• Re: Obscure 1950s Era Recordings - 2023 Year End Tournament - Round 2 -

    From Rick Schubert@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Dec 9 21:31:59 2023
    On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 21:03:05 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com> wrote:

    Group 1 is now open.

    1. Baby, Baby, Oh My Darling - Clovers
    2. I Won't Be The Fool Anymore - The Heartbeats
    3. When My Dreamboat Comes Home - Fats Domino
    4. Single Life - Billy Tate

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 10 06:25:40 2023
    1- I Won't Be The Fool Anymore - The Heartbeats

    2- Single Life – Billy Tate (Roger)

    3- Baby, Baby, Oh My Darling - Clovers

    4-When My Dreamboat Comes Home - Fats Domino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Colegrove@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 10 06:46:33 2023
    1. When My Dreamboat Comes Home - Fats Domino

    2. Single Life – Billy Tate

    3. I Won't Be The Fool Anymore - The Heartbeats

    4. Baby, Baby, Oh My Darling - Clovers

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Mc@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 10 06:48:07 2023
    1. Baby, Baby, Oh My Darling - Clovers

    2. When My Dreamboat Comes Home - Fats Domino

    3. Single Life – Billy Tate

    4. I Won't Be The Fool Anymore - The Heartbeats

    --
    Steve Mc

    DNA to SBC to respond

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark D.@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sun Dec 10 15:25:07 2023
    On Dec 9, 2023 at 11:03:05 PM CST, "Bruce" <SavoyBG@aol.com> wrote:

    Group 1 is now open.

    When My Dreamboat Comes Home - Fats Domino
    Baby, Baby, Oh My Darling - Clovers
    Single Life – Billy Tate
    I Won't Be The Fool Anymore - The Heartbeats

    --md

    remove "xx" for email

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick Schubert@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sun Dec 10 11:46:29 2023
    On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 08:30:20 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com> wrote:

    FINAL RANKINGS - same as Jim and Bwucie Wobert Bosett

    (That's how I said my name when I was first talking at like 2 years old)


    1. When My Dreamboat Comes Home - Fats Domino - 22
    2. Single Life – Billy Tate - 21

    3. I Won't Be The Fool Anymore - The Heartbeats - 19
    4. Baby, Baby, Oh My Darling - Clovers - 18


    My Facts ekes out the win thanks to Mark's first place ranking at the end of the voting. Roger's Single Life gets through to the ELITE EIGHT after a second place finish. Diane's H-Beats is out after taking third place and Rick's stubborn Clovers record
    is finally done after going much further than expected by me.

    I was pleasantly surprised that my song did as well as it did overall.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 10 23:17:46 2023
    On Sat, 09 Dec 2023 21:31:59 -0800, Rick Schubert <rns@san.rr.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 21:03:05 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com> wrote:

    Group 1 is now open.

    3. When My Dreamboat Comes Home - Fats Domino
    4. Single Life - Billy Tate

    two "cheating" entries in this Obscurities contest

    "cheating" entries are either

    1. popular records that somehow met the contest criteria for
    nomination

    2. clear (unoriginal) derivatives of popular records

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick Schubert@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sun Dec 10 23:57:46 2023
    On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 21:08:50 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com> wrote:

    Group 2 is now open.

    1. I Gotta Get Myself A Woman - Drifters
    2. Yes Yes Yes - The Cashmeres
    3. Love Only You - The Meadowlarks
    4. There You Go - Johnny Cash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 11 06:36:49 2023
    1-Yes Yes Yes - The Cashmeres

    2-I Gotta Get Myself A Woman - Drifters

    3-Love Only You - The Meadowlarks

    -4-There You Go - Johnny Cash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Colegrove@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 11 06:46:57 2023
    1. There You Go - Johnny Cash

    2. Yes Yes Yes - The Cashmeres

    3. I Gotta Get Myself A Woman - Drifters

    4. Love Only You - The Meadowlarks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark D.@21:1/5 to Bruce on Mon Dec 11 14:47:34 2023
    On Dec 10, 2023 at 11:08:50 PM CST, "Bruce" <SavoyBG@aol.com> wrote:

    Group 2 is now open.



