• Internet Oracularities Digest #1578

    From oracle-request@internetoracle.org@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 11 15:03:38 2018
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date: Fri, 11 May 18 11:03:26 -0500
    From: steve@kinzler.com (Steve Kinzler)
    Subject: Internet Oracularities Digest #1578

    To find out all about the Internet Oracle (TM), including how
    to participate, send mail to help@internetoracle.org, or go to http://internetoracle.org/ ("Internet Oracle" is a trademark of Stephen
    B Kinzler.)

    Let us know what you like! Send your ratings of these 10 Oracularities
    on an integer scale of 1 ("very bad") to 5 ("very good") with the volume
    number to vote@internetoracle.org (probably just reply to this message).
    For example:
    1578
    2 1 3 4 3 5 3 3 4 1

    1573 15 votes 16521 02751 27240 25332 03552 11643 14541 02193 13722 16350
    1573 3.1 mean 2.7 3.3 2.5 2.9 3.4 3.5 3.0 3.9 3.1 2.8

    ------------------------------

    Date: Fri, 11 May 18 11:03:27 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1578-01

    Selected-By: MVS Gmail <mvsopen@gmail.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    What are we going to do about all the stray ostriches? My back yard is
    full of them, and they are eating the petunias. I called the Animal
    Control office and they reminded me that "Animal Control" is merely a euphemism for dogcatcher, and that they only catch dogs. And not much
    of those, either.

    Oh, and I should grovel. You are a smart Oracle, and too smart to fall
    for the joke about, "Is there no bomb in Gilead?" At least not this
    time.

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } There are several simple solutions to your problem.
    }
    } Fix 1:
    } Rabid dogs have no fear of any animal and will bite with abandon. Use
    } some trained rabid dogs to chase the birds away, then have Animal
    } Control come and deal with the rabid dogs. Rabies is why dogcatchers
    } were first instituted and why they are still considered "law
    } enforcement officers" under the few gun control laws the US has.
    }
    } Drawbacks:
    } Rabid dogs have no fear of any animal and humans are animals. And just
    } because dogc^H^H^H^HAnimal Control can carry guns, doesn't mean they
    } do. Also rabid dogs tend to forget their training.
    }
    } Fix 2:
    } While "Animal Control" may be a fancy name for "dogcatcher", they
    } *are* responsible for dealing with all reported rabies-infected
    } animals no matter how much they'd rather shirk that duty. So, if you
    } infect all your ostriches with rabies, you can force Animal Control to
    } do something without needing rabid dogs.
    }
    } Drawbacks:
    } Rabies only infects mammals natively, so you'd need to do some genetic
    } engineering on the virus first. Also an ostrich bite is terrifying
    } even before you have a rabid bird.
    }
    } Fix 3:
    } As an invasive species not native to the area, ostriches are not
    } protected by the Migratory Bird Act of 1918. You are free to shoot the
    } birds, trap them and behead them, or (for slower control) raid their
    } nests for eggs. The eggs taste like chicken eggs, only are sized like
    } two dozen. The meat has some popularity as a lean alternative to
    } hamburger.
    }
    } Drawbacks:
    } There's a lot of blood in those things. Your petunias will get soaked.
    } And raiding the nests is dangerous, since there's that ostrich bite
    } thing to deal with. Also the talons. Did I mention the talons?
    } Ostriches don't have teeth but do have long sharp talons. And with a
    } natural instinct to fight by kicking, that's a concern.
    }
    } Fix 4:
    } Bring in the leopards. They can easily climb trees to escape the
    } flightless birds and from trees than can wait for an in-attentive
    } moment to pounce on your pesky petunia eaters.
    }
    } Drawbacks:
    } Still a risk of bloodying up your flowers. Also the leopards will move
    } on to other prey, like junior, after the birds have been dispatched.
    }
    } Fix 5:
    } Plant some petunias in your neighbor Paul's yard. When the birds go
    } over to eat them, quickly string up an electical fence. Either around
    } your yard to keep them from returning, or around Paul's to keep them
    } from leaving.
    }
    } Drawbacks:
    } Paul is just crazy enough that he may try to ride the ostriches and
    } lead them on a charge against you. Also Paul will just find some other
    } animal to release into your yard once you get rid of the ostriches he
    } put there.
    }
    } You owe the Oracle a large quiche.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Fri, 11 May 18 11:03:28 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1578-02

    Selected-By: Mark Lawrence <mtlrph@gmail.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    This year instead of asking you what you are going to give up for Lent
    I have a different question.

    Oh, and I am giving up smoking for Lent, which is very easy because I
    don't smoke.

