• Caroline Reviews Abbey Road

    From Bruce@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 4 07:02:07 2022
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 4 07:45:30 2022
    I case you missed the encore you gave a link to.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tkx9lwOLBOU

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norbert K@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Mar 4 07:23:01 2022
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    She's weak on the details in this commentary, IMO. She makes no note of George's great use of the Moog synthesizer, or of George's peaking as a songwriter and musician on this album. She doesn't remark on the guitar "battle" or Ringo's solo. The
    album oozes with great bass work from Paul, but she doesn't seem to take notice.

    I enjoyed Caroline's Beatles reviews in general, but I wish she had been more critical. In this case, she talks as if the whole album is wonderful. Does anyone really believe that "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" holds its own with "Come Together" and "
    Something"?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norbert K@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Mar 4 08:30:40 2022
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:45:33 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    I case you missed the encore you gave a link to.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tkx9lwOLBOU

    She's a good singer. I'd have expected her to alter the gender references in the lyrics; maybe she declines to do so out of deference to the original.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to Norbert K on Fri Mar 4 09:26:38 2022
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 11:30:43 AM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:45:33 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    I case you missed the encore you gave a link to.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tkx9lwOLBOU

    She's a good singer. I'd have expected her to alter the gender references in the lyrics; maybe she declines to do so out of deference to the original.

    That's what I thought.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Norbert K on Sat Mar 5 15:53:21 2022
    On 5/03/2022 4:23 am, Norbert K wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    She's weak on the details in this commentary, IMO. She makes no note of George's great use of the Moog synthesizer, or of George's peaking as a songwriter and musician on this album. She doesn't remark on the guitar "battle" or Ringo's solo. The
    album oozes with great bass work from Paul, but she doesn't seem to take notice.

    I enjoyed Caroline's Beatles reviews in general, but I wish she had been more critical. In this case, she talks as if the whole album is wonderful. Does anyone really believe that "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" holds its own with "Come Together" and "
    Something"?


    Does specifically mention pretty much any of the points that make yhis
    one of the greatest albums ever.

    Nearly slides off her chair during Something, but doesn't particularly
    mention the acme of George's song-writing and guitar parts, or one of
    the most fantastic bass lines ever ( despite George initially
    considering "too many notes").

    Then she obsesses over relatively insignificant technical musical details.

    And no mention of the pioneering and subtle synth parts that a a
    significant aspect of Here Comes ....

    In Because can't tell the difference between a brassy synth part and
    actual 'brass'.

    And no mention of the only real Beatles drum solo, or comment on the
    epic 3-way guitar 'dual'.

    And why she chopped the last abruptly-ending note off Her Majesty ?!!
    That part of the fun.

    She got the status of the album right in the general scheme of things
    IMO, but seemed to totally miss much of the point, and details that were
    well worthy of comment.

    If people want more detail, this website worth checking out, details of
    each song in the 'Songs' tab:
    https://www.beatlesbible.com/


    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to geoff on Sat Mar 5 19:49:33 2022
    On 5/03/2022 3:53 pm, geoff wrote:
    On 5/03/2022 4:23 am, Norbert K wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    She's weak on the details in this commentary, IMO.  She makes no note
    of George's great use of the Moog synthesizer, or of George's peaking
    as a songwriter and musician on this album.  She doesn't remark on the
    guitar "battle" or Ringo's solo.   The album oozes with great bass
    work from Paul, but she doesn't seem to take notice.

    I enjoyed Caroline's Beatles reviews in general, but I wish she had
    been more critical.  In this case, she talks as if the whole album is
    wonderful.  Does anyone really believe that "Maxwell's Silver Hammer"
    holds its own with "Come Together" and "Something"?


    Does specifically mention pretty much any of the points that make yhis
    one of the greatest albums ever.

    Nearly slides off her chair during Something, but doesn't particularly mention the acme of George's song-writing and guitar parts, or one of
    the most fantastic bass lines ever ( despite George initially
    considering "too many notes").

    Then she obsesses over relatively insignificant technical musical details.

    And no mention of the pioneering and subtle synth parts that a a
    significant aspect of Here Comes ....

    In Because can't tell the difference between a brassy synth part and
    actual 'brass'.

    And no mention of the only real Beatles drum solo, or comment on the
    epic 3-way guitar 'dual'.

    And why she chopped the last abruptly-ending note off Her Majesty ?!!
    That part of the fun.

    She got the status of the album right in the general scheme of things
    IMO, but seemed to totally miss much of the point, and details that were
    well worthy of comment.

    If people want more detail, this website worth checking out, details of
    each song in the 'Songs' tab:
    https://www.beatlesbible.com/


    geoff





    Sorry, meant "doesn't" ....

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norbert K@21:1/5 to geoff on Sat Mar 5 05:02:14 2022
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 9:53:33 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 5/03/2022 4:23 am, Norbert K wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    She's weak on the details in this commentary, IMO. She makes no note of George's great use of the Moog synthesizer, or of George's peaking as a songwriter and musician on this album. She doesn't remark on the guitar "battle" or Ringo's solo. The
    album oozes with great bass work from Paul, but she doesn't seem to take notice.

    I enjoyed Caroline's Beatles reviews in general, but I wish she had been more critical. In this case, she talks as if the whole album is wonderful. Does anyone really believe that "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" holds its own with "Come Together" and "
    Something"?
    Does specifically mention pretty much any of the points that make yhis
    one of the greatest albums ever.

    Nearly slides off her chair during Something, but doesn't particularly mention the acme of George's song-writing and guitar parts, or one of
    the most fantastic bass lines ever ( despite George initially
    considering "too many notes").

    Then she obsesses over relatively insignificant technical musical details.

    And no mention of the pioneering and subtle synth parts that a a
    significant aspect of Here Comes ....

    In Because can't tell the difference between a brassy synth part and
    actual 'brass'.

    And no mention of the only real Beatles drum solo, or comment on the
    epic 3-way guitar 'dual'.

    And why she chopped the last abruptly-ending note off Her Majesty ?!!
    That part of the fun.

    She got the status of the album right in the general scheme of things
    IMO, but seemed to totally miss much of the point, and details that were well worthy of comment.

    If people want more detail, this website worth checking out, details of
    each song in the 'Songs' tab:
    https://www.beatlesbible.com/


    geoff

    She's very generous with praise for the album, as is appropriate, but short on discernment. Maybe she was distracted by the popcorn.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to Norbert K on Sat Mar 5 07:31:17 2022
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:02:17 AM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:

    She's very generous with praise for the album, as is appropriate, but short on discernment. Maybe she was distracted by the popcorn.

    She's a musician so she analyzes differently than a big Beatles fan. She likes to show the chords and notes and give us a sample of how they are flowing rather than do discuss the individual personalities in the group.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJKellog@yahoo.com@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Mar 5 07:55:25 2022
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    I'm kind of surprised that she apparently loved the Beatles so much but is content to end without exploring the guys' post Beatles work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJKellog@yahoo.com@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Mar 5 07:31:06 2022
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    She's Allright. She seems to love everything straight off the bat. I always needed time to get to know albums.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to RJKe...@yahoo.com on Sat Mar 5 10:17:33 2022
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 10:55:27 AM UTC-5, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4
    I'm kind of surprised that she apparently loved the Beatles so much but is content to end without exploring the guys' post Beatles work.

    That could happen next, although any way you slice it it's disappointing compared to their work together.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norbert K@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Mar 5 13:48:00 2022
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 10:31:19 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:02:17 AM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:

    She's very generous with praise for the album, as is appropriate, but short on discernment. Maybe she was distracted by the popcorn.
    She's a musician so she analyzes differently than a big Beatles fan. She likes to show the chords and notes and give us a sample of how they are flowing rather than do discuss the individual personalities in the group.

    She briefly analyzes some of the melodic and harmonic components to, I think, three of the songs. The bulk of her videos show her nodding, bobbing, and swaying to the music. I specified a number of the album's musical aspects that Caroline seemed oddly
    oblivious to in my first post in this thread. Geoff did this, too.

    Most of her videos merely show her enjoying the music. There's nothing particularly wrong with that. It's good to see a person in her age group appreciating the Beatles.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From cuppajoe2go@21:1/5 to Norbert K on Sat Mar 5 15:03:48 2022
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 1:48:02 PM UTC-8, Norbert K wrote:
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 10:31:19 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:02:17 AM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:

    She's very generous with praise for the album, as is appropriate, but short on discernment. Maybe she was distracted by the popcorn.
    She's a musician so she analyzes differently than a big Beatles fan. She likes to show the chords and notes and give us a sample of how they are flowing rather than do discuss the individual personalities in the group.
    She briefly analyzes some of the melodic and harmonic components to, I think, three of the songs. The bulk of her videos show her nodding, bobbing, and swaying to the music. I specified a number of the album's musical aspects that Caroline seemed oddly
    oblivious to in my first post in this thread. Geoff did this, too.



    Most of her videos merely show her enjoying the music. There's nothing particularly wrong with that. It's good to see a person in her age group appreciating the Beatles.

    Pretty much my take on her videos. It's interesting to see youngins discover and enjoy the magic.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sun Mar 6 14:57:17 2022
    On 6/03/2022 4:31 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:02:17 AM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:

    She's very generous with praise for the album, as is appropriate, but short on discernment. Maybe she was distracted by the popcorn.

    She's a musician so she analyzes differently than a big Beatles fan. She likes to show the chords and notes and give us a sample of how they are flowing rather than do discuss the individual personalities in the group.

    I'm a musician too.

    She doesn't mention major significant musical aspects, and then throws
    in some simplistic musical trivia to attempt to bolster her kudos.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to RJKe...@yahoo.com on Sun Mar 6 14:59:50 2022
    On 6/03/2022 4:55 am, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    I'm kind of surprised that she apparently loved the Beatles so much but is content to end without exploring the guys' post Beatles work.

    Maybe she will ...

    But it would likely remain with the same shallowness.

    Better than nothing I guess, especially if it gets others of her
    generation interested.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to Norbert K on Sun Mar 6 08:45:22 2022
    In article <7c49dd4f-bf8d-4a6e-92e6-35af75a66b7an@googlegroups.com>,
    Norbert K <norbertkosky69@gmail.com> wrote:

    I enjoyed Caroline's Beatles reviews in general, but I wish she had been more critical. In this case, she talks as if the whole album is wonderful. Does anyone really believe that "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" holds its own with "Come Together" and "Something"?

    I never thought "Come Together" was all that special and "Oh Darling!"
    is one of the most annoying songs the Beatles ever recorded IMO, closely followed by "Maxwell's Silver Hammer." The only thing that saves side
    one from total mediocrity is "Something."

    But Abbey Road is like Sgt. Pepper's at this point, the myth (in this
    case, "let's get back together for one more final try") takes precedence
    over any objectivity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norbert K@21:1/5 to geoff on Sun Mar 6 06:34:01 2022
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:57:26 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 6/03/2022 4:31 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:02:17 AM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:

    She's very generous with praise for the album, as is appropriate, but short on discernment. Maybe she was distracted by the popcorn.

    She's a musician so she analyzes differently than a big Beatles fan. She likes to show the chords and notes and give us a sample of how they are flowing rather than do discuss the individual personalities in the group.
    I'm a musician too.

    She doesn't mention major significant musical aspects, and then throws
    in some simplistic musical trivia to attempt to bolster her kudos.

    geoff

    I complained earlier about numerous features of Abbey Road that Caroline missed. However, her "big picture" sense isn't there, either. She doesn't get how different -- how much more polished, cohesive, and formal -- Abbey Road is from Let It Be. She
    seemed equally pleased with LiB.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Sun Mar 6 11:58:48 2022
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:57:26 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 6/03/2022 4:31 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:02:17 AM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:

    She's very generous with praise for the album, as is appropriate, but short on discernment. Maybe she was distracted by the popcorn.

    She's a musician so she analyzes differently than a big Beatles fan. She likes to show the chords and notes and give us a sample of how they are flowing rather than do discuss the individual personalities in the group.
    I'm a musician too.

    She doesn't mention major significant musical aspects, and then throws
    in some simplistic musical trivia to attempt to bolster her kudos.

    She's a musician, but she's not making the video for other musicians.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 7 09:46:26 2022
    On 7/03/2022 3:45 am, super70s wrote:
    In article <7c49dd4f-bf8d-4a6e-92e6-35af75a66b7an@googlegroups.com>,
    Norbert K <norbertkosky69@gmail.com> wrote:

    I enjoyed Caroline's Beatles reviews in general, but I wish she had been more
    critical. In this case, she talks as if the whole album is wonderful. Does >> anyone really believe that "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" holds its own with "Come
    Together" and "Something"?

