MrPalika123

    sorry, not interested - I shall never waste time again with him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Fri Mar 17 13:33:14 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:18:02 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    Or Casadesus and Eugéne Bigot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3o3JN2EwVY&ab_channel=gullivior
    And Curzon and Giullini -- but I can't see it on youtube.

    sorry not interested in Curzon. I shall also never waste any more time with Curzon.


    I think Richter and Muti is well worth keeping in touch with by the way -- it's clearly an original interpretation but when it can be satisfying to hear when you're in the mood.

    I should try this one again though... maybe not... I remember he is just not as good as Gould,Gieseking or Schnabel - I am very certain these are the three best recordings of this piece (the rest I don't care for; Lang Lang seems more free than Brendel,
    but then Brendel is never ugly, he is just dull...), and Schnabel is also much better than I remembered having just relistened to bits of his playing, not sure who I like more, Gieseking or Schnabel; but Gould I like most.

    Still haven't listened to Solomon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 17 16:36:26 2023
    Thinking about it Lang Lang is really not in good taste. When it comes to Asians YES is a really good Mozartian, I think (not only among Asians, but generally).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Fri Mar 17 16:42:32 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:18:02 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    Or Casadesus and Eugéne Bigot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3o3JN2EwVY&ab_channel=gullivior
    And Curzon and Giullini -- but I can't see it on youtube.

    I think Richter and Muti is well worth keeping in touch with by the way -- it's clearly an original interpretation but when it can be satisfying to hear when you're in the mood.

    You are right, it is. I just listened to the 3rd movement of it - a more grave take, a bit bleak maybe, but I love it actually. Maybe I should consider him among my other favourites in KV 491.

    I was maybe a bit harsh on Lupu thinking about the rest I heard today... but then I don't like him as well... He certainly is (sort of) in "good taste" compared to Lang Lang, I guess.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Fri Mar 17 18:53:53 2023
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:30:41 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:13:05 UTC+1:
    Or Anderszewski with Cambreling (I like the recording where he conducts it from the piano)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8j-m0Ctn8&ab_channel=JAPAN1913

    The pianist is not good. Reminds me of Brendel.

    Bingo! Anderszewski is competent, serious pianist.
    No touch, no tone, no colour, no phrasing. Modern
    intellectual sewing machine.

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Fri Mar 17 18:59:46 2023
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 1:21:10 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:15:20 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:08:15 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 10:34:03 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:

    What about Kempff with Maderna?

    Forgot the Kempff / Maderna link, sorry

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LpbkpZNDG4

    He is as dull and cute as with Leitner (just listened to bits
    of both) - Can anyone imagine Kempff as being impish?

    Your ears seem to be functioning very well today!
    Did you switch to Oolong? Audience, please note
    how an unbiased, unprejudiced listener without
    any axe to grind has immediately outed Kempff
    as a fraud!

    Well done!

    dk

    PS. It would be interesting to find out how many
    folks in this group have actually heard Kempff
    live. You can email me privately if you don't
    want to be embarrassed, and I will tally the
    votes (er, confessions!).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Fri Mar 17 19:06:08 2023
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 1:08:19 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    the problem with Lang Lang which I forgot to
    add also is: he has some weird "mannerisms"
    (phrasing) which seem unnatural; but he
    seems more free (than many/most others).

    The Lang van Bang performance I posted is
    very interesting in more than one way. It is a
    rather intimate reading, very subtly phrased,
    and superbly played. It avoids the Sturm und
    Drang approach so many pianists take with
    KV 491, while still maintaining an unbroken
    emotional flow from start to finish. To my
    mind this is how Santa Clara could have
    played it had she really lived up to her
    undeserved reputation.

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Sat Mar 18 04:37:01 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Samstag, 18. März 2023 um 02:53:56 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:30:41 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:13:05 UTC+1:
    Or Anderszewski with Cambreling (I like the recording where he conducts it from the piano)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8j-m0Ctn8&ab_channel=JAPAN1913

    The pianist is not good. Reminds me of Brendel.
    Bingo! Anderszewski is competent, serious pianist.
    No touch, no tone, no colour, no phrasing. Modern
    intellectual sewing machine.

    dk

    So, I was not wrong in being reminded of Brendel. Just listened to bits of Brendel playing 3rd movement of 491 (this time with Mackerras) and ya... my first feeling was right and your description seems accurate.

    In general I do not have anything against intellectuals, you seem to misunderstand things: Hitler was anti-intellectual and pro-occultism... Thomas Mann was an intellectual... Heidegger was an idiot (Adorno criticised him heavily in "The Jargon of
    Authenticity"). Herman is not an intellectual as well, he is an idiot and Brendel is also nto an intellectual, but an idiot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Sat Mar 18 05:09:41 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Samstag, 18. März 2023 um 03:06:11 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 1:08:19 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    the problem with Lang Lang which I forgot to
    add also is: he has some weird "mannerisms"
    (phrasing) which seem unnatural; but he
    seems more free (than many/most others).
    The Lang van Bang performance I posted is
    very interesting in more than one way. It is a
    rather intimate reading, very subtly phrased,
    and superbly played. It avoids the Sturm und
    Drang approach so many pianists take with
    KV 491, while still maintaining an unbroken
    emotional flow from start to finish. To my
    mind this is how Santa Clara could have
    played it had she really lived up to her
    undeserved reputation.

    Just listened to her playing the 3rd movement of KV 491 (with Markevitch) and I think I understand where you are coming from... yes.

    I also seem to agree with your assessment of it; but if I remember correctly this performance was more dark / serious (well it isn't really dark or serious is it) than the last one by Lang Lang that you uploaded. In any case I miss many things in this
    performance (melancholy, sorrow, anger etc.).

    Lang Lang is interesting, but compared to Gould, Gieseking and Schnabel he is just trash; not worth listening to imo... I do not want to waste time thinking about if it was better than Brendel's or not; because in the end both are trash compared to my
    favourites. Just remembered Richard Goode... I think he was also similar to Brendel...


    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Sat Mar 18 04:47:13 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Samstag, 18. März 2023 um 02:59:50 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 1:21:10 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:15:20 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:08:15 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 10:34:03 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:

    What about Kempff with Maderna?

    Forgot the Kempff / Maderna link, sorry

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LpbkpZNDG4

    He is as dull and cute as with Leitner (just listened to bits
    of both) - Can anyone imagine Kempff as being impish?
    Your ears seem to be functioning very well today!
    Did you switch to Oolong? Audience, please note
    how an unbiased, unprejudiced listener without
    any axe to grind has immediately outed Kempff
    as a fraud!

    As of yet I'm still busy with Earl Grey. I will come back to you as soon as I have oolong here.


    Well done!

    Thank you.


    dk

    PS. It would be interesting to find out how many
    folks in this group have actually heard Kempff
    live. You can email me privately if you don't
    want to be embarrassed, and I will tally the
    votes (er, confessions!).

    Does it matter? I do not like to go to live performances btw as I've been disappointed too often; I would not go to a Grosvenor-Recital, never - there is much better stuff on yt to spend my evening with.

    I remember watching a video of Kempff and Szeryng and some cellist on yt playing/rehearsing a Beethoven Trio and omg... Szeryng being such a great guy, and Kempff being an such an idiot imo... just a very uninspiring person.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Sat Mar 18 07:35:02 2023
    On Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 2:31:24 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    On Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 12:09:44 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Samstag, 18. März 2023 um 03:06:11 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 1:08:19 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    the problem with Lang Lang which I forgot to
    add also is: he has some weird "mannerisms"
    (phrasing) which seem unnatural; but he
    seems more free (than many/most others).
    The Lang van Bang performance I posted is
    very interesting in more than one way. It is a
    rather intimate reading, very subtly phrased,
    and superbly played. It avoids the Sturm und
    Drang approach so many pianists take with
    KV 491, while still maintaining an unbroken
    emotional flow from start to finish. To my
    mind this is how Santa Clara could have
    played it had she really lived up to her
    undeserved reputation.
    Just listened to her playing the 3rd movement of KV 491 (with Markevitch) and I think I understand where you are coming from... yes.

    I also seem to agree with your assessment of it; but if I remember correctly this performance was more dark / serious (well it isn't really dark or serious is it) than the last one by Lang Lang that you uploaded. In any case I miss many things in
    this performance (melancholy, sorrow, anger etc.).

    Lang Lang is interesting, but compared to Gould, Gieseking and Schnabel he is just trash; not worth listening to imo... I do not want to waste time thinking about if it was better than Brendel's or not; because in the end both are trash compared to
    my favourites. Just remembered Richard Goode... I think he was also similar to Brendel...


    dk
    Lang Lang did a good first movement cadenza. The recording with Harnoncourt is not so successful IMO but there are others available which are.

    Gould recorded it at least twice, once live in Sweden, and the studio recording which everyone knows. It's years since I heard either of them but I remember that he was imaginative in the later variations in the studio recording, to some effect in fact.
    I may get the Stockholm performance out later.

    Goode is very variable. I heard him do a Diabelli Variations recently and I thought it was just glib. But before that I heard him do Debussy Preludes I and it was fabulous. I've never explored the studio recordings.


    And I've just found Gould in Stockholm and it does sound rather nice, even in Movement 1 -- which is hard to get off the page I think. But it's the pianist's show -- the orchestra isn't coming across as so interesting,.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to Marc S on Sat Mar 18 07:31:21 2023
    On Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 12:09:44 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Samstag, 18. März 2023 um 03:06:11 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 1:08:19 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    the problem with Lang Lang which I forgot to
    add also is: he has some weird "mannerisms"
    (phrasing) which seem unnatural; but he
    seems more free (than many/most others).
    The Lang van Bang performance I posted is
    very interesting in more than one way. It is a
    rather intimate reading, very subtly phrased,
    and superbly played. It avoids the Sturm und
    Drang approach so many pianists take with
    KV 491, while still maintaining an unbroken
    emotional flow from start to finish. To my
    mind this is how Santa Clara could have
    played it had she really lived up to her
    undeserved reputation.
    Just listened to her playing the 3rd movement of KV 491 (with Markevitch) and I think I understand where you are coming from... yes.

    I also seem to agree with your assessment of it; but if I remember correctly this performance was more dark / serious (well it isn't really dark or serious is it) than the last one by Lang Lang that you uploaded. In any case I miss many things in this
    performance (melancholy, sorrow, anger etc.).

    Lang Lang is interesting, but compared to Gould, Gieseking and Schnabel he is just trash; not worth listening to imo... I do not want to waste time thinking about if it was better than Brendel's or not; because in the end both are trash compared to my
    favourites. Just remembered Richard Goode... I think he was also similar to Brendel...


    dk

    Lang Lang did a good first movement cadenza. The recording with Harnoncourt is not so successful IMO but there are others available which are.

    Gould recorded it at least twice, once live in Sweden, and the studio recording which everyone knows. It's years since I heard either of them but I remember that he was imaginative in the later variations in the studio recording, to some effect in fact.
    I may get the Stockholm performance out later.

    Goode is very variable. I heard him do a Diabelli Variations recently and I thought it was just glib. But before that I heard him do Debussy Preludes I and it was fabulous. I've never explored the studio recordings.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to Marc S on Sat Mar 18 10:09:54 2023
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 8:21:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:15:20 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:08:15 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 10:34:03 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 11:12:55 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 03:47:56 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 2:22:14 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Richter... hmmmm I was not too impressed with him here.
    Not his cup of tea.
    Maybe Radu Lupu (NDR-Sinfonieorchester and Dohnányi)? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuMCa-6gNJQ
    I had not listened to this one by Radu Lupu when I posted the link. Listened to the first movement today (and the last variation in the 3rd movement) - I was not impressed. Radu Lupu is just a bit dull imo... he always disappoints me. (Maybe -
    as you once declared - there is a great recording of the Prokofiev PC 2 with him from some competition, but as I'm not interested in the piece I don't care).
    Try this one:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/r9ex6rubyxyhso2/Mozart%20KV%20491.mp3?dl=0
    Just listened to the first movement and the last variation of the 3rd movement.

    I did not know who this pianist was; I had a feeling it was Lang Lang (touch and because I sort of have a feeling for pianists you like) and it seems it was indeed him (just checked yt).

    Very good, much better than the last one you uploaded with him I think (I am really not too sure though - maybe my taste changed; the other one seemed more innocent and playful maybe, not as dark and serious).

    But I think... Gould and Gieseking are just way better - next up is Schnabel, then probably Bashkirov and then maybe Osetinskaya and Lang Lang. The others are mostly very dull... and even Osetinskaya and Lang Lang don't really do it for me
    thinking about it. Screw Zacharias, Brendel, Lupu, Haskil, Kissin, Rubinstein, Richter - maybe I would rate Kempff and maybe even Buchbinder above or around the same as Osetinskaya and Lang Lang - to be really confident I would have to check again though.



    dk
    Maybe I am wrong about it being Lang Lang... maybe I should have compared directly, instead of just listening to a snippet of it and thinking it is Lang Lang. But I got other things to do as well.

    In any case... I think Gould and Gieseking are the best; after them there is sort of a gap, after which comes Schnabel, after him there is a gap as well, a bigger one, and this is where it becomes more difficult for me... I am very sure about my
    dismissal of Lupu, Haskil, Zacharias, Brendel, Rubinstein and Richter though - Kempff and Buchbinder I listened to ages ago and thought they were quite good (Kempff being more lyrical if I remember correctly); maybe I would think differently today (I
    would also have to listen to Richter again and compare him to Kempff and Buchbinder. And compare these three to Osetinskaya and Lang Lang(?)).
    What about Kempff with Maderna?
    Forgot the Kempff / Maderna link, sorry

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LpbkpZNDG4&t=517s&ab_channel=cismoll
    He is as dull and cute as with Leitner (just listened to bits of both) - Can anyone imagine Kempff as being impish?

    Haven’t heard the one with Leitner. This one is Bruno Maderna’s show. Kempff starts off slightly on autopilot (though he’s tender enough in the opening bars), but after less than 10 minutes into the first movement Maderna inspires him to some
    great collaborative music making. I love the delicate and warm music making in the variations - the winds especially.

