Not only the rolling stock adds up but also scenery as in structures,
vehicles, figures. All in all I believe an N-scale layout is more expensive >> per square meter/yard, especially when building a layout with a large city >> or towns. A real city scene can easily have plus 40 structures and still not >> look convincing because theres too much vacant room left.
OTOH, the 'cost' can be spread over a (large) period of time -- >*individualy*, N scale rolling stock, engines, and structures are
fairly cheap, cheaper than the same item in 0 scale. And the OP was
talking about a *small* layout. A small layout will have less 'stuff'
on it.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 47:55:44 |
Calls: | 6,648 |
Files: | 12,198 |
Messages: | 5,329,983 |