• Soft justice as burglars convicted of up to 27 break-ins before they ar

    From lawnside@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 4 07:24:09 2023
    XPost: soc.culture.african.american, uk.politics.misc, sac.politics
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    Burglars have been convicted of up to 27 break-ins before being jailed, according to data obtained by The Telegraph that exposes the scale of soft justice.

    They are escaping prison despite laws requiring judges to immediately jail
    them for a third offence, according to data obtained under Freedom of Information laws.

    Criminals are also being convicted of up to eight knife offences before
    being jailed, even though “one strike and out” laws require immediate
    prison terms for a second offence.

    Overall, the number of “super-prolific” criminals who have been spared
    prison even though they have been convicted of more than 100 previous
    crimes has tripled in the past 15 years to more than 250 a year.

    The disclosures prompted demands by Priti Patel, the former home
    secretary, for automatic jail sentences for prolific offenders amid dismay
    at the soft justice by UK courts.

    Ministers considered automatic prison sentences for prolific criminals
    when drawing up the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act two years
    ago.

    They were advocated by Chris Philp, then a justice minister, but were
    rejected by Sir Robert Buckland, then the justice secretary. It was judged
    too difficult to define the cut-off point for jailing a prolific offender
    whose crimes were often low-level theft, drugs or anti-social behaviour
    below the threshold for prison.

    The Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) internal research shows just nine per cent
    of offenders are “prolific”, but they account for more than 10 million
    offences - around half of all the crimes dealt with by courts each year in England and Wales.

    Yet the MoJ figures obtained by The Telegraph show there were 3,377 “super-prolific” criminals in 2021 who were not jailed, even though they
    had each been previously convicted of more than 50 offences. Of these, 258
    had been convicted of more than 100 individual previous offences, but were still not jailed.

    “A simple scheme targeted at prolific offenders with clear law enforcement measures to lock them up is required,” said Ms Patel.

    “It is disgraceful to see the courts letting so many off with soft
    sentences. Laws have been put in place to send offenders to prison when
    they commit multiple crimes and victims of crime are being let down by
    judges and magistrates failing to use these laws to keep our streets safe.

    “Offenders who carry knives and who steal are dangerous crooks who should
    be locked up and not set free to roam our streets and commit more crimes.”

    “Our police officers work tirelessly to bring offenders to justice and it
    is dreadful to see that work being undermined by the courts failing to
    jail crooks, burglars and dangerous offenders.”

    Harvey Redgrave, a former adviser to Sir Tony Blair at Number 10 and chief executive of crime consultancy Crest Advisory, said: “These statistics
    paint an extremely worrying picture of a justice system that is at crisis point.

    “There is little point in politicians talking ‘tough’ and passing new laws
    to toughen sentences when the ones we already have are being ignored.

    “It is an established fact that a small minority of prolific offenders
    drive a large proportion of total crime. These individuals are recycled
    through the system endlessly yet are neither being appropriately punished,
    nor rehabilitated.

    “Rather than treating every offence and every offender the same way, the justice system should prioritise lifetime offenders with a new targeted approach.”

    He cited the prolific and priority offenders (PPO) scheme, launched in
    2004 but since scrapped, which slashed offending rates by up to 62 per
    cent. It targeted a cohort of serial offenders by bringing together the
    police, Crown Prosecution Service, courts and probation.

    The Telegraph asked the MoJ to provide data on how many times an offender
    for 14 different crimes was convicted before they were jailed for the same offence.

    It revealed that in 2020, the highest number of previous convictions for possessing a knife was eight. In 2021, it was seven, five in 2019 and
    seven in 2018.

    This is despite the fact that anyone caught with a knife for a second time should automatically receive a six-month jail sentence under section 28 of
    the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015.

    For burglary, the figures were significantly higher. In 2019, the highest number of previous burglaries for which a criminal was convicted before
    being jailed was 27. In 2020, it was 20, in 2018, it was 18, and in 2021,
    it was 13.

    Sir Robert said there were problems with automatic jailing of prolific offenders. One was that the offences they were committing were often minor
    such as thefts, drug-related offences or or anti-social behaviour that did
    not reach the threshold for jail.

    “The question mark really was whether there came a moment where you
    declared them a prolific offender and gave them a longer sentence,” he
    said. “It's not an easy thing to do bearing in mind the fact that unless
    the issues are linked to a particular crime, like dangerousness, it's
    difficult for the court to add more on just on the basis that the person
    is a prolific.”

    Sir Robert said an alternative could be “prolific offender orders” to
    strike at the root causes and prevent repeat offending by placing the
    criminal under close supervision, with probation officers “in their face
    every day”. On top of this, courts could have been told to add “extra increments” on prolific offenders’ sentences.

    But, recalling the debate over the plans, he said: “As usual, we came up against the issue of resources and timing and I wanted to get on with some major reforms which I did. So it's not something I wanted to file away and forget about. It was something I wanted to return to.”

    Instead, the Government tightened up the legislation by telling judges to automatically jail repeat knife criminals, burglars and Class A drug
    offenders unless there were “exceptional” reasons not to do so.

    “These harsher sentences will see more criminals convicted of repeat knife
    and burglary offences face time behind bars,” said an MoJ spokesman.

    <https://news.yahoo.com/soft-justice-burglars-convicted-27-221620739.html>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)