On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:27:24 AM UTC-4, Norbert K wrote:head shaking, just doin a job, as it were. But Paul wanted a drummer that would help raise the excitement level of the whole experience of their performances, so Best had to go. Paul bravely gave that task to Brian.
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 8:34:10 PM UTC-4, Willy wrote:
I suspect his abilities were not up to snuff in the opinion of Paul, foremostly. Macca was dead serious about their band being as good as they could possibly be, and Best was not best, so he
wasted no more time in installing the last component, a drummer that they felt could
do everything that they needed their stickman to do. And Best didn't inspire their confidence, for reasons that they have never
elaborated on. I suspect they didn't feel that
he just didn't have the chops to help them get where they were determined to go, and he had no personality skills to speak of, which I feel was important to Paul, the social creature that he was. Best was fairly unexciting on stage, no smiles, no
Hmmm. Ringo was just what Doctor Macca ordered.There's audio of Lennon discussing the firing of Pete Best on Youtube. He says "We were getting sick of Pete Best because he was a lousy drummer -- and he never *improved*."
Whereas Best was a good looking man, Ringo was a bit of a plain sort, but the personality gains were sizable and immediate. Macca immediately liked the pugly shorty and said
to himself "time to roll, self", and immediately set out to thinking about ideas for original songs to begin serious work on.
All the above is of course pure speculation
about events about the Pete Best situation, but
informed by many things that I have heard over the years. If Pete Best did receive a life changing amount of money for his minor role in the Beatle story, then good for him. It doesn't bother me one bit. He's had to endure the
REJECT label all these years, and that was
probably humiliating and painful at times of
financial need that most people experience
in the struggle to achieve some peace of mind
when possible. Nobody ever said the guy was some brut asshole of a human being. He just wasn't quite good enough to work the sticks behind the greatest little Rock&Roll band of
all time. All the Best, Pete.
Lennon and McCartney were clearly determined to get better -- and they did.
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:27:24 AM UTC-4, Norbert K wrote:head shaking, just doin a job, as it were. But Paul wanted a drummer that would help raise the excitement level of the whole experience of their performances, so Best had to go. Paul bravely gave that task to Brian.
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 8:34:10 PM UTC-4, Willy wrote:
I suspect his abilities were not up to snuff in the opinion of Paul, foremostly. Macca was dead serious about their band being as good as they could possibly be, and Best was not best, so he
wasted no more time in installing the last component, a drummer that they felt could
do everything that they needed their stickman to do. And Best didn't inspire their confidence, for reasons that they have never
elaborated on. I suspect they didn't feel that
he just didn't have the chops to help them get where they were determined to go, and he had no personality skills to speak of, which I feel was important to Paul, the social creature that he was. Best was fairly unexciting on stage, no smiles, no
Hmmm. Ringo was just what Doctor Macca ordered.There's audio of Lennon discussing the firing of Pete Best on Youtube. He says "We were getting sick of Pete Best because he was a lousy drummer -- and he never *improved*."
Whereas Best was a good looking man, Ringo was a bit of a plain sort, but the personality gains were sizable and immediate. Macca immediately liked the pugly shorty and said
to himself "time to roll, self", and immediately set out to thinking about ideas for original songs to begin serious work on.
All the above is of course pure speculation
about events about the Pete Best situation, but
informed by many things that I have heard over the years. If Pete Best did receive a life changing amount of money for his minor role in the Beatle story, then good for him. It doesn't bother me one bit. He's had to endure the
REJECT label all these years, and that was
probably humiliating and painful at times of
financial need that most people experience
in the struggle to achieve some peace of mind
when possible. Nobody ever said the guy was some brut asshole of a human being. He just wasn't quite good enough to work the sticks behind the greatest little Rock&Roll band of
all time. All the Best, Pete.
Lennon and McCartney were clearly determined to get better -- and they did.
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 8:34:10 PM UTC-4, Willy wrote:head shaking, just doin a job, as it were. But Paul wanted a drummer that would help raise the excitement level of the whole experience of their performances, so Best had to go. Paul bravely gave that task to Brian.