    The first movement cadenza is impressive.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Sat Mar 18 10:25:56 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Samstag, 18. März 2023 um 15:35:04 UTC+1:
    On Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 2:31:24 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    On Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 12:09:44 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Samstag, 18. März 2023 um 03:06:11 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 1:08:19 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    the problem with Lang Lang which I forgot to
    add also is: he has some weird "mannerisms"
    (phrasing) which seem unnatural; but he
    seems more free (than many/most others).
    The Lang van Bang performance I posted is
    very interesting in more than one way. It is a
    rather intimate reading, very subtly phrased,
    and superbly played. It avoids the Sturm und
    Drang approach so many pianists take with
    KV 491, while still maintaining an unbroken
    emotional flow from start to finish. To my
    mind this is how Santa Clara could have
    played it had she really lived up to her
    undeserved reputation.
    Just listened to her playing the 3rd movement of KV 491 (with Markevitch) and I think I understand where you are coming from... yes.

    I also seem to agree with your assessment of it; but if I remember correctly this performance was more dark / serious (well it isn't really dark or serious is it) than the last one by Lang Lang that you uploaded. In any case I miss many things in
    this performance (melancholy, sorrow, anger etc.).

    Lang Lang is interesting, but compared to Gould, Gieseking and Schnabel he is just trash; not worth listening to imo... I do not want to waste time thinking about if it was better than Brendel's or not; because in the end both are trash compared to
    my favourites. Just remembered Richard Goode... I think he was also similar to Brendel...


    dk
    Lang Lang did a good first movement cadenza. The recording with Harnoncourt is not so successful IMO but there are others available which are.

    Gould recorded it at least twice, once live in Sweden, and the studio recording which everyone knows. It's years since I heard either of them but I remember that he was imaginative in the later variations in the studio recording, to some effect in
    fact. I may get the Stockholm performance out later.


    I know about this one, and you actually already recommended this to me about a year ago, 3/4 probably - no probs.

    I know of 3 Gould KV 491 performances: You forgot the live one with Bernstein. I think I'd probably rate the one with Jochum above it, I remember the playing being quite similar, but I never liked Bernstein's accompaniment too much - but I shall revisit.
    Love how he takes the Hummel-Cadenza in the recording with Bernstein:

    https://youtu.be/qV_lnAtLYkU?t=877

    And thanks for reminding me of Richter's (hve not had time to revisit it fully, but the 3rd movement was really good; but I don't know... I think Gould, Gieseking and Schnabel are just another level imo).

    Goode is very variable. I heard him do a Diabelli Variations recently and I thought it was just glib. But before that I heard him do Debussy Preludes I and it was fabulous. I've never explored the studio recordings.
    And I've just found Gould in Stockholm and it does sound rather nice, even in Movement 1 -- which is hard to get off the page I think. But it's the pianist's show -- the orchestra isn't coming across as so interesting,.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Sat Mar 18 10:31:39 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Samstag, 18. März 2023 um 18:09:57 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 8:21:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:15:20 UTC+1:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:08:15 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:
    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 10:34:03 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 11:12:55 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 03:47:56 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 2:22:14 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Richter... hmmmm I was not too impressed with him here.
    Not his cup of tea.
    Maybe Radu Lupu (NDR-Sinfonieorchester and Dohnányi)? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuMCa-6gNJQ
    I had not listened to this one by Radu Lupu when I posted the link. Listened to the first movement today (and the last variation in the 3rd movement) - I was not impressed. Radu Lupu is just a bit dull imo... he always disappoints me. (Maybe -
    as you once declared - there is a great recording of the Prokofiev PC 2 with him from some competition, but as I'm not interested in the piece I don't care).
    Try this one:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/r9ex6rubyxyhso2/Mozart%20KV%20491.mp3?dl=0
    Just listened to the first movement and the last variation of the 3rd movement.

    I did not know who this pianist was; I had a feeling it was Lang Lang (touch and because I sort of have a feeling for pianists you like) and it seems it was indeed him (just checked yt).

    Very good, much better than the last one you uploaded with him I think (I am really not too sure though - maybe my taste changed; the other one seemed more innocent and playful maybe, not as dark and serious).

    But I think... Gould and Gieseking are just way better - next up is Schnabel, then probably Bashkirov and then maybe Osetinskaya and Lang Lang. The others are mostly very dull... and even Osetinskaya and Lang Lang don't really do it for me
    thinking about it. Screw Zacharias, Brendel, Lupu, Haskil, Kissin, Rubinstein, Richter - maybe I would rate Kempff and maybe even Buchbinder above or around the same as Osetinskaya and Lang Lang - to be really confident I would have to check again though.



    dk
    Maybe I am wrong about it being Lang Lang... maybe I should have compared directly, instead of just listening to a snippet of it and thinking it is Lang Lang. But I got other things to do as well.

    In any case... I think Gould and Gieseking are the best; after them there is sort of a gap, after which comes Schnabel, after him there is a gap as well, a bigger one, and this is where it becomes more difficult for me... I am very sure about
    my dismissal of Lupu, Haskil, Zacharias, Brendel, Rubinstein and Richter though - Kempff and Buchbinder I listened to ages ago and thought they were quite good (Kempff being more lyrical if I remember correctly); maybe I would think differently today (I
    would also have to listen to Richter again and compare him to Kempff and Buchbinder. And compare these three to Osetinskaya and Lang Lang(?)).
    What about Kempff with Maderna?
    Forgot the Kempff / Maderna link, sorry

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LpbkpZNDG4&t=517s&ab_channel=cismoll
    He is as dull and cute as with Leitner (just listened to bits of both) - Can anyone imagine Kempff as being impish?
    Haven’t heard the one with Leitner. This one is Bruno Maderna’s show. Kempff starts off slightly on autopilot (though he’s tender enough in the opening bars), but after less than 10 minutes into the first movement Maderna inspires him to some
    great collaborative music making. I love the delicate and warm music making in the variations - the winds especially.

    The first movement cadenza is impressive.

    I am sorry, I did not listen to the cadenza and I do not intent to. I spent some time again with the video mentioned above (Beethoven Trio with Szeryng)... most uninspiring piano playing I ever heard... Szeryng otoh plays so great - did not really listen
    to the cellist sorry (and I still need to get more feeling for cellists I guess - Fournier I like in Bach, I actually do not like any other that I heard in Bach...)... just a quick check.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Sun Mar 19 05:09:38 2023
    On Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 4:47:16 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Samstag, 18. März 2023 um 02:59:50 UTC+1:

    PS. It would be interesting to find out how many
    folks in this group have actually heard Kempff
    live. You can email me privately if you don't
    want to be embarrassed, and I will tally the
    votes (er, confessions!).

    Does it matter?

    It does. Many artists sound different enough on
    stage than they sound in studio recordings. Live
    performances highlight and magnify both the
    best and the worst in a performance. Folks
    who only know Arrau or Backhaus or Kempff
    from recordings have no idea how ugly they
    sounded live and how incompetent they were
    on the keyboard.

    I do not like to go to live performances btw as
    I've been disappointed too often;

    Perhaps, however there is only one way to find
    out how an artist really performs.

    I would not go to a Grosvenor-Recital, never -

    Have you ever been to one? If not, your loss.

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Owen Hartnett@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Sun Mar 19 13:37:22 2023
    On 2023-03-18 01:59:46 +0000, Dan Koren said:

    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 1:21:10 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:15:20 UTC+1:> > On
    Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:08:15 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:> > > On
    Friday, March 17, 2023 at 10:34:03 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:> > >> > > What
    about Kempff with Maderna?> >> > Forgot the Kempff / Maderna link,
    sorry> >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LpbkpZNDG4

    He is as dull and cute as with Leitner (just listened to bits> of both)
    - Can anyone imagine Kempff as being impish?

    Your ears seem to be functioning very well today! Did you switch to
    Oolong? Audience, please note how an unbiased, unprejudiced listener withoutany axe to grind has immediately outed Kempffas a fraud!
    Well done!

    dk

    PS. It would be interesting to find out how manyfolks in this group
    have actually heard Kempfflive. You can email me privately if you
    don'twant to be embarrassed, and I will tally thevotes (er,
    confessions!).

    You need a new keyboard, DK -- either your space bar is broken, or
    you're missing thumbs.

    -Owen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Owen Hartnett on Sun Mar 19 16:29:03 2023
    On Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 10:37:35 AM UTC-7, Owen Hartnett wrote:
    On 2023-03-18 01:59:46 +0000, Dan Koren said:

    On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 1:21:10 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Mandryka schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:15:20 UTC+1:> > On
    Friday, March 17, 2023 at 12:08:15 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:> > > On
    Friday, March 17, 2023 at 10:34:03 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:> > >> > > What >> about Kempff with Maderna?> >> > Forgot the Kempff / Maderna link,
    sorry> >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LpbkpZNDG4

    He is as dull and cute as with Leitner (just listened to bits> of both) >> - Can anyone imagine Kempff as being impish?

    Your ears seem to be functioning very well today! Did you switch to Oolong? Audience, please note how an unbiased, unprejudiced listener withoutany axe to grind has immediately outed Kempffas a fraud!
    Well done!

    PS. It would be interesting to find out how manyfolks in this group
    have actually heard Kempfflive. You can email me privately if you don'twant to be embarrassed, and I will tally thevotes (er,
    confessions!).

    You need a new keyboard, DK -- either your space
    bar is broken, or you're missing thumbs.

    Just sent it back to Dell. They promised to replace it
    with a more dellicious one. I also ordered a pair of
    spare thumbs.

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 20 07:39:03 2023
    The comparison with the trailer is nonsensical, since I actually get to hear the whole thign on records; a bad trailer does not necessarily imply a bad movie, but most often it does I guess, same goes for pianists who sound bad on records.

    Can you name me one great pianist who sounds bad on records? No.

    According to your own theory there couldn't be one. So, if Grosvenor sounds bad on records to my ears, he is either in the category of good pianists or bad pianists according to your theory - I am not interested in good or bad pianists.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Mon Mar 20 07:30:09 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 15:18:38 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Sonntag, 19. März 2023 um 13:09:41 UTC+1:
    On Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 4:47:16 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Samstag, 18. März 2023 um 02:59:50 UTC+1:

    PS. It would be interesting to find out how many
    folks in this group have actually heard Kempff
    live. You can email me privately if you don't
    want to be embarrassed, and I will tally the
    votes (er, confessions!).

    Does it matter?
    It does. Many artists sound different enough on
    stage than they sound in studio recordings. Live
    performances highlight and magnify both the
    best and the worst in a performance. Folks
    who only know Arrau or Backhaus or Kempff
    from recordings have no idea how ugly they
    sounded live and how incompetent they were
    on the keyboard.
    I know about your theories:

    Great pianists are better live than on records.
    Good pianists are the same live as they are on records (not talking about the "sound", but their musicality).
    Bad pianists sound worse live than they do on records.

    In any case you are again talking besides the point I made; it does not matter to me how many people in this group heard Kempff live and what they think about him (probably Henk and Mandryka did? And maybe Ahriman as well). I mean if people want to,
    they can chime in and write about their experiences, but it does not matter to me, it does not change what I think about Kempff - the recordings speak for themselves... why would it be interesting to find out how many people have heard Kempff live in
    this ng? Why do you believe this info to be interesting?
    I do not like to go to live performances btw as
    I've been disappointed too often;
    Perhaps, however there is only one way to find
    out how an artist really performs.
    Look, if a screenplay is bad, I am not going to watch the movie to find out if I was wrong. Or maybe rather if a trailer is bad... it's maybe a more apt comparison.
    I would not go to a Grosvenor-Recital, never -
    Have you ever been to one? If not, your loss.
    You may enjoy him as much you like, but as explained above, I do not intend to find out... I think I am being very easy to understand and also reasonable. I have also not heard much from him as he does not seem to play the repertoire I like - I do not
    liek Schubert btw (just a thought, does not have anythign to do with Grosvenor, I think he does not play Schubert?)... god do I hate the German songs (probably songs in general), they remind me of Hurz! (I sort of like some of Berg and Webern I guess...).


    I do not like Schumann, Mahler and Strauss as well, and I also do not like Haydn, Schoenberg and Webern anymore (I like them more than others ofc, they still would be at the very top of my rankings, but I do not like to listen to them anymore since there
    is better stuff - they just don't come close to my favourite composers). Berg is the only one that still keeps my interest, but it's also fading... So in the end I think... the only composers I really like are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven and Brahms.


    Don't be an idiot like Celibidache (I still think his Brahms symphonies are great btw, 1,3,4 - do not like 2 too much; but I still need to think about it more, anyway I am not too much interested in Brahms' symphonies generally; i do not think I'll
    need them). Obviously, records can't capture the real sound, but even you hear things differently than other people in the concert hall (because of your seating, and your individual reception). Mengelberg's Beethoven is the best I ever heard, no matter
    the not so good sound, and I do not believe that there is a signle conductor on this planet that could change my opinion after hearing him live... I am very positive about this belief.


    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Mon Mar 20 07:18:35 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Sonntag, 19. März 2023 um 13:09:41 UTC+1:
    On Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 4:47:16 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Samstag, 18. März 2023 um 02:59:50 UTC+1:

    PS. It would be interesting to find out how many
    folks in this group have actually heard Kempff
    live. You can email me privately if you don't
    want to be embarrassed, and I will tally the
    votes (er, confessions!).

    Does it matter?
    It does. Many artists sound different enough on
    stage than they sound in studio recordings. Live
    performances highlight and magnify both the
    best and the worst in a performance. Folks
    who only know Arrau or Backhaus or Kempff
    from recordings have no idea how ugly they
    sounded live and how incompetent they were
    on the keyboard.

    I know about your theories:

    Great pianists are better live than on records.
    Good pianists are the same live as they are on records (not talking about the "sound", but their musicality).
    Bad pianists sound worse live than they do on records.