    There You Go - Johnny Cash
    I Gotta Get Myself A Woman - Drifters
    Love Only You - The Meadowlarks
    Yes Yes Yes - The Cashmeres

    --md

    remove "xx" for email

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Mc@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 11 07:51:40 2023
    1. Yes Yes Yes - The Cashmeres

    2. There You Go - Johnny Cash

    3. Love Only You - The Meadowlarks

    4. I Gotta Get Myself A Woman - Drifters


    --
    Steve Mc

    DNA to SBC to respond

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick Schubert@21:1/5 to Bruce on Mon Dec 11 21:29:39 2023
    On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 21:06:13 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com> wrote:

    Group 3 is now open.

    1. I Need Your Love So Bad - Vocaleers and Herman Dunham
    2. Young Fashion Ways - Muddy Waters
    3. Looka, No Hair - Professor Longhair
    4. Drinking Wine, Spo-Dee-O-Dee, Drinking Wine - Johnny Burnette

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick Schubert@21:1/5 to Bruce on Mon Dec 11 22:14:30 2023
    On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:01:16 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com> wrote:

    FINAL RANKINGS


    1. I Gotta Get Myself A Woman - Drifters - 22
    2. Yes Yes Yes - The Cashmeres - 20

    4. There You Go - Johnny Cash - 19 (2 first place, 2 second place)
    3. Love Only You - The Meadowlarks (2 first place, 0 second place)

    Looks like you copied my entry but forgot to reverse the numbers on the last 2 songs.

    I have a question about voting ethics (for lack of a better word).

    There are no rules as to how we decide how to rank the songs. Presumably we rank them in order of
    personal preference, but that isn't a requirement. Do you people consider it ethical to rank the
    songs in such a way that favors the outcome we desire? One example is ranking our own song first
    even though we may like other songs. I'll ignore that case for now.

    For this Group, I ended up voting according to my personal preference:

    1. I Gotta Get Myself A Woman - Drifters
    2. Yes Yes Yes - The Cashmeres
    3. Love Only You - The Meadowlarks
    4. There You Go - Johnny Cash

    While the first 2 songs did actually finish end up in those places and advanced to the next round,
    I actually thougt my third choice had a better chance of advancing than my second. Would you think
    it would have been ethical for me to switch the order of my votes? What if I had thought that my
    first choice was a lock to advance? Would it be OK for me to rank it lower to boost the chances of
    the song I wanted to end up in second? What if I didn't like 2 of the songs at all but feared that
    my third choice might battle for second place. Would it be ethical to vote it last even though I
    liked it better than my fourth choice?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 12 06:28:52 2023
    1-Young Fashion Ways - Muddy Waters

    2-Drinking Wine Spo-Dee-O-Dee, Drinking Wine - Johnny Burnette

    3-I Need Your Love So Bad - Vocaleers and Herman Dunham


    4-Looka No Hair - Professor Longhair

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Colegrove@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 12 06:47:22 2023
    1. Drinking Wine Spo-Dee-O-Dee, Drinking Wine - Johnny Burnette

    2. Looka No Hair - Professor Longhair

    3. Young Fashion Ways - Muddy Waters

    4. I Need Your Love So Bad - Vocaleers and Herman Dunham

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark D.@21:1/5 to Bruce on Tue Dec 12 16:09:33 2023
    On Dec 11, 2023 at 11:06:13 PM CST, "Bruce" <SavoyBG@aol.com> wrote:

    Group 3 is now open.


    Looka No Hair - Professor Longhair
    I Need Your Love So Bad - Vocaleers and Herman Dunham
    Young Fashion Ways - Muddy Waters
    Drinking Wine Spo-Dee-O-Dee, Drinking Wine - Johnny Burnette

    --md

    remove "xx" for email

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Mc@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 12 07:26:20 2023
    1. Looka No Hair - Professor Longhair

    2. Drinking Wine Spo-Dee-O-Dee, Drinking Wine - Johnny Burnette

    3. Young Fashion Ways - Muddy Waters

    4. I Need Your Love So Bad - Vocaleers and Herman Dunham


    --
    Steve Mc

    DNA to SBC to respond

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 12 23:28:38 2023
    On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:14:30 -0800, Rick Schubert <rns@san.rr.com>
    wrote:
    I have a question about voting ethics (for lack of a better word).

    There are no rules as to how we decide how to rank the songs.
    Presumably we rank them in order of personal preference, but that
    isn't a requirement.
    Do you people consider it ethical to rank the songs in such a way
    that favors the outcome we desire?