I suspect his abilities were not up to snuff in the opinion of Paul, foremostly. Macca was dead serious about their band being as good as they could possibly be, and Best was not best, so he
wasted no more time in installing the last component, a drummer that they felt could
do everything that they needed their stickman to do. And Best didn't inspire their confidence, for reasons that they have never
elaborated on. I suspect they didn't feel that
he just didn't have the chops to help them get where they were determined to go, and he had no personality skills to speak of, which I feel was important to Paul, the social creature that he was. Best was fairly unexciting on stage, no smiles, no
IHmmm. Ringo was just what Doctor Macca ordered.There's audio of Lennon discussing the firing of Pete Best on Youtube. He says "We were getting sick of Pete Best because he was a lousy drummer -- and he never *improved*."
Whereas Best was a good looking man, Ringo was a bit of a plain sort, but the personality gains were sizable and immediate. Macca immediately liked the pugly shorty and said
to himself "time to roll, self", and immediately set out to thinking about ideas for original songs to begin serious work on.
All the above is of course pure speculation
about events about the Pete Best situation, but
informed by many things that I have heard over the years. If Pete Best did receive a life changing amount of money for his minor role in the Beatle story, then good for him. It doesn't bother me one bit. He's had to endure the
REJECT label all these years, and that was
probably humiliating and painful at times of
financial need that most people experience
in the struggle to achieve some peace of mind
when possible. Nobody ever said the guy was some brut asshole of a human being. He just wasn't quite good enough to work the sticks behind the greatest little Rock&Roll band of
all time. All the Best, Pete.
Lennon and McCartney were clearly determined to get better -- and they did.
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 8:34:10 PM UTC-4, Willy wrote:head shaking, just doin a job, as it were. But Paul wanted a drummer that would help raise the excitement level of the whole experience of their performances, so Best had to go. Paul bravely gave that task to Brian.
I suspect his abilities were not up to snuff in the opinion of Paul, foremostly. Macca was dead serious about their band being as good as they could possibly be, and Best was not best, so he
wasted no more time in installing the last component, a drummer that they felt could
do everything that they needed their stickman to do. And Best didn't inspire their confidence, for reasons that they have never
elaborated on. I suspect they didn't feel that
he just didn't have the chops to help them get where they were determined to go, and he had no personality skills to speak of, which I feel was important to Paul, the social creature that he was. Best was fairly unexciting on stage, no smiles, no
Hmmm. Ringo was just what Doctor Macca ordered.There's audio of Lennon discussing the firing of Pete Best on Youtube. He says "We were getting sick of Pete Best because he was a lousy drummer -- and he never *improved*."
Whereas Best was a good looking man, Ringo was a bit of a plain sort, but the personality gains were sizable and immediate. Macca immediately liked the pugly shorty and said
to himself "time to roll, self", and immediately set out to thinking about ideas for original songs to begin serious work on.
All the above is of course pure speculation
about events about the Pete Best situation, but
informed by many things that I have heard over the years. If Pete Best did receive a life changing amount of money for his minor role in the Beatle story, then good for him. It doesn't bother me one bit. He's had to endure the
REJECT label all these years, and that was
probably humiliating and painful at times of
financial need that most people experience
in the struggle to achieve some peace of mind
when possible. Nobody ever said the guy was some brut asshole of a human being. He just wasn't quite good enough to work the sticks behind the greatest little Rock&Roll band of
all time. All the Best, Pete.
Lennon and McCartney were clearly determined to get better -- and they did.
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 8:34:10 PM UTC-4, Willy wrote:head shaking, just doin a job, as it were. But Paul wanted a drummer that would help raise the excitement level of the whole experience of their performances, so Best had to go. Paul bravely gave that task to Brian.
I suspect his abilities were not up to snuff in the opinion of Paul, foremostly. Macca was dead serious about their band being as good as they could possibly be, and Best was not best, so he
wasted no more time in installing the last component, a drummer that they felt could
do everything that they needed their stickman to do. And Best didn't inspire their confidence, for reasons that they have never
elaborated on. I suspect they didn't feel that
he just didn't have the chops to help them get where they were determined to go, and he had no personality skills to speak of, which I feel was important to Paul, the social creature that he was. Best was fairly unexciting on stage, no smiles, no
Hmmm. Ringo was just what Doctor Macca ordered.There's audio of Lennon discussing the firing of Pete Best on Youtube. He says "We were getting sick of Pete Best because he was a lousy drummer -- and he never *improved*."
Whereas Best was a good looking man, Ringo was a bit of a plain sort, but the personality gains were sizable and immediate. Macca immediately liked the pugly shorty and said
to himself "time to roll, self", and immediately set out to thinking about ideas for original songs to begin serious work on.