    In any case you are again talking besides the point I made; it does not matter to me how many people in this group heard Kempff live and what they think about him (probably Henk and Mandryka did? And maybe Ahriman as well). I mean if people want to, they
    can chime in and write about their experiences, but it does not matter to me, it does not change what I think about Kempff - the recordings speak for themselves... why would it be interesting to find out how many people have heard Kempff live in this ng?
    Why do you believe this info to be interesting?

    I do not like to go to live performances btw as
    I've been disappointed too often;
    Perhaps, however there is only one way to find
    out how an artist really performs.

    Look, if a screenplay is bad, I am not going to watch the movie to find out if I was wrong. Or maybe rather if a trailer is bad... it's maybe a more apt comparison.

    I would not go to a Grosvenor-Recital, never -
    Have you ever been to one? If not, your loss.

    You may enjoy him as much you like, but as explained above, I do not intend to find out... I think I am being very easy to understand and also reasonable. I have also not heard much from him as he does not seem to play the repertoire I like - I do not
    liek Schubert btw (just a thought, does not have anythign to do with Grosvenor, I think he does not play Schubert?)... god do I hate the German songs (probably songs in general), they remind me of Hurz! (I sort of like some of Berg and Webern I guess...).

    Don't be an idiot like Celibidache (I still think his Brahms symphonies are great btw, 1,3,4 - do not like 2 too much; but I still need to think about it more, anyway I am not too much interested in Brahms' symphonies generally; i do not think I'll need
    them). Obviously, records can't capture the real sound, but even you hear things differently than other people in the concert hall (because of your seating, and your individual reception). Mengelberg's Beethoven is the best I ever heard, no matter the
    not so good sound, and I do not believe that there is a signle conductor on this planet that could change my opinion after hearing him live... I am very positive about this belief.


    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 20 13:33:07 2023
    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Mon Mar 20 15:45:55 2023
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 1:33:10 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again...
    it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So
    the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart,
    Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.

    How can a German soul live without Buxtehude, Telemann,
    Bruckner, Reger, Pfitzner, Orff, and Dick Wagner ?!? BTW
    you don't realize Mendelssohn was every bit as good a
    omposer as Schubert?

    You also need several vaccines you seem to have skipped!

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to Marc S on Mon Mar 20 15:50:26 2023
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.

    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that the only composers I need all have a name which starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and Mozart. Now I’m not interested in any of them all that much!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Mon Mar 20 15:54:19 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:50:29 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.
    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that the only composers I need all have a name which starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and Mozart. Now I’m not interested in any of them all that much!

    Well you know... I am not you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Mon Mar 20 15:58:11 2023
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 3:50:29 PM UTC-7, Mandryka wrote:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:

    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again...
    it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So
    the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart,
    Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.

    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that
    the only composers I need all have a name which
    starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and Mozart.
    Now I’m not interested in any of them all that
    much!

    The only composers I REALLY NEED are Albeniz
    and Bill Evans.

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Mon Mar 20 15:58:19 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:45:58 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 1:33:10 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again...
    it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So
    the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart,
    Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.
    How can a German soul live without Buxtehude, Telemann,
    Bruckner, Reger, Pfitzner, Orff, and Dick Wagner ?!? BTW
    you don't realize Mendelssohn was every bit as good a
    omposer as Schubert?

    Because this is simply not true, Schubert is by far the greater composer.


    You also need several vaccines you seem to have skipped!

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Mon Mar 20 16:04:18 2023
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 3:58:22 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:45:58 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 1:33:10 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again...
    it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So
    the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart,
    Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.

    How can a German soul live without Buxtehude, Telemann,
    Bruckner, Reger, Pfitzner, Orff, and Dick Wagner ?!? BTW
    you don't realize Mendelssohn was every bit as good a
    omposer as Schubert?

    Because this is simply not true, Schubert is by far the greater composer.


    Greater than Buxtehude ?!? Even Bach worshipped Buxtehude! ;-)

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Mon Mar 20 16:10:35 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:50:29 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.
    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that the only composers I need all have a name which starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and Mozart. Now I’m not interested in any of them all that much!

    I also have to say I have my troubles with Schumann and Mahler.... I actually don't like them that much... same goes for Webern and Haydn.

    Schoenberg and Berg I find really interesting, and I like them very much actually... but I don't think I'll need them. They are just not as good as my 5 favourite composers...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Mon Mar 20 16:13:06 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 00:04:21 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 3:58:22 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:45:58 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 1:33:10 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again...
    it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So
    the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart,
    Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.

    How can a German soul live without Buxtehude, Telemann,
    Bruckner, Reger, Pfitzner, Orff, and Dick Wagner ?!? BTW
    you don't realize Mendelssohn was every bit as good a
    omposer as Schubert?

    Because this is simply not true, Schubert is by far the greater composer.

    Greater than Buxtehude ?!? Even Bach worshipped Buxtehude! ;-)

    I can't remember anything I heard from Buxtehude, but I think I searched for him once on youtube... like 5-6 years ago, around the time I started listening to classical music. For now I do not intend to revisit him, even though I remember nothing.
    Beethoven liked Händel... and I really do not appreciate Händel.


    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Mon Mar 20 16:20:46 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:58:14 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 3:50:29 PM UTC-7, Mandryka wrote:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:

    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again...
    it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So
    the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart,
    Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.

    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that
    the only composers I need all have a name which
    starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and Mozart.
    Now I’m not interested in any of them all that
    much!
    The only composers I REALLY NEED are Albeniz
    and Bill Evans.

    dk

    Bill Evans and Art Tatum were the only jazz musicians I sort of found interesting... but hmmmm... Albeniz... hmmmm...

    You do realize than Mendelssohn is a much, much greater composer than either of them?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Mon Mar 20 16:27:12 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 00:20:49 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:58:14 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 3:50:29 PM UTC-7, Mandryka wrote:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:

    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again...
    it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So
    the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart,
    Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.

    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that
    the only composers I need all have a name which
    starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and Mozart.
    Now I’m not interested in any of them all that
    much!
    The only composers I REALLY NEED are Albeniz
    and Bill Evans.

    dk
    Bill Evans and Art Tatum were the only jazz musicians I sort of found interesting... but hmmmm... Albeniz... hmmmm...

    You do realize than Mendelssohn is a much, much greater composer than either of them?

    *both of them

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From raymond.hallbear1@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Mon Mar 20 16:45:14 2023
    On Tuesday, 21 March 2023 at 09:58:14 UTC+11, Dan Koren wrote:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 3:50:29 PM UTC-7, Mandryka wrote:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:

    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again...
    it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So
    the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart,
    Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.

    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that
    the only composers I need all have a name which
    starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and Mozart.
    Now I’m not interested in any of them all that
    much!
    The only composers I REALLY NEED are Albeniz
    and Bill Evans.

    dk

    It would be a sad day without Shosty, Prokofiev, Bax, Janacek, Bartok, Stravinsky and Sibelius. The best two German composers are Mendelssohn and Bach. But Charlie Parker and Miles Davis are up there with all of them. I'll take LvB's quartets though. If
    really pushed for one only I'd have to take Bach, or I would be a fool.

    Ray Hall, Taree

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to raymond....@gmail.com on Mon Mar 20 16:52:33 2023
    raymond....@gmail.com schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 00:45:16 UTC+1:
    On Tuesday, 21 March 2023 at 09:58:14 UTC+11, Dan Koren wrote:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 3:50:29 PM UTC-7, Mandryka wrote:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:

    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again...
    it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So
    the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart,
    Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.

    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that
    the only composers I need all have a name which
    starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and Mozart.
    Now I’m not interested in any of them all that
    much!
    The only composers I REALLY NEED are Albeniz
    and Bill Evans.

    dk
    It would be a sad day without Shosty, Prokofiev, Bax, Janacek, Bartok, Stravinsky and Sibelius.

    Out of these I'd go for Shostakovich, Janacek and Bartok - screw the rest... especially Bax and Sibelius.

    The best two German composers are Mendelssohn and Bach. But Charlie Parker and Miles Davis are up there with all of them. I'll take LvB's quartets though. If really pushed for one only I'd have to take Bach, or I would be a fool.

    Ray Hall, Taree

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Mon Mar 20 18:39:51 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 02:36:51 UTC+1:
    Mandryka schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:50:29 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.
    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that the only composers I need all have a name which starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and Mozart. Now I’m not interested in any of them all that much!
    Just listened to the 1st movement of KV 491 by Richter... not good... I think I was wrong about the 3rd movement, I guess there were moments I liked or thought I liked... anyway: no, it does not work... it just seems I don't like him as a pianist...

    *parts of the 1st movement

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Mon Mar 20 18:36:49 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:50:29 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.
    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that the only composers I need all have a name which starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and Mozart. Now I’m not interested in any of them all that much!

    Just listened to the 1st movement of KV 491 by Richter... not good... I think I was wrong about the 3rd movement, I guess there were moments I liked or thought I liked... anyway: no, it does not work... it just seems I don't like him as a pianist...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Owen Hartnett@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Mon Mar 20 21:46:18 2023
    On 2023-03-19 23:29:03 +0000, Dan Koren said:

    On Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 10:37:35 AM UTC-7, Owen Hartnett wrote:
    On 2023-03-18 01:59:46 +0000, Dan Koren said:>> > On Friday, March 17,
    2023 at 1:21:10 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:> >> Mandryka schrieb am
    Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 13:15:20 UTC+1:> > On> >> Friday, March 17,
    2023 at 12:08:15 PM UTC, Mandryka wrote:> > > On> >> Friday, March 17,
    2023 at 10:34:03 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:> > >> > > What> >> about Kempff
    with Maderna?> >> > Forgot the Kempff / Maderna link,> >> sorry> >> >
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LpbkpZNDG4> >>> >> He is as dull and
    cute as with Leitner (just listened to bits> of both)> >> - Can anyone
    imagine Kempff as being impish?> >> > Your ears seem to be functioning
    very well today! Did you switch to> > Oolong? Audience, please note how
    an unbiased, unprejudiced listener
    withoutany axe to grind has immediately outed Kempffas a fraud!> > Well
    done!> >> > PS. It would be interesting to find out how manyfolks in
    this group> > have actually heard Kempfflive. You can email me
    privately if you> > don'twant to be embarrassed, and I will tally
    thevotes (er,> > confessions!).>> You need a new keyboard, DK -- either
    your space> bar is broken, or you're missing thumbs.
    Just sent it back to Dell. They promised to replace it with a more dellicious one. I also ordered a pair of spare thumbs.
    dk

    I hope they match your tin ears!

    -Owen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Mon Mar 20 19:53:13 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 03:38:35 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 4:52:36 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    raymond....@gmail.com schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 00:45:16 UTC+1:

    It would be a sad day without Shosty, Prokofiev,
    Bax, Janacek, Bartok, Stravinsky and Sibelius.

    Out of these I'd go for Shostakovich, Janacek and
    Bartok - screw the rest... especially Bax and Sibelius.
    You are screwing around too much lately.

    I do not think so. Bax and Sibelius can be accused of this (at least while they were alive).

    How about seeing a physician for a change?


    How about you listen to the super shitty Sibelius Symphony 7 or 5 or whatever, then listen to some Mendelssohn... and then ask yourself... "Why the fuck did I ever listsen to Sibelius 7 when there is such wonderful music out there... heck... even if
    there wasn't any music out there, I would not want to listen to shtity Sibelius... he is utter shite... and Bax? I believe he is even more shite...

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Mon Mar 20 19:38:31 2023
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 4:52:36 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    raymond....@gmail.com schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 00:45:16 UTC+1:

    It would be a sad day without Shosty, Prokofiev,
    Bax, Janacek, Bartok, Stravinsky and Sibelius.

    Out of these I'd go for Shostakovich, Janacek and
    Bartok - screw the rest... especially Bax and Sibelius.

    You are screwing around too much lately.
    How about seeing a physician for a change?

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Mon Mar 20 19:40:16 2023
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 4:20:49 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    You do realize than Mendelssohn is a much,
    much greater composer than either of them?

    Mendelssohn does not suit my Audi.
    I may try again when I can afford a
    new (i.e. more recent old) car.

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Mon Mar 20 23:00:24 2023
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 7:53:15 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 03:38:35 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 4:52:36 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Out of these I'd go for Shostakovich,
    Janacek and Bartok - screw the rest...
    especially Bax and Sibelius.

    You are screwing around too much lately.

    I do not think so. Bax and Sibelius can be
    accused of this (at least while they were alive).

    This doesn't sound to your ears like screwing
    around? It sounds to mine! ;-)

    https://youtu.be/ltplS9pUKfw
    https://youtu.be/xv2jihxZ6Ok
    https://youtu.be/PsO9uNs59Ok
    https://youtu.be/xv2jihxZ6Ok
    https://youtu.be/X63jKCcJ_4s
    https://youtu.be/-iDn8-Uuahk
    https://youtu.be/vSLBpsPp0ZE
    https://youtu.be/v9SPbrBrfEo
    https://youtu.be/YrEFRhA05T4
    https://youtu.be/DLggHrz_X2U
    https://youtu.be/p7asHalYDoE
    https://youtu.be/n-RAXEKVZz8
    https://youtu.be/MyLt0jeXq54

    Far better than Berlioz and far
    more interesting than Bruckner.

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MELMOTH@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 21 09:25:13 2023
    Le 20/03/2023, Dan Koren a suppos :
    The only composers I REALLY NEED are Albeniz
    and Bill Evans.

    *Monteverdi*...*JSB*...*Beethoven*...*Schubert*...*Liszt*...*Debussy*...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to MELMOTH on Tue Mar 21 01:41:16 2023
    On Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 1:25:18 AM UTC-7, MELMOTH wrote:
    Le 20/03/2023, Dan Koren a supposé :

    The only composers I REALLY
    NEED are Albeniz and Bill Evans.

    *Monteverdi*...*JSB*...*Beethoven*...
    *Schubert*...*Liszt*...*Debussy*...

    Boieldieu? Berlioz? Franck? Satie?
    Meyerbeer? d'Indy? Chaminade?
    Chausson? Ropartz? Magnard?
    Alkan? Ravel? Poulenc? Lully?
    Rameau? Couperin? Roussel?
    Lalo? Gounod? Saint-Saëns?

    Mais où est la France ?!?

