• Re: a Dios

    From Ed Chapin@21:1/5 to Ed Chapin on Fri Dec 10 22:58:39 2021
    On 3/30/20 7:01 PM, Ed Chapin wrote:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dta6CVWj6cc

    Ed

    . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ed Chapin@21:1/5 to Amos Nomore on Sat Aug 20 09:13:20 2022
    On 12/4/19 15:46, Amos Nomore wrote:
    On 2019-11-29 09:24:37 +0000, Ed Chapin said:

    On 10/5/19 9:53 PM, Band Beyond You wrote:
    Ed Chapin <edchapin01@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GfYV3db0aM

    Ed


    Thumbs up, Ed! How ya doin’?


    As RMGD has come to be populated largely by trolls, antagonists, and a
    variety of generally unpleasant cyberstalking federales, I don't tend
    to hang here.  I was solely stopping by to pay musical respects to RH,
    but since you asked . . .

    A couple of months ago, I took my mother to the hospital for a routine
    checkup and she took a tumble near the front door (she's had
    ambulatory issues for years).  As I approached to help her up, I
    noticed a nearby woman about my age with a rather smarmy, smirky look
    on her face, which seemed odd given what had just transpired in front
    of her.

    She was standing with another woman, who appeared old enough to be her
    mother, so my first thought was that maybe she had undergone a similar
    experience and could commiserate.  My second thought was "Do I know
    this person?," as I then considered that her expression appeared to
    indicate familiarity with me.

    I took a good look at her face, scanned her hair and body, and my
    thoughts proceeded thusly:



    "Oh, that's C." (C is somebody I worked with years ago, who lives in
    that town, and who has always treated me with a bit of disdain.)

    "No, that's not C.  That's C's daughter." (C's daughter has the same
    blond hair and general build.)

    "No, that's not C's daughter.  C's daughter is too young.  That's E.
    (E is a medical professional who works near that complex and who has
    also treated me with a bit of reservation.)

    "No, that's not E. E is taller with darker hair.  That's Dr. S."
    (Doctor S. works near that complex and has the same general
    height/hair color.)


    This woman then spoke to me, indicating that my mother fell
    gracefully, and my mother reaffirmed that she wasn't badly hurt. I
    decided at that point it was Dr. S., and continued to assist my
    mother.  After getting my mother to her feet, with the help of a male
    bystander, this woman walked off and spoke again, reaffirming that her
    fall had been a graceful one.  At that point, I decided . . .


    "No, that's not Dr. S.  That's V."  (This was quite disconcerting to
    me, as V is somebody I already wrote to once (incorrectly) trying to
    track down another woman in another incident of uncertain identity.

    As she walked off, I was trying to decide whether or not to use that
    name.  I decided against it (right call), and she walked off while my
    head spun.  I pondered the voice over the next few days and knew it
    sounded familiar from somewhere, and then, several days later . . .


    "Oh! That was B."  (B is someone I talked with a lot in a class I took
    years ago, and over the telephone a few times.  She also used the word
    "gracefully" in our conversations more that once and lives a few miles
    from hospital, or did 25 years ago.)


    So now, B thinks I either recognized her and didn't really acknowledge
    her or didn't recognize her at all.  Such is my life.



    It wouldn't be bit deal if it was a one-off, but I have played out
    scenarios like this dozens/hundreds of times throughout life, going
    back to elementary school.  A few years ago, some short dark-haired
    woman got so mad I didn't recognize her that she threatened to smack
    me with a baseball bat.  I tried to figure out, tease out, who she
    was, so that I could apologize.  Ultimately, I ended up writing to the
    wrong woman 4 times, and calling several others trying to resolve it.

    One of the people I called to apologize to was an ex-student, one for
    whom I wrote a grad school recommendation, and who now works as a
    teacher in the same small town I live in.  Trust me, this woman was a
    bit freaked out to have me call her 15 years later out of the blue.
    "IT WASN'T ME," she said.  I always look at the bright side, though,
    as it gave me an opportunity to congratulate her on her achievements.