    I never thought "Come Together" was all that special and "Oh Darling!"
    is one of the most annoying songs the Beatles ever recorded IMO, closely followed by "Maxwell's Silver Hammer." The only thing that saves side
    one from total mediocrity is "Something."

    No, no, no, and no. Truly bizarre to me, but your opinion none-the-less.

    Apart from Something, is there anything else you consider above mediocre ?

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Norbert K on Mon Mar 7 09:48:49 2022
    On 7/03/2022 3:34 am, Norbert K wrote:
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:57:26 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 6/03/2022 4:31 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:02:17 AM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:

    She's very generous with praise for the album, as is appropriate, but short on discernment. Maybe she was distracted by the popcorn.

    She's a musician so she analyzes differently than a big Beatles fan. She likes to show the chords and notes and give us a sample of how they are flowing rather than do discuss the individual personalities in the group.
    I'm a musician too.

    She doesn't mention major significant musical aspects, and then throws
    in some simplistic musical trivia to attempt to bolster her kudos.

    geoff

    I complained earlier about numerous features of Abbey Road that Caroline missed. However, her "big picture" sense isn't there, either. She doesn't get how different -- how much more polished, cohesive, and formal -- Abbey Road is from Let It Be. She
    seemed equally pleased with LiB.




    The Big Picture not there on any of the reviews. All seen very shallow,
    even on the relatively trivial earlier commercial pop releases.

    Little opinion on song-writing, lyrics, album construction, history, musicianship, etc.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Mon Mar 7 09:43:40 2022
    On 7/03/2022 8:58 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:57:26 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 6/03/2022 4:31 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:02:17 AM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:

    She's very generous with praise for the album, as is appropriate, but short on discernment. Maybe she was distracted by the popcorn.

    She's a musician so she analyzes differently than a big Beatles fan. She likes to show the chords and notes and give us a sample of how they are flowing rather than do discuss the individual personalities in the group.
    I'm a musician too.

    She doesn't mention major significant musical aspects, and then throws
    in some simplistic musical trivia to attempt to bolster her kudos.

    She's a musician, but she's not making the video for other musicians.

    No, but she trying to make them believe that she is more of a musician
    than she possibly is.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJKellog@yahoo.com@21:1/5 to geoff on Sun Mar 6 13:35:53 2022
    On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 3:46:34 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 7/03/2022 3:45 am, super70s wrote:
    In article <7c49dd4f-bf8d-4a6e...@googlegroups.com>,
    Norbert K <norbert...@gmail.com> wrote:

    I enjoyed Caroline's Beatles reviews in general, but I wish she had been more
    critical. In this case, she talks as if the whole album is wonderful. Does >> anyone really believe that "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" holds its own with "Come
    Together" and "Something"?

    I never thought "Come Together" was all that special and "Oh Darling!"
    is one of the most annoying songs the Beatles ever recorded IMO, closely followed by "Maxwell's Silver Hammer." The only thing that saves side
    one from total mediocrity is "Something."

    No, no, no, and no. Truly bizarre to me, but your opinion none-the-less.

    Apart from Something, is there anything else you consider above mediocre ?

    geoff

    I love Oh! Darling. A 50s rock pastiche with a more powerful delivery than anything from that era.

    Was it written on guitar or piano? My guess is piano, in spite of how the guitar jumps out in the mix.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Willie Williams@21:1/5 to Bruce on Tue Mar 8 12:25:15 2022
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    Thanks for posting all of these, Bruce. I was surprised to scroll endlessly through the comments and find not one negative one, pretty unusual for YouTube comments.

    I was pretty impressed at the enalysis of passages via some program like Reason or Logic Pro, I assume. I didn't realize that you could load an MP3 (again, my technical-Luddite assumption) into it and that it would break down all the instruments like
    that. Or did she get access to some digital master version of the album? Anyway, at the 11:10 mark where she does this for a passage of "Octopus's Garden" I was surprised at what cool contra-voicing was going on there.

    I never did get the explanation of how it is that she has never heard most of the songs before. She does say when she *has* heard a song before (like "Here Comes the Sun" from some movie). How old is she, anyway, and what desert island did she grow up on?
    Or did she have obsessively protective parents? Once, at work, on my birthday, a colleague named Vishal came to my cubicle and said, "Willie, I hear it's your birthday. Happy Birthday. How old are you?" I said, "Well, here's a hint," and started singing
    "When I'm Sixty-four" (so this was 12 years ago). Vishal said, "What is this song?" I said, "You know, the Beatles." He said, "What is this Beatles?" I said, "What? You know, John, Paul, Ringo, George." He said, "No, I don't know, but keep singing, I
    love it."

    I thought, Hello, he's never heard of the Beatles? (He grew up near Delhi.) But then I thought, well, I couldn't name the great Indian musicians, beyond Ravi Shankar and a few others.

    Also, Bruce, I've been reading a recent biography of B.B. King, and just got to a chapter that starts off like this:

    "At soime imperceptible moment, around the start of the 1960's, the musical genre known as rhythm and blues split in two. R&B had itself been a catchall term for the segregated pop music of Black America, formerly known as 'race'music. Now a new species
    of rhythm and blues emerged under the proud heading of 'soul.' A succession of songs conspired to consolidate the soul movement: 'Shop Around,' in the autumn of 1960, the first number 1 hit from Smokey Robinson's Miracles; 'Stand By Me', in the spring of
    1961 from Ben. E. King, and 'Hit the Road Jack,' in the summer of 1961 from Ray Charles. Then came the Marvelettes, Motown's first great girl group, with 'Please Mr. Postman.' Sam Cooke followed with 'Twistin' the Night Away' in early 1962."

    The author (Danel de Visé) goes on for a couple of pages on this point, saying the 'soul' music, not conventional R&B is what got picked up by white audiences, because it "Blended compositional elements of Black blues and white pop with a rock 'n roll
    backbeat and swooping vocal flourishes of gospel. Soul music marked a distinctly African American response to rock 'n roll." Hello? I don't get his definition of soul music. For me, soul music is James Brown, Otis Redding, Stax; not Motown. Ray Charles,
    too, but certainly not "Twistin' the Night Away." I thought, as I read this passage, Bruce would be furious.

    The book, however, is pretty darned good, though, including a startling account of the death of Johnny Ace. In 1954, B.B. was touring with Big Mama Thornton and Johnny Ace. Johnny Ace had several #1 hits on the R&B charts, and was a wild man, liking to
    drive at 90 MPH while shooting at the "O's" in roadside signs. On Christmas night, they were playing in Houston, and between sets, Johnny took out a pistol and pointed it at a couple in the room. Big Mama told him to cool it, and took the gun from him.
    She opened the chamber and a bullet fell out. Johnny told her to "put it back" (the book's words) and she did. (I assume this meant she put the bullet back in the chamber.) Johnny then took the gun, held it against his girlfriend's temple, and pulled
    the trigger. Nothing happened, but the girl, naturally enough, freaked out. Johnny then said, "Girl, stop worrying," then put the gun against his own temple and blew his brains out.

    de Visé speculates that it's possible Ace's promoter put more bullets in the chambers, hoping Ace would do just what he did, and this would increase sales of his current hit, "Pledging My Love" (which it apparently did, as the song soared to #1).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to Willie Williams on Tue Mar 8 13:39:35 2022
    On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 3:25:17 PM UTC-5, Willie Williams wrote:

    I never did get the explanation of how it is that she has never heard most of the songs before. How old is she, anyway, and what desert island did she grow up on?

    I would guess she's in her mid-20s. She's from Australia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Willie Williams on Wed Mar 9 11:37:11 2022
    On 9/03/2022 9:25 am, Willie Williams wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    Thanks for posting all of these, Bruce. I was surprised to scroll endlessly through the comments and find not one negative one, pretty unusual for YouTube comments.

    I was pretty impressed at the enalysis of passages via some program like Reason or Logic Pro, I assume. I didn't realize that you could load an MP3 (again, my technical-Luddite assumption) into it and that it would break down all the instruments like
    that. Or did she get access to some digital master version of the album? Anyway, at the 11:10 mark where she does this for a passage of "Octopus's Garden" I was surprised at what cool contra-voicing was going on there.

    The analysis was simplistic at best.

    Not any fancy audio app being used, just a simple MIDI player, possibly
    free or shareware. The level of gear she uses is also pretty low-end,
    though adequate for purpose (not being a gear-snob here !).

    They are simply MIDI file versions of the songs. Not derived from the
    original audio at all - compiled track-by-track by all sorts of people
    on a music keyboard, computer-keyboard/mouse, and/or other musical
    controller device.

    There are apps to reliably convert single melody lines into MIDI data,
    and I'm sure the AI people are working on more sophisticated stuff to
    achieve what you suggest. At the moment results are very 'hot-and-miss'.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJKellog@yahoo.com@21:1/5 to geoff on Wed Mar 9 05:44:01 2022
    On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 5:37:25 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 9/03/2022 9:25 am, Willie Williams wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    Thanks for posting all of these, Bruce. I was surprised to scroll endlessly through the comments and find not one negative one, pretty unusual for YouTube comments.

    I was pretty impressed at the enalysis of passages via some program like Reason or Logic Pro, I assume. I didn't realize that you could load an MP3 (again, my technical-Luddite assumption) into it and that it would break down all the instruments like
    that. Or did she get access to some digital master version of the album? Anyway, at the 11:10 mark where she does this for a passage of "Octopus's Garden" I was surprised at what cool contra-voicing was going on there.
    The analysis was simplistic at best.

    Not any fancy audio app being used, just a simple MIDI player, possibly
    free or shareware. The level of gear she uses is also pretty low-end,
    though adequate for purpose (not being a gear-snob here !).

    They are simply MIDI file versions of the songs. Not derived from the original audio at all - compiled track-by-track by all sorts of people
    on a music keyboard, computer-keyboard/mouse, and/or other musical controller device.

    There are apps to reliably convert single melody lines into MIDI data,
    and I'm sure the AI people are working on more sophisticated stuff to achieve what you suggest. At the moment results are very 'hot-and-miss'.

    geoff

    I'd have expected her to at least say something about the epic guitar duel. Not a word.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to RJKe...@yahoo.com on Thu Mar 10 09:25:00 2022
    On 10/03/2022 2:44 am, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 5:37:25 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 9/03/2022 9:25 am, Willie Williams wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    Thanks for posting all of these, Bruce. I was surprised to scroll endlessly through the comments and find not one negative one, pretty unusual for YouTube comments.

    I was pretty impressed at the enalysis of passages via some program like Reason or Logic Pro, I assume. I didn't realize that you could load an MP3 (again, my technical-Luddite assumption) into it and that it would break down all the instruments like
    that. Or did she get access to some digital master version of the album? Anyway, at the 11:10 mark where she does this for a passage of "Octopus's Garden" I was surprised at what cool contra-voicing was going on there.
    The analysis was simplistic at best.

    Not any fancy audio app being used, just a simple MIDI player, possibly
    free or shareware. The level of gear she uses is also pretty low-end,
    though adequate for purpose (not being a gear-snob here !).

    They are simply MIDI file versions of the songs. Not derived from the
    original audio at all - compiled track-by-track by all sorts of people
    on a music keyboard, computer-keyboard/mouse, and/or other musical
    controller device.

    There are apps to reliably convert single melody lines into MIDI data,
    and I'm sure the AI people are working on more sophisticated stuff to
    achieve what you suggest. At the moment results are very 'hot-and-miss'.

    geoff

    I'd have expected her to at least say something about the epic guitar duel. Not a word.



    Well, she did move her head slightly in relation to the stereo panning,
    but surprisingly for a musician didn't appear to realise it was any more
    than one part being played. Let alone more than one player in one of the
    most epic 3-way guitar duels in rock history !

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Wed Mar 9 13:44:15 2022
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 3:25:13 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 10/03/2022 2:44 am, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 5:37:25 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 9/03/2022 9:25 am, Willie Williams wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    Thanks for posting all of these, Bruce. I was surprised to scroll endlessly through the comments and find not one negative one, pretty unusual for YouTube comments.

    I was pretty impressed at the enalysis of passages via some program like Reason or Logic Pro, I assume. I didn't realize that you could load an MP3 (again, my technical-Luddite assumption) into it and that it would break down all the instruments
    like that. Or did she get access to some digital master version of the album? Anyway, at the 11:10 mark where she does this for a passage of "Octopus's Garden" I was surprised at what cool contra-voicing was going on there.
    The analysis was simplistic at best.