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Tue Mar 21 02:57:45 2023
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 1:33:10 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Just listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again...
    it's just too good. Made me realize I need Schubert...
    So the only composers I really need are Bach,
    Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.

    Don't forget https://youtu.be/gevQIv0crDI

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Tue Mar 21 03:09:37 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 07:00:27 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 7:53:15 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 03:38:35 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 4:52:36 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Out of these I'd go for Shostakovich,
    Janacek and Bartok - screw the rest...
    especially Bax and Sibelius.

    You are screwing around too much lately.

    I do not think so. Bax and Sibelius can be
    accused of this (at least while they were alive).
    This doesn't sound to your ears like screwing
    around? It sounds to mine! ;-)

    https://youtu.be/ltplS9pUKfw
    https://youtu.be/xv2jihxZ6Ok
    https://youtu.be/PsO9uNs59Ok
    https://youtu.be/xv2jihxZ6Ok
    https://youtu.be/X63jKCcJ_4s
    https://youtu.be/-iDn8-Uuahk
    https://youtu.be/vSLBpsPp0ZE
    https://youtu.be/v9SPbrBrfEo
    https://youtu.be/YrEFRhA05T4
    https://youtu.be/DLggHrz_X2U
    https://youtu.be/p7asHalYDoE
    https://youtu.be/n-RAXEKVZz8
    https://youtu.be/MyLt0jeXq54

    Far better than Berlioz and far
    more interesting than Bruckner.

    I don't know... they all are unlistenable imo... Wagner is far better than any of the guys you mentioned.

    Furthermore my point was that Shostakovich, Janacek and Bartok were far better composers than Prokofiev, Stravinsky, Bax or Sibelius... I think the last 4 are unlistenable as well, while the first 3 are at least interesting in some ways.

    Out of the composers mentioned by Ray (excluding Bach, Beethoven, Mendelssohn and the Jazz guys) I would guess that yoru ranking woul be sth like Sibelius and Prokofiev at the top, then probably Janacek or Stravinsky, then Bax or Bartok and last:
    Shostakovich?


    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Tue Mar 21 03:13:06 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 11:09:39 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 07:00:27 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 7:53:15 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 03:38:35 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 4:52:36 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Out of these I'd go for Shostakovich,
    Janacek and Bartok - screw the rest...
    especially Bax and Sibelius.

    You are screwing around too much lately.

    I do not think so. Bax and Sibelius can be
    accused of this (at least while they were alive).
    This doesn't sound to your ears like screwing
    around? It sounds to mine! ;-)

    https://youtu.be/ltplS9pUKfw
    https://youtu.be/xv2jihxZ6Ok
    https://youtu.be/PsO9uNs59Ok
    https://youtu.be/xv2jihxZ6Ok
    https://youtu.be/X63jKCcJ_4s
    https://youtu.be/-iDn8-Uuahk
    https://youtu.be/vSLBpsPp0ZE
    https://youtu.be/v9SPbrBrfEo
    https://youtu.be/YrEFRhA05T4
    https://youtu.be/DLggHrz_X2U
    https://youtu.be/p7asHalYDoE
    https://youtu.be/n-RAXEKVZz8
    https://youtu.be/MyLt0jeXq54

    Far better than Berlioz and far
    more interesting than Bruckner.
    I don't know... they all are unlistenable imo... Wagner is far better than any of the guys you mentioned.

    Furthermore my point was that Shostakovich, Janacek and Bartok were far better composers than Prokofiev, Stravinsky, Bax or Sibelius... I think the last 4 are unlistenable as well, while the first 3 are at least interesting in some ways.

    Out of the composers mentioned by Ray (excluding Bach, Beethoven, Mendelssohn and the Jazz guys) I would guess that yoru ranking woul be sth like Sibelius and Prokofiev at the top, then probably Janacek or Stravinsky, then Bax or Bartok and last:
    Shostakovich?

    *The Jazz guys are ofc unlistenable as well...



    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Tue Mar 21 03:10:09 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 09:41:19 UTC+1:
    On Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 1:25:18 AM UTC-7, MELMOTH wrote:
    Le 20/03/2023, Dan Koren a supposé :

    The only composers I REALLY
    NEED are Albeniz and Bill Evans.

    *Monteverdi*...*JSB*...*Beethoven*...
    *Schubert*...*Liszt*...*Debussy*...
    Boieldieu? Berlioz? Franck? Satie?
    Meyerbeer? d'Indy? Chaminade?
    Chausson? Ropartz? Magnard?
    Alkan? Ravel? Poulenc? Lully?
    Rameau? Couperin? Roussel?
    Lalo? Gounod? Saint-Saëns?

    Mais où est la France ?!?

    dk

    A bit of it seems to be within Liszt?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Tue Mar 21 03:26:37 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 11:09:39 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 07:00:27 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 7:53:15 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 03:38:35 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 4:52:36 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Out of these I'd go for Shostakovich,
    Janacek and Bartok - screw the rest...
    especially Bax and Sibelius.

    You are screwing around too much lately.

    I do not think so. Bax and Sibelius can be
    accused of this (at least while they were alive).
    This doesn't sound to your ears like screwing
    around? It sounds to mine! ;-)

    https://youtu.be/ltplS9pUKfw
    https://youtu.be/xv2jihxZ6Ok
    https://youtu.be/PsO9uNs59Ok
    https://youtu.be/xv2jihxZ6Ok
    https://youtu.be/X63jKCcJ_4s
    https://youtu.be/-iDn8-Uuahk
    https://youtu.be/vSLBpsPp0ZE
    https://youtu.be/v9SPbrBrfEo
    https://youtu.be/YrEFRhA05T4
    https://youtu.be/DLggHrz_X2U
    https://youtu.be/p7asHalYDoE
    https://youtu.be/n-RAXEKVZz8
    https://youtu.be/MyLt0jeXq54

    Far better than Berlioz and far
    more interesting than Bruckner.
    I don't know... they all are unlistenable imo... Wagner is far better than any of the guys you mentioned.

    Furthermore my point was that Shostakovich, Janacek and Bartok were far better composers than Prokofiev, Stravinsky, Bax or Sibelius... I think the last 4 are unlistenable as well, while the first 3 are at least interesting in some ways.

    Out of the composers mentioned by Ray (excluding Bach, Beethoven, Mendelssohn and the Jazz guys) I would guess that yoru ranking woul be sth like Sibelius and Prokofiev at the top, then probably Janacek or Stravinsky, then Bax or Bartok and last:
    Shostakovich?

    Maybe you would rate Bax last... not sure; and maybe Shostakovich above Bartok... not so sure.



    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Owen Hartnett@21:1/5 to Marc S on Tue Mar 21 14:49:54 2023
    On 2023-03-20 22:54:19 +0000, Marc S said:

    Mandryka schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:50:29 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:> > Just
    listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too
    good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really
    need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.
    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that the only composers I
    need all have a name which starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and
    Mozart. Now I’m not interested in any of them all that much!

    Well you know... I am not you.

    I believe what Mandryka was trying to say was that, as we grow older,
    we wear out our favorites such that we can only deal with them as an
    occasional treat, but not a steady diet.

    In my 20's, and 30's, I'd travel far to hear my favorite conductors
    play a Beethoven symphony, but I"ve heard them so many times...

    Same with Brahms, and like W.C. Fields said about women and elephants,
    I admire Bach but I wouldn't want to own him.

    -Owen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From raymond.hallbear1@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Owen Hartnett on Tue Mar 21 17:46:06 2023
    On Wednesday, 22 March 2023 at 05:50:08 UTC+11, Owen Hartnett wrote:
    On 2023-03-20 22:54:19 +0000, Marc S said:

    Mandryka schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:50:29 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:> > Just
    listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too
    good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really >> need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.
    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that the only composers I
    need all have a name which starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and
    Mozart. Now I’m not interested in any of them all that much!

    Well you know... I am not you.
    I believe what Mandryka was trying to say was that, as we grow older,
    we wear out our favorites such that we can only deal with them as an occasional treat, but not a steady diet.

    In my 20's, and 30's, I'd travel far to hear my favorite conductors
    play a Beethoven symphony, but I"ve heard them so many times...

    Same with Brahms, and like W.C. Fields said about women and elephants,
    I admire Bach but I wouldn't want to own him.

    -Owen

    There comes a point where a lot of this music one first listened to becomes stale and ultimately .... just plain boring. J S Bach is about the only composer before the 1870s, with very few exceptions, that withstands the test of time. Timeless in fact.
    At least for these ears. There comes a time when one needs to move on. And Bax does not bore me, and neither does a lot of other good music, that hasn't been done to death and pulverised into a relentless uniformity of vanilla type blandness.

    Ray Hall, Taree

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Owen Hartnett on Tue Mar 21 18:52:38 2023
    On Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 11:50:08 AM UTC-7, Owen Hartnett wrote:

    like W.C. Fields said about women and elephants,


    He obviously did not understand either species. ;-)

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Wed Mar 22 01:45:09 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Mittwoch, 22. März 2023 um 09:39:00 UTC+1:
    Owen Hartnett schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 19:50:08 UTC+1:
    On 2023-03-20 22:54:19 +0000, Marc S said:

    Mandryka schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:50:29 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:> > Just
    listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too
    good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really >> need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.
    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that the only composers I >> need all have a name which starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and
    Mozart. Now I’m not interested in any of them all that much!

    Well you know... I am not you.
    I believe what Mandryka was trying to say was that, as we grow older,
    we wear out our favorites such that we can only deal with them as an occasional treat, but not a steady diet.
    Well... yes... either this or that his favourite composers changed over time. In any case I am different from you and Mandryka. You don't seem to get what I was trying to say... you seem to think all humans share the same experiences: "...as _we_ grow
    older...". I have listened to all sorts of music all my life, long before I got into classical msuic, and I was aways on the quest to find something better than I heard before... I was called a musical Nazi (stupid term, bu tjust to give an idea) by
    friend of mine. I am not interested in mediocre music - 99% of music is just absolute shit; it gibves me a bad feeling, in different ways. It's often the personality I sense behind the music that I do not like (Mahler being too whiney for example...) and
    also a lack of "no-nonsense- approach" (mahler is not a no-nonsense guy... Schumann isn't either). So for me to like music that I have already dismissed, my personality would need to change, which it very likely won't.... The only music that does not do
    this (make me feel bad in some ways about the music I am hearing) is the music of Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms - the only other composers I get something out of and don't make me feel like an idiot are: Schoenberg and Berg.


    *music-Nazi (not a musical Nazi)

    In my 20's, and 30's, I'd travel far to hear my favorite conductors
    play a Beethoven symphony, but I"ve heard them so many times...

    You see, I don't intend to spend my time listening to bad music... because it makes me feel bad; as of yet, I can listen to Mozart everyday without getting bored.... and I do not think this will ever change. And if - for whatever reason, which will
    very likely never happen - I do get bored of Mozart... well then I for sure will not turn to worse music... why would I?
    Same with Brahms, and like W.C. Fields said about women and elephants,
    I admire Bach but I wouldn't want to own him.
    If you want to listen to bad music, just because you listened to good music too often... that's your choice. But I see and do things differently.


    -Owen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Wed Mar 22 01:52:25 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Mittwoch, 22. März 2023 um 09:45:12 UTC+1:
    Marc S schrieb am Mittwoch, 22. März 2023 um 09:39:00 UTC+1:
    Owen Hartnett schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 19:50:08 UTC+1:
    On 2023-03-20 22:54:19 +0000, Marc S said:

    Mandryka schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:50:29 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:> > Just >> listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too >> good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really
    need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.
    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that the only composers I >> need all have a name which starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and
    Mozart. Now I’m not interested in any of them all that much!

    Well you know... I am not you.
    I believe what Mandryka was trying to say was that, as we grow older,
    we wear out our favorites such that we can only deal with them as an occasional treat, but not a steady diet.
    Well... yes... either this or that his favourite composers changed over time. In any case I am different from you and Mandryka. You don't seem to get what I was trying to say... you seem to think all humans share the same experiences: "...as _we_
    grow older...". I have listened to all sorts of music all my life, long before I got into classical msuic, and I was aways on the quest to find something better than I heard before... I was called a musical Nazi (stupid term, bu tjust to give an idea) by
    friend of mine. I am not interested in mediocre music - 99% of music is just absolute shit; it gibves me a bad feeling, in different ways. It's often the personality I sense behind the music that I do not like (Mahler being too whiney for example...) and
    also a lack of "no-nonsense- approach" (mahler is not a no-nonsense guy... Schumann isn't either). So for me to like music that I have already dismissed, my personality would need to change, which it very likely won't.... The only music that does not do
    this (make me feel bad in some ways about the music I am hearing) is the music of Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms - the only other composers I get something out of and don't make me feel like an idiot are: Schoenberg and Berg.

    *music-Nazi (not a musical Nazi)
    In my 20's, and 30's, I'd travel far to hear my favorite conductors
    play a Beethoven symphony, but I"ve heard them so many times...

    You see, I don't intend to spend my time listening to bad music... because it makes me feel bad; as of yet, I can listen to Mozart everyday without getting bored.... and I do not think this will ever change. And if - for whatever reason, which will
    very likely never happen - I do get bored of Mozart... well then I for sure will not turn to worse music... why would I?
    Same with Brahms, and like W.C. Fields said about women and elephants,
    I admire Bach but I wouldn't want to own him.
    If you want to listen to bad music, just because you listened to good music too often... that's your choice. But I see and do things differently.


    -Owen

    The more I listen the more I am sure I only need Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms... I could not stand hearing Chopin, Prokofiev, Rachmaninov, Tchaikovsky, Debussy etc ever again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Owen Hartnett on Wed Mar 22 01:38:57 2023
    Owen Hartnett schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 19:50:08 UTC+1:
    On 2023-03-20 22:54:19 +0000, Marc S said:

    Mandryka schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:50:29 UTC+1:
    On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:> > Just
    listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too
    good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really >> need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.
    I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that the only composers I
    need all have a name which starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and
    Mozart. Now I’m not interested in any of them all that much!

