Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
Sapo=frog=toad
Read here about the word sapo :
http://dle.rae.es/?id=XH8nuO8
El miércoles, 15 de febrero de 2017, 20:57:48 (UTC+1), Moh Bel escribió:
Sapo=frog=toad
A frog is not the same as a toad.
Read here about the word sapo :
http://dle.rae.es/?id=XH8nuO8
None of the definitions of "sapo" there corresponds to the animal referred to in English as frog.
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 4:25:05 AM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El miércoles, 15 de febrero de 2017, 20:57:48 (UTC+1), Moh Bel escribió:
Sapo=frog=toad
A frog is not the same as a toad.
Read here about the word sapo :
http://dle.rae.es/?id=XH8nuO8
None of the definitions of "sapo" there corresponds to the animal referred to in English as frog.
You are deeply dumb
Read this :
8. m. Arg., Bol., Chile, Ec., Perú y Ur. rana (‖ juego).
El viernes, 17 de febrero de 2017, 10:29:54 (UTC+1), Moh Bel escribió:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 4:25:05 AM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El miércoles, 15 de febrero de 2017, 20:57:48 (UTC+1), Moh Bel escribió:
Sapo=frog=toad
A frog is not the same as a toad.
Read here about the word sapo :
http://dle.rae.es/?id=XH8nuO8
None of the definitions of "sapo" there corresponds to the animal referred to in English as frog.
You are deeply dumb
Read this :
8. m. Arg., Bol., Chile, Ec., Perú y Ur. rana (‖ juego).
"rana (‖ juego)" means "frog (‖ game)", not "frog (‖ animal)". Read my previous post again.
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
Sapos (frogs in Spanish) is a game for 2 players
Materials
8x8 board
32 pieces in two colors, 16 pieces of one color, and 16 pieces of another color
Object
Player last to move wins.
Setup
The game is played on the spaces of an 8x8 board that starts out with 4 pieces of one color placed on the points d2, d3,e2,e3 and 4 pieces of another color are placed on d6,d7,e6,e7. The remaining 24 pieces are held in a player's respective reserves.
Play
Choose a player to move first and then the second player will move twice only on her first turn, thereafter turns alternate.
Each turn a player must make one or more jumps with one of his pieces.
Each jump must be in an orthogonal direction over one friendly or enemy piece into a vacant space directly after the jumped piece. The jumping piece may change direction between jumps.
Clarifications
An enemy piece is removed from the board immediately after a jump and returned to the owner's reserve.
You may not add a piece from your reserve if on the same turn you have captured an enemy piece
If no enemy pieces are jumped, a piece from a player’s reserve is placed in a vacant orthogonal adjacent space to the final position of the jumping piece.
End of game
The game ends when a player is unable to take his turn.
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
Shit for brains play the game or go play with your pussy
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 12:00:52 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish) is a game for 2 players
Materials
8x8 board
32 pieces in two colors, 16 pieces of one color, and 16 pieces of another color
Object
Player last to move wins.
Setup
The game is played on the spaces of an 8x8 board that starts out with 4 pieces of one color placed on the points d2, d3,e2,e3 and 4 pieces of another color are placed on d6,d7,e6,e7. The remaining 24 pieces are held in a player's respective reserves.
Play
Choose a player to move first and then the second player will move twice only on her first turn, thereafter turns alternate.
Each turn a player must make one or more jumps with one of his pieces.
Each jump must be in an orthogonal direction over one friendly or enemy piece into a vacant space directly after the jumped piece. The jumping piece may change direction between jumps.
Clarifications
An enemy piece is removed from the board immediately after a jump and returned to the owner's reserve.
You may not add a piece from your reserve if on the same turn you have captured an enemy piece
If no enemy pieces are jumped, a piece from a player’s reserve is placed in a vacant orthogonal adjacent space to the final position of the jumping piece.
End of game
The game ends when a player is unable to take his turn.
All this chatter about frogs and toads, my question is has either of you actually played a full game?
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:16:00 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
Shit for brains play the game or go play with your pussy
I will not comment a crappy game you did not even test play.
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:ha ha ha
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?
Yes! Fully aware
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:21:04 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:16:00 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
Shit for brains play the game or go play with your pussy
I will not comment a crappy game you did not even test play.
play the game or shut up, only pussies like you talk shit
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:30:47 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?
Yes! Fully aware
Good, at list we agree on something
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?ha ha ha
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:31:12 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?ha ha ha
But seriously play the game, the game ends in three possible ways,
1) blocked into a corner
2) all of your 16 pieces are on the board before your opponent
3) Pieces that you own are separated thus unable to move
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:40:39 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:38:00 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:31:12 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right .pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?ha ha ha
But seriously play the game, the game ends in three possible ways,
1) blocked into a corner
2) all of your 16 pieces are on the board before your opponent
3) Pieces that you own are separated thus unable to move
Ask Corey Clark for help he is as smart as you are.
So, if you think you are so smart let us work together.
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:38:00 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:31:12 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?ha ha ha
But seriously play the game, the game ends in three possible ways,
1) blocked into a corner
2) all of your 16 pieces are on the board before your opponent
3) Pieces that you own are separated thus unable to move
Ask Corey Clark for help he is as smart as you are.
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:40:39 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:38:00 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:31:12 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right .pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?ha ha ha
But seriously play the game, the game ends in three possible ways,
1) blocked into a corner
2) all of your 16 pieces are on the board before your opponent
3) Pieces that you own are separated thus unable to move
Ask Corey Clark for help he is as smart as you are.
So, if you think you are so smart let us work together.