    This is a subject that some voters may prefer not to openly discuss
    with complete honesty.

    A vote could be even be influenced by the nominator or ranker of a
    particular song?

    No matter what, there is no way to prove that a voter did not vote
    according to their personal 'taste' in music, and every 'calculating'
    voter knows that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick Schubert@21:1/5 to Bruce on Tue Dec 12 22:06:55 2023
    On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:09:07 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, December 12, 2023 at 1:14:42?AM UTC-5, Rick Schubert wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:01:16 -0800 (PST), Bruce <Sav...@aol.com> wrote:

    FINAL RANKINGS


    1. I Gotta Get Myself A Woman - Drifters - 22
    2. Yes Yes Yes - The Cashmeres - 20

    4. There You Go - Johnny Cash - 19 (2 first place, 2 second place)
    3. Love Only You - The Meadowlarks (2 first place, 0 second place)
    Looks like you copied my entry but forgot to reverse the numbers on the last 2 songs.

    I have a question about voting ethics (for lack of a better word).

    There are no rules as to how we decide how to rank the songs. Presumably we rank them in order of
    personal preference, but that isn't a requirement. Do you people consider it ethical to rank the
    songs in such a way that favors the outcome we desire? One example is ranking our own song first
    even though we may like other songs. I'll ignore that case for now.

    For this Group, I ended up voting according to my personal preference:
    1. I Gotta Get Myself A Woman - Drifters
    2. Yes Yes Yes - The Cashmeres
    3. Love Only You - The Meadowlarks
    4. There You Go - Johnny Cash
    While the first 2 songs did actually finish end up in those places and advanced to the next round,
    I actually thougt my third choice had a better chance of advancing than my second. Would you think
    it would have been ethical for me to switch the order of my votes? What if I had thought that my
    first choice was a lock to advance? Would it be OK for me to rank it lower to boost the chances of
    the song I wanted to end up in second? What if I didn't like 2 of the songs at all but feared that
    my third choice might battle for second place. Would it be ethical to vote it last even though I
    liked it better than my fourth choice?

    Anybody can vote any way they want. The instructions are to list the records in the order based on how much you like each record, but voters can just let their conscience be their guide.

    So you are saying that from an ethical point of view (ethical and conscience are related closely
    enough) you should not vote in a way to try to get the outcome you desire (one could say
    "manipulate") but strictly based on how much you like each record.

    Out of curiousity I found your original post where you explained the Tournament. You wrote:

    We will then each rank the 4 items in each group from one to four. Points will >be awarded as follows, 4 points for each #1 ranking, 3 points for each #2 >ranking, 2 points for each #3 ranking and 1 point for each #4 ranking

    There is no mention of how to rank them. But it sounds like your intent was that we rank them
    according to how much we like each song.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick Schubert@21:1/5 to Bruce on Tue Dec 12 21:38:39 2023
    On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:11:41 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com> wrote:

    Group 4 is now open.

    1. Get Rich Quick - Little Richard
    2. Let Me Go Home Whiskey - Amos Milburn
    3. I'm Wild About You Baby - Lightnin' Hopkins
    4. Just Got To Know - Jimmy McCracklin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 13 06:57:53 2023
    1-Just Got To Know - Jimmy McCracklin

    2-Get Rich Quick - Little Richard

    3-Let Me Go Home Whiskey - Amos Milburn

    4-I'm Wild About You Baby - Lightnin' Hopkins

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Colegrove@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 13 06:57:56 2023
    1. Just Got To Know - Jimmy McCracklin

    2. Get Rich Quick - Little Richard

    3. Let Me Go Home Whiskey - Amos Milburn

    4. I'm Wild About You Baby - Lightnin' Hopkins

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to RWC on Wed Dec 13 08:52:05 2023
    On 12/12/2023 11:28 PM, RWC wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:14:30 -0800, Rick Schubert <rns@san.rr.com>
    wrote:
    I have a question about voting ethics (for lack of a better word).

    There are no rules as to how we decide how to rank the songs.
    Presumably we rank them in order of personal preference, but that
    isn't a requirement.
    Do you people consider it ethical to rank the songs in such a way
    that favors the outcome we desire?

    This is a subject that some voters may prefer not to openly discuss
    with complete honesty.

    A vote could be even be influenced by the nominator or ranker of a
    particular song?

