On Monday, August 3, 2020 at 5:34:18 PM UTC-4, General Zod wrote:

On Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 3:48:41 PM UTC-4, Dave Parker wrote:

On 8/2/2020 11:56 AM, Susan Cohen wrote:

* [ with special thanks to Peter J Ross]

Psychologist J. Philippe Rushton once observed that science moves forward, continuing to gather data and refine its theories, but with

Choke on Donald Trump's ballsack you retarded lesbian Nazi.

Blacks have superior as in bigger dicks, so I like that. Maybe I like it too much.

There is no such thing as too much, my friend.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, August 3, 2020 at 5:36:40 PM UTC-4, General Zod wrote:

On Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 2:56:57 PM UTC-4, Susan Cohen wrote:

* [ with special thanks to Peter J Ross]

Psychologist J. Philippe Rushton once observed that science moves
forward, continuing to gather data and refine its theories, but with
one important exception. A century ago, there was a robust Darwinian science of race differences in a variety of traits, from differences
in skull shape and cranial capacity, to differences in intelligence
and behavioral restraint. However, this young science was nipped in
the bud, but not because it was displaced by a new, powerful, and empirically based theory. Rather, the demise of racial science came
about because of intellectual movements dominated by ethnic Jews and tightly linked to the political left.

This was a case of science being replaced by ideology, an
ideology designed to oppose the idea that Europeans were in any way
unique or superior to other human groups; an ideology designed to
advance the interests of ethnic outsiders with their own strong sense
of biological uniqueness and superiority. Ultimately, it was an
ideology that rationalized the decline of Europeans and their culture
that we see all around us today. The new ideology decreed that humans
were infinitely malleable creatures of their culture and eventually
became defined by the view that race does not exist at all.

Franz Boas, the high priest of the new cult, was a strongly
identified Jew and committed leftist. His famous study purporting to
show that skull shape changed as a result of immigration from Europe
to America was very effective propaganda weapon in the cause of eradicating racial science. Indeed, it was intended as propaganda.
Based on their reanalysis of Boas’s data, physical anthropologists
Corey Sparks and Richard Jantz do not accuse Boas of scientific fraud,
but they do find that his data do not show any significant
environmental effects on cranial form as a result of immigration. They also claim that Boas may well have been motivated by a desire to
expunge racialist views from academic anthropology:

While Boas never stated explicitly that he had based any
conclusions on anything but the data themselves, it is obvious that he
had a personal agenda in the displacement of the eugenics movement in
the United States. In order to do this, any differences observed
between European- and U.S.-born individuals will be used to its
fullest extent to prove his point.

As a result of the massive success of this onslaught, the science
of race differences languished, whatever truths it had uncovered were forgotten. In Raciology, Vladimir Avdeyev resurrects the vast
tradition of research on the physical anthropology and psychology of
race differences. His book is an exhaustive summary of research in
this field from the eighteenth century to the present. It includes a
great many summaries of the research of individual scientists, many of whom have been virtually forgotten. But it is far more than a
compendium of research. It also vigorously defends the idea that the problem of race is the nerve center of world history. It is intended therefore to influence how people think about race in the context of history and current events.

Several themes recur throughout Raciology. Race is overwhelmingly
the result of biological inheritance, not cultural programming.
Beginning with Count Joseph Arthur de Gobineau, this body of theory
and research proposed that the biologically based racial
characteristics of Whites have led them to be originators of superior cultures. The White race evolved in the north of Europe and spread
south and east to be the main force behind the ancient cultures of
Greece, Rome, Egypt, India, Persia, and the Hittites. The ancestral
type of the White race, called the Nordic race originally by Joseph Deniker, is characterized by blond hair, blue eyes, light skin, tall stature, dolichocephalic (long-headed) skull, and a brain with a
well developed prefrontal area (the area of the brain associated with intelligence, impulse control, and decision making). Houston Stewart Chamberlain may be considered paradigmatic of a theorist who proposed
that northern Europeans are a superior people:

All outstanding peoples that appeared starting in the 6th century
in the role of true deciders of the fate of humanity as founders of nations and creators of new thinking and original art, were namely of German origin. The creations of the Arabs stand out for their short duration; the Mongols only destroyed but they created nothing; the ingenious Italians of the Middle Ages were all émigrés, or of the
north which was saturated with Lombard, Gothic, or Frankish blood, or
they were Germano-Hellenes of the south; in Spain, the creative
element was the Visigoths. The awakening of the Germans forms the foundation of European history, for their worldwide historical significance as founders of a completely new civilization and a
completely new culture.