    Not any fancy audio app being used, just a simple MIDI player, possibly >> free or shareware. The level of gear she uses is also pretty low-end,
    though adequate for purpose (not being a gear-snob here !).

    They are simply MIDI file versions of the songs. Not derived from the
    original audio at all - compiled track-by-track by all sorts of people
    on a music keyboard, computer-keyboard/mouse, and/or other musical
    controller device.

    There are apps to reliably convert single melody lines into MIDI data,
    and I'm sure the AI people are working on more sophisticated stuff to
    achieve what you suggest. At the moment results are very 'hot-and-miss'. >>
    geoff

    I'd have expected her to at least say something about the epic guitar duel. Not a word.


    Well, she did move her head slightly in relation to the stereo panning,
    but surprisingly for a musician didn't appear to realise it was any more than one part being played. Let alone more than one player in one of the most epic 3-way guitar duels in rock history !

    geoff

    Whatever this supposed guitar duel is, I'm not aware of it either. And none of the Beatles is considered some kind of special guitar player. They're known more for other things, like songwriting, vocal harmonies, inventive arrangements, studio tricks,
    etc...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Thu Mar 10 12:12:30 2022
    On 10/03/2022 10:44 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 3:25:13 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 10/03/2022 2:44 am, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 5:37:25 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 9/03/2022 9:25 am, Willie Williams wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    Thanks for posting all of these, Bruce. I was surprised to scroll endlessly through the comments and find not one negative one, pretty unusual for YouTube comments.

    I was pretty impressed at the enalysis of passages via some program like Reason or Logic Pro, I assume. I didn't realize that you could load an MP3 (again, my technical-Luddite assumption) into it and that it would break down all the instruments
    like that. Or did she get access to some digital master version of the album? Anyway, at the 11:10 mark where she does this for a passage of "Octopus's Garden" I was surprised at what cool contra-voicing was going on there.
    The analysis was simplistic at best.

    Not any fancy audio app being used, just a simple MIDI player, possibly >>>> free or shareware. The level of gear she uses is also pretty low-end,
    though adequate for purpose (not being a gear-snob here !).

    They are simply MIDI file versions of the songs. Not derived from the
    original audio at all - compiled track-by-track by all sorts of people >>>> on a music keyboard, computer-keyboard/mouse, and/or other musical
    controller device.

    There are apps to reliably convert single melody lines into MIDI data, >>>> and I'm sure the AI people are working on more sophisticated stuff to
    achieve what you suggest. At the moment results are very 'hot-and-miss'. >>>>
    geoff

    I'd have expected her to at least say something about the epic guitar duel. Not a word.


    Well, she did move her head slightly in relation to the stereo panning,
    but surprisingly for a musician didn't appear to realise it was any more
    than one part being played. Let alone more than one player in one of the
    most epic 3-way guitar duels in rock history !

    geoff

    Whatever this supposed guitar duel is, I'm not aware of it either. And none of the Beatles is considered some kind of special guitar player. They're known more for other things, like songwriting, vocal harmonies, inventive arrangements, studio tricks,
    etc...

    You what ?!!!! Surely you are jesting ?

    00:53 to 01:30 on The End.

    Paul starts on left, then George in the middle, and John on the right,
    and so on.

    Only one of the most memorable Beatles moments ever. And right up there
    in all of modern music.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norbert K@21:1/5 to Bruce on Wed Mar 9 14:42:07 2022
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 4:44:18 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 3:25:13 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 10/03/2022 2:44 am, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 5:37:25 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 9/03/2022 9:25 am, Willie Williams wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    Thanks for posting all of these, Bruce. I was surprised to scroll endlessly through the comments and find not one negative one, pretty unusual for YouTube comments.

    I was pretty impressed at the enalysis of passages via some program like Reason or Logic Pro, I assume. I didn't realize that you could load an MP3 (again, my technical-Luddite assumption) into it and that it would break down all the instruments
    like that. Or did she get access to some digital master version of the album? Anyway, at the 11:10 mark where she does this for a passage of "Octopus's Garden" I was surprised at what cool contra-voicing was going on there.
    The analysis was simplistic at best.

    Not any fancy audio app being used, just a simple MIDI player, possibly >> free or shareware. The level of gear she uses is also pretty low-end, >> though adequate for purpose (not being a gear-snob here !).

    They are simply MIDI file versions of the songs. Not derived from the >> original audio at all - compiled track-by-track by all sorts of people >> on a music keyboard, computer-keyboard/mouse, and/or other musical
    controller device.

    There are apps to reliably convert single melody lines into MIDI data, >> and I'm sure the AI people are working on more sophisticated stuff to >> achieve what you suggest. At the moment results are very 'hot-and-miss'.

    geoff

    I'd have expected her to at least say something about the epic guitar duel. Not a word.


    Well, she did move her head slightly in relation to the stereo panning, but surprisingly for a musician didn't appear to realise it was any more than one part being played. Let alone more than one player in one of the most epic 3-way guitar duels in rock history !

    geoff
    Whatever this supposed guitar duel is, I'm not aware of it either. And none of the Beatles is considered some kind of special guitar player. They're known more for other things, like songwriting, vocal harmonies, inventive arrangements, studio tricks,
    etc...

    And what instrument do you suppose the bulk of their songs are written on?

    I wouldn't call any of them a virtuoso lead guitarist. More importantly, George and Paul could come up with distinctive, tasteful and memorable lead lines.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Thu Mar 10 15:01:26 2022
    On 10/03/2022 2:25 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 6:12:42 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 10/03/2022 10:44 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 3:25:13 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 10/03/2022 2:44 am, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 5:37:25 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 9/03/2022 9:25 am, Willie Williams wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    Thanks for posting all of these, Bruce. I was surprised to scroll endlessly through the comments and find not one negative one, pretty unusual for YouTube comments.

    I was pretty impressed at the enalysis of passages via some program like Reason or Logic Pro, I assume. I didn't realize that you could load an MP3 (again, my technical-Luddite assumption) into it and that it would break down all the instruments
    like that. Or did she get access to some digital master version of the album? Anyway, at the 11:10 mark where she does this for a passage of "Octopus's Garden" I was surprised at what cool contra-voicing was going on there.
    The analysis was simplistic at best.

    Not any fancy audio app being used, just a simple MIDI player, possibly >>>>>> free or shareware. The level of gear she uses is also pretty low-end, >>>>>> though adequate for purpose (not being a gear-snob here !).

    They are simply MIDI file versions of the songs. Not derived from the >>>>>> original audio at all - compiled track-by-track by all sorts of people >>>>>> on a music keyboard, computer-keyboard/mouse, and/or other musical >>>>>> controller device.

    There are apps to reliably convert single melody lines into MIDI data, >>>>>> and I'm sure the AI people are working on more sophisticated stuff to >>>>>> achieve what you suggest. At the moment results are very 'hot-and-miss'. >>>>>>
    geoff

    I'd have expected her to at least say something about the epic guitar duel. Not a word.


    Well, she did move her head slightly in relation to the stereo panning, >>>> but surprisingly for a musician didn't appear to realise it was any more >>>> than one part being played. Let alone more than one player in one of the >>>> most epic 3-way guitar duels in rock history !

    geoff

    Whatever this supposed guitar duel is, I'm not aware of it either. And none of the Beatles is considered some kind of special guitar player. They're known more for other things, like songwriting, vocal harmonies, inventive arrangements, studio tricks,
    etc...
    You what ?!!!! Surely you are jesting ?

    00:53 to 01:30 on The End.

    Paul starts on left, then George in the middle, and John on the right,
    and so on.

    Only one of the most memorable Beatles moments ever. And right up there
    in all of modern music.

    Yeah right. I just listened to it. It's not even very good. Just an average guitar break for the time.

    "All of modern music" my fucking ass.

    Here's the description of it on Wikipedia. Doesn't sound like any all time great moment to me.

    McCartney, George Harrison and Lennon perform a rotating sequence of three, two-bar guitar solos. The idea for a guitar instrumental over this section was Harrison's, and Lennon suggested that the three of them each play a section. The solos begin
    approximately 53 seconds into the song. Geoff Emerick, the Beatles' recording engineer, later recalled: "John, Paul and George looked like they had gone back in time, like they were kids again, playing together for the sheer enjoyment of it. More than
    anything, they reminded me of gunslingers, with their guitars strapped on, looks of steely-eyed resolve, determined to outdo one another. Yet there was no animosity, no tension at all – you could tell they were simply having fun."




    As you like. Others, who have a clue, may differ.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Wed Mar 9 17:25:49 2022
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 6:12:42 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 10/03/2022 10:44 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 3:25:13 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 10/03/2022 2:44 am, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 5:37:25 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 9/03/2022 9:25 am, Willie Williams wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    Thanks for posting all of these, Bruce. I was surprised to scroll endlessly through the comments and find not one negative one, pretty unusual for YouTube comments.

    I was pretty impressed at the enalysis of passages via some program like Reason or Logic Pro, I assume. I didn't realize that you could load an MP3 (again, my technical-Luddite assumption) into it and that it would break down all the instruments
    like that. Or did she get access to some digital master version of the album? Anyway, at the 11:10 mark where she does this for a passage of "Octopus's Garden" I was surprised at what cool contra-voicing was going on there.
    The analysis was simplistic at best.

    Not any fancy audio app being used, just a simple MIDI player, possibly >>>> free or shareware. The level of gear she uses is also pretty low-end, >>>> though adequate for purpose (not being a gear-snob here !).

    They are simply MIDI file versions of the songs. Not derived from the >>>> original audio at all - compiled track-by-track by all sorts of people >>>> on a music keyboard, computer-keyboard/mouse, and/or other musical
    controller device.

    There are apps to reliably convert single melody lines into MIDI data, >>>> and I'm sure the AI people are working on more sophisticated stuff to >>>> achieve what you suggest. At the moment results are very 'hot-and-miss'.

    geoff

    I'd have expected her to at least say something about the epic guitar duel. Not a word.


    Well, she did move her head slightly in relation to the stereo panning, >> but surprisingly for a musician didn't appear to realise it was any more >> than one part being played. Let alone more than one player in one of the >> most epic 3-way guitar duels in rock history !

    geoff

    Whatever this supposed guitar duel is, I'm not aware of it either. And none of the Beatles is considered some kind of special guitar player. They're known more for other things, like songwriting, vocal harmonies, inventive arrangements, studio tricks,
    etc...
    You what ?!!!! Surely you are jesting ?

    00:53 to 01:30 on The End.

    Paul starts on left, then George in the middle, and John on the right,
    and so on.

    Only one of the most memorable Beatles moments ever. And right up there
    in all of modern music.

    Yeah right. I just listened to it. It's not even very good. Just an average guitar break for the time.

    "All of modern music" my fucking ass.

    Here's the description of it on Wikipedia. Doesn't sound like any all time great moment to me.

    McCartney, George Harrison and Lennon perform a rotating sequence of three, two-bar guitar solos. The idea for a guitar instrumental over this section was Harrison's, and Lennon suggested that the three of them each play a section. The solos begin
    approximately 53 seconds into the song. Geoff Emerick, the Beatles' recording engineer, later recalled: "John, Paul and George looked like they had gone back in time, like they were kids again, playing together for the sheer enjoyment of it. More than
    anything, they reminded me of gunslingers, with their guitars strapped on, looks of steely-eyed resolve, determined to outdo one another. Yet there was no animosity, no tension at all – you could tell they were simply having fun."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Wed Mar 9 18:49:02 2022
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 9:01:36 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    As you like. Others, who have a clue, may differ.

    Eat dick, dork. I have WAY more of a clue than you when it comes to the historical facts about popular music.

    Here are some different lists of the greatest moments in popular music history. I don't see your stupid "three way guitar duel" anywhere.

    https://watchmojo.com/video/id/35997

    https://www.history101.com/15-iconic-moments-in-music-history/

    https://stacker.com/stories/4280/100-iconic-moments-music-history

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Thu Mar 10 17:17:50 2022
    On 10/03/2022 3:49 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 9:01:36 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    As you like. Others, who have a clue, may differ.

    Eat dick, dork. I have WAY more of a clue than you when it comes to the historical facts about popular music.

    Here are some different lists of the greatest moments in popular music history. I don't see your stupid "three way guitar duel" anywhere.

    https://watchmojo.com/video/id/35997

    https://www.history101.com/15-iconic-moments-in-music-history/

    https://stacker.com/stories/4280/100-iconic-moments-music-history

    You may know selected popular historical shallow 'facts', but apparently
    not actual musical appreciation.

    Many (most ?) who have anything more than a face-value appreciation of especially the later Beatles music would get more out of The End (esp
    the solo/s) than you, apparently.

