reverse backcrosses(blind catching behind back) are harder in my opinion Jason Lee Quinn <jason...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8pjblf$3mv$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
In article <qs9v5.1351$%g3.7...@news1.cableinet.net>,
"Mark Thomas" <juggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Back crosses (IMO). It's the only one I know of that I can't dosolidly.
I second that motion. Continuous behind the back (=back crosses?) is by
far the most difficult pattern with 3 for me (and probably most other people). I only get 20-30 catches on a good run with this. The control needed for this is very high and difficult to achieve. I always have to concentrate to do it whereas the "in front" patterns are easy enough to relax. I think that RR,MM, and BB aren't even close in difficulty to continuous behind the back.
Of course you can always pile on more difficult things (eyes closed, hopping,etc) but I don't think that is what the poster is looking for.
They just wanted a "pure" pattern. If anything behind the back doesn't qualify as "pure", then I'd nominate RR...
jason
--
--Woah?! How many is that?
I think it really depends... I learned Mill's Mess and Chops before even learning Juggler's Tennis.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 293 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 228:29:25 |
Calls: | 6,624 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 12,171 |
Messages: | 5,318,992 |