• The old order changeth

    From Gary McGath@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 18 19:02:36 2021
    Some of us here are old enough to remember the protest singers of the
    sixties and seventies. What they protested isn't important to what I'm
    saying here. What is important is that they were eager to take on controversial topics, to point out death and suffering, and to condemn
    those they saw as responsible.

    At this weekend's Festival of the Living Rooms, people have been putting content warnings ahead of half their songs, to let listeners protect
    themselves against hearing anything unpleasant. Someone told me today
    that if I introduced a set by saying my songs would mention serious harm
    that real people have suffered, I'd lose most of my audience. I don't
    believe that at all, but it suggests that some people want nothing but sweetness and blandness in their musical diet.

    I wouldn't find much value in that kind of culture. It goes against
    everything filk has been. I haven't performed a single set online;
    trying to connect to an audience that's visible only through a computer
    screen seems too difficult for me. I prefer the interaction of open circles.

    But if I were asked to perform a set now, I'd push the edge as hard as I
    could, to break the trap misleadingly called a "safe space." Here's a
    possible set list:

    This Is My Phone (start with something simple and fun, though even that
    song mentions government spying)
    Lullaby for a Benevolent Despot (warning of well-meaning tyranny)
    Black Cats Matter (got to have a cat song; this one mentions animal abuse)
    The Qualified Immunity Waltz (police violence and lack of recourse)
    Monster (alienation, threat of violence)
    Mary Dyer (woman killed, religious persecution, but an optimistic ending)
    Heart of the Planet Pluto (got to close with a cheerful song)

    I'd preface the set by saying that my songs will include serious,
    sometimes painful subjects. If people walk out or disconnect their audio
    in response, then I'll live with it.
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arthur T.@21:1/5 to Gary McGath on Sun Jul 18 19:53:29 2021
    In Message-ID:<sd2bue$9bb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Gary McGath <garym@REMOVEmcgathREMOVE.com> wrote:

    But if I were asked to perform a set now, I'd push the edge as hard as I >could, to break the trap misleadingly called a "safe space." Here's a >possible set list:

    If your set's going to make a statement, you might as well include
    Music of the Right.

    --
    Arthur T. - ar23hur "at" pobox "dot" com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe Kesselman@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 19 02:15:52 2021
    There are times and places for everything.

    Protest songs are great at a protest where the point is to force folks
    to hear something they may not want to hear, or where people expect them
    and want to engage with them. (Though the former, frankly, is rarely
    effective; protest songs are much more effective at motivating the
    faithful than at getting those who disagree to consider another point of
    view. And I say this as someone who was part of an activist chorus for a
    decade or so.)

    If you know your song is something that will offend some part of your
    audience, and it isn't clearly on topic at the moment, you may well want
    to think about either holding off until a better time or letting those
    folks know that they may want to step out of the room for the next four
    minutes or so.

    If you don't want to do so, fine. But I think it's inappropriate to
    complain if others do want to issue whatever warnings they consider
    desirable at the moment. Especially as you're the one who has requested
    warning before "dead cat songs", which is an uncommon trigger.


    Pick your battles, and pick your times to battle, and pick who you
    really feel has to be battled with.


    Obligatory song cue: Tom Lehrer's _Folk Song Army_.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary McGath@21:1/5 to Joe Kesselman on Mon Jul 19 06:58:16 2021
    On 7/19/21 2:15 AM, Joe Kesselman wrote:
    There are times and places for everything.

    Protest songs are great at a protest where the point is to force folks
    to hear something they may not want to hear, or where people expect them
    and want to engage with them. (Though the former, frankly, is rarely effective; protest songs are much more effective at motivating the
    faithful than at getting those who disagree to consider another point of view. And I say this as someone who was part of an activist chorus for a decade or so.)

    A carefully designed protest song may get people to think, even if they
    don't initially agree with its point. Granted, it's very hard to do
    that. Presenting little-known facts in a song can be effective. My
    "Interfilk Wench Rant" may have helped in adjusting the Interfilk
    wenching policy. I can't think of a case where a song by itself has
    changed my mind, though. Some may have predisposed me to pay more
    attention to other arguments; for example, my views on homosexuality
    have changed greatly over my life (as is true for many of my age), and
    songs may have helped me to pay attention to more prosaic arguments.

    If you know your song is something that will offend some part of your audience, and it isn't clearly on topic at the moment, you may well want
    to think about either holding off until a better time or letting those
    folks know that they may want to step out of the room for the next four minutes or so.