    Anyway, my question is about Maundy Thursday. March 29th this year.
    There has got to be some way to make a GOOD joke about Joe Friday
    marrying Tuesday Weld on Maundy Thursday, and somehow getting
    Wednesday into the joke as well.

    Please tell me that joke, or else have a really, really good excuse. A
    few years ago your excuse was that you had a "code in your nodes" and
    it was ROT13, which is probably the most lame code there is, and thus
    a very lame excuse.

    So without further delay, the joke is ... (Ta-Da!):

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } So, did you hear the news? This Maundy Thursday Joe Friday is
    } marrying Tuesday Weld at a church in Temple. The ceremony was to be
    } ministered by Wednesday Addams. Basically Wednesday will make
    } Tuesday a Friday on Maundy Thursday in a Temple church.
    }
    } Unfortunately Abbott and Costello were in charge of printing the
    } invitations, so no one is likely to know who, what, or when.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Fri, 11 May 18 11:03:29 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1578-03

    Selected-By: Mark Lawrence <mtlrph@gmail.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    You've heard of Rogue One. Will the sequel be Nethack Two? It only
    makes sense.

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } My plans are to get Willie Crowther and Donnie Woods back into a replay
    } of their childhood adventures, including much-enhanced exploration of
    } the Mammoth and Flint Ridge cave systems. They do not yet know the full
    } extent of those caves nor of my intent. In particular, the Hollow Earth
    } theories of Sprague de Camp and other sceptics and septics will be
    } found full of the much-needed emptiness required to extend the original
    } ADVENT adventure game to the point that it can run on a real virtual
    } implementation, written in INTERCAL, of a PDP-6 executing on a
    } mechanical Babbage engine. Nothing like this has ever (and with good
    } reason) been attempted before. We are on the forefront of
    } speleomathematical computation and explosions.
    }
    } You owe the Oracle a PhD thesis that explains why the Crowther-Woods
    } code for ADVENT was some of the best-written Fortran software ever
    } developed. (YOU write the thesis and sit for the orals. I get the PhD.)

    ------------------------------

    Date: Fri, 11 May 18 11:03:30 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1578-04

    Selected-By: Ian Davis

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    Would you say atheists and agnostics are "substitious"?

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } Ahhh, putting atheists and agnostics into the same boat, are we?
    }
    } Let's look for a moment at the true meaning of those words. The atheist
    } refuses the idea that the unprovable must be accepted as the given, and
    } thus refuses to accept the burden of proof for believing in gods or
    } oracles. The agnostic claims, through a magnificent sleight of hand, to
    } have special knowledge through which he knows he is unable to know
    } whether or not he should believe in gods or oracles. The agnostic is
    } thus far more useful to me.
    }
    } Thus we have fully examined the positions of those two guys. Except for
    } them, everyone else has some sort of religious or superstitious belief.
    }
    } Now we finally arrive at your purported "substitious" supposition. The
    } word has no meaning to the true atheist. (False atheists, a dime a
    } dozen around here, are in the same category as agnostics or shell-game
    } operators.) Agnostics, and no small number of the deeply religious as
    } well, believe in The Lottery, and see it as a particularly worthwhile
    } investment strategy, in spite of the provably dreadful return on the
    } investment. The Lottery is a tax on Bad Mathematics, being right up
    } there in utterly foolish behavior with trying to get sensible answers
    } from an anonymous and fake genius on the Internet.
    }
    } So as any fool can plainly see, the answer to your question is a real
    } mess, with "substition" being used as a substitute for superstition by
    } the religious and the irreligious as they buy their Lottery tickets, so
    } that they can claim they are not superstitious.
    }
    } You owe the Oracle condolences over his off-by-one error in selecting
    } the latest Mega Million, where 14 38 51 64 70 9 was the winner and the
    } Oracular Selection was 14 37 51 64 70 9. So close! Maybe next time.
    } I've lost so often I'm due for a big win. I can feel it in my bones.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Fri, 11 May 18 11:03:31 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1578-05

    Selected-By: Dave <lightinchains@gmail.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    Please tell me about the decline and fall of Edward Gibbon. He has
    nothing to do with the Gibbous or Waxing Moon, as you told me before. A
    silly idea and especially wrong. This time I will flunk faster or not
    at all.

