• Bard apologizes for its ignorance of 1950s music

    From DianeE@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 18 08:50:53 2023
    DIANE:
    Why do you say so many historically inaccurate things? For example my
    friend asked you for a list of female singers with "sensuous voices" of
    the 1950s. You included Lorraine Ellison who didn't make records till
    the 1960s and Vicki Lawrence who didn't make records till the 1970s.
    Even worse you didn't include the most well-known sensuous-voiced female
    singer of the 1950s, Julie London. I was dismayed by this.



    BARD:

    I apologize for the error in my previous response. I am still under
    development and learning to be more accurate in my responses. I will try
    my best to avoid making such errors in the future.

    I understand your dismay at my omission of Julie London from the list of
    female singers with "sensuous voices" of the 1950s. She is indeed one of
    the most well-known and respected singers of that era, and her voice is undeniably sensual. I will include her in the list from now on.

    I also apologize for including Lorraine Ellison and Vicki Lawrence on
    the list. They are both talented singers, but they did not release their
    first albums until the 1960s and 1970s, respectively.

    I will try my best to be more accurate and comprehensive in my responses
    in the future. Thank you for your feedback.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to DianeE on Thu May 18 07:48:22 2023
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 8:52:07 AM UTC-4, DianeE wrote:
    DIANE:
    Why do you say so many historically inaccurate things? For example my
    friend asked you for a list of female singers with "sensuous voices" of
    the 1950s. You included Lorraine Ellison who didn't make records till
    the 1960s and Vicki Lawrence who didn't make records till the 1970s.
    Even worse you didn't include the most well-known sensuous-voiced female singer of the 1950s, Julie London. I was dismayed by this.



    BARD:

    I apologize for the error in my previous response. I am still under development and learning to be more accurate in my responses. I will try
    my best to avoid making such errors in the future.

    I understand your dismay at my omission of Julie London from the list of female singers with "sensuous voices" of the 1950s. She is indeed one of
    the most well-known and respected singers of that era, and her voice is undeniably sensual. I will include her in the list from now on.

    I also apologize for including Lorraine Ellison and Vicki Lawrence on
    the list. They are both talented singers, but they did not release their first albums until the 1960s and 1970s, respectively.

    I will try my best to be more accurate and comprehensive in my responses
    in the future. Thank you for your feedback.

    That's how everybody should be responding when they are corrected. Instead most people try and make the corrector the bad guy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to DianeE on Thu May 18 18:36:49 2023
    On 5/18/2023 8:50 AM, DianeE wrote:


    BARD:

    I also apologize for including Lorraine Ellison and Vicki Lawrence on
    the list. They are both talented singers, but they did not release their first albums until the 1960s and 1970s, respectively.
    -----------
    ALBUMS. I missed this on first reading. I said "records" and Bard
    replied with "albums."
    It doesn't know about 45s, probably not about 78s either.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Roman@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 22 20:44:21 2023
    Bard claims not to know what laws and regulations control or limit what it can do.

    I intended to ask it, "Does Bard have the same flaws as ChatGPT?"
    But I missed a keystroke and asked, "Does Bard have the same laws as ChatGPT?"

    This was its response:

    Bard and ChatGPT are both large language models, but they are developed by different companies and have different capabilities. As a result, they may be subject to different laws and regulations.

    ChatGPT is developed by OpenAI, a non-profit research company. OpenAI has stated that it is committed to developing AI that is safe and beneficial to humanity. As a result, ChatGPT is subject to a number of policies and guidelines that are designed to
    ensure that it is used responsibly. These policies include:

    * A prohibition on using ChatGPT to generate harmful or misleading content.
    * A requirement that ChatGPT be used in a way that respects human rights and privacy.
    * A commitment to transparency and accountability.

    Bard is developed by Google AI, a research division of Google. Google AI has not released any specific information about the laws and regulations that apply to Bard. However, it is likely that Bard is subject to similar policies and guidelines as ChatGPT.

    It is important to note that the laws and regulations that apply to large language models are still evolving. As AI technology continues to develop, it is likely that new laws and regulations will be put in place to ensure that AI is used responsibly.

    --
    BR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)