    In a circle, I try to pay attention to the mood; if it seems necessary
    to shift it (e.g., after 5 Firefly songs in a row), I'll say that's what
    I'm doing. In a set, whatever I want to sing is on topic. (If a filker
    sings it, it's filk.) Saying at the start of the set that it's going to
    touch on dark topics may be useful.

    If you don't want to do so, fine. But I think it's inappropriate to
    complain if others do want to issue whatever warnings they consider
    desirable at the moment. Especially as you're the one who has requested warning before "dead cat songs", which is an uncommon trigger.

    Have I? I'll take your word for it. I've requested time enough to flee
    the room before "Nobody's Moggy Lands," but that may not be quite the
    same thing.

    The "uncommon triggers" is a point in itself. Phobias are, by their
    nature, not governed by reason. It's hard to know in advance what topics
    could upset someone in the audience. If someone interrupts me with,
    "Please, I don't want to hear this," I'll pause the song, and depending
    on the circumstances may give the person time to get out of earshot or
    leave the song for another time.



    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Davis@21:1/5 to Gary McGath on Mon Jul 19 04:56:22 2021
    On Sunday, July 18, 2021 at 7:02:39 PM UTC-4, Gary McGath wrote:
    Some of us here are old enough to remember the protest singers of the
    sixties and seventies. What they protested isn't important to what I'm
    saying here. What is important is that they were eager to take on controversial topics, to point out death and suffering, and to condemn
    those they saw as responsible.

    What many do not know is those Protest singers of the 50/60/70s suffered greatly
    Though today many of us know and sing their songs many were "Blacklisted" and not allowed to perform in many venus.. (The old "Committee on Unamerican Affairs blacklist).

    Many were true heroes of the time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From david union@21:1/5 to wa8...@gmail.com on Mon Jul 19 09:57:49 2021
    On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 7:56:23 am UTC-4, wa8...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, July 18, 2021 at 7:02:39 PM UTC-4, Gary McGath wrote:
    Some of us here are old enough to remember the protest singers of the sixties and seventies. What they protested isn't important to what I'm saying here. What is important is that they were eager to take on controversial topics, to point out death and suffering, and to condemn those they saw as responsible.
    What many do not know is those Protest singers of the 50/60/70s suffered greatly
    Though today many of us know and sing their songs many were "Blacklisted" and not allowed to perform in many venus.. (The old "Committee on Unamerican Affairs blacklist).

    Many were true heroes of the time.

    Push the envelope for sure.

    Many years ago at a Boskone Julia was performing "hands of god", and she said at a prior performance someone had complained
    that it felt like it was poking fun at their religion and they found it offensive. She told them that if it reminded them of their
    religion, then they ought to be offended.

    This is my view, too.

    If people can't take their beliefs and options being challenged, they don't believe in them well enough anyway.

    See Kierkegaard's 'Knight of Faith' writing. If you really believe, then nothing anyone says can
    make you feel uncomfortable or challenge that. Only if you doubt your own belief can you feel
    threatened by someone else's views (or songs). And in that case, if you doubt your own beliefs, something is
    telling you deep down inside, they might not really be right. Maybe you ought to listen.

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arthur T.@21:1/5 to david union on Mon Jul 19 14:46:27 2021
    In
    Message-ID:<3ba21de1-d735-4a40-bfc6-81e59a7afb5en@googlegroups.com>,
    david union <david.union@gmail.com> wrote:

    If people can't take their beliefs and options being challenged, they don't believe in them well enough anyway.

    The mystic knows that doubt is always part of genuine faith.
    - Stephen Prothero

    --
    Arthur T. - ar23hur "at" pobox "dot" com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe Kesselman@21:1/5 to david union on Mon Jul 19 22:58:31 2021
    On 7/19/2021 12:57 PM, david union wrote:
    Many years ago at a Boskone Julia was performing "hands of god", and she said at a prior performance someone had complained
    that it felt like it was poking fun at their religion and they found it offensive. She told them that if it reminded them of their
    religion, then they ought to be offended.

    I'm told that Julia has been very clear that the religion this song
    refers to is a fictional one.

    There are certainly times when one should challenge peoples' beliefs.
    However, in most cases they will not thank you for doing so, and may dig
    in more strongly in reaction. Pick your battles, and pick the time to
    battle, to minimize unwanted fallout.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lee Gold XP@21:1/5 to Joe Kesselman on Mon Jul 19 20:15:34 2021
    On 7/19/2021 7:58 PM, Joe Kesselman wrote:
    I'm told that Julia has been very clear that the religion this song
    refers to is a fictional one.

    reprint from Xeno #57

    "THE HAND OF GOD" AND SOME OTHER JULIA ECKLAR SONGS
    by Joe Ellis (reprinted from rec.music.filk with permission)


    Gary McGath asked: Does anyone know what book/story (if any) the Julia Ecklar song "The Hand of God" is based on?

