[continued from previous message]

   @10: Sup: 22 (#319 ***); Ego: 5 (#184),
   Male: #319; Feme: #184
} // #670

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #670 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics); I-Ching:
H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 - Branching
Out;

THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; *I* *DEAL* *NOT* *FRAUDULENTLY*.

    #VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), *GRASPING* *THE* *ONE*, but     #TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
    #POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
    #TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
    #CANON: #140

"AND WHILE- THE DAY WAS COMING- ON, PAUL BESOUGHT THEM ALL TO TAKE MEAT, SAYING, THIS DAY IS THE FOURTEENTH DAY THAT YE HAVE TARRIED AND CONTINUED
{#670 as [#4, #10, #1, #300, #5, #30, #5, #10, #300, #5] = diateleo
(G1300): continue} FASTING, HAVING TAKEN NOTHING." [Acts 27:33 (KJV)]

#670 as [#4, #10, #1, #300, #5, #30, #5, #10, #300, #5] = diateleo (G1300): {#50 as #670 % #41 = #14} 1) to bring thoroughly to an end, accomplish;

BRING FORTH THEREFORE FRUITS MEET FOR REPENTANCE: AND THINK NOT TO SAY
WITHIN YOURSELVES, WE HAVE ABRAHAM {ie. #123} TO OUR FATHER: FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT GOD IS ABLE OF THESE STONES TO RAISE UP CHILDREN UNTO ABRAHAM.
AND NOW ALSO THE AXE IS LAID UNTO THE ROOT OF THE TREES: THEREFORE EVERY
TREE WHICH BRINGETH NOT FORTH GOOD FRUIT IS HEWN DOWN, AND CAST INTO THE
FIRE.

I INDEED BAPTIZE YOU WITH WATER UNTO REPENTANCE: BUT HE THAT COMETH AFTER
ME IS MIGHTIER THAN I, WHOSE SHOES I AM NOT WORTHY TO BEAR: HE SHALL
BAPTIZE YOU WITH THE HOLY GHOST, AND WITH FIRE: WHOSE FAN IS IN HIS HAND,
AND HE WILL THOROUGHLY PURGE HIS FLOOR, AND GATHER HIS WHEAT INTO THE
GARNER; BUT HE WILL BURN UP THE CHAFF WITH UNQUENCHABLE FIRE." [Matthew
3:7-12 (KJV)]

That if *OUSIA* (οὐσία) is the ancient Greek noun formed on the feminine present participle of the verb εἰμί, eimí, ie. "*TO* *BE*, *I* *AM*", that
Jesus is here saying, I know the *INTELLECT* of the *MIND* as *NOUS* {GREEK PHILOSOPHY: mind or intellect; NEOPLATONISM: the first and purest emanation
of the *ONE*, regarded as the self-contemplating order of the universe}
which brought all these things into *BEING* by the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS:

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift} (1139 CE) /
Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of decree deciding
between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/EarthSeasons.png>

[IMAGE: Earth’s elliptical orbit around the sun accounts for points of
least and greatest center-to-center distances between the two celestial
bodies; mean values for the orbit’s two extremes are 152,000,000+
kilometers for aphelion and 147,000,000+ kilometers for perihelion: Gothika (vector image from Horst Frank/German Wikipedia drawing), CC BY SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons @ <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Seasons1.svg>]

There are equally 12 hours of day which occurs yearly upon the Equinoxes of
21 March (NOUS: #13 / TETRA: #17 - HOLDING BACK / PROTOTYPE: *HOMOIOS*
{#274 / #436} / HETEROS {#260 / #429} / TORAH {#266 / #432}) and 23
September (NOUS: #48 / TETRA: #20 - ADVANCE / PROTOTYPE: *HOMOIOS* {#317 / #264} / HETEROS {#303 / #257} / TORAH {#303 / #257})