    Well you know... I am not you.
    I believe what Mandryka was trying to say was that, as we grow older,
    we wear out our favorites such that we can only deal with them as an occasional treat, but not a steady diet.

    Well... yes... either this or that his favourite composers changed over time. In any case I am different from you and Mandryka. You don't seem to get what I was trying to say... you seem to think all humans share the same experiences: "...as _we_ grow
    older...". I have listened to all sorts of music all my life, long before I got into classical msuic, and I was aways on the quest to find something better than I heard before... I was called a musical Nazi (stupid term, bu tjust to give an idea) by
    friend of mine. I am not interested in mediocre music - 99% of music is just absolute shit; it gibves me a bad feeling, in different ways. It's often the personality I sense behind the music that I do not like (Mahler being too whiney for example...)
    and also a lack of "no-nonsense- approach" (mahler is not a no-nonsense guy... Schumann isn't either). So for me to like music that I have already dismissed, my personality would need to change, which it very likely won't.... The only music that does not
    do this (make me feel bad in some ways about the music I am hearing) is the music of Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms - the only other composers I get something out of and don't make me feel like an idiot are: Schoenberg and Berg.


    In my 20's, and 30's, I'd travel far to hear my favorite conductors
    play a Beethoven symphony, but I"ve heard them so many times...


    You see, I don't intend to spend my time listening to bad music... because it makes me feel bad; as of yet, I can listen to Mozart everyday without getting bored.... and I do not think this will ever change. And if - for whatever reason, which will very
    likely never happen - I do get bored of Mozart... well then I for sure will not turn to worse music... why would I?

    Same with Brahms, and like W.C. Fields said about women and elephants,
    I admire Bach but I wouldn't want to own him.

    If you want to listen to bad music, just because you listened to good music too often... that's your choice. But I see and do things differently.


    -Owen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Wed Mar 22 02:01:36 2023
    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 1:52:28 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    The more I listen the more I am sure I only need
    Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms...
    I could not stand hearing Chopin, Prokofiev,
    Rachmaninov, Tchaikovsky, Debussy etc
    ever again.

    You are excommunicated -- effective immediately!

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Wed Mar 22 03:09:32 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Mittwoch, 22. März 2023 um 09:39:00 UTC+1:
    If you want to listen to bad music, just because you listened to good music too often... that's your choice. But I see and do things differently.


    *If you want to listen to bad music, just because *you think* you listened to good music too often...

    I really can't understand why one would want to listen to Sibelius Symphonies, or Chopin piano pieces etc. I just can't... and I never will...

    There was a time I listened to Sibelius Symphonies, because it was different and I was curious... but this did wear out quite quickly and today I sort of could kick myself in the ass for wasting too much time with Sibelius and all the other comosers I
    deem to be bad.

    In a way it is ofc beneficial to have listened to all sorts of different music; as Adorno put it, I am not quoting him directly but paraphrasing: "Bach can only be "understood" today when you also know Schoenberg and Schoenberg can only be "understood"
    if you also know Bach.". But sometimes I feel I spent too much time with bad music... I mean there are only 7 composers who I think did good music, so obviously most music I listened to I would consider bad.

    Another interesting thign I remember Adorno saying about Schoenberg about one of his compositions is the followign (unfortunately I do not remember which piece it was about, but I could find out I guess):
    Schoenberg was writing a piece, and he himself said he di dnot understand why he did something the way he did it in this composition; like he was guided by something else, he just magically put the notes in that place without understanding why - these
    seem to be the moments of true inspiration maybe...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Wed Mar 22 02:54:37 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Mittwoch, 22. März 2023 um 10:01:39 UTC+1:
    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 1:52:28 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    The more I listen the more I am sure I only need
    Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms...
    I could not stand hearing Chopin, Prokofiev,
    Rachmaninov, Tchaikovsky, Debussy etc
    ever again.
    You are excommunicated -- effective immediately!

    dk

    De gustibus est disputandum.

    I always thought it was funny, that in a way, we have a similar taste in pianists, conductors etc. But when it comes to composers we view things completely differently.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Owen Hartnett on Wed Mar 22 13:05:08 2023
    Owen Hartnett schrieb am Mittwoch, 22. März 2023 um 20:44:11 UTC+1:
    On 2023-03-22 08:38:57 +0000, Marc S said:

    Owen Hartnett schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 19:50:08 UTC+1:
    On 2023-03-20 22:54:19 +0000, Marc S said:>> > Mandryka schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:50:29 UTC+1:> >> On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:> > Just> >> listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just
    good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really> >> need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.> >> I remember saying to someone in around 2005 that the only composers I> >> need all have a name which starts
    with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and> >> Mozart. Now I’m not interested in any of them all that much!> >> > Well you know... I am not you.
    I believe what Mandryka was trying to say was that, as we grow older,> we wear out our favorites such that we can only deal with them as an> occasional treat, but not a steady diet.
    Well... yes... either this or that his favourite composers changed over time. Virtually the same thing.

    But not _really_ the same thing is it? In your wording your favourites stay your favourites; while in my wording the favourites change.

    In any case I am different from you and Mandryka. You don't seem to get what I was trying to say... you seem to think all humans share the same experiences: "...as _we_ grow older...". I have listened to all sorts of music all my life, long before I
    got into classical msuic, and I was aways on the quest to find something better than I heard before... I was called a musical Nazi (stupid term, bu tjust to give an idea) by friend of mine. I am not interested in mediocre music - 99% of music is just
    absolute shit; it gibves me a bad feeling, in different ways.
    You seem to approach music from a competitive viewpoint, in a quest for the "best" music, which most fits your taste. Can there not be more than one approach that you appreciate?
    I think most of us have started in classical music with a similar approach, but sometimes hearing something completely unexpected in a performance makes us realize that an alternative viewpoint could be at least as good, if not better than our already
    preconceived ideas about that music.

    If you think you did it the same as I did, I think you are surely mistaken; so ofc there are more approaches than mine.

    It's often the personality I sense behind the music that I do not like (Mahler being too whiney for example...) and also a lack of "no-nonsense- approach" (mahler is not a no-nonsense guy... Schumann isn't either). So for me to like music that I have
    already dismissed, my personality would need to change, which it very likely won't.... The only music that does not do this (make me feel bad in some ways about the music I am hearing) is the music of Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms - the
    only other composers I get something out of and don't make me feel like an idiot are: Schoenberg and Berg.


    In my 20's, and 30's, I'd travel far to hear my favorite conductors> play a Beethoven symphony, but I"ve heard them so many times...>
    You see, I don't intend to spend my time listening to bad music... because it makes me feel bad; as of yet, I can listen to Mozart everyday without getting bored.... and I do not think this will ever change. And if - for whatever reason, which will
    very likely never happen - I do get bored of Mozart... well then I for sure will not turn to worse music... why would I?
    Do you play an instrument? I've found that trying to play a piece of music myself gives me much greater insight into the piece.

    It is not that I am lacking insight into the pieces I don't like... I mean I am lacking insight in musical theory, but that won't change a thing about how I perceive the music.

    Same with Brahms, and like W.C. Fields said about women and elephants,> I admire Bach but I wouldn't want to own him.
    If you want to listen to bad music, just because you listened to good music too often... that's your choice. But I see and do things differently.
    The fact that other people speak highly of some music I "don't get" sometimes motivates me to explore it further just to see what they like about it.


    It is not that I don't "get" Ravel, Debussy, Rachmaninov, Tchaikovsky, Mahler, Schumann or whoever, it is rather because I do get it that I don't like it.

    -Owen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Owen Hartnett@21:1/5 to Marc S on Wed Mar 22 15:43:57 2023
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

    ----------------1637451358142329917
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

    On 2023-03-22 08:38:57 +0000, Marc S said:

    Owen Hartnett schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 19:50:08 UTC+1:
    On 2023-03-20 22:54:19 +0000, Marc S said:>> > Mandryka schrieb am
    Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:50:29 UTC+1:> >> On Monday, March 20, 2023
    at 8:33:10 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:> > Just> >> listened to some piano
    solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too> >> good. Made me realize
    I need Schubert... So the only composers I really> >> need are Bach,
    Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.> >> I remember saying to
    someone in around 2005 that the only composers I> >> need all have a
    name which starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and> >> Mozart. Now I’m
    not interested in any of them all that much!> >> > Well you know... I
    am not you.
    I believe what Mandryka was trying to say was that, as we grow older,>
    we wear out our favorites such that we can only deal with them as an>
    occasional treat, but not a steady diet.
    Well... yes... either this or that his favourite composers changed over time.

    Virtually the same thing.

    In any case I am different from you and Mandryka. You don't seem to
    get what I was trying to say... you seem to think all humans share the
    same experiences: "...as _we_ grow older...". I have listened to all
    sorts of music all my life, long before I got into classical msuic, and
    I was aways on the quest to find something better than I heard
    before... I was called a musical Nazi (stupid term, bu tjust to give an
    idea) by friend of mine. I am not interested in mediocre music - 99% of
    music is just absolute shit; it gibves me a bad feeling, in different
    ways.

    You seem to approach music from a competitive viewpoint, in a quest for
    the "best" music, which most fits your taste. Can there not be more
    than one approach that you appreciate?
    I think most of us have started in classical music with a similar
    approach, but sometimes hearing something completely unexpected in a performance makes us realize that an alternative viewpoint could be at
    least as good, if not better than our already preconceived ideas about
    that music.

    It's often the personality I sense behind the music that I do not like (Mahler being too whiney for example...) and also a lack of
    "no-nonsense- approach" (mahler is not a no-nonsense guy... Schumann
    isn't either). So for me to like music that I have already dismissed,
    my personality would need to change, which it very likely won't.... The
    only music that does not do this (make me feel bad in some ways about
    the music I am hearing) is the music of Bach, Mozart, Beethoven,
    Schubert and Brahms - the only other composers I get something out of
    and don't make me feel like an idiot are: Schoenberg and Berg.


    In my 20's, and 30's, I'd travel far to hear my favorite conductors>
    play a Beethoven symphony, but I"ve heard them so many times...>
    You see, I don't intend to spend my time listening to bad music...
    because it makes me feel bad; as of yet, I can listen to Mozart
    everyday without getting bored.... and I do not think this will ever
    change. And if - for whatever reason, which will very likely never
    happen - I do get bored of Mozart... well then I for sure will not turn
    to worse music... why would I?

    Do you play an instrument? I've found that trying to play a piece of
    music myself gives me much greater insight into the piece.

    Same with Brahms, and like W.C. Fields said about women and elephants,>
    I admire Bach but I wouldn't want to own him.
    If you want to listen to bad music, just because you listened to good
    music too often... that's your choice. But I see and do things
    differently.

    The fact that other people speak highly of some music I "don't get"
    sometimes motivates me to explore it further just to see what they like
    about it.

    -Owen
    ----------------1637451358142329917
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
    <html>
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css">
    <title></title>
    <meta name="Generator" content="Cocoa HTML Writer">
    <meta name="CocoaVersion" content="2113.6">
    <style type="text/css">
    p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 15.0px; font: 14.0px 'Book Antiqua'}
    p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 15.0px; font: 14.0px 'Book Antiqua'; min-height: 17.0px}
    p.p3 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px; line-height: 17.0px; font: 14.0px 'Book Antiqua'; color: #000080}
    p.p4 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 24.0px; font: 14.0px 'Book Antiqua'; color: #008000}
    p.p5 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px; font: 14.0px 'Book Antiqua'; color: #000080}
    p.p6 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 17.0px; font: 14.0px 'Book Antiqua'; min-height: 17.0px}
    p.p7 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 17.0px; font: 14.0px 'Book Antiqua'}
    p.p8 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px; font: 14.0px 'Book Antiqua'; color: #000080; min-height: 17.0px}
    p.p9 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 24.0px; font: 14.0px 'Book Antiqua'; color: #008000; min-height: 17.0px}
    p.p10 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 17.0px; font: 14.0px 'Book Antiqua'; color: #000080; min-height: 17.0px}
    span.s1 {font: 14.0px 'Lucida Grande'}
    </style>
    </head>
    <body>
    <p class="p1">On 2023-03-22 08:38:57 +0000, Marc S said:</p>
    <p class="p2"><br></p>
    <p class="p3">Owen Hartnett schrieb am Dienstag, 21. März 2023 um 19:50:08 UTC+1:</p>
    <p class="p4">On 2023-03-20 22:54:19 +0000, Marc S said:&gt;&gt; &gt; Mandryka schrieb am Montag, 20. März 2023 um 23:50:29 UTC+1:&gt; &gt;&gt; On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 8:33:10<span class="s1"> </span>PM UTC, Marc S wrote:&gt; &gt; Just&gt; &gt;&
    gt; listened to some piano solo stuff by Schubert again... it's just too&gt; &gt;&gt; good. Made me realize I need Schubert... So the only composers I really&gt; &gt;&gt; need are Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.&gt; &gt;&gt; I remember
    saying to someone in around 2005 that the only composers I&gt; &gt;&gt; need all have a name which starts with M - Monteverdi, Mahler and&gt; &gt;&gt; Mozart. Now I’m not interested in any of them all that much!&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; Well you know... I am
    not you.</p>
    <p class="p4">I believe what Mandryka was trying to say was that, as we grow older,&gt; we wear out our favorites such that we can only deal with them as an&gt; occasional treat, but not a steady diet.</p>
    <p class="p5">Well... yes... either this or that his favourite composers changed over time.</p>
    <p class="p6"><br></p>
    <p class="p7">Virtually the same thing.</p>
    <p class="p6"><br></p>
    <p class="p5"><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>In any case I am different from you and Mandryka. You don't seem to get what I was trying to say... you seem to think all humans share the same experiences: "...as _we_ grow older...". I have
    listened to all sorts of music all my life, long before I got into classical msuic, and I was aways on the quest to find something better than I heard before... I was called a musical Nazi (stupid term, bu tjust to give an idea) by friend of mine. I am
    not interested in mediocre music - 99% of music is just absolute shit; it gibves me a bad feeling, in<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>different ways.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></p>
    <p class="p6"><br></p>
    <p class="p7">You seem to approach music from a competitive viewpoint, in a quest for the "best" music, which most fits your taste.<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>Can there not be more than one approach that you appreciate?</p>
    <p class="p7">I think most of us have started in classical music with a similar approach, but sometimes hearing something completely unexpected in a performance makes us realize that an alternative viewpoint could be at least as good, if not better than
    our already preconceived ideas about that music.</p>
    <p class="p6"><br></p>
    <p class="p5">It's often the personality I sense behind the music that I do not like (Mahler being too whiney for example...) and also a lack of "no-nonsense- approach" (mahler is not a no-nonsense guy... Schumann isn't either). So for me to like music
    that I have already dismissed, my personality would need to change, which it very likely won't.... The only music that does not do this (make me feel bad in some ways about the music I am hearing) is the music of Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and
    Brahms - the only other composers I get something out of and don't make me feel like an idiot are: Schoenberg and Berg.</p>
    <p class="p8"><br></p>
    <p class="p9"><br></p>
    <p class="p4">In my 20's, and 30's, I'd travel far to hear my favorite conductors&gt; play a Beethoven symphony, but I"ve heard them so many times...&gt;</p>
    <p class="p5">You see, I don't intend to spend my time listening to bad music... because it makes me feel bad; as of yet, I can listen to Mozart everyday without getting bored.... and I do not think this will ever change. And if - for whatever reason,
    which will very likely never happen - I do get bored of Mozart... well then I for sure will not turn to worse music... why would I?</p>
    <p class="p6"><br></p>
    <p class="p7">Do you play an instrument?<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>I've found that trying to play a piece of music myself gives me much greater insight into the piece.</p>
    <p class="p10"><br></p>
    <p class="p4">Same with Brahms, and like W.C. Fields said about women and elephants,&gt; I admire Bach but I wouldn't want to own him.</p>
    <p class="p5">If you want to listen to bad music, just because you listened to good music too often... that's your choice. But I see and do things differently.</p>
    <p class="p6"><br></p>
    <p class="p7">The fact that other people speak highly of some music I "don't get" sometimes motivates me to explore it further just to see what they like about it. <span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></p>
    <p class="p6"><br></p>
    <p class="p7">-Owen</p>
    </body>
    </html>
    ----------------1637451358142329917--