    Yes, as a matter of fact, I do... <<smirk>>
    There are a number of Julia's songs that are based on a fantasy storyline that is, for the most part, unpublished. Elements of it have
    appeared in some of her SF stories. The only commercial publication I
    can think of now is the short-lived graphic novel "Honor Among Thieves"
    (two issues!) which introduced some of the characters. The three main characters were Daven Turdock (a horse breeder, some- times mistaken for
    a boy due to his jockey-like build), Galen (a sort of warrior/
    priest/sheriff), and Darquementi, a carnival magician with real (if
    sometimes unpredictable) magick.
    Daven ran away from a cloistered community in the high mountains when he was coming of age. It was a matriarchal society, run by the five
    oldest women, who were known as the Hand of God. (Absolute control, five fingers,... see?) Daven con- fronted the ultra-conservative Hand and
    defied them when they tried to control him.

    Other songs set in this mythos:
    "One Man Magical Show": Dar at the carnival... Yes, there really WAS a 'Boneless Man' in the show. When the gods curse you, they don't do it
    half-way! That's a story unto itself. And Rikki the Carnivorous Pony was
    a failed attempt at a magical construction. Listen carefully to the
    calliope; it's playing "Hand of God"!
    "Temper of Revenge": The gods are real and still walk among the mortals. There are two factions - the Creators and the Time-Chen, and a
    great deal of hard feelings between them. The Creators are sort of
    second-class gods,... not quite as powerful and unable to do some of the
    things that the Time-Chen can. The TC even create better than the
    Creators, but have only done it twice - horses and Humans. The heroine
    of ToR is one of these 'created' humans (still a minor god to 'regular
    people') whose life companion is killed by a creature created by one of
    the most powerful Creators. She vows revenge, makes a sword, and Creates
    a horse to ride to vengeance. (BTW, she is the figure at the head of
    Galen's religion. Their symbol is her trefoil lance, and Galen carries
    her sword: not a duplicate, her sword. He knows it's special, but he
    has NO idea HOW special.
    I know there are others, but as I recall, these are the only ones Julia has recorded.

    The story line of the fantasy is loosely based on a D&D campaign we were in during our misspent youth at the University of Dayton. Julia's character was Daven Turdock, the horse-breeder (his 'day job' -- you
    can't adventure ALL the time!). Mine was Darquementi, the prestidigitator/wizard. The side effects of his magic were sometimes
    more dangerous/effective than the magic itself!
    However, Julia developed the characters FAR beyond the scope of the games, and also was the creator of the world in which they lived, so the storyline and characters are truly hers. That was agreed to a LONG time ago.
    We worked well together -- you might say TOO well. When rookie gamers under an experienced DM take on a Balrog (NOT one of the D&D 'dumbed
    down' ones -- it was meant to scare us off, but we were too stooopid to
    know this...) and kill it, then walk around in leather armor made from
    the membranes of its wings.... Well, they get a bit of an attitude. And
    anyone who recognises the source of their armor tends to be a bit easier
    to deal with. <G>
    The songs are all based on material that Julia created, not on events from the campaign. They are totally hers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary McGath@21:1/5 to Gary McGath on Tue Jul 20 05:46:56 2021
    On 7/19/21 6:58 AM, Gary McGath wrote:
    On 7/19/21 2:15 AM, Joe Kesselman wrote:


    If you don't want to do so, fine. But I think it's inappropriate to
    complain if others do want to issue whatever warnings they consider
    desirable at the moment. Especially as you're the one who has requested
    warning before "dead cat songs", which is an uncommon trigger.

    Have I? I'll take your word for it. I've requested time enough to flee
    the room before "Nobody's Moggy Lands," but that may not be quite the
    same thing.

    The "uncommon triggers" is a point in itself. Phobias are, by their
    nature, not governed by reason. It's hard to know in advance what topics could upset someone in the audience. If someone interrupts me with,
    "Please, I don't want to hear this," I'll pause the song, and depending
    on the circumstances may give the person time to get out of earshot or
    leave the song for another time.

    Something else I just thought of: I don't want to raise a concern that
    doesn't apply to me, when it could dilute serious ones. I am not
    "triggered" by songs of any kind. I don't have panic attacks or
    flashbacks. I just severely dislike them.