    No matter what, there is no way to prove that a voter did not vote
    according to their personal 'taste' in music, and every 'calculating'
    voter knows that.
    -------------
    I don't understand why you would be asking this question now, when the
    contest is drawing to a close, and not, say, three years ago.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark D.@21:1/5 to Bruce on Wed Dec 13 14:03:45 2023
    On Dec 12, 2023 at 11:11:41 PM CST, "Bruce" <SavoyBG@aol.com> wrote:

    Group 4 is now open.

    Let Me Go Home Whiskey - Amos Milburn
    Get Rich Quick - Little Richard
    I'm Wild About You Baby - Lightnin' Hopkins
    Just Got To Know - Jimmy McCracklin


    --md

    remove "xx" for email

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Mc@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 13 06:43:07 2023
    1. I'm Wild About You Baby - Lightnin' Hopkins

    2. Let Me Go Home Whiskey - Amos Milburn

    3. Get Rich Quick - Little Richard

    4. Just Got To Know - Jimmy McCracklin


    --
    Steve Mc

    DNA to SBC to respond

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to DianeE on Wed Dec 13 12:22:51 2023
    On 12/13/2023 8:52 AM, DianeE wrote:
    On 12/12/2023 11:28 PM, RWC wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:14:30 -0800, Rick Schubert <rns@san.rr.com>
    wrote:
    I have a question about voting ethics (for lack of a better word).

    There are no rules as to how we decide how to  rank the songs.
    Presumably we rank them in order of personal preference, but that
    isn't a requirement.
    Do you people consider it ethical to rank the songs in such a way
    that favors the outcome we desire?

    This is a subject that some voters may prefer not to openly discuss
    with complete honesty.

    A vote could be even be influenced by the nominator or ranker of a
    particular song?

    No matter what, there is no way to prove that a voter did not vote
    according to their personal 'taste' in music, and every 'calculating'
    voter knows that.
    -------------
    I don't understand why you would be asking this question now, when the contest is drawing to a close, and not, say, three years ago.

    -----------
    Personally, I always put my own records first. A couple of times, I
    lost by a point or two because I didn't do so. To hell with that, I
    said, and now I know that if my record gets kicked out it's not by my
    own hand. That should be the most unethical thing I've ever done in my
    life.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 13 13:38:10 2023
    On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:06:55 -0800, Rick Schubert <rns@san.rr.com>
    wrote:

    [Bruce] Anybody can vote any way they want. The instructions are to list
    the records in the order based on how much you like each record, but
    voters can just let their conscience be their guide.

    So you are saying that from an ethical point of view (ethical and conscience >are related closely enough) you should not vote in a way to try to get the >outcome you desire (one could say "manipulate") but strictly based on how >much you like each record.

    Note, Bruce says "but"... Ethics does not equate to Bruce's use of the
    word conscience here.

    Anyway, in general:
    Ethics is concerned with the cultural and societal standards that
    outline how "everyone" is expected to behave in order to maintain
    social order and prevent chaos.
    Conscience, on the other hand, is an internal sense of morality that
    is unique to each individual. It's a personal set of beliefs and
    values regarding right and wrong that may change as one faces new
    experiences in life, gains knowledge, or copes with hardships.

    Conscience is more complex than ethics because it's a personal and
    subjective set of beliefs that is shaped by an individual's
    prioritized values in the context of a specific set of circumstances,
    and which may override generally accepted societal (or sub-societal
    such as this tournament?) ethics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 13 14:55:19 2023
    On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:05:57 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com>
    wrote:

    FINAL RANKINGS - same as Brucie


    1. Get Rich Quick - Little Richard - 26
    2. Just Got To Know - Jimmy McCracklin - 19

    3. Let Me Go Home Whiskey - Amos Milburn - 18
    4. I'm Wild About You Baby - Lightnin' Hopkins - 17

    First time in a long time where somebody took first and second in a group as both of Diane's records move into the ELITE 8. Mark's Milburn was a point behind in third place and Carl's Hopkins was last.