All the above is of course pure speculation
about events about the Pete Best situation, but
informed by many things that I have heard over the years. If Pete Best did receive a life changing amount of money for his minor role in the Beatle story, then good for him. It doesn't bother me one bit. He's had to endure the
REJECT label all these years, and that was
probably humiliating and painful at times of
financial need that most people experience
in the struggle to achieve some peace of mind
when possible. Nobody ever said the guy was some brut asshole of a human being. He just wasn't quite good enough to work the sticks behind the greatest little Rock&Roll band of
all time. All the Best, Pete.
Lennon and McCartney were clearly determined to get better -- and they did.
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 8:34:10 PM UTC-4, Willy wrote:head shaking, just doin a job, as it were. But Paul wanted a drummer that would help raise the excitement level of the whole experience of their performances, so Best had to go. Paul bravely gave that task to Brian.
I suspect his abilities were not up to snuff in the opinion of Paul, foremostly. Macca was dead serious about their band being as good as they could possibly be, and Best was not best, so he
wasted no more time in installing the last component, a drummer that they felt could
do everything that they needed their stickman to do. And Best didn't inspire their confidence, for reasons that they have never
elaborated on. I suspect they didn't feel that
he just didn't have the chops to help them get where they were determined to go, and he had no personality skills to speak of, which I feel was important to Paul, the social creature that he was. Best was fairly unexciting on stage, no smiles, no
Hmmm. Ringo was just what Doctor Macca ordered.There's audio of Lennon discussing the firing of Pete Best on Youtube. He says "We were getting sick of Pete Best because he was a lousy drummer -- and he never *improved*."
Whereas Best was a good looking man, Ringo was a bit of a plain sort, but the personality gains were sizable and immediate. Macca immediately liked the pugly shorty and said
to himself "time to roll, self", and immediately set out to thinking about ideas for original songs to begin serious work on.
All the above is of course pure speculation
about events about the Pete Best situation, but
informed by many things that I have heard over the years. If Pete Best did receive a life changing amount of money for his minor role in the Beatle story, then good for him. It doesn't bother me one bit. He's had to endure the
REJECT label all these years, and that was
probably humiliating and painful at times of
financial need that most people experience
in the struggle to achieve some peace of mind
when possible. Nobody ever said the guy was some brut asshole of a human being. He just wasn't quite good enough to work the sticks behind the greatest little Rock&Roll band of
all time. All the Best, Pete.
Lennon and McCartney were clearly determined to get better -- and they did.
So why WAS he sacked, anyway?
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:27:24 AM UTC-4, Norbert K wrote:head shaking, just doin a job, as it were. But Paul wanted a drummer that would help raise the excitement level of the whole experience of their performances, so Best had to go. Paul bravely gave that task to Brian.
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 8:34:10 PM UTC-4, Willy wrote:
I suspect his abilities were not up to snuff in the opinion of Paul, foremostly. Macca was dead serious about their band being as good as they could possibly be, and Best was not best, so he
wasted no more time in installing the last component, a drummer that they felt could
do everything that they needed their stickman to do. And Best didn't inspire their confidence, for reasons that they have never
elaborated on. I suspect they didn't feel that
he just didn't have the chops to help them get where they were determined to go, and he had no personality skills to speak of, which I feel was important to Paul, the social creature that he was. Best was fairly unexciting on stage, no smiles, no
Hmmm. Ringo was just what Doctor Macca ordered.There's audio of Lennon discussing the firing of Pete Best on Youtube. He says "We were getting sick of Pete Best because he was a lousy drummer -- and he never *improved*."
Whereas Best was a good looking man, Ringo was a bit of a plain sort, but the personality gains were sizable and immediate. Macca immediately liked the pugly shorty and said
to himself "time to roll, self", and immediately set out to thinking about ideas for original songs to begin serious work on.
All the above is of course pure speculation
about events about the Pete Best situation, but
informed by many things that I have heard over the years. If Pete Best did receive a life changing amount of money for his minor role in the Beatle story, then good for him. It doesn't bother me one bit. He's had to endure the
REJECT label all these years, and that was
probably humiliating and painful at times of
financial need that most people experience
in the struggle to achieve some peace of mind
when possible. Nobody ever said the guy was some brut asshole of a human being. He just wasn't quite good enough to work the sticks behind the greatest little Rock&Roll band of
all time. All the Best, Pete.
Lennon and McCartney were clearly determined to get better -- and they did.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 384 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 62:34:24 |
| Calls: | 8,173 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 13,113 |
| Messages: | 5,864,569 |