And similarly each day is reckoned by 12 hours allotment from 0600 hours
(NOUS: #73 / TETRA: #7 - ASCENT / PROTOTYPES: *HOMOIOS* {#392 / #419} /
HETEROS {#395 / #461} / TORAH {#395 / #461}) and 18 hours (NOUS: #67 /
TETRA: #48 - RITUAL / PROTOTYPES: *HOMOIOS* {#291 / #471} / HETEROS {#276 / #423} / TORAH {#360 / #465})

Within philosophy, *ONTIC* (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: "of that
which is") is physical, real, or factual existence. The British
philosopher Roy Bhaskar (15 May 1944 – 19 November 2014), who was closely associated with the philosophical movement of Critical Realism writes:

"I differentiate the '*ONTIC*' ('*ONTICAL*' etc.) from the 'ontological'. I employ the former to refer to:

#1) whatever pertains to being generally [SUCH AS THE THOTH MEASURES AS
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES}], rather than some distinctively philosophical (or scientific) theory of it (ontology),
so that in this sense, that of the *ONTIC*, we can speak of the *ONTIC* presuppositions of a work of art, a joke or a strike as much as a theory of knowledge [IN THEIR BEING ESSENTIAL RATIOCINATION QUANTITATIVE AND
CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS AS META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES CIRCUMSCRIBING
LANGUAGE EPISTEMOLOGY]; and, within this rubric, to

#2) the intransitive objects of some specific, historically determinate, scientific investigation (or set of such investigations [OF TEMPORAL DISTINCTIONS]), the *ONTIC*.

Professor Ruth Groff (Political Science department at Saint Louis
University, St. Louis, Missouri) offers this expansion of Bhaskar's note
above:

"The *ONTIC* is always specified, and only identified, by its relation, as
the intransitive object(s) of some or other (denumerable set of) particular transitive process(es) of enquiry. It is cognitive process-, and level-specific; whereas the ontological (like the *ONTIC*) is not."

Thusly Ontoticism or onticism is the philosophical branch of ontology which studies the factual existence.

The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:

9(9²+1)/2 = #369

to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence can
define factual existence:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

John Scotus Eriugena, or Johannes Scotus Erigena (c. 815 – c. 877) was an Irish theologian, neoplatonist philosopher, and poet. He wrote a number of works, but is best known today for having written The Division of Nature,
which has been called the final achievement of ancient philosophy, a work
which "synthesizes the philosophical accomplishments of fifteen centuries."


The Latin title De divisione naturae (Περί φύσεων) refers to these four
divisions of nature:

(1) that which creates and is not created;

+ 0, H27, H54 {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL
LAW}

(2) that which is created and creates;

+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. SYSTEM'S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH - FORMULA OF HUMANITY}

(3) that which is created and does not create;

+ 0, H3, H6 {ie. SEA AS SELF IDENTITY - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY}

(4) that which is neither created nor creates.

+ H1, H2, H3 {ie. FOUNTAINS OF WATERS AS FORMULA OF PROGRESSION TO
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA (WAN WU)}

The first is God as the ground or origin of all things, the last is God as
the final end or goal of all things, that into which the world of created things ultimately returns.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. AS ACT OF NATURE THE ORGANIZATION OF THE
MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}

The second and third together compose the created universe, which is the manifestation of God, God in process, Theophania; the second is the world
of Platonic ideas or forms:

H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE OF BEING IS A TRANSCENDENT PRINCIPLE OF
A MATHEMATICAL LOGICAL AND CERTAINTY AS HAVING AN INESCAPABLE CONSEQUENCE;

And the third is a more pantheistic world, or a pandeistic one, depending
on the interference of God.

Eriugena argued on behalf of something like a pantheistic definition of
nature. He translated and made commentaries upon the work of
Pseudo-Dionysius, and was one of the few Western European philosophers of
his day that knew Greek, having studied in Athens.