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 22 16:06:47 2023
    I think my rankings wrt composers would be as follows:

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann, Wagner

    *the difference between placements (and also composers; alphabetical order btw) is individual; after this comes a big jump.

    And it becomes more difficult thinking about it... probably:

    5) Chopin, Mahler, Scriabin, Strauss, Shostakovich

    and then... hmmm, does not matter anyway, tired of thinkign about it, but these I am very sure about... I think maybe I would also rate some less known composers from the classical period higher (example: Hummel) if I listened to them more... this is
    just a ranking based on composers I know.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Wed Mar 22 16:33:56 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 00:06:50 UTC+1:
    I think my rankings wrt composers would be as follows:

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann, Wagner

    *the difference between placements (and also composers; alphabetical order btw) is individual; after this comes a big jump.

    And it becomes more difficult thinking about it... probably:

    5) Chopin, Mahler, Scriabin, Strauss, Shostakovich


    thinking about it, I should probably exchange Chopin and Scriabin with Wagner... ya... maybe even Shostakovich... anyway who cares... my 5 favourites are set... and I'm sure I do not need more. Always interested in hearing _new & good_ music ofc (which
    you don't these days)

    and then... hmmm, does not matter anyway, tired of thinkign about it, but these I am very sure about... I think maybe I would also rate some less known composers from the classical period higher (example: Hummel) if I listened to them more... this is
    just a ranking based on composers I know.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Wed Mar 22 17:45:48 2023
    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 4:06:50 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    I think my rankings wrt composers would be as follows:

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg,
    Schumann, Wagner

    Rankings are meaningless. One likes whatever
    one likes, and one dislikes whatever one dislikes.
    Is there any point in comparing soup and dessert?
    It is perfectly OK to like and enjoy both. Beethoven
    ofc tastes like bleach.

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Thu Mar 23 00:43:05 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 01:45:51 UTC+1:
    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 4:06:50 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    I think my rankings wrt composers would be as follows:

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg,
    Schumann, Wagner
    Rankings are meaningless. One likes whatever
    one likes, and one dislikes whatever one dislikes.
    Is there any point in comparing soup and dessert?

    First of all: Soup and desserts are sth completely different from art. (Kant has interesting ideas about the difference between judging a meal and judging a work of art; ideas you likely won't be able to get.)

    Secondly if one likes some music and dislikes some other music there is already a ranking of sorts taking place... so the point you are making goes against what you think you are pointing out... this you likely won't get either...

    It is perfectly OK to like and enjoy both. Beethoven
    ofc tastes like bleach.

    This just goes on to show that your taste is corrupted.


    dk

    You may make it simple for yourself (*I like what I like, and don't what I don't like), I won't.

    So since you obviously "like" Grosvenor and you also "like" Volodos, you like them the same, right? No further evaluation about rankings needed, hm? Or could it be that you actually rank Volodos above Grosvenor if you thought a little more and if you
    were honest?...

    Well... I don't like Grosvenor, but Volodos is very good and I rank him way above Grosvenor; if you don't, it's just another sign that your taste is corrupted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Thu Mar 23 00:52:44 2023
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 12:43:08 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 01:45:51 UTC+1:
    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 4:06:50 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    I think my rankings wrt composers would be as follows:

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann, Wagner

    Rankings are meaningless. One likes whatever
    one likes, and one dislikes whatever one dislikes.
    Is there any point in comparing soup and dessert?

    First of all: Soup and desserts are sth completely
    different from art. (Kant has interesting ideas about
    the difference between judging a meal and judging a
    work of art; ideas you likely won't be able to get.)

    Kant probably never had dinner at restaurants such
    as El Bulli, L'Aubergine or L'Oranger, where food is art.

    If you ever visit Milan I can steer you to a restaurant
    where food is art. I stop there for dinner every time I
    am in the area. Last time (2013) I drove there from
    Munich just for dinner.

    If you don't understand that food can be art, you do
    not really understand anything. Adorno and Kant are
    wasted on you.

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Thu Mar 23 00:55:37 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 08:43:08 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 01:45:51 UTC+1:
    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 4:06:50 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    I think my rankings wrt composers would be as follows:

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg,
    Schumann, Wagner
    Rankings are meaningless. One likes whatever
    one likes, and one dislikes whatever one dislikes.
    Is there any point in comparing soup and dessert?
    First of all: Soup and desserts are sth completely different from art. (Kant has interesting ideas about the difference between judging a meal and judging a work of art; ideas you likely won't be able to get.)

    Secondly if one likes some music and dislikes some other music there is already a ranking of sorts taking place... so the point you are making goes against what you think you are pointing out... this you likely won't get either...
    It is perfectly OK to like and enjoy both. Beethoven
    ofc tastes like bleach.
    This just goes on to show that your taste is corrupted.


    dk

    You may make it simple for yourself (*I like what I like, and don't what I don't like), I won't.

    So since you obviously "like" Grosvenor and you also "like" Volodos, you like them the same, right? No further evaluation about rankings needed, hm? Or could it be that you actually rank Volodos above Grosvenor if you thought a little more and if you
    were honest?...

    Well... I don't like Grosvenor, but Volodos is very good and I rank him way above Grosvenor; if you don't, it's just another sign that your taste is corrupted.

    Or another example:

    You like Chopin and you like Sibelius; going by what you said, it would be meaningless to think about who the greater composer is. So, if you were asked to choose between Chopin and Sibelius to listen to for the rest of your life; you wouldn't care if it
    were Chopin or Sibelius since you like them both?

    I am very sure you would go for Chopin - obviously. Just goes on to show that you don't know what you are saying... as it is so often the case. But sometimes you do and sometimes you are funny... but things like this... make you seem like an idiot...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Thu Mar 23 01:02:21 2023
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 12:43:08 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    So since you obviously "like" Grosvenor and
    you also "like" Volodos, you like them the same,
    right? No further evaluation about rankings needed,
    hm? Or could it be that you actually rank Volodos
    above Grosvenor if you thought a little more and
    if you were honest?...

    Not at all. They are both good enough and different
    enough that I see no point in "ranking" them. This is
    oh so Prussian. I am not a (law and) order person.

    If you were a wee bit smarter than you are, you
    would have asked the question differently, e.g.
    which of the two I would pick to hear if they
    both performed the same night in different
    venues. It would be down to the programs.

    If the programs were identical, I would most
    likely pick Grosvenor, because he is younger
    and more likely to surprise me.

    Incidentally, this is not a hypothetical scenario.
    I flew to London in June 1997 to hear Zhukov's
    London debut recital at Wigmore Hall. He was
    rather unlucky since both Kissin and Argerich
    gave concerts the same evening, one at the
    Barbican and the other at the Royal Festival
    Hall.

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Thu Mar 23 01:26:47 2023
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:15:41 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 08:52:47 UTC+1:

    If you don't understand that food can be art, you do
    not really understand anything. Adorno and Kant are
    wasted on you.

    Says you, who never read Adorno or Kant...

    You sound a bit like a religious zealot: Food is art,
    Food is art, Food is art; thereby thinking that food
    really is art. ("Bible is from god, bible is from god,
    bible is from god").

    I only said it once. The zealotry is your imagination.
    Your project zealotry on everyone else because you
    are a zealot.

    You don't give me any understanding about why
    food should be considered art... you don't give
    me any arguments. You may believe your nonsense...

    I am not giving you any arguments or explanations
    because the only way to understand that food can
    be art is by eating it.

    How about you explain to me why some food
    would be considered art and some food wouldn't?

    Try https://www.illuogoaimoenadia.com/ in Milan,
    than eat a fast food burger. Your stomach will be
    able to tell immediately which one is art and which
    one is poison.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Thu Mar 23 01:24:24 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:15:41 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 08:52:47 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 12:43:08 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 01:45:51 UTC+1:
    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 4:06:50 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    I think my rankings wrt composers would be as follows:

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann, Wagner

    Rankings are meaningless. One likes whatever
    one likes, and one dislikes whatever one dislikes.
    Is there any point in comparing soup and dessert?

    First of all: Soup and desserts are sth completely
    different from art. (Kant has interesting ideas about
    the difference between judging a meal and judging a
    work of art; ideas you likely won't be able to get.)
    Kant probably never had dinner at restaurants such
    as El Bulli, L'Aubergine or L'Oranger, where food is art.

    It is rather that you never read Kant and don't understand how wrong you are with what you are saying.

    It does not matter how fancy a restaurant is (I ate 800$ Shabu-Shabu-dinner in Tokyo my dear friend...). There is still a difference in judging a work of art and judging food; there is also a difference between a painting and music. etc etc.

    Judgements about food Kant considers judgements of the agreeable: You like this food, okay you like it and I don't. => agreeable

    Judgements about music Kant considers judgements of beauty (or sublime)... These are aesthetic judgements. Whether you like some food and dislike other food is not an aesthetic judgement no matter how fancy the food looks on the plate; the decoration
    of the food might be art, but not neccesarily.

    If I remember correctly... Kant also considers "judgements of the agreeable" aesthetic judgements; but there is a difference between judgements of the beauty/sublime and judgements of the agreeable (food):

    "The other type of aesthetic judgment are judgments of the agreeable, “which are the kind of judgment expressed by saying simply that one likes something or finds it pleasing.” These are judgments of what, in Kant's words, please “the senses in
    sensation” as opposed to pleasing ourcognition in reflection."

    If you want to treat music like food that's up to you; I won't.

    If you ever visit Milan I can steer you to a restaurant
    where food is art. I stop there for dinner every time I
    am in the area. Last time (2013) I drove there from
    Munich just for dinner.
    They may think it is art, and you may think it is art; but food is not art.

    If you don't understand that food can be art, you do
    not really understand anything. Adorno and Kant are
    wasted on you.
    Says you, who never read Adorno or Kant...

    You sound a bit like a religious zealot: Food is art, Food is art, Food is art; thereby thinking that food really is art. ("Bible is from god, bible is from god, bible is from god").

    You don't give me any understanding about why food should be considered art... you don't give me any arguments. You may believe your nonsense...

    How about you explain to me why some food would be considered art and some food wouldn't?

    The Japanese boil green tea as if it were art; it is not art. If I produce Nickel(II)-Chloride in a chemistry lab it is also not art... Are chemists artists? Are tea-boilers artists? I do not think so...


    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Thu Mar 23 01:15:39 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 08:52:47 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 12:43:08 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 01:45:51 UTC+1:
    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 4:06:50 PM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    I think my rankings wrt composers would be as follows:

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann, Wagner

    Rankings are meaningless. One likes whatever
    one likes, and one dislikes whatever one dislikes.
    Is there any point in comparing soup and dessert?

    First of all: Soup and desserts are sth completely
    different from art. (Kant has interesting ideas about
    the difference between judging a meal and judging a
    work of art; ideas you likely won't be able to get.)
    Kant probably never had dinner at restaurants such
    as El Bulli, L'Aubergine or L'Oranger, where food is art.


    It is rather that you never read Kant and don't understand how wrong you are with what you are saying.

    It does not matter how fancy a restaurant is (I ate 800$ Shabu-Shabu-dinner in Tokyo my dear friend...). There is still a difference in judging a work of art and judging food; there is also a difference between a painting and music. etc etc.

    Judgements about food Kant considers judgements of the agreeable: You like this food, okay you like it and I don't. => agreeable

    Judgements about music Kant considers judgements of beauty (or sublime)... These are aesthetic judgements. Whether you like some food and dislike other food is not an aesthetic judgement no matter how fancy the food looks on the plate; the decoration of
    the food might be art, but not neccesarily.

    If you ever visit Milan I can steer you to a restaurant
    where food is art. I stop there for dinner every time I
    am in the area. Last time (2013) I drove there from
    Munich just for dinner.

    They may think it is art, and you may think it is art; but food is not art.


    If you don't understand that food can be art, you do
    not really understand anything. Adorno and Kant are
    wasted on you.