    I know the difference because I've experienced real phobic reactions in
    certain situations, which I'd prefer not to discuss here, and I've
    occasionally had to help others to deal with phobia-related panic attacks.

    That's not what I've experienced with songs of any kind. Please save the concern at that level for people who need it. I should have mentioned
    that the first time.


    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to garym@REMOVEmcgathREMOVE.com on Tue Jul 20 15:38:42 2021
    Gary McGath <garym@REMOVEmcgathREMOVE.com> wrote:

    Something else I just thought of: I don't want to raise a concern that >doesn't apply to me, when it could dilute serious ones. I am not
    "triggered" by songs of any kind. I don't have panic attacks or
    flashbacks. I just severely dislike them.

    "That's not a real chord! That's a so-called 'Jazz Chord.' Jazz musicians do that.
    We do not."
    -- My Piano Teacher In Third Grade


    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From david union@21:1/5 to Gary McGath on Tue Jul 20 15:24:05 2021
    On Tuesday, 20 July 2021 at 5:46:59 am UTC-4, Gary McGath wrote:
    On 7/19/21 6:58 AM, Gary McGath wrote:
    On 7/19/21 2:15 AM, Joe Kesselman wrote:


    If you don't want to do so, fine. But I think it's inappropriate to
    complain if others do want to issue whatever warnings they consider
    desirable at the moment. Especially as you're the one who has requested
    warning before "dead cat songs", which is an uncommon trigger.

    Have I? I'll take your word for it. I've requested time enough to flee
    the room before "Nobody's Moggy Lands," but that may not be quite the
    same thing.

    The "uncommon triggers" is a point in itself. Phobias are, by their
    nature, not governed by reason. It's hard to know in advance what topics could upset someone in the audience. If someone interrupts me with, "Please, I don't want to hear this," I'll pause the song, and depending
    on the circumstances may give the person time to get out of earshot or leave the song for another time.
    Something else I just thought of: I don't want to raise a concern that doesn't apply to me, when it could dilute serious ones. I am not
    "triggered" by songs of any kind. I don't have panic attacks or
    flashbacks. I just severely dislike them.

    I know the difference because I've experienced real phobic reactions in certain situations, which I'd prefer not to discuss here, and I've occasionally had to help others to deal with phobia-related panic attacks.

    That's not what I've experienced with songs of any kind. Please save the concern at that level for people who need it. I should have mentioned
    that the first time.
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    Not being a 'cat owner' I'm not a huge fan of cat songs unless they are
    the kind of song that takes on a more general meaning for example
    about loss, like Lauren's cat song this past weekend was fantastic. I could listen
    to that over and over. But that doesn't mean I 'dislike' them in any specific sense.
    Living, dying or dead cat songs, are all fine with me.

    I suspect if the filk became a 'cat song theme' for really long, I'd probably leave for
    a different filk room or on zoom, just go off and listen to recorded music and come back
    later :) But a cat song here and there is fine... in fact any song... because
    I enjoy that OTHER people, including the performer, are enjoying the
    songs. That includes religious songs, even though I'm an atheist. In fact
    I perform quite a number of songs that are religious or feature god in a positive way
    not because I believe in god, but because it happens to be a good song, and I'm OK with that.

    And as I said before, different beliefs don't bother me, I am comfortable
    with mine. So I have no reason to change the words and sing it differently.

    The only songs I find a bit bitter are ones that specifically advocate brainwashing
    children (that are too young to avoid being brainwashed) to any cults, which I consider most major religions in general to be these days.

    That's probably the only time I am likely to change words about religion in a song
    because I don't want to espouse this form of child abuse. I am in fact fighting with
    a line in a song I'm learning now and trying to decide if I need to change it when I
    perform it due to this.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From david union@21:1/5 to Lee Gold XP on Tue Jul 20 15:26:24 2021
    On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 11:15:36 pm UTC-4, Lee Gold XP wrote:
    On 7/19/2021 7:58 PM, Joe Kesselman wrote:
    I'm told that Julia has been very clear that the religion this song
    refers to is a fictional one.
    reprint from Xeno #57

    "THE HAND OF GOD" AND SOME OTHER JULIA ECKLAR SONGS
    by Joe Ellis (reprinted from rec.music.filk with permission)


    Gary McGath asked: Does anyone know what book/story (if any) the Julia
    Ecklar song "The Hand of God" is based on?

