Went to the local hobbyshop over the weekend. The new Atlas Code 55 track and switches are in and they look real nice. The kicker came when we tested a Micro
Trains car on the new track, the wheels hit the ties and the car bounced!
It seems that if you want to use the new Code 55 track from Atlas all cars and
locos must have low profile wheels. This problem is unique to the new Atlas track and no similiar problem is found with Micro Engineering or Peco Code 55 products.
This is a real disapointment as the track really looks nice, but there will be
an added expense of low profile wheels unless Atlas does something to correct the problem in the near future.
Dave
Went to the local hobbyshop over the weekend. The new Atlas Code 55 track and switches are in and they look real nice. The kicker came when we tested a Micro
Trains car on the new track, the wheels hit the ties and the car bounced!
It seems that if you want to use the new Code 55 track from Atlas all cars and
locos must have low profile wheels. This problem is unique to the new Atlas track and no similiar problem is found with Micro Engineering or Peco Code 55 products.
This is a real disapointment as the track really looks nice, but there will be
an added expense of low profile wheels unless Atlas does something to correct the problem in the near future.
Dave
So, you're saying that Atlas should have LOWERED the quality of their Code 55 rail just so it wouldn't conflict with non-compliant, out dated, out of proportion wheels from MT?
Some have tried to couch this as an "Atlas problem" but I don't see how track that conforms to NMRA standards can be labeled that. The MT pizza cutter flanges are the real problem.
I don't really think the ommission of N scale spike heads represents a signifigant lowering of quality.
It's particularly ironic since MT and Kato have
the reputation for having the best in the scale,
but sooner or later their refusal to adapt will
bite them in the butt...
Is the Atlas cod 55 track scale or is for the masses?
Huh?!?
"WARNING!! This product conforms to NMRA Standards."
Maybe I'm looking at this wrong, but it seems to me that manufacturers
who DON'T comply with NMRA standards bear the onus if their product
doesn't work with those that comply.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 23:42:48 |
Calls: | 6,646 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,193 |
Messages: | 5,327,711 |