H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU WHICH GIVES RISE TO {ie. ORGANIZATION
OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}

And Eriugena explains that reason is necessary to understand and interpret revelation. Authority is the source of knowledge, but the reason of mankind
is the *DIALECTIC* norm by which all authority is judged:

#4 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {RESTATEMENT OF A SACRED / SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE
AS INSTANCE OF: 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 / #41 = #9 AS @4 - #VIRTUE}:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

+ H1 - *ZEN*, H2 - *ROW*, H3 - *COL* {ie. FOUNTAINS OF WATERS AS FORMULA OF PROGRESSION TO INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA (WAN WU)}

Is entirely a logical proposition of relativity to a progression of the
*EGO* and *SELF* *AUTONOMY* which is defined by the universal norm of the _GIZMO {} array as INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS.

Within our example of EVENT 71582072@{} this is the initial NOUS stem:

@1: Sup: 47 (#47); Ego: 47 (#47)

As the meta-descriptor prototype: #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the
Distant; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution, Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold Resolution

#3 - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY {ASSUMPTIVE PROPOSITION AS @3 - #TOOLS}:

These then follow the norm which is the DIALECTIC applied to the trinomial definition of #NUMBER itself and thusly defines the second (or by reverse notation) in terms of:

@2: Sup: 79 (#126); Ego: 32 (#79):

+ 0, H3 - #32, H6 - #79 {ie. SEA AS SELF IDENTITY - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY}

As the meta-descriptor prototypes: #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 - Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting;
Tetra: 43 - Encounters

#79 - Recognizing Agreements, Keeping Obligations; I-Ching: H56 - The
Wanderer, Sojourning, Traveling; Tetra: 31 - Packing

Which conveys from the TAXIS of those meta-descriptor prototypes as
“thinking about thinking” some sort of conception as a troubling lack of discernment about encountering a *MORAL* deficiency:

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #126 % #41 = #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition;

THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at Chemunnu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *EVIL* *MINDED*.

    #VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
    #TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire.
    #POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
    #TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?     #CANON: #130

#126 as [#70, #6, #700] = `avon (H5771): {UMBRA: #3 as #126 % #41 = #3} 1) perversity, depravity, iniquity, guilt or punishment of iniquity; 1a)
iniquity; 1b) guilt of iniquity, guilt (as great), guilt (of condition);
1c) consequence of or punishment for iniquity;

#2 - FORMULA OF HUMANITY {MINOR PREMISE AS @2 - #POSITION}:

+ 0, H9 - @3: Ego: n (#n), H18 - @3: Sup: n (#n) {ie. SYSTEM'S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH - FORMULA OF HUMANITY}

@3: Sup: n (#n); Ego: n (#n):

#1 - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW (MAJOR PREMISE: TEMPORALITY AS @1 - #TIME):

+ 0, H27 - @4: Ego: n (#n), H54 - @4: Sup: n (#n) {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE
AS HEAVEN - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW} #5 - DISCRIMINATING NORM {PAIRING} AS CANONICAL IMPERATIVE

As described by Harald Atmanspacher, quantum brain dynamics theory is the
most fundamental theory of matter that is currently available, it is a legitimate question to ask whether quantum theory can help us to understand consciousness. He writes extensively about the philosophy of science, especially as it relates to Chaos theory, determinism, causation, and stochasticity. He explains that "*ONTIC* states describe all properties of
a physical system exhaustively. ('Exhaustive' in this context means that an *ONTIC* state is 'precisely the way it is,' without any reference to
epistemic knowledge or ignorance.)"

In an earlier paper, Atmanspacher portrays the difference between an
epistemic perspective of a [PARADIGMATIC] system, and an *ONTIC*
perspective:

Philosophical discourse traditionally distinguishes between ontology and epistemology and generally enforces this distinction by keeping the two
subject areas separated. However, the relationship between the two areas is
of central importance to physics and philosophy of physics. For instance,
many measurement-related problems force us to consider both our knowledge
of the states and observables of a system (epistemic perspective) and its states and observables, independent of such knowledge (*ONTIC*
perspective). This applies to quantum systems in particular.