    Says you, who never read Adorno or Kant...

    You sound a bit like a religious zealot: Food is art, Food is art, Food is art; thereby thinking that food really is art. ("Bible is from god, bible is from god, bible is from god").

    You don't give me any understanding about why food should be considered art... you don't give me any arguments. You may believe your nonsense...

    How about you explain to me why some food would be considered art and some food wouldn't?

    The Japanese boil green tea as if it were art; it is not art. If I produce Nickel(II)-Chloride in a chemistry lab it is also not art... Are chemists artists? Are tea-boilers artists? I do not think so...


    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Thu Mar 23 01:31:41 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:02:24 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 12:43:08 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    So since you obviously "like" Grosvenor and
    you also "like" Volodos, you like them the same,
    right? No further evaluation about rankings needed,
    hm? Or could it be that you actually rank Volodos
    above Grosvenor if you thought a little more and
    if you were honest?...
    Not at all. They are both good enough and different
    enough that I see no point in "ranking" them. This is
    oh so Prussian. I am not a (law and) order person.


    Well... we all know that you were a bit "prussian" yourself, as you have ranked composers in the past, as well as artists and performances - somehow you forgot about all of this, hm?

    It is just that you love to argue which is why you change your opinions so often... And I'm actually tired of arguing with an idiot like you... you are unteachable, quite opportunistic and lacking in self- reflection (similar to Herman).

    So if Volodos and Grosvenor were to give the same recital the same evening (a program you think both are accomplished at), you would just toss a coin to decide whose recital you would go to? I am 100% I would go to Volodos.

    If you were a wee bit smarter than you are, you
    would have asked the question differently, e.g.
    which of the two I would pick to hear if they
    both performed the same night in different
    venues. It would be down to the programs.


    Just thought about this haha.

    If the programs were identical, I would most
    likely pick Grosvenor, because he is younger
    and more likely to surprise me.


    Surprise? Well... if you want to be "surprised" you are not there to listen to "good music"... I think "good music" surprises much more than "surprises"... Sure listen to Lang Lang and be "surprised", but don't tell other people you are listening to "
    good music"...

    As from what I heard Volodos seems to be capable of surprising much more so than Grosvenor btw... Volodos is capable of "real magic".

    Why does his age have anything to do with him being able to surprise people btw? Can you explain this to me?

    You seem to surprise me more often than many younger people do haha.

    Incidentally, this is not a hypothetical scenario.
    I flew to London in June 1997 to hear Zhukov's
    London debut recital at Wigmore Hall. He was
    rather unlucky since both Kissin and Argerich
    gave concerts the same evening, one at the
    Barbican and the other at the Royal Festival
    Hall.

    So, how about Chopin and Sibelius? You like them the same and see no point in ranking them?


    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Thu Mar 23 01:36:19 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:26:51 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:15:41 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 08:52:47 UTC+1:

    If you don't understand that food can be art, you do
    not really understand anything. Adorno and Kant are
    wasted on you.

    Says you, who never read Adorno or Kant...

    You sound a bit like a religious zealot: Food is art,
    Food is art, Food is art; thereby thinking that food
    really is art. ("Bible is from god, bible is from god,
    bible is from god").
    I only said it once. The zealotry is your imagination.
    Your project zealotry on everyone else because you
    are a zealot.

    No, you bring up this stupid argument everytime someone ranks musicians... just like a religious zealot. Ofc you have forgotten about this as well...

    You don't give me any understanding about why
    food should be considered art... you don't give
    me any arguments. You may believe your nonsense...
    I am not giving you any arguments or explanations
    because the only way to understand that food can
    be art is by eating it.

    If you think eating amounts to understanding, you are completely an idiot.

    You sound like a religious zealot: The only way one can understand the bible is from god is by reading and believing it.

    How about you explain to me why some food
    would be considered art and some food wouldn't?
    Try https://www.illuogoaimoenadia.com/ in Milan,
    than eat a fast food burger. Your stomach will be
    able to tell immediately which one is art and which
    one is poison.

    I never argued that some food tastes better than other food; but food is not art...

    Tangerines from Jejudo (korean island) taste better than any other tangerine I ate; now is a tangerine an object of art? Why would it be?

    And if it is not, why would fancy meals be a work of art? The decoration maybe, but not the food.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Thu Mar 23 01:50:05 2023
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:46:47 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:26:51 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:15:41 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    How about you explain to me why some food
    would be considered art and some food wouldn't?

    Try https://www.illuogoaimoenadia.com/ in Milan,
    than eat a fast food burger. Your stomach will be
    able to tell immediately which one is art and which
    one is poison.

    Lastly: If you want to treat music (or art in general)
    as if were food... you are surely on the wrong path,
    but you are allowed to follow it.

    There are no "right" or "wrong" paths. You really need
    to get rid of your Prussian normative prescriptive
    mindset.

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Thu Mar 23 01:46:44 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:26:51 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:15:41 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 08:52:47 UTC+1:

    If you don't understand that food can be art, you do
    not really understand anything. Adorno and Kant are
    wasted on you.

    Says you, who never read Adorno or Kant...

    You sound a bit like a religious zealot: Food is art,
    Food is art, Food is art; thereby thinking that food
    really is art. ("Bible is from god, bible is from god,
    bible is from god").
    I only said it once. The zealotry is your imagination.
    Your project zealotry on everyone else because you
    are a zealot.
    You don't give me any understanding about why
    food should be considered art... you don't give
    me any arguments. You may believe your nonsense...
    I am not giving you any arguments or explanations
    because the only way to understand that food can
    be art is by eating it.
    How about you explain to me why some food
    would be considered art and some food wouldn't?
    Try https://www.illuogoaimoenadia.com/ in Milan,
    than eat a fast food burger. Your stomach will be
    able to tell immediately which one is art and which
    one is poison.

    Lastly: If you want to treat music (or art in general) as if were food... you are surely on the wrong path, but you are allowed to follow it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Thu Mar 23 01:54:46 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:50:08 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:46:47 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:26:51 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:15:41 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    How about you explain to me why some food
    would be considered art and some food wouldn't?

    Try https://www.illuogoaimoenadia.com/ in Milan,
    than eat a fast food burger. Your stomach will be
    able to tell immediately which one is art and which
    one is poison.

    Lastly: If you want to treat music (or art in general)
    as if were food... you are surely on the wrong path,
    but you are allowed to follow it.
    There are no "right" or "wrong" paths. You really need
    to get rid of your Prussian normative prescriptive
    mindset.

    No, you really need to start "thinking" more... especially about how contradictory you are. But since you are incapable of admitting mistakes (similar to how you were not able to admit how wrong you were wrt to Juan), you will never change.

    You ranked food (like a prussian would, and like I would), you rank some restaurants above other restaurants... and then you point fingers at people who rank musicians (while you have ranked musicians yorurself). Can't make this shit up...

    Since Dan has no arguments, all he does is go "ad hominem" (prussian etc)... very sad.


    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Thu Mar 23 02:01:14 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:54:49 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:50:08 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:46:47 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:26:51 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:15:41 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    How about you explain to me why some food
    would be considered art and some food wouldn't?

    Try https://www.illuogoaimoenadia.com/ in Milan,
    than eat a fast food burger. Your stomach will be
    able to tell immediately which one is art and which
    one is poison.

    Lastly: If you want to treat music (or art in general)
    as if were food... you are surely on the wrong path,
    but you are allowed to follow it.
    There are no "right" or "wrong" paths. You really need
    to get rid of your Prussian normative prescriptive
    mindset.
    No, you really need to start "thinking" more... especially about how contradictory you are. But since you are incapable of admitting mistakes (similar to how you were not able to admit how wrong you were wrt to Juan), you will never change.

    *you will just dig your hole deeper; and never come out of _your_ cave; because admitting mistakes is sth you are not able to do (similar to Herman).


    You ranked food (like a prussian would, and like I would), you rank some restaurants above other restaurants... and then you point fingers at people who rank musicians (while you have ranked musicians yorurself). Can't make this shit up...

    Since Dan has no arguments, all he does is go "ad hominem" (prussian etc)... very sad.


    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Thu Mar 23 02:41:36 2023
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 2:01:17 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Marc S schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:54:49 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:50:08 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:46:47 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Lastly: If you want to treat music (or art in general)
    as if were food... you are surely on the wrong path,
    but you are allowed to follow it.

    There are no "right" or "wrong" paths. You really need
    to get rid of your Prussian normative prescriptive
    mindset.

    No, you really need to start "thinking" more...

    Too late -- why bother?

    especially about how contradictory you are.

    One cannot be "contradictory" if one does not
    think.

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Thu Mar 23 02:53:29 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 10:41:39 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 2:01:17 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Marc S schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:54:49 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:50:08 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:46:47 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Lastly: If you want to treat music (or art in general)
    as if were food... you are surely on the wrong path,
    but you are allowed to follow it.

    There are no "right" or "wrong" paths. You really need
    to get rid of your Prussian normative prescriptive
    mindset.

    No, you really need to start "thinking" more...
    Too late -- why bother?
    especially about how contradictory you are.
    One cannot be "contradictory" if one does not
    think.

    dk

    I mean be honest... Volodos is a better pianist than Grosvenor. I am very certain you would see it similar to me if you thought about it more/were honest.

    Maybe you really consider Volodos and Grosvenor about the same, because you like both... well... if that's your opinion so be it; I sure view things differently.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Thu Mar 23 02:50:17 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 10:41:39 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 2:01:17 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Marc S schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:54:49 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:50:08 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:46:47 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    Lastly: If you want to treat music (or art in general)
    as if were food... you are surely on the wrong path,
    but you are allowed to follow it.

    There are no "right" or "wrong" paths. You really need
    to get rid of your Prussian normative prescriptive
    mindset.

    No, you really need to start "thinking" more...
    Too late -- why bother?

    I do not think so. I believe that you very much have the capacity (more than most others in this ng) to think; it's just that when you are being shown that you are mistaken, that you stop to think - likely, because you do not like to admit mistakes.

    You are being normative as well if you say that rankings are nonsensical; and that one either likes or dislikes something (which is a very primitive and simplistic way of rankign things btw - as I already pointed out).

    Not hard to see... The thing is, as I have already pointed out: Likes and dislikes already amount to ranking something; it's just not as clearly ranked.

    Maybe your rankings differ from mine, but to say that rankings are nonsensical, while you are ranking things yourself (sometimes primitively; and sometimes more elaborated, at least when it serves your purpose) is just disingenous.

    Saying it is a "prussian" thign to do, is also racist.

    We all know you rank(ed) composers, performers and performances yourself; and you also rank restaurants... so why are you telling us now that rankings are nonsensical? Because you are nonsensical...

    especially about how contradictory you are.
    One cannot be "contradictory" if one does not
    think.

    The contradiction exists whether one is aware of it or not.

    I maybe think too much to be spending time here haha.


    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gerard@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 23 05:35:46 2023
    Op donderdag 23 maart 2023 om 00:33:59 UTC+1 schreef Marc S:

    thinking about it, I should probably exchange Chopin and Scriabin with Wagner... ya... maybe even Shostakovich... anyway who cares

    Exactly: who cares?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Thu Mar 23 08:03:03 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:50:08 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:46:47 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:26:51 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:15:41 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    How about you explain to me why some food
    would be considered art and some food wouldn't?

    Try https://www.illuogoaimoenadia.com/ in Milan,
    than eat a fast food burger. Your stomach will be
    able to tell immediately which one is art and which
    one is poison.

    Lastly: If you want to treat music (or art in general)
    as if were food... you are surely on the wrong path,
    but you are allowed to follow it.
    There are no "right" or "wrong" paths. You really need
    to get rid of your Prussian normative prescriptive
    mindset.

    dk

    You should also note the following: I am not telling you what _the_ right path is. I am just telling you what is wrong; and it is quite obvious (to anyone who is reasonable at least) that food and music is sth different and that your comparison is
    nonsensical; one does not get anything out of it ("Jargon of authenticity"... you think you say sth meaningful but in the end you end up saying nonsense).

    The Christian crusaders (as opposed to the bible), or the Muslim conquerors (not as opposed to the Quran and Sunnah, but exactly as the Quran adn Sunnah demand) or Hitler and the Nazis, or Lenin and the (pseudo)communists all thought they had found _the_
    right path; they all had an utopian vision... this is all quite different from me telling you about what is wrong. As Horkheimer said: We can't know what "the right thing" is, but we can know what is wrong. (We do can't know how a perfect world could be
    organzied, but we do know what is wrong with this world and we can name it.; maybe similar to music: we know when sth sounds shitty, but we do not know the perfect interpretation).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Gerard on Thu Mar 23 08:05:20 2023
    Gerard schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 13:35:49 UTC+1:
    Op donderdag 23 maart 2023 om 00:33:59 UTC+1 schreef Marc S:

    thinking about it, I should probably exchange Chopin and Scriabin with Wagner... ya... maybe even Shostakovich... anyway who cares
    Exactly: who cares?

    Another genial comment by the other ridiculously overeducated dutch guy from this group...

    These comments, utterly devoid of self-reflection, triggered by feelings of animosity and resentment towards myself, always fill me with joy haha.

    Thanks Gerard for caring enough to answer and making me feel good that I stepped on your feet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Thu Mar 23 08:12:15 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 16:03:07 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:50:08 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:46:47 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:26:51 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:15:41 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    How about you explain to me why some food
    would be considered art and some food wouldn't?

    Try https://www.illuogoaimoenadia.com/ in Milan,
    than eat a fast food burger. Your stomach will be
    able to tell immediately which one is art and which
    one is poison.

    Lastly: If you want to treat music (or art in general)
    as if were food... you are surely on the wrong path,
    but you are allowed to follow it.
    There are no "right" or "wrong" paths. You really need
    to get rid of your Prussian normative prescriptive
    mindset.

    dk
    You should also note the following: I am not telling you what _the_ right path is. I am just telling you what is wrong; and it is quite obvious (to anyone who is reasonable at least) that food and music is sth different and that your comparison is
    nonsensical; one does not get anything out of it ("Jargon of authenticity"... you think you say sth meaningful but in the end you end up saying nonsense).