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:40:39 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:38:00 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:31:12 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right .pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?ha ha ha
But seriously play the game, the game ends in three possible ways,
1) blocked into a corner
2) all of your 16 pieces are on the board before your opponent
3) Pieces that you own are separated thus unable to move
Ask Corey Clark for help he is as smart as you are.
So, if you think you are so smart let us work together.
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:48:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:40:39 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:38:00 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:31:12 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right .pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?ha ha ha
But seriously play the game, the game ends in three possible ways,
1) blocked into a corner
2) all of your 16 pieces are on the board before your opponent
3) Pieces that you own are separated thus unable to move
Ask Corey Clark for help he is as smart as you are.
So, if you think you are so smart let us work together.
How many turns both players could play without capturing each other?
I assume that the 2 players are collaborating
Is the game sensitive to mirroring play?
There are many questions you need to answer to and for some to fix them.
In reality you did not invent a game. You have just thrown a draft hoping that others will solve for you.
You remain crappy game designer as long as you do not burn your brain and play test your game or at least some mechanics.
I will post 5 games (some are completely new games with no borrowed mechanisms) in the next few days.
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:48:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:40:39 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:38:00 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:31:12 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right .pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?ha ha ha
But seriously play the game, the game ends in three possible ways,
1) blocked into a corner
2) all of your 16 pieces are on the board before your opponent
3) Pieces that you own are separated thus unable to move
Ask Corey Clark for help he is as smart as you are.
So, if you think you are so smart let us work together.
The first player will always win.
i will let you find why and how.
Corey Luis Freeling etc... all those fake and crappy game designers are invited to find why and how.
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:48:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:40:39 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:38:00 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:31:12 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right .pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?ha ha ha
But seriously play the game, the game ends in three possible ways,
1) blocked into a corner
2) all of your 16 pieces are on the board before your opponent
3) Pieces that you own are separated thus unable to move
Ask Corey Clark for help he is as smart as you are.
So, if you think you are so smart let us work together.
How many turns both players could play without capturing each other?
I assume that the 2 players are collaborating
Is the game sensitive to mirroring play?
There are many questions you need to answer to and for some to fix them.
In reality you did not invent a game. You have just thrown a draft hoping that others will solve for you.
You remain crappy game designer as long as you do not burn your brain and play test your game or at least some mechanics.
I will post 5 games (some are completely new games with no borrowed mechanisms) in the next few days.
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 5:52:12 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:48:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:40:39 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:38:00 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:31:12 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?ha ha ha
But seriously play the game, the game ends in three possible ways,
1) blocked into a corner
2) all of your 16 pieces are on the board before your opponent
3) Pieces that you own are separated thus unable to move
Ask Corey Clark for help he is as smart as you are.
So, if you think you are so smart let us work together.
How many turns both players could play without capturing each other?
I assume that the 2 players are collaborating
Is the game sensitive to mirroring play?
There are many questions you need to answer to and for some to fix them.
In reality you did not invent a game. You have just thrown a draft hoping that others will solve for you.
You remain crappy game designer as long as you do not burn your brain and play test your game or at least some mechanics.
I will post 5 games (some are completely new games with no borrowed mechanisms) in the next few days.
I have played the game many times, the problem you are having is you are trying to play it in your head. Follow the rules and play the game then you can comment
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 6:41:44 PM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 5:52:12 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:48:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:40:39 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:38:00 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:31:12 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:28:15 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:07:22 AM UTC-5, Rey Alicea wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:57:48 PM UTC-5, Moh Bel wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-5, Luis Bolaños Mures wrote:
El martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 6:00:52 (UTC+1), Rey Alicea escribió:
Sapos (frogs in Spanish)
"Sapos" means "toads", not "frogs".
The 2 are correct
Sapo=frog=toad
Instead of talking words talk about the game.
At first glance the game is deeply flawed.
Starting for a square 2x2 anywhere on the board :
pp
pp
I can play indefinitely by jumping at left and then at right
.pp
pp
then
pp.
pp
or vertically too
Ask this dumb game designer why not removing the captured piece instead of replacing it on the reserve?
There are at least 10 flaws.
Rey Alicea does not burn his "brain" more than one second. He wants other players to design "his" botched game. He just throws rules randomly. Who knows why?
No play test! No even a little burn in the brain! Nothing!!!
You my friend are a grade a pussy, you talk a lot of shit, follow the rules and play the game or simply shut the fuck up. Not are fault your parents threw out the baby and raised the placenta.
Are you aware that you are the crappiest game designer I ever seen?
Are you aware you are an imbecile?ha ha ha
But seriously play the game, the game ends in three possible ways,
1) blocked into a corner
2) all of your 16 pieces are on the board before your opponent
3) Pieces that you own are separated thus unable to move
Ask Corey Clark for help he is as smart as you are.
So, if you think you are so smart let us work together.
How many turns both players could play without capturing each other?
I assume that the 2 players are collaborating
Is the game sensitive to mirroring play?
There are many questions you need to answer to and for some to fix them.
In reality you did not invent a game. You have just thrown a draft hoping that others will solve for you.
You remain crappy game designer as long as you do not burn your brain and play test your game or at least some mechanics.
I will post 5 games (some are completely new games with no borrowed mechanisms) in the next few days.
I have played the game many times, the problem you are having is you are trying to play it in your head. Follow the rules and play the game then you can comment
You are a liar! A big liar!
Even if you are right (which is not true) that the second player will force the win then you have a flawed game.
I will not show how I play test any game.
First you need to build tools to check out any game.
Second you need to answer the more important question : is the game funny or not? If it is boring no matter what your rules are and no matter how elegant are your rules.
Now fuck you!
I will never ever answer to any crappy game you post.
NEVER EVER!!!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 37:59:49 |
| Calls: | 6,648 |
| Files: | 12,193 |
| Messages: | 5,329,242 |