    And even more poignant by being at the very culmination of The Beatles'
    output .

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Wed Mar 9 20:27:28 2022
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 11:18:01 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 10/03/2022 3:49 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 9:01:36 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    As you like. Others, who have a clue, may differ.

    Eat dick, dork. I have WAY more of a clue than you when it comes to the historical facts about popular music.

    Here are some different lists of the greatest moments in popular music history. I don't see your stupid "three way guitar duel" anywhere.

    https://watchmojo.com/video/id/35997

    https://www.history101.com/15-iconic-moments-in-music-history/

    https://stacker.com/stories/4280/100-iconic-moments-music-history
    You may know selected popular historical shallow 'facts', but apparently
    not actual musical appreciation.

    Many (most ?) who have anything more than a face-value appreciation of especially the later Beatles music would get more out of The End (esp
    the solo/s) than you, apparently.

    And even more poignant by being at the very culmination of The Beatles' output .

    You've got your head up your ass. There are TENS OF THOUSANDS of better moments for music appreciation that this stupid mediocre 3 guitar battle.

    The 3 different solos in this are far more famous:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bt1qBVQTNM

    The trombone solo in this is infinitely more famous:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtTSzSIgzAo

    The sax break in this is WAY more famous and interesting:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4IGVn4W9oo

    Satch's solo in this is WAY more famous and significant.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WPCBieSESI

    Stop sucking the Beatles dicks already!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Thu Mar 10 17:39:01 2022
    On 10/03/2022 5:27 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 11:18:01 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 10/03/2022 3:49 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 9:01:36 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    As you like. Others, who have a clue, may differ.

    Eat dick, dork. I have WAY more of a clue than you when it comes to the historical facts about popular music.

    Here are some different lists of the greatest moments in popular music history. I don't see your stupid "three way guitar duel" anywhere.

    https://watchmojo.com/video/id/35997

    https://www.history101.com/15-iconic-moments-in-music-history/

    https://stacker.com/stories/4280/100-iconic-moments-music-history
    You may know selected popular historical shallow 'facts', but apparently
    not actual musical appreciation.

    Many (most ?) who have anything more than a face-value appreciation of
    especially the later Beatles music would get more out of The End (esp
    the solo/s) than you, apparently.

    And even more poignant by being at the very culmination of The Beatles'
    output .

    You've got your head up your ass. There are TENS OF THOUSANDS of better moments for music appreciation that this stupid mediocre 3 guitar battle.

    The 3 different solos in this are far more famous:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bt1qBVQTNM

    The trombone solo in this is infinitely more famous:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtTSzSIgzAo

    The sax break in this is WAY more famous and interesting:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4IGVn4W9oo

    Satch's solo in this is WAY more famous and significant.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WPCBieSESI

    Stop sucking the Beatles dicks already!




    Learn basic grammar and physics. I can't "Stop sucking the Beatles dicks already!", because if I had done it already, there would be no point in
    asking me to do it. It's a time-space-continuum thing.

    OK, so you prefer a different style of music and don't even appear to
    like guitar or The Beatles. So why are you even here ?

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Wed Mar 9 21:40:49 2022
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 11:39:13 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    OK, so you prefer a different style of music and don't even appear to
    like guitar or The Beatles. So why are you even here ?

    The Beatles are my second favorite artist of all time. Doesn't mean I am not well versed in all kinds of Popular Music, unlike you, who thinks that music started and ended with the Mop Tops.

    There are lots of guitar players among my 100 favorite artists of all time.

    1 - Fats Domino
    2 - Beatles - GUITAR
    3 - Elvis Presley - GUITAR
    4 - Little Richard
    5 - Hank Williams - GUITAR
    6 - Joe Turner
    7 - Drifters
    8 - Muddy Waters - GUITAR
    9 - Smiley Lewis - GUITAR
    10 - Clovers - GUITAR
    11 - Carl Perkins - GUITAR
    12 - Buddy Holly & Crickets - GUITAR
    13 - B.B. King - GUITAR
    14 - Bo Diddley - GUITAR
    15 - Hank Ballard & Midnighters / Royals
    16 - Chuck Berry - GUITAR
    17 - James Brown
    18 - Howlin' Wolf - GUITAR
    19 - Wynonie Harris
    20 - Robins
    21 - Orioles - GUITAR
    22 - Five Royales - GUITAR
    23 - Creedence Clearwater Revival / John Fogerty - GUITAR
    24 - Five Keys
    25 - Ray Charles
    26 - Rolling Stones - GUITAR
    27 - Beach Boys - GUITAR
    28 - Jerry Lee Lewis
    29 - Spaniels
    30 - Temptations
    31 - Elmore James - GUITAR
    32 - Bobby "Blue" Bland
    33 - Sonny Boy Williamson II (Rice Miller)
    34 - Sticks McGhee - GUITAR
    35 - Huey "Piano" Smith and the Clowns
    36 - Dominoes
    37 - Johnny Burnette Trio - GUITAR
    38 - Louis Jordan
    39 - Spiders
    40 - Flamingos
    41 - Moonglows
    42 - Coasters
    43 - Curtis Mayfield & Impressions - GUITAR
    44 - Eddie Cochran - GUITAR
    45 - Lloyd Price
    46 - Bill Haley & Comets - GUITAR
    47 - Buddy & Ella Johnson
    48 - Ivory Joe Hunter
    49 - Swallows
    50 - Little Walter
    51 - Jimmy Reed - GUITAR
    52 - Everly Brothers - GUITAR
    53 - Gene Vincent & Blue Caps - GUITAR
    54 - Johnny Cash - GUITAR
    55 - Amos Milburn
    56 - Roy Brown
    57 - Jack Scott - GUITAR
    58 - El Dorados
    59 - Dave Bartholomew
    60 - Champion Jack Dupree
    61 - Roy Orbison - GUITAR
    62 - Smokey Robinson & Miracles
    63 - Checkers
    64 - Jimmy McCracklin
    65 - Little Esther
    66 - Eddie "Cleanhead" Vinson
    67 - Marvin Gaye
    68 - Tommy James & Shondells - GUITAR
    69 - Jackie Wilson
    70 - Mills Brothers - GUITAR
    71 - Ruth Brown
    72 - Bob Dylan - GUITAR
    73 - Shirley & Lee
    74 - Aretha Franklin
    75 - Dells
    76 - Wilson Pickett
    77 - Little Milton - GUITAR
    78 - Marvin & Johnny (Jesse & Marvin)
    79 - Heartbeats / Shep & Limelites
    80 - Harptones
    81 - Doors - GUITAR
    82 - Little Willie John
    83 - Ravens
    84 - Marty Robbins - GUITAR
    85 - Lamplighters
    86 - Willie Mabon
    87 - Guitar Slim - GUITAR
    88 - Solomon Burke
    89 - Jerry Butler
    90 - Roy Milton
    91 - Rosco Gordon
    92 - Charlie Feathers - GUITAR
    93 - Penguins
    94 - J.B. Lenore - GUITAR
    95 - Big Maybelle
    96 - Cadillacs
    97 - Chuck Willis
    98 - Mac Curtis - GUITAR
    99 - Cardinals
    100 - Slim Harpo - GUITAR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Thu Mar 10 20:06:07 2022
    On 10/03/2022 6:40 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 11:39:13 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    OK, so you prefer a different style of music and don't even appear to
    like guitar or The Beatles. So why are you even here ?

    The Beatles are my second favorite artist of all time. Doesn't mean I am not well versed in all kinds of Popular Music, unlike you, who thinks that music started and ended with the Mop Tops.

    Totally false. A little pre-Beatles, and lots post-Beatles because I
    didn't listen to a lot of contemporary music in (and before) my childhood.


    There are lots of guitar players among my 100 favorite artists of all time.

    You do rather restrict yourself to a very specific era. I don't. And
    your Beatles ignorance is astounding.

    I'm not so OCD as to make a list like that.


    1 - Fats Domino
    2 - Beatles - GUITAR
    3 - Elvis Presley - GUITAR
    4 - Little Richard
    5 - Hank Williams - GUITAR
    6 - Joe Turner
    7 - Drifters
    8 - Muddy Waters - GUITAR
    9 - Smiley Lewis - GUITAR
    10 - Clovers - GUITAR
    11 - Carl Perkins - GUITAR
    12 - Buddy Holly & Crickets - GUITAR
    13 - B.B. King - GUITAR
    14 - Bo Diddley - GUITAR
    15 - Hank Ballard & Midnighters / Royals
    16 - Chuck Berry - GUITAR
    17 - James Brown
    18 - Howlin' Wolf - GUITAR
    19 - Wynonie Harris
    20 - Robins
    21 - Orioles - GUITAR
    22 - Five Royales - GUITAR
    23 - Creedence Clearwater Revival / John Fogerty - GUITAR
    24 - Five Keys
    25 - Ray Charles
    26 - Rolling Stones - GUITAR
    27 - Beach Boys - GUITAR
    28 - Jerry Lee Lewis
    29 - Spaniels
    30 - Temptations
    31 - Elmore James - GUITAR
    32 - Bobby "Blue" Bland
    33 - Sonny Boy Williamson II (Rice Miller)
    34 - Sticks McGhee - GUITAR
    35 - Huey "Piano" Smith and the Clowns
    36 - Dominoes
    37 - Johnny Burnette Trio - GUITAR
    38 - Louis Jordan
    39 - Spiders
    40 - Flamingos
    41 - Moonglows
    42 - Coasters
    43 - Curtis Mayfield & Impressions - GUITAR
    44 - Eddie Cochran - GUITAR
    45 - Lloyd Price
    46 - Bill Haley & Comets - GUITAR
    47 - Buddy & Ella Johnson
    48 - Ivory Joe Hunter
    49 - Swallows
    50 - Little Walter
    51 - Jimmy Reed - GUITAR
    52 - Everly Brothers - GUITAR
    53 - Gene Vincent & Blue Caps - GUITAR
    54 - Johnny Cash - GUITAR
    55 - Amos Milburn
    56 - Roy Brown
    57 - Jack Scott - GUITAR
    58 - El Dorados
    59 - Dave Bartholomew
    60 - Champion Jack Dupree
    61 - Roy Orbison - GUITAR
    62 - Smokey Robinson & Miracles
    63 - Checkers
    64 - Jimmy McCracklin
    65 - Little Esther
    66 - Eddie "Cleanhead" Vinson
    67 - Marvin Gaye
    68 - Tommy James & Shondells - GUITAR
    69 - Jackie Wilson
    70 - Mills Brothers - GUITAR
    71 - Ruth Brown
    72 - Bob Dylan - GUITAR
    73 - Shirley & Lee
    74 - Aretha Franklin
    75 - Dells
    76 - Wilson Pickett
    77 - Little Milton - GUITAR
    78 - Marvin & Johnny (Jesse & Marvin)
    79 - Heartbeats / Shep & Limelites
    80 - Harptones
    81 - Doors - GUITAR
    82 - Little Willie John
    83 - Ravens
    84 - Marty Robbins - GUITAR
    85 - Lamplighters
    86 - Willie Mabon
    87 - Guitar Slim - GUITAR
    88 - Solomon Burke
    89 - Jerry Butler
    90 - Roy Milton
    91 - Rosco Gordon
    92 - Charlie Feathers - GUITAR
    93 - Penguins
    94 - J.B. Lenore - GUITAR
    95 - Big Maybelle
    96 - Cadillacs
    97 - Chuck Willis
    98 - Mac Curtis - GUITAR
    99 - Cardinals
    100 - Slim Harpo - GUITAR


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norbert K@21:1/5 to Bruce on Thu Mar 10 03:10:35 2022
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 8:25:51 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 6:12:42 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 10/03/2022 10:44 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 3:25:13 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 10/03/2022 2:44 am, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 5:37:25 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 9/03/2022 9:25 am, Willie Williams wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    Thanks for posting all of these, Bruce. I was surprised to scroll endlessly through the comments and find not one negative one, pretty unusual for YouTube comments.

    I was pretty impressed at the enalysis of passages via some program like Reason or Logic Pro, I assume. I didn't realize that you could load an MP3 (again, my technical-Luddite assumption) into it and that it would break down all the
    instruments like that. Or did she get access to some digital master version of the album? Anyway, at the 11:10 mark where she does this for a passage of "Octopus's Garden" I was surprised at what cool contra-voicing was going on there.
    The analysis was simplistic at best.

    Not any fancy audio app being used, just a simple MIDI player, possibly
    free or shareware. The level of gear she uses is also pretty low-end, >>>> though adequate for purpose (not being a gear-snob here !).