    The Christian crusaders (as opposed to the bible), or the Muslim conquerors (not as opposed to the Quran and Sunnah, but exactly as the Quran adn Sunnah demand) or Hitler and the Nazis, or Lenin and the (pseudo)communists all thought they had found _
    the_ right path; they all had an utopian vision... this is all quite different from me telling you about what is wrong. As Horkheimer said: We can't know what "the right thing" is, but we can know what is wrong. (We do can't know how a perfect world
    could be organzied, but we do know what is wrong with this world and we can name it.; maybe similar to music: we know when sth sounds shitty, but we do not know the perfect interpretation).

    Having said this... ofc the ONLY right path to music is Mozart.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Thu Mar 23 08:21:13 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 16:03:07 UTC+1:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:50:08 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:46:47 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:
    Dan Koren schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 09:26:51 UTC+1:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 1:15:41 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    How about you explain to me why some food
    would be considered art and some food wouldn't?

    Try https://www.illuogoaimoenadia.com/ in Milan,
    than eat a fast food burger. Your stomach will be
    able to tell immediately which one is art and which
    one is poison.

    Lastly: If you want to treat music (or art in general)
    as if were food... you are surely on the wrong path,
    but you are allowed to follow it.
    There are no "right" or "wrong" paths. You really need
    to get rid of your Prussian normative prescriptive
    mindset.

    dk
    You should also note the following: I am not telling you what _the_ right path is. I am just telling you what is wrong; and it is quite obvious (to anyone who is reasonable at least) that food and music is sth different and that your comparison is
    nonsensical; one does not get anything out of it ("Jargon of authenticity"... you think you say sth meaningful but in the end you end up saying nonsense).

    The Christian crusaders (as opposed to the bible), or the Muslim conquerors (not as opposed to the Quran and Sunnah, but exactly as the Quran adn Sunnah demand) or Hitler and the Nazis, or Lenin and the (pseudo)communists all thought they had found _
    the_ right path; they all had an utopian vision... this is all quite different from me telling you about what is wrong. As Horkheimer said: We can't know what "the right thing" is, but we can know what is wrong. (We do can't know how a perfect world
    could be organzied, but we do know what is wrong with this world and we can name it.; maybe similar to music: we know when sth sounds shitty, but we do not know the perfect interpretation).

    *Bible ofc has a utopian vision as well; but as opposed to Quran, the bible actually does not teach to spread the faith through the sword...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gerard@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 23 09:15:52 2023
    Op donderdag 23 maart 2023 om 16:05:23 UTC+1 schreef Marc S:
    Gerard schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 13:35:49 UTC+1:
    Op donderdag 23 maart 2023 om 00:33:59 UTC+1 schreef Marc S:

    thinking about it, I should probably exchange Chopin and Scriabin with Wagner... ya... maybe even Shostakovich... anyway who cares
    Exactly: who cares?
    Another genial comment by the other ridiculously overeducated dutch guy from this group...

    These comments, utterly devoid of self-reflection, triggered by feelings of animosity and resentment towards myself, always fill me with joy haha.

    Thanks Gerard for caring enough to answer and making me feel good that I stepped on your feet.


    Haha, 2 words already is enough for a new load of cliche crud from your side. Please go on this way.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Gerard on Thu Mar 23 10:34:52 2023
    Gerard schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 17:15:55 UTC+1:
    Op donderdag 23 maart 2023 om 16:05:23 UTC+1 schreef Marc S:
    Gerard schrieb am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023 um 13:35:49 UTC+1:
    Op donderdag 23 maart 2023 om 00:33:59 UTC+1 schreef Marc S:

    thinking about it, I should probably exchange Chopin and Scriabin with Wagner... ya... maybe even Shostakovich... anyway who cares
    Exactly: who cares?
    Another genial comment by the other ridiculously overeducated dutch guy from this group...

    These comments, utterly devoid of self-reflection, triggered by feelings of animosity and resentment towards myself, always fill me with joy haha.

    Thanks Gerard for caring enough to answer and making me feel good that I stepped on your feet.
    Haha, 2 words already is enough for a new load of cliche crud from your side.
    Please go on this way.

    Cliches? Seems to be reality to me.

    I was talking about my favourites; if you don't care that's fine, you can just go on your way then. But you can't since I rub your sorry ass the wrong way. Sorry not sorry.

    Don't you have better things to do than being a dick to a guy half your age? Like posting things about Trump and his SS and making jokes about antisemitism not being taken seriously?

    Get lost you fool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 24 13:18:54 2023
    I have to revise my favourite composers:

    After thinking about Brahms I came to the conclusion that I do not need him; and this goes even more for Chopin.

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann (and maybe/likely? Scriabin)

    The rest I really don't care about... as already said above... and I also can't get into more modern music; for me it sort of ends with Berg...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Fri Mar 24 13:45:39 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 24. März 2023 um 21:18:56 UTC+1:
    I have to revise my favourite composers:

    After thinking about Brahms I came to the conclusion that I do not need him; and this goes even more for Chopin.

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann (and maybe/likely? Scriabin)

    The rest I really don't care about... as already said above... and I also can't get into more modern music; for me it sort of ends with Berg...

    But I only need tier 1-3, they are just most special to me and leave the others in dust... after 3) comes the biggest gap... they can't be reached, at least not for a long time, not in "this world" probably...

    Maybe I'll try out other music once again... but I think not for a long time... I'll probably still listen to tier 4) for a while, but less and less so...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Fri Mar 24 13:53:41 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 24. März 2023 um 21:45:42 UTC+1:
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 24. März 2023 um 21:18:56 UTC+1:
    I have to revise my favourite composers:

    After thinking about Brahms I came to the conclusion that I do not need him; and this goes even more for Chopin.

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann (and maybe/likely? Scriabin)

    The rest I really don't care about... as already said above... and I also can't get into more modern music; for me it sort of ends with Berg...
    But I only need tier 1-3, they are just most special to me and leave the others in dust... after 3) comes the biggest gap... they can't be reached, at least not for a long time, not in "this world" probably...

    Maybe I'll try out other music once again... but I think not for a long time... I'll probably still listen to tier 4) for a while, but less and less so...

    *or maybe one should say that it ends for me with Schoenberg (since I like some of his dodecaphonic works; but as said not nearly as much as tier 1-3).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gerard@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 24 13:56:09 2023
    Op vrijdag 24 maart 2023 om 21:18:56 UTC+1 schreef Marc S:
    I have to revise my favourite composers:


    Who cares?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Gerard on Fri Mar 24 14:14:37 2023
    Gerard schrieb am Freitag, 24. März 2023 um 21:56:11 UTC+1:
    Op vrijdag 24 maart 2023 om 21:18:56 UTC+1 schreef Marc S:
    I have to revise my favourite composers:

    Who cares?

    I do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Marc S on Sat Mar 25 04:20:01 2023
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 24. März 2023 um 21:18:56 UTC+1:
    I have to revise my favourite composers:

    After thinking about Brahms I came to the conclusion that I do not need him; and this goes even more for Chopin.

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann (and maybe/likely? Scriabin)

    The rest I really don't care about... as already said above... and I also can't get into more modern music; for me it sort of ends with Berg...

    *Another revision: I was wrong about Brahms, I should rank him tier 3 as I did before. Schumann and Haydn I don't need and Scriabin is just not to my taste (similar to Chopin and Messiaen).

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert

    These are the only composers I need I guess... Haydn and Schumann just don't work for me... I mean they are fine, but they don't reach the heights of the composers I mentioned.

    Furthermore, as mentioned, I really like Schoenberg and Berg, but I can't rank them above Haydn and Schumann; I think if Mozart and the other composers I mentioned didn't exist, I'd probably listen to more Haydn and Schumann...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to Marc S on Sat Mar 25 06:16:27 2023
    On Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 11:20:04 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 24. März 2023 um 21:18:56 UTC+1:
    I have to revise my favourite composers:

    After thinking about Brahms I came to the conclusion that I do not need him; and this goes even more for Chopin.

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann (and maybe/likely? Scriabin)

    The rest I really don't care about... as already said above... and I also can't get into more modern music; for me it sort of ends with Berg...
    *Another revision: I was wrong about Brahms, I should rank him tier 3 as I did before. Schumann and Haydn I don't need and Scriabin is just not to my taste (similar to Chopin and Messiaen).

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert

    These are the only composers I need I guess... Haydn and Schumann just don't work for me... I mean they are fine, but they don't reach the heights of the composers I mentioned.

    Furthermore, as mentioned, I really like Schoenberg and Berg, but I can't rank them above Haydn and Schumann; I think if Mozart and the other composers I mentioned didn't exist, I'd probably listen to more Haydn and Schumann...

    Have you heard Don Giovanni and Figaro?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Sat Mar 25 06:41:51 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Samstag, 25. März 2023 um 14:16:29 UTC+1:
    On Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 11:20:04 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 24. März 2023 um 21:18:56 UTC+1:
    I have to revise my favourite composers:

    After thinking about Brahms I came to the conclusion that I do not need him; and this goes even more for Chopin.

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann (and maybe/likely? Scriabin)

    The rest I really don't care about... as already said above... and I also can't get into more modern music; for me it sort of ends with Berg...
    *Another revision: I was wrong about Brahms, I should rank him tier 3 as I did before. Schumann and Haydn I don't need and Scriabin is just not to my taste (similar to Chopin and Messiaen).

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert

    These are the only composers I need I guess... Haydn and Schumann just don't work for me... I mean they are fine, but they don't reach the heights of the composers I mentioned.

    Furthermore, as mentioned, I really like Schoenberg and Berg, but I can't rank them above Haydn and Schumann; I think if Mozart and the other composers I mentioned didn't exist, I'd probably listen to more Haydn and Schumann...
    Have you heard Don Giovanni and Figaro?

    Is this a serious question?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Koren@21:1/5 to Marc S on Sat Mar 25 06:27:17 2023
    On Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 4:20:04 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    *Another revision: I was wrong about Brahms, I
    should rank him tier 3 as I did before. Schumann
    and Haydn I don't need and Scriabin is just not to
    my taste (similar to Chopin and Messiaen).

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert

    Who cares about ratings! Are
    you handicapping sports bets?

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mandryka@21:1/5 to Marc S on Sat Mar 25 06:55:38 2023
    On Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 1:41:54 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Mandryka schrieb am Samstag, 25. März 2023 um 14:16:29 UTC+1:
    On Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 11:20:04 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 24. März 2023 um 21:18:56 UTC+1:
    I have to revise my favourite composers:

    After thinking about Brahms I came to the conclusion that I do not need him; and this goes even more for Chopin.

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann (and maybe/likely? Scriabin)

    The rest I really don't care about... as already said above... and I also can't get into more modern music; for me it sort of ends with Berg...
    *Another revision: I was wrong about Brahms, I should rank him tier 3 as I did before. Schumann and Haydn I don't need and Scriabin is just not to my taste (similar to Chopin and Messiaen).

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert

    These are the only composers I need I guess... Haydn and Schumann just don't work for me... I mean they are fine, but they don't reach the heights of the composers I mentioned.

    Furthermore, as mentioned, I really like Schoenberg and Berg, but I can't rank them above Haydn and Schumann; I think if Mozart and the other composers I mentioned didn't exist, I'd probably listen to more Haydn and Schumann...
    Have you heard Don Giovanni and Figaro?
    Is this a serious question?

    Yes, I'm sure a couple of weeks ago you said you hadn't got a recording of them. Maybe I'm confusing you with someone else.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Mandryka on Sat Mar 25 07:08:35 2023
    Mandryka schrieb am Samstag, 25. März 2023 um 14:55:41 UTC+1:
    On Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 1:41:54 PM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Mandryka schrieb am Samstag, 25. März 2023 um 14:16:29 UTC+1:
    On Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 11:20:04 AM UTC, Marc S wrote:
    Marc S schrieb am Freitag, 24. März 2023 um 21:18:56 UTC+1:
    I have to revise my favourite composers:

    After thinking about Brahms I came to the conclusion that I do not need him; and this goes even more for Chopin.

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Schubert
    4) Berg, Haydn, Schoenberg, Schumann (and maybe/likely? Scriabin)

    The rest I really don't care about... as already said above... and I also can't get into more modern music; for me it sort of ends with Berg...
    *Another revision: I was wrong about Brahms, I should rank him tier 3 as I did before. Schumann and Haydn I don't need and Scriabin is just not to my taste (similar to Chopin and Messiaen).

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert

    These are the only composers I need I guess... Haydn and Schumann just don't work for me... I mean they are fine, but they don't reach the heights of the composers I mentioned.

    Furthermore, as mentioned, I really like Schoenberg and Berg, but I can't rank them above Haydn and Schumann; I think if Mozart and the other composers I mentioned didn't exist, I'd probably listen to more Haydn and Schumann...
    Have you heard Don Giovanni and Figaro?
    Is this a serious question?
    Yes, I'm sure a couple of weeks ago you said you hadn't got a recording of them. Maybe I'm confusing you with someone else.

    Sorry, I really wasn't sure if you were serious.

    No, you didn't confuse me with anyone else. I did also explain in said thread that I already evaluated the different Mozart opera recordings against each other over time a couple of times; so obviously I have known the operas for quite a while (6-7 years
    I think, basically since I started listening to classical music). I didn't want to buy any recordings before I was sure about which interpretation I liked most, so this is why I allowed myself some time before I bought any.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc S@21:1/5 to Dan Koren on Sat Mar 25 06:43:23 2023
    Dan Koren schrieb am Samstag, 25. März 2023 um 14:27:21 UTC+1:
    On Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 4:20:04 AM UTC-7, Marc S wrote:

    *Another revision: I was wrong about Brahms, I
    should rank him tier 3 as I did before. Schumann
    and Haydn I don't need and Scriabin is just not to
    my taste (similar to Chopin and Messiaen).

    1) Mozart
    2) Beethoven
    3) Bach, Brahms, Schubert
    Who cares about ratings! Are

    I care!

    you handicapping sports bets?

    dk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)