"*ONTIC*" describes what is there, as opposed to the nature or properties
of that being. To illustrate:

Roger Bacon, observing that all languages are built upon a common grammar, stated that they share a foundation of ontically anchored linguistic structures.

Martin Heidegger posited the concept of Sorge, or caring, as the
fundamental concept of the intentional being, and presupposed an
ontological significance that distinguishes ontological being from mere "thinghood" of an *ONTIC* being. He uses [as an *ILLUSIONAL* use of] the
German word "Dasein" for a being that is capable of ontology, that is, recursively comprehending properties of the very fact of its own Being.

#1) existence, existence, existence
#2) human life, especially with regard to its conditions; human existence
#3) the presence
#4) (Philosophy) merely empirical presence of a thing or a person

H1878@{
   @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
   @2: Sup: 34 (#64); Ego: 4 (#34),
   @3: Sup: 10 (#74); Ego: 57 (#91),
   @4: Sup: 60 (#134); Ego: 50 (#141),
   @5: Sup: 66 (#200); Ego: 6 (#147),
   Male: #200; Feme: #147
} // #390

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #354 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity; I-Ching:
H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;

THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *THE* *CAUSE* *OF* *WEEPING* *TO* *ANY*.

    #VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
    #TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
    #POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.     #TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
    #CANON: #168

{#390 as [#30, #4, #300, #50, #6] = dashen (H1878): {#1 as #354 = *MOON* %
#41 = #26} 1) to be fat, grow fat, become fat, become prosperous, anoint;
1a) (Qal) of prosperity (fig.); 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to make fat, anoint; 1b2)
to find fat (of offering - acceptable); 1b3) to take away ashes (from
altar); 1c) (Pual) to be made fat; 1d) (Hothpael) to fatten oneself (of Jehovah's sword)}

RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 - Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not Steal} / #17 / #5
- Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming Nature}}
[#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol Invictus}: 6
x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke 1:19-38] / {#6
- goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated)
THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 - Form of Nature
[#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 = #287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in excelso {#7 -
The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO ANAGRAM / Do Not
Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 - Autonomous Nature]

7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]

EGO (FEMALE) A-U-M HETEROS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without
Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 - Departure / INNER: #4 -
Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering} #168 has 2 Categories: 

#8, #80, #80 = To cover, protect; scrape off, to lay bare; #40, #9, #4, #40, #6,
#60, #4, #5 = Rod of appointment;

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without
Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 - Departure / INNER: #4 -
Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering} #168 has 63 Categories:

#8, #100, #20, #600 = choq (H2706): {#5 as #168 % #41 = #4} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, something prescribed, due; 1a) prescribed task; 1b) prescribed portion; 1c) action prescribed (for oneself), resolve; 1d) prescribed due; 1e) prescribed limit, boundary; 1f) enactment, decree, ordinance; 1f1) specific decree; 1f2) law in general; 1g) enactments,
statutes; 1g1) conditions; 1g2) enactments; 1g3) decrees; 1g4) civil
enactments prescribed by God

#20, #80, #60, #8 = pecach (H6453): {#22 as #168 % #41 = #4} 1) passover;
1a) sacrifice of passover; 1b) animal victim of the passover; 1c) festival
of the passover

[PARTIAL LIST OF CATEGORIES ONLY]

For Heidegger, "*ONTICAL*" signifies concrete, specific realities, whereas "ontological" signifies deeper underlying structures of reality.
Ontological objects or subjects have an *ONTICAL* dimension, but they also include aspects of being like self-awareness, evolutionary vestiges, future potentialities, and networks of relationship.