    They are simply MIDI file versions of the songs. Not derived from the >>>> original audio at all - compiled track-by-track by all sorts of people
    on a music keyboard, computer-keyboard/mouse, and/or other musical >>>> controller device.

    There are apps to reliably convert single melody lines into MIDI data,
    and I'm sure the AI people are working on more sophisticated stuff to >>>> achieve what you suggest. At the moment results are very 'hot-and-miss'.

    geoff

    I'd have expected her to at least say something about the epic guitar duel. Not a word.


    Well, she did move her head slightly in relation to the stereo panning, >> but surprisingly for a musician didn't appear to realise it was any more
    than one part being played. Let alone more than one player in one of the
    most epic 3-way guitar duels in rock history !

    geoff

    Whatever this supposed guitar duel is, I'm not aware of it either. And none of the Beatles is considered some kind of special guitar player. They're known more for other things, like songwriting, vocal harmonies, inventive arrangements, studio
    tricks, etc...
    You what ?!!!! Surely you are jesting ?

    00:53 to 01:30 on The End.

    Paul starts on left, then George in the middle, and John on the right,
    and so on.

    Only one of the most memorable Beatles moments ever. And right up there
    in all of modern music.
    Yeah right. I just listened to it. It's not even very good. Just an average guitar break for the time.

    "All of modern music" my fucking ass.

    Here's the description of it on Wikipedia. Doesn't sound like any all time great moment to me.

    McCartney, George Harrison and Lennon perform a rotating sequence of three, two-bar guitar solos. The idea for a guitar instrumental over this section was Harrison's, and Lennon suggested that the three of them each play a section. The solos begin
    approximately 53 seconds into the song. Geoff Emerick, the Beatles' recording engineer, later recalled: "John, Paul and George looked like they had gone back in time, like they were kids again, playing together for the sheer enjoyment of it. More than
    anything, they reminded me of gunslingers, with their guitars strapped on, looks of steely-eyed resolve, determined to outdo one another. Yet there was no animosity, no tension at all – you could tell they were simply having fun."

    In the context of the band's history (and of Geoff Emerick's book) this recording is obviously a significant even. When you consider that this was the band's last album, and when you consider all of the problems the band had had (the inter-group
    squabbles, John's drug use, Yoko [who had been asked to leave the room for this piece], etc.), they got it together for this joyous bout of guitar-slinging.

    It is obvious that Emerick knew he was witnessing something momentous and it is obvious to every Beatles fan I've ever known that this is an important moment in the band's history.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to Norbert K on Thu Mar 10 07:15:13 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 6:10:38 AM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:

    It is obvious that Emerick knew he was witnessing something momentous and it is obvious to every Beatles fan I've ever known that this is an important moment in the band's history.

    Like you've discussed this shit with EVERY Beatles fan you've EVER known. Either you're a fucking liar, or you only know a couple of Beatles fans.

    Most Beatles fans are unaware that the solo is even played by 3 different people.

    I wonder if this thing even made this book?

    The Beatles 100: One Hundred Pivotal Moments in Beatles History

    https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41j607RZRCS._SX326_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Thu Mar 10 07:11:24 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 2:06:20 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    Totally false. A little pre-Beatles, and lots post-Beatles because I
    didn't listen to a lot of contemporary music in (and before) my childhood.

    I wasn't born until 1957, but unlike you, I don't just like what I heard growing up. I seriously explored everything that came before I was around. You seem to think that music only started mattering after you cared about it.

    You do rather restrict yourself to a very specific era. I don't.

    Sure you do. You barely even know any music before the 1960s.

    And your Beatles ignorance is astounding.

    Your pre-Beatles musical ignorance is unbelievably huge. I'll bet you can't even name one song by giants like Duke Ellington, Charlie Parker, Paul Whiteman and Lightning Hopkins.

    Go jerk off while you pretend one of the Mop Tops is sucking your tiny pecker.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to Norbert K on Thu Mar 10 09:29:02 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 12:17:54 PM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:

    Each soloist has a completely different sound and style. The "battle" is widely analyzed (as on the Mike Pachelli video -- and numerous others) and debated, but everyone knows it's Paul, George and John. In saying that "Most Beatles fans are unaware
    that the solo is even played by 3 different people," you're trying to project your own astounding lack of discernment onto most fans.

    MOST fans are not at all interested in those kind of details. They just like hearing the music. The Abbey Road Medley is my girlfriend's favorite Beatles recording, and she has no idea what this three guitar battle is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norbert K@21:1/5 to Bruce on Thu Mar 10 09:17:52 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 10:15:15 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 6:10:38 AM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:

    It is obvious that Emerick knew he was witnessing something momentous and it is obvious to every Beatles fan I've ever known that this is an important moment in the band's history.
    Like you've discussed this shit with EVERY Beatles fan you've EVER known. Either you're a fucking liar, or you only know a couple of Beatles fans.

    Most Beatles fans are unaware that the solo is even played by 3 different people.

    I wonder if this thing even made this book?

    The Beatles 100: One Hundred Pivotal Moments in Beatles History

    https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41j607RZRCS._SX326_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg


    Each soloist has a completely different sound and style. The "battle" is widely analyzed (as on the Mike Pachelli video -- and numerous others) and debated, but everyone knows it's Paul, George and John. In saying that "Most Beatles fans are unaware
    that the solo is even played by 3 different people," you're trying to project your own astounding lack of discernment onto most fans. But nobody makes sound generalizations from a defective sample

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Mar 11 09:47:48 2022
    On 11/03/2022 4:11 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 2:06:20 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    Totally false. A little pre-Beatles, and lots post-Beatles because I
    didn't listen to a lot of contemporary music in (and before) my childhood.

    I wasn't born until 1957, but unlike you, I don't just like what I heard growing up. I seriously explored everything that came before I was around. You seem to think that music only started mattering after you cared about it.

    You do rather restrict yourself to a very specific era. I don't.

    Sure you do. You barely even know any music before the 1960s.

    And your Beatles ignorance is astounding.

    Your pre-Beatles musical ignorance is unbelievably huge. I'll bet you can't even name one song by giants like Duke Ellington, Charlie Parker, Paul Whiteman and Lightning Hopkins.

    Ellington and Parker of course. How about Shostakovich, Bach, Mussorgsky
    ? Have seen Dave Brubeck and Acker Bilk live. But I'm not into
    name-dropping to bolster my own credibility.


    Go jerk off while you pretend one of the Mop Tops is sucking your tiny pecker.


    Yep, that makes your argument far more convincing.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 10 12:58:44 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 3:48:00 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    How about Shostakovich, Bach, Mussorgsky? Have seen Dave Brubeck and Acker Bilk live.

    All white guys, okay, we know where you're at.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Mar 11 09:57:01 2022
    On 11/03/2022 6:29 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 12:17:54 PM UTC-5, Norbert K wrote:

    Each soloist has a completely different sound and style. The "battle" is widely analyzed (as on the Mike Pachelli video -- and numerous others) and debated, but everyone knows it's Paul, George and John. In saying that "Most Beatles fans are unaware
    that the solo is even played by 3 different people," you're trying to project your own astounding lack of discernment onto most fans.

    MOST fans are not at all interested in those kind of details. They just like hearing the music. The Abbey Road Medley is my girlfriend's favorite Beatles recording, and she has no idea what this three guitar battle is.

    I bet she loves that part, even though she is ignorant of the technical
    and historical musical aspects. That's not a criticism of her.

    And if made aware of it she would gain even more joy from hearing it in
    that context.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Thu Mar 10 14:20:48 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 3:57:13 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    I bet she loves that part, even though she is ignorant of the technical
    and historical musical aspects. That's not a criticism of her.

    And if made aware of it she would gain even more joy from hearing it in
    that context.

    You'd lose that bet. She was not even aware of there being a guitar solo in that song, and she also said she has no interest in who plays what part or any of that side info.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Mar 11 11:50:06 2022
    On 11/03/2022 9:58 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 3:48:00 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    How about Shostakovich, Bach, Mussorgsky? Have seen Dave Brubeck and Acker Bilk live.

    All white guys, okay, we know where you're at.

    Sorry, forgot have seen George Benson - sorry. Better now ?

    'We'? You are so sad.

    So how about, if you want race/era/name-droppingto be a factor, Joan Armatrading, Tracy Chapman, Nora Jones, Grace Jones. That would account
    for over 30 CDs I own.

    Ooops , you probably have a problem with gender too. Now about Grover Washington, Herbie Hancock, Victor Wooten, Carlos Santana, Oscar
    Peterson, etc,etc,etc.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Thu Mar 10 16:10:02 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 5:50:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    So how about, if you want race/era/name-droppingto be a factor, Joan Armatrading, Tracy Chapman, Nora Jones, Grace Jones. That would account
    for over 30 CDs I own.

    All genetically black acts that do music that is mainly done by whites. That's why they are acceptable to you.

    How about some REAL black music, like James Brown, Joe Simon, Little Milton, Parliament, Funkadelic, Bobby Bland, the Delfonics, Aretha Franklin, Irma Thomas, Luther Vandross, Gladys Knight & the Pips, Isley Brothers, Kool & the Gang, Tyrone Davis,
    Manhattans, Johnny Taylor, Little Johnnie Taylor, Bobby Womack, Chi-Lites, Barry White, Al Green, Gene Chandler, Dramatics, Rick James, Millie Jackson, Betty Wright.

    That's 26 artists. How many CD do you own by these 26 acts?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Mar 11 14:25:06 2022
    On 11/03/2022 1:10 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 5:50:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    So how about, if you want race/era/name-droppingto be a factor, Joan
    Armatrading, Tracy Chapman, Nora Jones, Grace Jones. That would account
    for over 30 CDs I own.

    All genetically black acts that do music that is mainly done by whites. That's why they are acceptable to you.

    Que ?


    How about some REAL black music, like James Brown, Joe Simon, Little Milton, Parliament, Funkadelic, Bobby Bland, the Delfonics, Aretha Franklin, Irma Thomas, Luther Vandross, Gladys Knight & the Pips, Isley Brothers, Kool & the Gang, Tyrone Davis,
    Manhattans, Johnny Taylor, Little Johnnie Taylor, Bobby Womack, Chi-Lites, Barry White, Al Green, Gene Chandler, Dramatics, Rick James, Millie Jackson, Betty Wright.

    That's 26 artists. How many CD do you own by these 26 acts?


    7 or 8 : JB, Parliament, and Funkadelic, Green, Aretha. But should I
    have to purchase CD these other acts, even if they appeal to me ? Some
    of those Ido, some don't, and some I am not familiar with. Glad they
    give you a stiffy, such as it is.

    But I don't feel guilty that I prefer my 'list', and the likes of Floyd
    (Pink, not Anderson), Supertramp, Simply Red, APP, Focus, Genesis, Tull,
    Dire Straits, Stones, etc. All to do with style(s) of music, not the
    racial origins of the members.

    Again, apologies if you disapprove of the breadth of my taste, which
    does lean towards 'prog rock', though includes classical, jazz, be-bop,
    folk, and at a stretch some country. I like to think that I can
    appreciate most forms. Not so keen on gangster rap or hip-hop, with
    exceptions - I'm sure you'll have an opinion on that ....

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Thu Mar 10 17:59:53 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 8:25:18 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    But I don't feel guilty that I prefer my 'list', and the likes of Floyd (Pink, not Anderson), Supertramp, Simply Red, APP, Focus, Genesis, Tull,
    Dire Straits, Stones, etc. All to do with style(s) of music, not the
    racial origins of the members.

    Of course. You prefer all the white styles best.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Thu Mar 10 18:03:58 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 8:25:18 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 1:10 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 5:50:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    So how about, if you want race/era/name-droppingto be a factor, Joan
    Armatrading, Tracy Chapman, Nora Jones, Grace Jones. That would account >> for over 30 CDs I own.

    All genetically black acts that do music that is mainly done by whites. That's why they are acceptable to you.
    Que ?

    How about some REAL black music, like James Brown, Joe Simon, Little Milton, Parliament, Funkadelic, Bobby Bland, the Delfonics, Aretha Franklin, Irma Thomas, Luther Vandross, Gladys Knight & the Pips, Isley Brothers, Kool & the Gang, Tyrone Davis,
    Manhattans, Johnny Taylor, Little Johnnie Taylor, Bobby Womack, Chi-Lites, Barry White, Al Green, Gene Chandler, Dramatics, Rick James, Millie Jackson, Betty Wright.

    That's 26 artists. How many CD do you own by these 26 acts?

    7 or 8 : JB, Parliament, and Funkadelic, Green, Aretha.

