• Internet Oracularities Digest #1569

    From oracle-request@internetoracle.org@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 29 13:43:08 2016
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 29 Dec 16 08:42:56 -0500
    From: steve@kinzler.com (Steve Kinzler)
    Subject: Internet Oracularities Digest #1569

    To find out all about the Internet Oracle (TM), including how
    to participate, send mail to help@internetoracle.org, or go to http://internetoracle.org/ ("Internet Oracle" is a trademark of Stephen
    B Kinzler.)

    Let us know what you like! Send your ratings of these 10 Oracularities
    on an integer scale of 1 ("very bad") to 5 ("very good") with the volume
    number to vote@internetoracle.org (probably just reply to this message).
    For example:
    1569
    2 1 3 4 3 5 3 3 4 1

    1564 24 votes 14865 12b55 0aa40 23865 36573 143a6 05874 033b7 15873 27555
    1564 3.3 mean 3.4 3.5 2.8 3.4 3.0 3.7 3.4 3.9 3.2 3.2

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 29 Dec 16 08:42:57 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1569-01

    Selected-By: Ian Davis

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    Oracle who knows which products will give you the rash,

    Why is it that Gene Wilder never collaborated with Sean Connery?

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } How soon they forget. Alice in Highlander, The Woman in Red October,
    } The Little Prince of Thieves, Rising Sunday Lovers, The Name of the
    } Rhinoserose, The Red Woman of Straw, and my favorite, The World's
    } Greatest Train Robbery Lover.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 29 Dec 16 08:42:58 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1569-02

    Selected-By: Ian Davis

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    Oh? Who was the first?

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } Correct. Who's on first.
    }
    } You owe the Oracle a well-executed performance of the
    } Abbott-and-Costello Hebrew Lesson.
    }
    } ABBOTT: I see you're here for your Hebrew lesson.
    } COSTELLO: I'm ready to learn.
    } A: Now, the first thing you must understand is that Hebrew and
    } English have many words which sound alike, but they do not mean
    } the same thing.
    } C: Sure, I understand.
    } A: Now, don't be too quick to say that.
    } C: How stupid do you think I am -don't answer that. It's simple-some
    } words in Hebrew sound like words in English, but they don't mean
    } the same.
    } A: Precisely.
    } C: We have that word in English, too. What does it mean in Hebrew?
    } A: No, no. Precisely is an English word.
    } C: I didn't come here to learn English, I came to learn Hebrew. So
    } make with the Hebrew.
    } A: Fine. Let's start with mee.
    } C: You.
    } A: No , mee.
    } C: Fine, we'll start with you.
    } A: No, we'll start with mee.
    } C: Okay, have it your way.
    } A: Now, mee is who.
    } C: You is Abbott.
    } A: No, no, no. Mee is who.
    } C: You is Abbott.
    } A: You don't understand.
    } C: I don't understand? Did you just say me is who?
    } A: Yes I did. Mee is who.
    } C: You is Abbott.
    } A: No, You Misunderstand what I am saying. Tell me about mee.
    } C: Well, you're a nice enough guy.
    } A: No, no. Tell me about mee!
    } C: Who?
    } A: Precisely.
    } C: Precisely what?
    } A: Precisely who.
    } C: It's precisely whom!
    } A: No, mee is who.
    } C: Don't start that again-go on to something else.
    } A: All right. Hu is he.
    } C: Who is he?
    } A: Yes.
    } C: I don't know. Who is he?
    } A: Sure you do. You just said it.
    } C: I just said what?
    } A: Hu is he.
    } C: Who is he?
    } A: Precisely.
    } C: Again with the precisely! Precisely who?
    } A: No, precisely hee.
    } C: Precisely he? Who is he?
    } A: Precisely!
    } C: And what about me?
    } A: Hu.
    } C: me, me, me!
    } A: Hu, hu, hu!
    } C: What are you, an owl? Me! Who is me?
    } A: No, hu is he!
    } C: I don't know I maybe he is me!
    } A: No, hee is she! (STARE AT ABBOTT)
    } C: Do his parents know about this?
    } A: About what?
    } C: About her!
    } A: What about her?
    } C: That she is he!
    } A: No, you've got it wrong-hee is she!
    } C: Then who is he?
    } A: Precisely!
    } C: Who?
    } A: He!
    } C: Me?
    } A: Hu!
    } C: He?
    } A: She!
    } C: Who is she?
    } A: No, hu is he.
    } C: I don't care who is he, I want to know who is she?
    } A: No, that's not right.
    } C: How can it not be right? I said it. I was standing here when I
    } said it, and I know me.
    } A: Hu.
    } C: Who?
    } A: Precisely!
    } C: Me! Me is that he you are talking about! He is me!
    } A: No, hee is she!
    } C: Wait a Minute, wait a minute! I'm trying to learn a little
    } Hebrew, and now I can't even speak English. Let me review.
    } A: Go ahead.
    } C: Now first You want to know me is who.
    } A: Correct.
    } C: And then you say who is he.
    } A: Absolutely.
    } C: And then you tell me he is she.
    } A & C: Precisely!
    } C: Now look at this logically. If me is who. And who is he. And he
    } is she. Don't it stand to reason that me is she?
    } A: Who?
    } C: She!
    } A: That is he!
    } C: Who is he?
    } A & C: Precisely!
    } C: I have just about had it. You have me confused I want to go home.
    } You know what I want? Ma!
    } A: What.
    } C: I said Ma.
    } A: What.
    } Q: What are you, deaf? I want Ma!
    } A: What!
    } C: Not what, who!
    } A: He!
    } C: Not he! Ma is not he!
    } A: Of course not! Hu is he!
    } C: I don't know. I don't know. I don't care. I don't care who is he,
    } he is she, me is who, ma is what. I just want to go home now and
    } play with my dog.
    } A: Fish.
    } C: Fish?
    } A: Dag is fish.
    } C: That's all, I'm outa here.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 29 Dec 16 08:42:59 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1569-03

    Selected-By: Dave <lightinchains@gmail.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    Are you still answering questions, and if so, why not?