    Just for fun and challenge I've today created a little spreadsheet
    that can monitor the progress of a Round as votes come in.
    After pasting the Round's songs just once, all one has to do is paste
    each voter's posted ranking below these songs - this list might need
    some very minor editing to make it conform to the expected pattern)

    Anyway, and this is just trivia I know, the winner on this occasion
    was determined after 7 votes (because at that point its minimum score
    after 8 votes was greater than every other song's maximum score);
    but the last vote (Steve's) was needed to determine 2nd place because
    Amos was still in the running (leaving aside a tie-breaker situation
    which the spreadsheet can't handle yet :) .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to RWC on Wed Dec 13 15:58:54 2023
    On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:55:19 -0500, RWC <letsrock@opbox.com> wrote:

    FINAL RANKINGS

    1. Get Rich Quick - Little Richard - 26
    2. Just Got To Know - Jimmy McCracklin - 19

    3. Let Me Go Home Whiskey - Amos Milburn - 18
    4. I'm Wild About You Baby - Lightnin' Hopkins - 17

    but the last vote (Steve's) was needed to determine 2nd place because
    Amos was still in the running .

    Sorry, this is not right, because Agent's timing of Steve's post put
    me wrong - Google Groups is better for showing the sequence of votes.

    Mark had the last vote (as is often the case :)
    It was Hopkins that was still in the running after 7 votes (leaving
    aside tie-breaker rules).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 13 16:23:48 2023
    On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 08:27:25 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com>
    wrote:

    FINAL RANKINGS - same as me and Jim.


    1. Drinking Wine Spo-Dee-O-Dee, Drinking Wine - Johnny Burnette - 24
    2. Looka No Hair - Professor Longhair - 20 (2 first place)

    3. Young Fashion Ways - Muddy Waters - 20 (1 first place)
    4. I Need Your Love So Bad - Vocaleers and Herman Dunham - 16

    Carl's Burnette which won the March tournament wins this group too.

    guaranteed winner after 7 votes

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 13 16:40:45 2023
    On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:01:16 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com>
    wrote:

    FINAL RANKINGS


    1. I Gotta Get Myself A Woman - Drifters - 22
    2. Yes Yes Yes - The Cashmeres - 20

    4. There You Go - Johnny Cash - 19 (2 first place, 2 second place)
    3. Love Only You - The Meadowlarks (2 first place, 0 second place)

    My Drifters from June did not even make the FINAL 4 that month, but it wins this group

    again, guaranteed winner after 7 votes

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to RWC on Wed Dec 13 18:33:55 2023
    On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:40:45 -0500, RWC <letsrock@opbox.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:01:16 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com>
    wrote:

    FINAL RANKINGS

    1. I Gotta Get Myself A Woman - Drifters - 22
    2. Yes Yes Yes - The Cashmeres - 20

    4. There You Go - Johnny Cash - 19 (2 first place, 2 second place)
    3. Love Only You - The Meadowlarks (2 first place, 0 second place)

    My Drifters from June did not even make the FINAL 4 that month, but it wins this group

    again, guaranteed winner after 7 votes

    I've just added columns for number of 1st and 2nd placings.

    This is a small section of the spreadsheet after all (8) votes: https://RWC-0.tinytake.com/media/157f1c4?filename=1702508048998_Obscurities+After+8+Votes.png
    interesting to see that every song got 2 first places

    this was the status after 7 votes: https://rwc-0.tinytake.com/media/157f1bf?filename=1702507513139_Obscurities+After+7+Votes.png
    "Winner" because minimum points of 22 is higher than
    maximum points of 20, 19, 19

    (multi-column lists cannot be posted as message text because
    the text formatting by Agent (3 users) and Google Groups are
    very incompatible with each other - what looks nicely formatted
    in one looks horrible in the other - hence the posted snapshot links) =========================================
    I'm very rusty with Excel so I got several cell formulas from Bing
    Chat. For instance, to get the number of first places I asked
    ("C" represents Artist):

    excel formula that counts the occurancies of "C" in a column of
    multiple "A","B","C","D"s with value 4 on same row in another column

    the reply from CHAT:

    1. Select the cell where you want to display the result.
    2. Enter the following formula: =COUNTIFS(A:A,"C",B:B,4)
    3. Press Enter.
    4. The result will be the number of times “C” appears in column A
    and 4 appears in column B on the same row.

    brilliant!; obviously, to get number of second places just replace 4
    with 3 in the formula; columns A and B are simply changed to the
    actual column letters used for Artist and Points

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 14 00:14:48 2023
    On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:45:45 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com>
    wrote:

    The first tie breaker is which record was ranked higher on the most ballots. >With an even amount of voters like we have now with 8, this will usually be
    a 4-4 tie. If we had an odd number of voters we would never need to go to
    the second tie breaker.