    I'm sure if you actually do have 7 or 8 that they are full of cobwebs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Mar 11 15:05:07 2022
    On 11/03/2022 2:59 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 8:25:18 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    But I don't feel guilty that I prefer my 'list', and the likes of Floyd
    (Pink, not Anderson), Supertramp, Simply Red, APP, Focus, Genesis, Tull,
    Dire Straits, Stones, etc. All to do with style(s) of music, not the
    racial origins of the members.

    Of course. You prefer all the white styles best.

    Your characterisation of styles is hugely flawed.

    I don't discriminate on anything other than what appeals to my ear and
    mind, and that has nothing to do with race.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Mar 11 15:10:55 2022
    On 11/03/2022 3:03 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 8:25:18 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 1:10 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 5:50:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    So how about, if you want race/era/name-droppingto be a factor, Joan
    Armatrading, Tracy Chapman, Nora Jones, Grace Jones. That would account >>>> for over 30 CDs I own.

    All genetically black acts that do music that is mainly done by whites. That's why they are acceptable to you.
    Que ?

    How about some REAL black music, like James Brown, Joe Simon, Little Milton, Parliament, Funkadelic, Bobby Bland, the Delfonics, Aretha Franklin, Irma Thomas, Luther Vandross, Gladys Knight & the Pips, Isley Brothers, Kool & the Gang, Tyrone Davis,
    Manhattans, Johnny Taylor, Little Johnnie Taylor, Bobby Womack, Chi-Lites, Barry White, Al Green, Gene Chandler, Dramatics, Rick James, Millie Jackson, Betty Wright.

    That's 26 artists. How many CD do you own by these 26 acts?

    7 or 8 : JB, Parliament, and Funkadelic, Green, Aretha.

    I'm sure if you actually do have 7 or 8 that they are full of cobwebs.


    Possibly. My least likely to be 'full of cobwebs' just now would be Joan
    A and Duke. You Look Good To Me is one of my fave tracks, and for a 1965
    album extremely hi-fi. Even have it on SACD. One of my reference bass
    tracks.

    And me being a bassist (as well as other instruments), Bootsie is right
    up there too.


    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Thu Mar 10 19:09:51 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:05:18 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 2:59 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 8:25:18 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    But I don't feel guilty that I prefer my 'list', and the likes of Floyd
    (Pink, not Anderson), Supertramp, Simply Red, APP, Focus, Genesis, Tull, >> Dire Straits, Stones, etc. All to do with style(s) of music, not the
    racial origins of the members.

    Of course. You prefer all the white styles best.
    Your characterisation of styles is hugely flawed.

    I don't discriminate on anything other than what appeals to my ear and
    mind, and that has nothing to do with race.

    So, you claim that's it's just a coincidence that the styles you like best are done almost exclusively by white people?

    Don't you see? You've been conditioned all of your life to like white styles of music best. By radio stations, by your peers, by your environment, etc....Clearly you did not grow up in the inner city with lots of black friends.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Thu Mar 10 19:14:44 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:11:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    Possibly. My least likely to be 'full of cobwebs' just now would be Joan
    A and Duke. You Look Good To Me is one of my fave tracks, and for a 1965 album extremely hi-fi. Even have it on SACD. One of my reference bass
    tracks.

    And me being a bassist (as well as other instruments), Bootsie is right
    up there too.

    So you play upright and electric?

    What do you think of Leonard Gaskin?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Mar 11 17:09:33 2022
    On 11/03/2022 4:14 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:11:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    Possibly. My least likely to be 'full of cobwebs' just now would be Joan
    A and Duke. You Look Good To Me is one of my fave tracks, and for a 1965
    album extremely hi-fi. Even have it on SACD. One of my reference bass
    tracks.

    And me being a bassist (as well as other instruments), Bootsie is right
    up there too.

    So you play upright and electric?

    'Upright' only Ashbory, and my Ibanez MC940 fretless.


    What do you think of Leonard Gaskin?


    Not aware of him as an individual. Just looked him up from what I
    saw/heard not a patch on Ray Brown.

    Of course I haven't heard much of Gaskin, but what I have heard doesn't
    inspire me to go searching for more.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to Bruce on Thu Mar 10 20:43:27 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 11:35:35 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 11:09:45 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 4:14 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:11:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    Possibly. My least likely to be 'full of cobwebs' just now would be Joan
    A and Duke. You Look Good To Me is one of my fave tracks, and for a 1965
    album extremely hi-fi. Even have it on SACD. One of my reference bass >> tracks.

    And me being a bassist (as well as other instruments), Bootsie is right >> up there too.

    So you play upright and electric?
    'Upright' only Ashbory, and my Ibanez MC940 fretless.

    Don't you need an upright to play "You Look Good To Me" the way the record sounds? I'm not a huge jazz fan, but I certainly think that the acoustic bass is a must for that sound.

    Other than funk, I vastly prefer the upright bass, which is one reason why I prefer 50s music over what came later. I also prefer the days of rock in the late 40s and 50s when the lead instrument was sax or piano rather than guitar as it later became
    when the white guys commandeered the genre from the black originators.

    You may be interested in this site, where the author is trying to review every rock single ever, starting with what he has named the first rock record, "Good Rocking Tonight" by Roy Brown from the fall of 1947. He is currently up to May 1951. Good place
    to learn about the early days of rock music, which was almost entirely black.

    https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/about-spontaneous-lunacy/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Thu Mar 10 20:35:33 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 11:09:45 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 4:14 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:11:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    Possibly. My least likely to be 'full of cobwebs' just now would be Joan >> A and Duke. You Look Good To Me is one of my fave tracks, and for a 1965 >> album extremely hi-fi. Even have it on SACD. One of my reference bass
    tracks.

    And me being a bassist (as well as other instruments), Bootsie is right
    up there too.

    So you play upright and electric?
    'Upright' only Ashbory, and my Ibanez MC940 fretless.

    Don't you need an upright to play "You Look Good To Me" the way the record sounds?

    What do you think of Leonard Gaskin?
    Not aware of him as an individual. Just looked him up from what I
    saw/heard not a patch on Ray Brown.

    Of course I haven't heard much of Gaskin, but what I have heard doesn't inspire me to go searching for more.

    He did a lot of studio work, including playing on Dylan's first album. His last couple of years were spent in the nursing home my girlfriend used to work in. Played on a lot of stuff for my Grandfather at Savoy, including this classic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPMZZeKekk8

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Mar 11 23:17:53 2022
    On 11/03/2022 5:35 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 11:09:45 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 4:14 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:11:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    Possibly. My least likely to be 'full of cobwebs' just now would be Joan >>>> A and Duke. You Look Good To Me is one of my fave tracks, and for a 1965 >>>> album extremely hi-fi. Even have it on SACD. One of my reference bass
    tracks.

    And me being a bassist (as well as other instruments), Bootsie is right >>>> up there too.

    So you play upright and electric?
    'Upright' only Ashbory, and my Ibanez MC940 fretless.

    Don't you need an upright to play "You Look Good To Me" the way the record sounds?

    Closest on the Ashbory (except the bowed part), but WTF has that got do
    do with anything ?


    What do you think of Leonard Gaskin?
    Not aware of him as an individual. Just looked him up from what I
    saw/heard not a patch on Ray Brown.

    Of course I haven't heard much of Gaskin, but what I have heard doesn't
    inspire me to go searching for more.

    He did a lot of studio work, including playing on Dylan's first album. His last couple of years were spent in the nursing home my girlfriend used to work in. Played on a lot of stuff for my Grandfather at Savoy, including this classic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPMZZeKekk8

    Everything I've heard seems to be very sparse staccato notes, slightly
    'walky'.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Fri Mar 11 07:21:32 2022
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 5:18:04 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 5:35 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 11:09:45 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 4:14 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:11:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    Possibly. My least likely to be 'full of cobwebs' just now would be Joan >>>> A and Duke. You Look Good To Me is one of my fave tracks, and for a 1965 >>>> album extremely hi-fi. Even have it on SACD. One of my reference bass >>>> tracks.

    And me being a bassist (as well as other instruments), Bootsie is right >>>> up there too.

    So you play upright and electric?
    'Upright' only Ashbory, and my Ibanez MC940 fretless.

    Don't you need an upright to play "You Look Good To Me" the way the record sounds?
    Closest on the Ashbory (except the bowed part), but WTF has that got do
    do with anything ?

    I didn't get why you would warm up to a recording that uses an upright acoustic bass if you don't have one.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Mar 12 12:45:41 2022
    On 12/03/2022 4:21 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 5:18:04 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 5:35 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 11:09:45 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 4:14 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:11:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    Possibly. My least likely to be 'full of cobwebs' just now would be Joan >>>>>> A and Duke. You Look Good To Me is one of my fave tracks, and for a 1965 >>>>>> album extremely hi-fi. Even have it on SACD. One of my reference bass >>>>>> tracks.

    And me being a bassist (as well as other instruments), Bootsie is right >>>>>> up there too.

    So you play upright and electric?
    'Upright' only Ashbory, and my Ibanez MC940 fretless.

    Don't you need an upright to play "You Look Good To Me" the way the record sounds?
    Closest on the Ashbory (except the bowed part), but WTF has that got do
    do with anything ?

    I didn't get why you would warm up to a recording that uses an upright acoustic bass if you don't have one.

    Why would I need to have an instrument in order to heavily like music
    that involved it ?!!! That would makes one's musical aoppreciation
    extremely restricted.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Fri Mar 11 16:32:47 2022
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 6:45:49 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 4:21 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 5:18:04 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 5:35 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 11:09:45 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 4:14 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:11:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    Possibly. My least likely to be 'full of cobwebs' just now would be Joan
    A and Duke. You Look Good To Me is one of my fave tracks, and for a 1965
    album extremely hi-fi. Even have it on SACD. One of my reference bass >>>>>> tracks.

    And me being a bassist (as well as other instruments), Bootsie is right
    up there too.

    So you play upright and electric?
    'Upright' only Ashbory, and my Ibanez MC940 fretless.

    Don't you need an upright to play "You Look Good To Me" the way the record sounds?
    Closest on the Ashbory (except the bowed part), but WTF has that got do
    do with anything ?

    I didn't get why you would warm up to a recording that uses an upright acoustic bass if you don't have one.
    Why would I need to have an instrument in order to heavily like music
    that involved it ?!!! That would makes one's musical aoppreciation
    extremely restricted.

    I'm not saying you can't like it. I'm saying that if you are going to play your bass along with a recording why pick a recording that does not include the type of bass that you are playing?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Mar 12 13:42:54 2022
    On 12/03/2022 1:32 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 6:45:49 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 4:21 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 5:18:04 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 5:35 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 11:09:45 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/03/2022 4:14 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:11:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    Possibly. My least likely to be 'full of cobwebs' just now would be Joan
    A and Duke. You Look Good To Me is one of my fave tracks, and for a 1965
    album extremely hi-fi. Even have it on SACD. One of my reference bass >>>>>>>> tracks.

    And me being a bassist (as well as other instruments), Bootsie is right
    up there too.

    So you play upright and electric?
    'Upright' only Ashbory, and my Ibanez MC940 fretless.

    Don't you need an upright to play "You Look Good To Me" the way the record sounds?
    Closest on the Ashbory (except the bowed part), but WTF has that got do >>>> do with anything ?

    I didn't get why you would warm up to a recording that uses an upright acoustic bass if you don't have one.
    Why would I need to have an instrument in order to heavily like music
    that involved it ?!!! That would makes one's musical aoppreciation
    extremely restricted.

    I'm not saying you can't like it. I'm saying that if you are going to play your bass along with a recording why pick a recording that does not include the type of bass that you are playing?

    I tend to play my basses with other people (or just by myself) as
    opposed to 'along with a recording'.

    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played
    on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical),
    or for that matter even on a fretted one (which would certainly sound a
    little different). Or even a keyboard, at a stretch.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Fri Mar 11 17:23:40 2022
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:43:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played
    on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical),

    You're out of your fucking mind if you think that there's no difference in how and acoustic bass sounds and how ANY kind of electric bass sounds playing the same piece. It's not even close to sounding the same.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Mar 12 14:36:08 2022
    On 12/03/2022 2:23 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:43:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played
    on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical),

    You're out of your fucking mind if you think that there's no difference in how and acoustic bass sounds and how ANY kind of electric bass sounds playing the same piece. It's not even close to sounding the same.

    Of course you know this from experience.

    A fretless electric bass, especially with muted strings, can sound not
    too far off, if imitation is your criteria.