    The upshot is this:  I'm prosopagnosic--one of the 2% of the
    population that doesn't recognize people via a facial processing unit
    in the right fusiform gyrus fold part of the brain.  I recognize
    people via a mix of face, location, body shape, hair, posture, gait,
    and voice.  Unless I am currently interacting with you on a regular
    basis, the face often needs additional context to incite recognition.

    This condition has only been documented to be as prevalent as it is in
    the last few years, and it is blowing quite a few minds.  98% of the
    population will likely never understand, because they've never been in
    that particular cave, but there ya go . . .

    As somebody trained in the social sciences, I get a bit of an extra
    chuckle out of it, as this condition certainly has the potential to
    present a challenge to some social constructionist models of human
    behavior :-)

    To any good folks left here, carry on.

    It's interesting how much variation exists in how individuals perceive reality.

    I have difficulty visualizing things in my "mind's eye", a condition
    known as aphantasia which occurs in a small percentage of the general population.  I had always assumed that people use their visual
    imagination similarly to my own but became suspicious that I was
    different than most after being guided into hypnosis via closed-eye
    visual imagery, which I couldn't really grasp.  I asked around amongst friends and learned that some of them could actually conjure up
    closed-eye (and sometimes even open-eye) photographic mental images at
    will and that most of the others had some capacity to "see" mental
    images without much effort.  I just see black but am not an extreme case
    in that I don't have to rely on non-sensory or linguistic memory to
    describe an object or scenario in my imagination like some people with complete aphantasia need to do.

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-the-minds-eye-is-blind1/

    I dream vividly and in color and have had very detailed and intense closed-eye visuals on psychedelics.  I'm extremely observant and
    sensitive to sensory input most of the time and have no difficulty
    planning and imagining outcomes, etc., but I simply cannot (or am barely
    able to) "see" these things in my mind's eye.

    I kind of wish I'd never heard about this phenomenon because I feel
    that, to some degree, I'm missing out on an aspect of living that the majority of people take for granted.  Though I don't have prosopagnosia,
    I empathize with you and your ability to cope with and adapt to this
    peculiar mode of experiencing the world around and within you.

    Be well and let us know how you're doing when you feel like it.


    Thank you, especially coming from one who has personally sensed how
    potentially wide the spectrum of interpretive experience may actually be.

    Take some solace if your mind's ear works, as being able to listen to
    favorite passages at will is quite handy at times.

    Many days, the prosopagnosia doesn't bother me at all.  A quick review
    of the literature will reveal that many prosopagnosics are very good at
    reading other contextual clues surrounding the face. As long as you see
    people in expected situations, it is quite likely that you will
    recognize them based largely on other than facial cues--and sometimes
    even on facial clues if there is a distinctive feature (mole, crooked
    nose, etc.).

    This type of recognition, however occurs using different parts of the
    brain than the super hi-def facial processing center used by the 98% of
    the population with normal facial recognition skills. And it is not an all-or-nothing thing, either, as some people appear to have greater
    recognition deficits than others.  I tend to be an optimist, and for the record, I think I recognize most people most of the time.

    But, I also fail to recognize them at a higher rate than normal.

    ~~~~~

    A certain part of the brain “allows most people to recognize faces in
    more detail than they do similarly complex inanimate objects. For those
    with prosopagnosia, the method for recognizing faces depends on the less sensitive object-recognition system.”

    “Prosopagnosics often learn to use "piecemeal" or "feature-by-feature" recognition strategies. This may involve secondary clues such as
    clothing, gait, hair color, skin color, body shape, and voice.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosopagnosia

    ~~~~~

    “People with developmental prosopagnosia appear to make up the low end
    of the distribution of face recognition abilities.”

    These people “have never recognized faces normally so their impairment
    is often not readily apparent to them. As a result, many developmental prosopagnosics are unaware of their prosopagnosia even as adults.”

    https://www.faceblind.org/research

    ~~~~~

    An interesting sideshoot of learning about prosopagnosia is learning
    that many people, even the so-called “liberal” ones tend to distrust the science here. Some version of “You recognized me, so you can’t really
    have it” may rear its head in some Mickey Mouse detectivistic “I gotcha” kind of moment.