As Wayne J. Hankey in an attempt to '*CLEAR* *THE* *BATS* *IN* *THE*
*BELFRY*' by purging the Roman Catholic Church of any fascist identity, outlines within "Why Heidegger’s 'History' of Metaphysics is Dead" as a
paper published in the American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78:3
(2004): 425-443, which features the emerging consensus that philosophy has
now liberated itself from the horizon of *ONTO*-theology with respect to
the history of metaphysics.

“Bats 🦇 are, of course, the erratically flying mammals and 'belfries' are bell towers, sometimes found at the top of churches. 'Bats 🦇 in the
belfry' refers to someone who acts as though he has bats🦇 careering around his topmost part, that is, his head.”

YOUTUBE: “Chicken Little - The Sky is Falling”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO04VXBIS0M>

I draw on Jean- Marc Narbonne, Hénologie, Ontologie et Ereignis (Plotin-Proclus-Heidegger), conferences presented at La métaphysique: son histoire, sa critique, ses enjeux held at Laval University in 1998, and
other recent work, showing why Heidegger’s horizon does not encompass
ancient or medieval Platonic or Aristotelian philosophy. Noting that both French Neoplatonic studies after Bréhier and Heidegger in Identität und Differenz were opposing Hegelian accounts of the history of philosophy, I suggest that:

(1) both were reacting to the same problem,
(2) French Neoplatonism was motivated by Heidegger’s questions,
(3) Heidegger’s *ACCOUNT* *OF* *BEING* *BEYOND* *THE* *DIFFERENCE* *OF* *BEING* *AND* *BEINGS* *RESEMBLES* *THE* *NEOPLATONIC* *ACCOUNT* *OF* *THE* *ONE*.

<https://cdn.dal.ca/content/dam/dalhousie/pdf/fass/Classics/Hankey/Why%20Heidegger%20Dead%20for%20ACPQ%20revised.pdf>

HITLER'S TABLE TALK: IDEA @I / PAGE #3 ON SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941: “THE *FASCIST* *MOVEMENT* *IS* *A* *SPONTANEOUS* *RETURN* *TO* *THE*
*TRADITIONS* *OF* *ANCIENT* *ROME* {strength}.”

IDEA @52 / PAGE #87 ON EVENING 25 OCTOBER 1941 WHERE HEYDRICH (architect of
the Holocaust) WAS A SPECIAL GUEST. He was an Senior Group Leader and
General of Police as well as chief of the Reich Main Security Office
including the Gestapo: “*THE* *ATTEMPT* *TO* *CREATE* *A* *JEWISH* *STATE* *WILL* *BE* *A* *FAILURE*.

THE BOOK THAT CONTAINS THE REFLECTIONS OF THE EMPEROR JULIAN (Latin:
Flavius Claudius Iulianus Augustus; 331/332 – 26 June 363 CE) SHOULD BE CIRCULATED IN MILLIONS. WHAT WONDERFUL INTELLIGENCE, WHAT DISCERNMENT, ALL
THE WISDOM OF ANTIQUITY!

IT'S EXTRA-ORDINARY: Julian was a man of unusually complex character: he
was "the military commander, the theosophist, the social reformer, and the
man of letters". *HE* *WAS* *THE* *LAST* *NON*-*CHRISTIAN* *RULER* *OF*
*THE* *ROMAN* *EMPIRE*, *AND* *HE* *BELIEVED* *THAT* *IT* *WAS* *NECESSARY* *TO* *RESTORE* *THE* *EMPIRE'S* *ANCIENT* *ROMAN* *VALUES* *AND*
*TRADITIONS* *IN* *ORDER* *TO* *SAVE* *IT* *FROM* *DISSOLUTION*.