    Yes, as a matter of fact, I do... <<smirk>>
    There are a number of Julia's songs that are based on a fantasy
    storyline that is, for the most part, unpublished. Elements of it have appeared in some of her SF stories. The only commercial publication I
    can think of now is the short-lived graphic novel "Honor Among Thieves"
    (two issues!) which introduced some of the characters. The three main characters were Daven Turdock (a horse breeder, some- times mistaken for
    a boy due to his jockey-like build), Galen (a sort of warrior/ priest/sheriff), and Darquementi, a carnival magician with real (if
    sometimes unpredictable) magick.
    Daven ran away from a cloistered community in the high mountains when
    he was coming of age. It was a matriarchal society, run by the five
    oldest women, who were known as the Hand of God. (Absolute control, five fingers,... see?) Daven con- fronted the ultra-conservative Hand and
    defied them when they tried to control him.

    Other songs set in this mythos:
    "One Man Magical Show": Dar at the carnival... Yes, there really WAS a 'Boneless Man' in the show. When the gods curse you, they don't do it half-way! That's a story unto itself. And Rikki the Carnivorous Pony was
    a failed attempt at a magical construction. Listen carefully to the
    calliope; it's playing "Hand of God"!
    "Temper of Revenge": The gods are real and still walk among the
    mortals. There are two factions - the Creators and the Time-Chen, and a
    great deal of hard feelings between them. The Creators are sort of second-class gods,... not quite as powerful and unable to do some of the things that the Time-Chen can. The TC even create better than the
    Creators, but have only done it twice - horses and Humans. The heroine
    of ToR is one of these 'created' humans (still a minor god to 'regular people') whose life companion is killed by a creature created by one of
    the most powerful Creators. She vows revenge, makes a sword, and Creates
    a horse to ride to vengeance. (BTW, she is the figure at the head of
    Galen's religion. Their symbol is her trefoil lance, and Galen carries
    her sword: not a duplicate, her sword. He knows it's special, but he
    has NO idea HOW special.
    I know there are others, but as I recall, these are the only ones Julia
    has recorded.

    The story line of the fantasy is loosely based on a D&D campaign we
    were in during our misspent youth at the University of Dayton. Julia's character was Daven Turdock, the horse-breeder (his 'day job' -- you
    can't adventure ALL the time!). Mine was Darquementi, the prestidigitator/wizard. The side effects of his magic were sometimes
    more dangerous/effective than the magic itself!
    However, Julia developed the characters FAR beyond the scope of the
    games, and also was the creator of the world in which they lived, so the storyline and characters are truly hers. That was agreed to a LONG time ago. We worked well together -- you might say TOO well. When rookie gamers
    under an experienced DM take on a Balrog (NOT one of the D&D 'dumbed
    down' ones -- it was meant to scare us off, but we were too stooopid to
    know this...) and kill it, then walk around in leather armor made from
    the membranes of its wings.... Well, they get a bit of an attitude. And anyone who recognises the source of their armor tends to be a bit easier
    to deal with. <G>
    The songs are all based on material that Julia created, not on events
    from the campaign. They are totally hers.

    When Julia performed Hands of God at one concert I believe she mentioned the book
    the religion in the song was based on. I no longer remember it, however.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Igenlode Wordsmith@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 25 09:59:03 2021
    On 19 Jul 2021 Gary McGath wrote:

    Some of us here are old enough to remember the protest singers of the
    sixties and seventies. What they protested isn't important to what I'm
    saying here. What is important is that they were eager to take on >controversial topics, to point out death and suffering, and to condemn
    those they saw as responsible.

    At this weekend's Festival of the Living Rooms, people have been putting >content warnings ahead of half their songs, to let listeners protect >themselves against hearing anything unpleasant. Someone told me today
    that if I introduced a set by saying my songs would mention serious harm
    that real people have suffered, I'd lose most of my audience.

    I don't think the protest singers of the 1960s and 70s gained a wider
    audience by singing songs about death and suffering, or ever expected to
    do so -- some of them were using their pre-existing popularity to push
    an agenda that was more challenging to their audience, and/or voicing an indignation that was already shared by their fanbase. As Joe Kesselman mentioned, protest songs go down best with those who are doing the
    protesting.

    I imagine most of the unconvinced either turned the dial on the radio
    station to find easier listening (and how many radio stations were
    actually prepared to broadcast material condemning the Powers That Be?)
    or didn't attend that sort of concert. On the other hand, folk ballads
    about death and suffering have been popular since the Middle Ages...

    --
    Igenlode Visit the Ivory Tower http://ivory.ueuo.com/Tower/

    The world owes you nothing. It was here first.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)