    Then we go to....

    1 - Most first place votes
    2 - Most second place votes
    3 - most third place votes

    If those are all ties than so will the last place votes be tied.

    Many thanks Bruce for details of this tie breaker procedure.
    To model the above will be a challenge, but the steps below
    would require a 'database' of all previous round-groups, which
    would be located beyond the present round-group's sheet.
    A spreadsheet could be dedicated to a month's tournament with
    a tabbed sheet, suitably named, for each round-group...
    The EOY tournament would in addition require easy access to
    relevant past monthly spreadsheets. In theory the whole
    procedure could be automated, but what a task!

    Then it would go to points for each record in the previous round.
    If that is tied then the round before that.
    If that is still tied through the earliest round in that tournament,
    then with the year end we would go back to where the item finished in its
    month.
    If both items finished in the same place, then we would look at total
    points that each had in the FINAL FOUR of that month.

    Again, thanks.

    here's a bigger picture of the spreadsheet
    apart from '# of players' and first column, all data is formulated:


    https://RWC-0.tinytake.com/media/157f4c2?filename=1702530382688_Obscurities.png

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick Schubert@21:1/5 to DianeE on Wed Dec 13 21:32:59 2023
    On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:22:51 -0500, DianeE <DianeE@NoSpam.net> wrote:

    On 12/13/2023 8:52 AM, DianeE wrote:
    On 12/12/2023 11:28 PM, RWC wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:14:30 -0800, Rick Schubert <rns@san.rr.com>
    wrote:
    I have a question about voting ethics (for lack of a better word).

    There are no rules as to how we decide how to  rank the songs.
    Presumably we rank them in order of personal preference, but that
    isn't a requirement.
    Do you people consider it ethical to rank the songs in such a way
    that favors the outcome we desire?

    This is a subject that some voters may prefer not to openly discuss
    with complete honesty.

    A vote could be even be influenced by the nominator or ranker of a
    particular song?

    No matter what, there is no way to prove that a voter did not vote
    according to their personal 'taste' in music, and every 'calculating'
    voter knows that.

    I don't understand why you would be asking this question now, when the
    contest is drawing to a close, and not, say, three years ago.

    It's more a question of curiosity than a practical one. And even if we knew for sure that this was
    our last contest, I may have asked the question, although I may have worded it as "Was it
    ethical...?" But the actual reason I asked now is that, other than the issue of voting for our one
    nominations, I think it occurred to me for the first time. I think this was the first time I
    thought about reordering my votes based on it possibly advancing a particular song over another.

    Personally, I always put my own records first. A couple of times, I
    lost by a point or two because I didn't do so. To hell with that, I
    said, and now I know that if my record gets kicked out it's not by my
    own hand. That should be the most unethical thing I've ever done in my >life.

    There have been a few times that I've voted for another song over mine, and a few times that I've
    voted for my song over one that I liked better. But part of the latter is I think I have some
    tendency to be biased toward my own song so that I think I like it better even though I might not
    think so if someone else had nominated it. But I didn't need to ask about the ethics of voting for
    our own songs. I think it is technically unethical, but that didn't stop me from doing so a few
    times.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 14 10:48:44 2023
    On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:03:51 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com>
    wrote:

    The Hopkins was eliminated after 7 ballots.... McCracklin had already been ranked higher than the Hopkins on 5 of the 7 ballots,

    Bruce, I don't see that, I make it 4 each after all 8 votes:

    McCracklin
    Bruce, Roger, Diane, Jim

    Hopkins
    Rick, Carl, Mark, Steve

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 14 12:18:05 2023
    On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 07:56:51 -0800 (PST), Bruce <SavoyBG@aol.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, December 14, 2023 at 10:48:51?AM UTC-5, RWC wrote:
    On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:03:51 -0800 (PST), Bruce <Sav...@aol.com>
    wrote:

    The Hopkins was eliminated after 7 ballots.... McCracklin had already been ranked higher than the Hopkins on 5 of the 7 ballots,

    Bruce, I don't see that, I make it 4 each after all 8 votes:

    McCracklin
    Bruce, Roger, Diane, Jim

    Hopkins
    Rick, Carl, Mark, Steve

    It was some other reason.

    *In short*, it was because McCracklin had already been ranked higher
    than *Milburn* on 5 of the 7 ballots.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)