He revive traditional Roman religious practices at the expense of
Christianity. Julian also forbade the Christians from teaching classical
texts and learning. His rejection of the Christianity imposed on him in his youth, and his *PROMOTION* *OF* *NEOPLATONIC* *HELLENISM* {ie. advocated by IRISH THEOLOGIAN John Scotus Eriugena (c. 815 – c. 877) as consisting of Pythagorean binomial HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER however the PRE-PLATONIC
advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) considered the Natural Year to be 364.5
days} in its place caused him to be remembered as Julian the Apostate by
the church. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_(emperor)>]"

Nicolai Hartmann distinguishes among ontology, *ONTICS*, and metaphysics:
(i) ontology concerns the categorical analysis of entities by means of the knowledge categories able to classify them, (ii) *ONTICS* refers to a pre-categorical and pre-objectual connection which is best expressed in the relation to transcendent acts, and (iii) metaphysics is that part of
*ONTICS* or that part of ontology which concerns the residue of being that cannot be *RATIONALIZED* further according to categories. [<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontic>]

Syncretism of cognitions can only occur when there is *ONTIC* referential integrity relating to the nature of references or any allusions. And for
this realisation one must have recourse to at least a rudimentary
understanding of the meta-descriptor prototypes as being implicit within
the notion of any metacognition which is "cognition about cognition",
"thinking about thinking", "knowing about knowing", becoming "aware of
one's awareness" and higher-order thinking skills. The term comes from the
root word meta, meaning "beyond".

The term metacognition literally means cognition about cognition, or more informally, thinking about thinking. Flavell defined metacognition as
knowledge about cognition and control of cognition. For example, a person
is engaging in metacognition if he notices that they are having a *DILEMMA*
as more trouble learning #A than #B, or if it strikes them that they should double-check #C before accepting it as factually #D. [J. H. Flavell (1976,
p. 232)]

Q. What is a “cesspool of political bias”?

A. Essentially it is a mafia {ie. any small powerful or influential #123 - GROUP in an #369 - ORGANISATION or field; clique} which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct {#78
/ #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable
collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct of detrude.

"FOR IT IS BETTER, IF THE WILL OF GOD BE SO, THAT YE SUFFER FOR WELL DOING, THAN FOR EVIL DOING.

FOR CHRIST ALSO HATH ONCE SUFFERED FOR SINS, THE JUST FOR THE UNJUST, THAT
HE MIGHT BRING US TO GOD, BEING PUT TO DEATH IN THE FLESH, BUT QUICKENED BY
THE SPIRIT:

BY WHICH ALSO HE WENT AND PREACHED UNTO THE SPIRITS IN PRISON; WHICH
SOMETIME WERE DISOBEDIENT, WHEN ONCE THE LONGSUFFERING OF GOD WAITED IN THE DAYS OF NOAH, WHILE THE ARK WAS A PREPARING, WHEREIN FEW, THAT IS, EIGHT
SOULS WERE SAVED BY WATER.

THE LIKE FIGURE WHEREUNTO EVEN BAPTISM DOTH ALSO NOW SAVE US (NOT THE
PUTTING AWAY OF THE FILTH OF THE FLESH, BUT THE ANSWER OF A GOOD CONSCIENCE TOWARD GOD,) BY THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS CHRIST:

WHO IS GONE INTO HEAVEN, AND IS ON THE RIGHT HAND OF GOD; ANGELS AND AUTHORITIES AND POWERS BEING MADE SUBJECT UNTO HIM." [1 Peter 3:8-22 (KJV)]

- dolf

AN EXPANDED PDF COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT WILL BE AVAILABLE FROM THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/AllianceDefendingFreedom.pdf>

Christopher Morton <cmort@cox.net> wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 23:47:44 -0500, "\"MIDIcian\" \(tm\)" <Stan@NeverFalls.com> wrote:

"Christopher Morton" <cmort@cox.net> wrote:

... I'm Black ....

I find that rather hard to believe.

Bigots usually do.

You're anti-gay, anti-Black isn't much of a stretch.
--
"Holocaust was greatly exaggerated and you know it. Another monster lie
from the gover-media." - Judy Diarya, AKA "Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend"

Check out: http://machjr.blogspot.com

--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)