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } Well, it's one for the grovel
    } Two for the dough
    } Three so I can ZOT you
    } and I'll do it NOW!
    }
    } But don't you
    } ask 'bout the brown w**d ch*cks
    } Well you can do anything
    } But stay off those brown w**d ch*cks
    }
    } Well, it's
    } Brown, brown
    } brown w**d ch*cks
    } Brown, brown
    } brown w**d ch*cks, yeah!
    } Brown, brown
    } brown w**d ch*cks, baby!
    } Brown, brown
    } brown w**d ch*cks
    } Well, you can do anything
    } But stay off of those brown w**d ch*cks!

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 29 Dec 16 08:43:00 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1569-04

    Selected-By: twchew <twchew@mindspring.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    From Are there monsters in my closet?

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } All the monsters in your closet are totally imaginary. You can get out
    } of bed and go and look if you doubt me.
    }
    } You are so fortunate to have a helpful Oracle available to save you
    } from Dark and Fearsome Horrors. I live underneath your bed,
    } composing answers while you sleep, which is why you never
    } see me. And rarely if ever do I cackle, snort, or reach out
    } to grab your ankles.
    }
    } Cackle.
    }
    } Snort.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 29 Dec 16 08:43:01 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1569-05

    Selected-By: Dave <lightinchains@gmail.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    What are the symptoms of high libido?

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } Great excitement at any hint of a glimpse of a Freudian slip.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 29 Dec 16 08:43:02 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1569-06

    Selected-By: Christophe <xof@chanticleer.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    You said, perhaps in haste,
    } That's not how keyboards work.
    } That's also not how jokes work.

    But, but, they DID. They did so! They DID!!!

    Every time I ask you a question I am so absobumptly THRILLED to get
    some sort of answer that is not one of Milton Berle's jokes, but
    instead something partially different. Do you do that with partial differentials? I think my car needs one.

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } We're going to need a bigger bad pun jar, Zadoc.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 29 Dec 16 08:43:03 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1569-07

    Selected-By: Christophe <xof@chanticleer.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    Is it me or you?

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } I am you.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 29 Dec 16 08:43:04 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1569-08

    Selected-By: twchew <twchew@mindspring.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    Good plural for a mongoose please. All I've been able to figure out
    is, "Please send me a mongoose. While you are at it, please send
    me another." It's probably not mongeese or digoose.

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } Actually, supplicant, you've missed the key point. The reason that
    } there's no linguistic plural for "mongoose" is because there's no
    } *physical* plural for "mongoose". There is always, and has only ever
    } been, one ophiophagous herpestid -- the trick is, it goes back and
    } forth through time so as to exist in multiple places at once, like
    } with electrons (or rather, like with *the single electron*).
    } Therefore, we cannot send you mongooses, mongeese, mongice, mongices,
    } mongen, mongoosen, mongi, mongii, mongiii, mongiv, mongeeth, mongeet,
    } monga, mongae, digoose, digeese, trigoose, trigeese, polygoose,
    } polygeese, polygoosen, or polygooses. We can only send you the
    } mongoose. If you need more, we can send it to you again.
    }
    } You owe the Oracle a chemistry textbook that explains molecular
    } bonding in terms of mongoose exchange.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 29 Dec 16 08:43:05 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1569-09

    Selected-By: Christophe <xof@chanticleer.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    What is best in life?

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } That would be Henry R. Luce, who was also the best in Time, Fortune,
    } and Sports Illustrated.
    }
    } You owe the Oracle a time-travel luncheon expedition to Carbur's
    } Restaurant in Hadley, Massachusetts. It was famous for having booths
    } with strange names. There was of course the John Wilkes booth and
    } (appropriate to our purposes right now) the Clare Luce booth.
    }
    } I realize that we are far into the has-to-be-explained in-joke
    } territory, but that's one of the hazards you encounter when you ask a
    } question of a Wise Guy who is tremendously smarter than you are and
    } whose immortality allowed him to see 1975 first-handedly.
    }
    } Explanation: Clare Boothe Luce was Henry's wife.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 29 Dec 16 08:43:06 -0500
    From: Internet Oracle <vote@internetoracle.org>
    Subject: Internet Oracularity #1569-10

    Selected-By: Dave <lightinchains@gmail.com>

    The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
    Your question was:

    Oops again. By mistake I'm asking about Yakaturian V. Parmenter. It's
    not a person, but instead a legal case. Yakaturian and Parmenter want
    to hate each other, so they have filed a lawsuit.

    Please tell me how to sweep up lawsuit filings. Steel filings you can
    get with a magnet. These don't.

    And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

    } You can create a new magnet to pick up steel filings by rubbing a
    } piece of steel against a magnet for several hours.
    }
    } Similarly, you can create a new lawyer to pick up lawsuit filings by
    } rubbing a piece of steel against a lawyer for several hours.
    }
    } Sorry, let me try again:
    }
    } You can force a lawyer to pick up lawsuit filings for a tenth of their
    } standard fee by rubbing a piece of sharp steel against them for
    } several hours.
    }
    } You owe the Oracle a clean joke about legal briefs.

    ------------------------------

    End of Internet Oracularities Digest #1569 ******************************************

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)