    But why should it have to in the first place ? Not everybody is so anally-retentive about the minutiae of sound.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Fri Mar 11 20:11:30 2022
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 8:36:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 2:23 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:43:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played >> on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical),

    You're out of your fucking mind if you think that there's no difference in how and acoustic bass sounds and how ANY kind of electric bass sounds playing the same piece. It's not even close to sounding the same.
    Of course you know this from experience.

    A fretless electric bass, especially with muted strings, can sound not
    too far off, if imitation is your criteria.

    But why should it have to in the first place ? Not everybody is so anally-retentive about the minutiae of sound.

    I don't see the difference between acoustic and electric bass as anywhere close to minutiae. Do you also think that the difference between acoustic and electric guitar is minutiae?

    I can ALWAYS tell instantly when a recording has electric or acoustic bass, and for me, acoustic is ALWAYS better except for funk recordings. I actually like this below almost as much as the Beatles version because it has an acoustic bass.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1KOwvPgu4Y

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Mar 12 18:52:27 2022
    On 12/03/2022 5:11 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 8:36:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 2:23 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:43:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played >>>> on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical), >>>
    You're out of your fucking mind if you think that there's no difference in how and acoustic bass sounds and how ANY kind of electric bass sounds playing the same piece. It's not even close to sounding the same.
    Of course you know this from experience.

    A fretless electric bass, especially with muted strings, can sound not
    too far off, if imitation is your criteria.

    But why should it have to in the first place ? Not everybody is so
    anally-retentive about the minutiae of sound.

    I don't see the difference between acoustic and electric bass as anywhere close to minutiae. Do you also think that the difference between acoustic and electric guitar is minutiae?

    No, but obsessing over whether or not it is significant is.


    I can ALWAYS tell instantly when a recording has electric or acoustic bass, and for me, acoustic is ALWAYS better except for funk recordings.


    Pleased for you.

    I actually like this below almost as much as the Beatles version because
    it has an acoustic bass.

    If you want to split hairs then I have an acoustic bass. And it's not
    upright and it's not fretless.https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ysf9fppdytbjtl/Ibanez%20Talman%20acoustic%20bass%20w.pickup.jpg?dl=0


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1KOwvPgu4Y

    It's OK. No better or worse than any other bass line just because of the instrument.

    We get it. You get a stiffy almost exclusively for upright basses.


    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Fri Mar 11 22:31:14 2022
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 12:52:37 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 5:11 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 8:36:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 2:23 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:43:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played >>>> on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical), >>>
    You're out of your fucking mind if you think that there's no difference in how and acoustic bass sounds and how ANY kind of electric bass sounds playing the same piece. It's not even close to sounding the same.
    Of course you know this from experience.

    A fretless electric bass, especially with muted strings, can sound not
    too far off, if imitation is your criteria.

    But why should it have to in the first place ? Not everybody is so
    anally-retentive about the minutiae of sound.

    I don't see the difference between acoustic and electric bass as anywhere close to minutiae. Do you also think that the difference between acoustic and electric guitar is minutiae?
    No, but obsessing over whether or not it is significant is.

    I can ALWAYS tell instantly when a recording has electric or acoustic bass, and for me, acoustic is ALWAYS better except for funk recordings.
    Pleased for you.
    I actually like this below almost as much as the Beatles version because
    it has an acoustic bass.
    If you want to split hairs then I have an acoustic bass. And it's not
    upright and it's not fretless.https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ysf9fppdytbjtl/Ibanez%20Talman%20acoustic%20bass%20w.pickup.jpg?dl=0


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1KOwvPgu4Y

    It's OK. No better or worse than any other bass line just because of the instrument.

    We get it. You get a stiffy almost exclusively for upright basses.

    They have a COMPLETELY different sound than an electric bass, and I'm sure vastly different than your guitar shaped acoustic. A must for rockabilly and jazz. You can't get this kind of sound from anything but an upright acoustic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggi5Tq3XDRI

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Mar 12 21:41:52 2022
    On 12/03/2022 7:31 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 12:52:37 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 5:11 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 8:36:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 2:23 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:43:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played >>>>>> on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical), >>>>>
    You're out of your fucking mind if you think that there's no difference in how and acoustic bass sounds and how ANY kind of electric bass sounds playing the same piece. It's not even close to sounding the same.
    Of course you know this from experience.

    A fretless electric bass, especially with muted strings, can sound not >>>> too far off, if imitation is your criteria.

    But why should it have to in the first place ? Not everybody is so
    anally-retentive about the minutiae of sound.

    I don't see the difference between acoustic and electric bass as anywhere close to minutiae. Do you also think that the difference between acoustic and electric guitar is minutiae?
    No, but obsessing over whether or not it is significant is.

    I can ALWAYS tell instantly when a recording has electric or acoustic bass, and for me, acoustic is ALWAYS better except for funk recordings.
    Pleased for you.
    I actually like this below almost as much as the Beatles version because
    it has an acoustic bass.
    If you want to split hairs then I have an acoustic bass. And it's not
    upright and it's not
    fretless.https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ysf9fppdytbjtl/Ibanez%20Talman%20acoustic%20bass%20w.pickup.jpg?dl=0


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1KOwvPgu4Y

    It's OK. No better or worse than any other bass line just because of the
    instrument.

    We get it. You get a stiffy almost exclusively for upright basses.

    They have a COMPLETELY different sound than an electric bass, and I'm sure vastly different than your guitar shaped acoustic. A must for rockabilly and jazz. You can't get this kind of sound from anything but an upright acoustic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggi5Tq3XDRI

    https://lmgtfy.app/?q=https%3A%2F%2Flmgtfy.app%2F%3Fq%3Dfretless%2Belectric%2Bbass%2Bupright%2Bsound&iie=1

    But what would they all know.

    Actually I can do better on by fretless Ibanez than any of these - with
    muting, scooped EQ and a sharper picking angle I can even get a good
    slap bass sound.

    And then there is the Ashbory which is pretty much an exact upright sound. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t33mxAKVj4

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to geoff on Sat Mar 12 07:14:37 2022
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 3:42:03 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    And then there is the Ashbory which is pretty much an exact upright sound. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t33mxAKVj4

    If you think that this sounds ANYWHERE NEAR an "exact upright sound" you need some of this:

    https://images.freshop.com/00042037104795/9c4c88065b4f89174ce22396f55926ca_large.png

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dennis Rowan@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Mar 12 08:00:02 2022
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 10:14:39 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 3:42:03 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    And then there is the Ashbory which is pretty much an exact upright sound. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t33mxAKVj4
    If you think that this sounds ANYWHERE NEAR an "exact upright sound" you need some of this:

    https://images.freshop.com/00042037104795/9c4c88065b4f89174ce22396f55926ca_large.png

    Just play Lou Reed's "Walk on the Wild Side". Herbie Flowers electric and standup basses are fugued together!!
    The sonic differences are distinctly displayed here!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Dennis Rowan on Sun Mar 13 12:53:01 2022
    On 13/03/2022 5:00 am, Dennis Rowan wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 10:14:39 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 3:42:03 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    And then there is the Ashbory which is pretty much an exact upright sound. >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t33mxAKVj4
    If you think that this sounds ANYWHERE NEAR an "exact upright sound" you need some of this:

    https://images.freshop.com/00042037104795/9c4c88065b4f89174ce22396f55926ca_large.png

    Just play Lou Reed's "Walk on the Wild Side". Herbie Flowers electric and standup basses are fugued together!!
    The sonic differences are distinctly displayed here!!

    Certainly are, as they are intended to be in this case. Wouldn't be any
    point in doing that doubling otherwise !

    But that's not to say that an electric bass (esp fretless) can't be
    played and EQed to sound much more like an upright bass than that, if
    that is want if wanted, by:
    - Reduced sustain by hand muting and/or a damper on the strings)
    - EQ by reducing the low mids and upper lows, to produce the more boxy
    sound.
    - Fingering technique.

    Bruce (not Jack Bruce !) might disagree.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sun Mar 13 12:41:42 2022
    On 13/03/2022 4:14 am, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 3:42:03 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    And then there is the Ashbory which is pretty much an exact upright sound. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t33mxAKVj4

    Sound pretty much like the one that I play (not mine, and 'only' a 3/4).


    If you think that this sounds ANYWHERE NEAR an "exact upright sound" you need some of this:

    https://images.freshop.com/00042037104795/9c4c88065b4f89174ce22396f55926ca_large.png

    Apparently.

    geoiff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norbert K@21:1/5 to geoff on Sun Mar 13 05:41:38 2022
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 3:42:03 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 7:31 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 12:52:37 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 5:11 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 8:36:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 2:23 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:43:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played
    on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical),

    You're out of your fucking mind if you think that there's no difference in how and acoustic bass sounds and how ANY kind of electric bass sounds playing the same piece. It's not even close to sounding the same.
    Of course you know this from experience.

    A fretless electric bass, especially with muted strings, can sound not >>>> too far off, if imitation is your criteria.

    But why should it have to in the first place ? Not everybody is so
    anally-retentive about the minutiae of sound.

    I don't see the difference between acoustic and electric bass as anywhere close to minutiae. Do you also think that the difference between acoustic and electric guitar is minutiae?
    No, but obsessing over whether or not it is significant is.

    I can ALWAYS tell instantly when a recording has electric or acoustic bass, and for me, acoustic is ALWAYS better except for funk recordings.
    Pleased for you.
    I actually like this below almost as much as the Beatles version because >> it has an acoustic bass.
    If you want to split hairs then I have an acoustic bass. And it's not
    upright and it's not
    fretless.https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ysf9fppdytbjtl/Ibanez%20Talman%20acoustic%20bass%20w.pickup.jpg?dl=0


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1KOwvPgu4Y

    It's OK. No better or worse than any other bass line just because of the >> instrument.

    We get it. You get a stiffy almost exclusively for upright basses.

    They have a COMPLETELY different sound than an electric bass, and I'm sure vastly different than your guitar shaped acoustic. A must for rockabilly and jazz. You can't get this kind of sound from anything but an upright acoustic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggi5Tq3XDRI
    https://lmgtfy.app/?q=https%3A%2F%2Flmgtfy.app%2F%3Fq%3Dfretless%2Belectric%2Bbass%2Bupright%2Bsound&iie=1

    But what would they all know.

    Actually I can do better on by fretless Ibanez than any of these - with muting, scooped EQ and a sharper picking angle I can even get a good
    slap bass sound.

    And then there is the Ashbory which is pretty much an exact upright sound. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t33mxAKVj4

    geoff

    That thing sounds amazing. I never even tried one -- to my shame.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dennis Rowan@21:1/5 to Norbert K on Sun Mar 13 07:02:57 2022
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 8:41:39 AM UTC-4, Norbert K wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 3:42:03 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 7:31 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 12:52:37 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 5:11 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 8:36:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 2:23 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:43:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played
    on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical),

    You're out of your fucking mind if you think that there's no difference in how and acoustic bass sounds and how ANY kind of electric bass sounds playing the same piece. It's not even close to sounding the same.
    Of course you know this from experience.

    A fretless electric bass, especially with muted strings, can sound not >>>> too far off, if imitation is your criteria.

    But why should it have to in the first place ? Not everybody is so >>>> anally-retentive about the minutiae of sound.

    I don't see the difference between acoustic and electric bass as anywhere close to minutiae. Do you also think that the difference between acoustic and electric guitar is minutiae?
    No, but obsessing over whether or not it is significant is.

    I can ALWAYS tell instantly when a recording has electric or acoustic bass, and for me, acoustic is ALWAYS better except for funk recordings.
    Pleased for you.
    I actually like this below almost as much as the Beatles version because >> it has an acoustic bass.
    If you want to split hairs then I have an acoustic bass. And it's not
    upright and it's not
    fretless.https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ysf9fppdytbjtl/Ibanez%20Talman%20acoustic%20bass%20w.pickup.jpg?dl=0


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1KOwvPgu4Y

    It's OK. No better or worse than any other bass line just because of the >> instrument.

    We get it. You get a stiffy almost exclusively for upright basses.

    They have a COMPLETELY different sound than an electric bass, and I'm sure vastly different than your guitar shaped acoustic. A must for rockabilly and jazz. You can't get this kind of sound from anything but an upright acoustic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggi5Tq3XDRI
    https://lmgtfy.app/?q=https%3A%2F%2Flmgtfy.app%2F%3Fq%3Dfretless%2Belectric%2Bbass%2Bupright%2Bsound&iie=1

    But what would they all know.

    Actually I can do better on by fretless Ibanez than any of these - with muting, scooped EQ and a sharper picking angle I can even get a good
    slap bass sound.