However, despite the great flowering of culture emanating from
Europe and despite the knowledge that Europeans and their culture dominated the planet, there is also a pessimism that pervades this literature, the idea that White racial elites tend to become degraded
over historical time because of admixture with other races. It was
common among these thinkers to assert that the depletion of the Nordic racial stratum accounts for the decline of Greece, Rome, the Hindus,
the Persians, and other Nordic civilizations. For example, Ludwig Woltmann: The blonde element of the people defines its cultural worthiness, and the fall of great cultures is explained by the dying
out of this element. Eugen Fischer: In Greece, the death of the
families of fully-vested citizens and the admission of the descendants
of slaves and the aboriginal population as citizens, led . . . to collapse. Rome died of race mixing and the products of degeneracy.
And finally, Otto Reche, writing in 1936:

That which we call "world history" is in essence nothing more than
the history of the Indo-Germans and their achievements; the powerfully rousing and simultaneously tragic song about the Nordic race and its idealism; a song which tells about how the strength of the race did
what seemed impossible and reached for the stars, and how the strength quickly dried up when the "law of race" was forgotten, when the Nordic
man ceased to preserve the purity of his blood and strongly mixes with races [that are] less gifted in cultural terms.

Lenz gives major weight to the selective pressures of the Ice Age
on northern peoples. He proposed that the intellectual abilities of
these peoples are due to a great need to master the natural
environment, resulting in selection for traits related to mechanical ability, structural design, and inventiveness in problem solving (what psychologists term "performance IQ"), whereas he argued that Jewish intelligence was the result of intensive social living (what
psychologists term "verbal IQ"). There is in fact good evidence that
in general intelligence is linked to mastering the natural environment
and this is particularly the case among Northern peoples. Lenz argued
that over the course of their recent evolution, Europeans were less subjected to between-group natural selection than Jews and other
Middle Eastern populations. Because of the harsh environment of the
Ice Age, the Nordic peoples evolved in small groups and have a
tendency toward social isolation rather than toward cohesive groups.

Under ecologically adverse circumstances like the Ice Ages,
adaptations are directed more at coping with the adverse physical environment than at competing with other groups, and in such an environment, there would be less pressure for selection for extended kinship networks and highly collectivist groups. Evolutionary conceptualizations of ethnocentrism emphasize the utility of
ethnocentrism in group competition. Ethnocentrism would thus be of no importance at all in combating the physical environment, and such an environment would not support large competing groups. Europeans are therefore less ethnocentric than other groups, which makes them susceptible to being subverted by groups with a strong sense of
in group solidarity.

The strong influence of Franz Boas and his tightly knit group of
Jewish race deniers continues to have a strong influence. Anthropology
as well as other fields in the social sciences and humanities are best described as "tribal moral communities" communities based not on
science but on a shared moral vision and unified by the view that
research on race and race differences must be suppressed at all costs. Raciology is a most welcome development. It is clear that the
antiracial theorizing of Boas and his followers continues to bear
fruit in the current era. Such theories are in their essence cultural weapons against European peoples masquerading as science, designed to disarm Europeans, to make them defenseless against the onslaught of
other peoples and cultures. The reality is that the racial science
that thrived in America until the 1920s and in Germany until the end
of World War II coincided with an era of racial and cultural
confidence among Europeans. It occurred at a time when Europe
dominated the planet and was spreading its people and culture to all corners of the world. On the other hand, the assault on this body of research has coincided with an unprecedented retreat of Europeans, not only from outposts like South Africa and Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), but
even in Europe itself, which is now being overrun by non-Whites.
Countries like the United States and Australia that were at least 90 percent European in 1950 are undergoing demographic transitions which,
if present trends continue, imply that Europeans will be a minority
with a generation or two. During this ongoing disaster of European retreat, racial science has remained undeveloped and largely
forgotten. It is to be hoped that a resurgence of racial science as outlined in Raciology will be part of a general resurgence of the
European peoples. It is certainly a step in the right direction.

--

PJR :)

t? ??? d??a??? ??de ?a? t????d?a.
- Aristophanes

Black have bigger dicks, which I love.

I'm a BBC queen.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)