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } Gibbon is best known for his work "Decline and Fall of the Roaming
    } Primate", in which he describes the tragic end of an Archbishop by
    } slipping down a greased pulpit step into the font below.
    }
    } He was born in 1737, in Numpty, South Lanarkshire, and due to poor
    } health had a very long bath before being sent to Oxford to dry off. He
    } proceeded to deny the existence of miracles, but recanted when he
    } discovered Suzanne Kirkwood, a Swiss woman who went cuckoo with a
    } small penknife.
    }
    } Gibbons spent twelve years writing his most famous work, "Why The
    } French Smell", but also found time to critique Christianity. His main
    } reason for denying the existence of God was the proximity of the
    } smelly French to England, God's own country. He also maintained that
    } if Jesus' feet did walk upon England's mountains green, at least he
    } had the decency to put some proper shoes on first, and not wear
    } sandals like some Middle Eastern hippy.
    }
    } He spent much of his later years in The Grotty, a small hovel with 6
    } bedrooms, 3 kitchens, 4 internal toilets, and a view over the South
    } Downs. He is buried in grounds the Sheffield Mouse Museum, where his
    } powdered wig is on display and is nibbled daily by the inhabitants.
    }
    } You owe the Oracle a copy of Gibbon's "Journey from Geneva to
    } Aromatherapy" (in French).

    ------------------------------

    Date: Fri, 11 May 18 11:03:32 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1578-06

    Selected-By: Mark Lawrence <mtlrph@gmail.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    O Wide Oracle, oops I mean Wise Oracle, whose fingers never leave his
    hands, unlike mine that smoetimes get crossed, please tell me/

    Why did the chicken cross the Moebius strip?

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } To get halfway around, the quick way.
    }
    } You owe the Oracle a wit. You're halfway there.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Fri, 11 May 18 11:03:33 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1578-07

    Selected-By: Klone (aka Daniel Klein)<daniel.v.klein@gmail.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    Oracle most calculable,

    Will it ever be the good times again?

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } Sure. If you say, "Six times nine is forty-seven," (or even 56) then
    } that is bad times. If instead you say, "Six times nine is fifty-four,"
    } then that is good times.
    }
    } A proper appreciation of mathematics will improve your life.
    }
    } You owe the Oracle a factorial!

    ------------------------------

    Date: Fri, 11 May 18 11:03:34 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1578-08

    Selected-By: Ian Davis

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    I hate complaining because that suggests the blame is yours, rather
    than someone else's. So don't blame me if you misunderstand this mild complaint as an attack. It isn't. I just wish you would get things
    right once in a while. Especially when I grovel.

    What I want to say is that I really really,

    I mean, really really really really really really really really really really,

    needed headlights for my car. Headlights.

    There was a slight misunderstanding.

    Perhaps you gave the task to Zadoc or some other entity whose ears are swathed in blankets.

    Anyway, I don't need the headlice. How can I get rid of them, and where
    shall I send them?

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } Sorry, no refunds. But as a special service to a faithful supplicant,
    } I have upgraded them to crabs for you.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Fri, 11 May 18 11:03:35 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1578-09

    Selected-By: Klone (aka Daniel Klein)<daniel.v.klein@gmail.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    You've never heard of me. My name is Nathan Spungzupp. I'm certain you
    know nothing about me because I am only a figment of my own
    imagination, sort of like Bishop Berkeley. He denied the existence of material substance, and thus of course of himself. It's kind of neat,
    because I can get away with almost anything. Watch as I set myself on
    fire and nothing happens!

    Oops.

    A bucket of water, please. Quickly!!

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } SPLASH!!!
    }
    } There. You owe me your life savings.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Fri, 11 May 18 11:03:36 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1578-10

    Selected-By: Christophe <xof@chanticleer.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    I demand results.

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } Good supplication! It gives me a chance to illustrate some
    } disadvantages of my favorite calculation tool, the venerable "dc"
    } program.
    }
    } Sometimes our calculations do not match our expectations and hence the
    } results are not quite what we wanted. In the first example, below, we
    } extract some square roots. (The v operator in dc was presumably chosen
    } for its visual similarity to the radical symbol. Sidewisely, the _
    } operator is the unary negative symbol, because - is already the
    } subtraction operator.)
    }
    } $ dc
    } 625 625*p
    } 390625
    } vp
    } 625
    } vp
    } 25
    } vp
    } 5
    } 625 vp
    } 25
    } _625 vp
    } dc: square root of negative number
    } 25
    } q
    } $
    }
    } That's not the result you demanded.
    }
    } Next we attempt division, forgetting for the moment that the dc program
    } truncates the results miserably unless you use the k operator.
    }
    } $ dc
    } 144 24/p
    } 6
    } 154 24/p
    } 6
    } q
    } $
    }
    } Again, that's not the result you demanded.
    }
    } You owe the Oracle an unwary operator, such as k. Indeed try the last
    } example yourself, but start with "5 k" beforehand.

    ------------------------------

    End of Internet Oracularities Digest #1578 ******************************************

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)