    That simply tells me they haven’t grasped the difference between object recognition and facial recognition. And it is certainly not politically convenient for many contemporary liberals to acknowledge that a certain percentage of the population is genetically predisposed to using body
    features for identification purposes.

    This is not a blanket condemnation of liberalism, BTW, but the
    liberalism that initially attracted me back in the 1960s and 1970s
    appeared to be much more open minded, and not merely dogma of a
    different stripe.

    Truly, I recognize people I haven't seen in years if conditions are
    right.  For example, I recognized an old friend at a grocery store in
    Dover after not having seen her for 15 years, in the neighborhood I know
    her from, from a passing side/rear view, based largely on her hair style
    and eyeglasses, clothing style, and overall height and body shape--which
    hadn't changed much in 15 years.  That was just a few months into the
    COVID thing, and she was wearing a paranoid person's face mask, from
    below her chin right up to the base of her eyes.

    I recognized another woman I hadn’t seen for 10 years in the same
    grocery store, and she lives 40 miles away, but I also know she travels
    this way periodically. She is also very tall with long, frizzy red
    hair. Duh!

    I recognized a professor from UNH walking down the street in Portsmouth,
    from 25 feet away, based largely on her hair, gait, posture, and clothing.

    I recognized another professor from UNH in a Walmart near her house,
    from down the aisle 40 feet away, based largely on location, height, and
    hair.

    In short, I tend to recognize people more successfully when I see their
    whole body, especially in motion, or in a specific familiar context.

    This method of identification, however, is slower, nowhere near as
    accurate, and is much more likely to fail in passing close-up
    situations.  It is the difference between object based recognition, and specific facial based recognition activated in a specific part of the
    brain.  The latter is faster and more accurate.

    Out of context, for example, I walked right by an ex-neighbor loading
    his van outside of a shop in York. Walked right by him, looked right at
    his face from 2-3 feet away, and the bulb didn’t come on. About 10 feet
    past him, he said in a tone of disbelief, “Hey, Ed!” I turned and
    looked, probably looking dumbfounded, but still not recognizing him,
    until he finally said, “It’s *****.”

    Another day, I had a 2 minute conversation with a customer (a different ex-neighbor) at the L-shaped counter at a store in Biddeford, him on one
    side, me on the other. I finished my purchase and started to walk out
    of the store, and he said “See you later, Ed” when I passed by him. I
    was so startled that he knew my name, I literally jumped, which startled
    him, “What the hell are you jumping for?”

    And don’t even get me started on how many times I have confused one
    person for another. I can’t (or won’t) begin to explain the numerous
    dicey situations this has caused, but on a fairly benign level . . .

    A few months ago, I started a conversation with a regular delivery
    person while was walking toward the vehicle, and was 3-4 sentences into
    an ongoing dialogue when I realized this person looked quite puzzled. 
    In fact, it was not the same delivery person at all.  In fact, it wasn't
    even a woman, but a man of the same general build and hair color, who
    had his hair pulled backed in a similar style ponytail.  Oops!

    And for every incident I have ever told anybody about, there are
    probably 100 more I haven’t. In hindsight, it has likely been the root
    of many of my social quirks over the years. I can trace it back to
    about 1971.

    A few years ago, I think I responded to somebody I once knew fairly well
    (saw Pat Metheny with, in the old City Hall Auditorium in Portland) in
    an unfamiliar place and didn't recognize him to give him a real friend's greeting.  I spoke to him more politely, like he was a total stranger. 
    I didn't figure this out until several days later.  This person died of natural causes shortly thereafter, and I never got to explain or
    apologize.  This one has been a festering oops for years, but I take
    some solace in knowing this guy was so easy going that he likely
    understood on some level that I was not being maliciously unfriendly.
    But, still . . .

    Sorry it took so long to respond, but engaging this newsgroup has become
    so generally unpleasant in recent years that I actually have to force
    myself to do it.

    Be well!

    Ed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)