    And then there is the Ashbory which is pretty much an exact upright sound. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t33mxAKVj4

    geoff
    That thing sounds amazing. I never even tried one -- to my shame.

    https://youtu.be/2CmnKprLoAs

    Now, that's how you minimally maximize your rhythm section, baby!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJKellog@yahoo.com@21:1/5 to dennis...@gmail.com on Sun Mar 13 13:54:31 2022
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 10:03:00 AM UTC-4, dennis...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 8:41:39 AM UTC-4, Norbert K wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 3:42:03 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 7:31 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 12:52:37 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 5:11 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 8:36:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 2:23 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:43:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:

    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played
    on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical),

    You're out of your fucking mind if you think that there's no difference in how and acoustic bass sounds and how ANY kind of electric bass sounds playing the same piece. It's not even close to sounding the same.
    Of course you know this from experience.

    A fretless electric bass, especially with muted strings, can sound not
    too far off, if imitation is your criteria.

    But why should it have to in the first place ? Not everybody is so >>>> anally-retentive about the minutiae of sound.

    I don't see the difference between acoustic and electric bass as anywhere close to minutiae. Do you also think that the difference between acoustic and electric guitar is minutiae?
    No, but obsessing over whether or not it is significant is.

    I can ALWAYS tell instantly when a recording has electric or acoustic bass, and for me, acoustic is ALWAYS better except for funk recordings.
    Pleased for you.
    I actually like this below almost as much as the Beatles version because
    it has an acoustic bass.
    If you want to split hairs then I have an acoustic bass. And it's not >> upright and it's not
    fretless.https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ysf9fppdytbjtl/Ibanez%20Talman%20acoustic%20bass%20w.pickup.jpg?dl=0


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1KOwvPgu4Y

    It's OK. No better or worse than any other bass line just because of the
    instrument.

    We get it. You get a stiffy almost exclusively for upright basses.

    They have a COMPLETELY different sound than an electric bass, and I'm sure vastly different than your guitar shaped acoustic. A must for rockabilly and jazz. You can't get this kind of sound from anything but an upright acoustic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggi5Tq3XDRI
    https://lmgtfy.app/?q=https%3A%2F%2Flmgtfy.app%2F%3Fq%3Dfretless%2Belectric%2Bbass%2Bupright%2Bsound&iie=1

    But what would they all know.

    Actually I can do better on by fretless Ibanez than any of these - with muting, scooped EQ and a sharper picking angle I can even get a good
    slap bass sound.

    And then there is the Ashbory which is pretty much an exact upright sound.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t33mxAKVj4

    geoff
    That thing sounds amazing. I never even tried one -- to my shame.
    https://youtu.be/2CmnKprLoAs

    Now, that's how you minimally maximize your rhythm section, baby!!
    What are the Ashbory's strings made from?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to RJKe...@yahoo.com on Mon Mar 14 10:18:58 2022
    On 14/03/2022 9:54 am, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 10:03:00 AM UTC-4, dennis...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 8:41:39 AM UTC-4, Norbert K wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 3:42:03 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 7:31 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 12:52:37 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 5:11 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 8:36:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 2:23 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:43:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played
    on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical),

    You're out of your fucking mind if you think that there's no difference in how and acoustic bass sounds and how ANY kind of electric bass sounds playing the same piece. It's not even close to sounding the same.
    Of course you know this from experience.

    A fretless electric bass, especially with muted strings, can sound not >>>>>>>> too far off, if imitation is your criteria.

    But why should it have to in the first place ? Not everybody is so >>>>>>>> anally-retentive about the minutiae of sound.

    I don't see the difference between acoustic and electric bass as anywhere close to minutiae. Do you also think that the difference between acoustic and electric guitar is minutiae?
    No, but obsessing over whether or not it is significant is.

    I can ALWAYS tell instantly when a recording has electric or acoustic bass, and for me, acoustic is ALWAYS better except for funk recordings.
    Pleased for you.
    I actually like this below almost as much as the Beatles version because >>>>>> it has an acoustic bass.
    If you want to split hairs then I have an acoustic bass. And it's not >>>>>> upright and it's not
    fretless.https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ysf9fppdytbjtl/Ibanez%20Talman%20acoustic%20bass%20w.pickup.jpg?dl=0


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1KOwvPgu4Y

    It's OK. No better or worse than any other bass line just because of the >>>>>> instrument.

    We get it. You get a stiffy almost exclusively for upright basses.

    They have a COMPLETELY different sound than an electric bass, and I'm sure vastly different than your guitar shaped acoustic. A must for rockabilly and jazz. You can't get this kind of sound from anything but an upright acoustic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggi5Tq3XDRI
    https://lmgtfy.app/?q=https%3A%2F%2Flmgtfy.app%2F%3Fq%3Dfretless%2Belectric%2Bbass%2Bupright%2Bsound&iie=1

    But what would they all know.

    Actually I can do better on by fretless Ibanez than any of these - with >>>> muting, scooped EQ and a sharper picking angle I can even get a good
    slap bass sound.

    And then there is the Ashbory which is pretty much an exact upright sound. >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t33mxAKVj4

    geoff
    That thing sounds amazing. I never even tried one -- to my shame.
    https://youtu.be/2CmnKprLoAs

    Now, that's how you minimally maximize your rhythm section, baby!!
    What are the Ashbory's strings made from?



    Silicone rubber. Sound is fun and usable at a pinch, but hard to play
    very accurately in tune - due to the short fretboard.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJKellog@yahoo.com@21:1/5 to geoff on Tue Mar 15 11:29:22 2022
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 5:19:09 PM UTC-4, geoff wrote:
    On 14/03/2022 9:54 am, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 10:03:00 AM UTC-4, dennis...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 8:41:39 AM UTC-4, Norbert K wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 3:42:03 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 7:31 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 12:52:37 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 5:11 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 8:36:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 2:23 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:43:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played
    on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical),

    You're out of your fucking mind if you think that there's no difference in how and acoustic bass sounds and how ANY kind of electric bass sounds playing the same piece. It's not even close to sounding the same.
    Of course you know this from experience.

    A fretless electric bass, especially with muted strings, can sound not
    too far off, if imitation is your criteria.

    But why should it have to in the first place ? Not everybody is so >>>>>>>> anally-retentive about the minutiae of sound.

    I don't see the difference between acoustic and electric bass as anywhere close to minutiae. Do you also think that the difference between acoustic and electric guitar is minutiae?
    No, but obsessing over whether or not it is significant is.

    I can ALWAYS tell instantly when a recording has electric or acoustic bass, and for me, acoustic is ALWAYS better except for funk recordings.
    Pleased for you.
    I actually like this below almost as much as the Beatles version because
    it has an acoustic bass.
    If you want to split hairs then I have an acoustic bass. And it's not >>>>>> upright and it's not
    fretless.https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ysf9fppdytbjtl/Ibanez%20Talman%20acoustic%20bass%20w.pickup.jpg?dl=0


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1KOwvPgu4Y

    It's OK. No better or worse than any other bass line just because of the
    instrument.

    We get it. You get a stiffy almost exclusively for upright basses. >>>>>
    They have a COMPLETELY different sound than an electric bass, and I'm sure vastly different than your guitar shaped acoustic. A must for rockabilly and jazz. You can't get this kind of sound from anything but an upright acoustic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggi5Tq3XDRI
    https://lmgtfy.app/?q=https%3A%2F%2Flmgtfy.app%2F%3Fq%3Dfretless%2Belectric%2Bbass%2Bupright%2Bsound&iie=1

    But what would they all know.

    Actually I can do better on by fretless Ibanez than any of these - with >>>> muting, scooped EQ and a sharper picking angle I can even get a good >>>> slap bass sound.

    And then there is the Ashbory which is pretty much an exact upright sound.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t33mxAKVj4

    geoff
    That thing sounds amazing. I never even tried one -- to my shame.
    https://youtu.be/2CmnKprLoAs

    Now, that's how you minimally maximize your rhythm section, baby!!
    What are the Ashbory's strings made from?


    Silicone rubber. Sound is fun and usable at a pinch, but hard to play
    very accurately in tune - due to the short fretboard.

    geoff

    How much are they?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to RJKe...@yahoo.com on Wed Mar 16 10:20:36 2022
    On 16/03/2022 7:29 am, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 5:19:09 PM UTC-4, geoff wrote:
    On 14/03/2022 9:54 am, RJKe...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 10:03:00 AM UTC-4, dennis...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 8:41:39 AM UTC-4, Norbert K wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 3:42:03 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 7:31 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 12:52:37 AM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/03/2022 5:11 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 8:36:19 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/03/2022 2:23 pm, Bruce wrote:
    On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:43:05 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>
    But there is no reason why an upright acoustic bass part can't be played
    on a fretless electric bass guitar (which could sound nearly identical),

    You're out of your fucking mind if you think that there's no difference in how and acoustic bass sounds and how ANY kind of electric bass sounds playing the same piece. It's not even close to sounding the same.
    Of course you know this from experience.

    A fretless electric bass, especially with muted strings, can sound not
    too far off, if imitation is your criteria.

    But why should it have to in the first place ? Not everybody is so >>>>>>>>>> anally-retentive about the minutiae of sound.

    I don't see the difference between acoustic and electric bass as anywhere close to minutiae. Do you also think that the difference between acoustic and electric guitar is minutiae?
    No, but obsessing over whether or not it is significant is.

    I can ALWAYS tell instantly when a recording has electric or acoustic bass, and for me, acoustic is ALWAYS better except for funk recordings.
    Pleased for you.
    I actually like this below almost as much as the Beatles version because
    it has an acoustic bass.
    If you want to split hairs then I have an acoustic bass. And it's not >>>>>>>> upright and it's not
    fretless.https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ysf9fppdytbjtl/Ibanez%20Talman%20acoustic%20bass%20w.pickup.jpg?dl=0


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1KOwvPgu4Y

    It's OK. No better or worse than any other bass line just because of the
    instrument.

    We get it. You get a stiffy almost exclusively for upright basses. >>>>>>>
    They have a COMPLETELY different sound than an electric bass, and I'm sure vastly different than your guitar shaped acoustic. A must for rockabilly and jazz. You can't get this kind of sound from anything but an upright acoustic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggi5Tq3XDRI
    https://lmgtfy.app/?q=https%3A%2F%2Flmgtfy.app%2F%3Fq%3Dfretless%2Belectric%2Bbass%2Bupright%2Bsound&iie=1

    But what would they all know.

    Actually I can do better on by fretless Ibanez than any of these - with >>>>>> muting, scooped EQ and a sharper picking angle I can even get a good >>>>>> slap bass sound.

    And then there is the Ashbory which is pretty much an exact upright sound.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t33mxAKVj4

    geoff
    That thing sounds amazing. I never even tried one -- to my shame.
    https://youtu.be/2CmnKprLoAs

    Now, that's how you minimally maximize your rhythm section, baby!!
    What are the Ashbory's strings made from?


    Silicone rubber. Sound is fun and usable at a pinch, but hard to play
    very accurately in tune - due to the short fretboard.

    geoff

    How much are they?

    http://www.ashelec.demon.co.uk/ashbory/

    https://www.basscentre.com/bass-centre-ashbory-bass.html

    Used ones on Reverb.com
    https://reverb.com/item/21186041-fender-ashbory-bass

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From curtissdubois@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Mar 25 07:30:56 2022
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4



    I don't know how much of a Beatles fan she really was. She may have used the reviews as a gimmick to gain subscribers and interest in her own, very un-Beatlesy stuff. However, she gave us fans something to talk about and debate.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to curtis...@gmail.com on Fri Mar 25 10:51:48 2022
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 10:30:57 AM UTC-4, curtis...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:02:10 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4



    I don't know how much of a Beatles fan she really was. She may have used the reviews as a gimmick to gain subscribers and interest in her own, very un-Beatlesy stuff. However, she gave us fans something to talk about and debate.

    She wasn't a Beatles fan at all. most of their songs she was hearing for the first time, an even those she had heard already she was not very familiar with them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norbert K@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sun Jul 24 06:40:23 2022
    On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 7:02:10 AM UTC-8, Bruce wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoxG4MF3y4

    Caroline is now tackling conspiracy theories, including "Elvis is Alive" and "Paul is Dead." She's not a Richard Dawkins or a Frederick Crews, but she's got some some sense and makes a reasonable case for the truth.

    She asked people for suggestions on which conspiracy she ought to consider next, and I suggested Q-Anon. Which is funny, because shortly after giving her that reply, I read the Sunday Boston Globe and found an article titled "Welcome to the Beatles-
    verse."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)