• The Secret of the Fischer-Spassky Chess Set

    From Quadibloc@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 2 15:21:20 2021
    Apparently, from 1938 to 1972, at least, Jacques did not change the style
    of the chess sets they made, even though it was definitely a different style from that of their original Staunton pieces in 1849.
    This I learned from this web page...

    http://www.fersht.com/chess/

    I first tried to find the page by searching on his name, and I found results that I thought were about someone else.

    But when I backed up from the page about Staunton chess pieces to his
    home page, there was a book about protein folding mentioned there. Thus
    he is indeed the same Sir Alan Roy Fersht, FRS FMedSci that my Google
    results had turned up!!

    To continue with the initial topic...

    From this page:

    https://bobby-fischer-1972.blogspot.com/1972/07/chess-champions-poised-for-match.html

    the salient facts of the board and pieces used are given.

    I remembered that the board was green and white marble. But that the
    squares were 2 1/4" and chemically treated to be non-glossy were
    things I did not know.

    Also, while I have seen offered for sale many reproductions of the Fischer-Spassky chess set, I did not know what was being
    reproduced. Now I've learned the original set was from Jaques,
    being the type they were selling at the time, and the pieces used
    had a 3 1/2" King height.

    Incidentally, under current USCF standards, a chess board with
    2 1/4" squares is _still_ too big for chess pieces with a 3 1/2"
    King height. Which goes to show that Fischer was not all that
    fussy, despite what the press of the day made out!!

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From William Hyde@21:1/5 to Quadibloc on Mon Aug 2 15:58:46 2021
    On Monday, August 2, 2021 at 6:21:21 PM UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
    Apparently, from 1938 to 1972, at least, Jacques did not change the style
    of the chess sets they made, even though it was definitely a different style from that of their original Staunton pieces in 1849.
    This I learned from this web page...

    http://www.fersht.com/chess/

    I first tried to find the page by searching on his name, and I found results that I thought were about someone else.

    But when I backed up from the page about Staunton chess pieces to his
    home page, there was a book about protein folding mentioned there. Thus
    he is indeed the same Sir Alan Roy Fersht, FRS FMedSci that my Google
    results had turned up!!

    To continue with the initial topic...

    From this page:

    https://bobby-fischer-1972.blogspot.com/1972/07/chess-champions-poised-for-match.html

    the salient facts of the board and pieces used are given.

    I remembered that the board was green and white marble. But that the
    squares were 2 1/4" and chemically treated to be non-glossy were
    things I did not know.

    Also, while I have seen offered for sale many reproductions of the Fischer-Spassky chess set, I did not know what was being
    reproduced. Now I've learned the original set was from Jaques,
    being the type they were selling at the time, and the pieces used
    had a 3 1/2" King height.

    Incidentally, under current USCF standards, a chess board with
    2 1/4" squares is _still_ too big for chess pieces with a 3 1/2"
    King height. Which goes to show that Fischer was not all that
    fussy, despite what the press of the day made out!!

    His complaints were generally about practical matters, not following the minutiae of rules set by
    those he was generally complaining about.

    And as Larsen has mentioned, Fischer's "fussiness" as to lighting and
    sound was originally entirely justified. Reading Larsen's columns of
    the day you often run into comments about playing halls that were
    dark, hot, smoky, or noisy. Or many of the above. Nosebleeds were
    common at the Thessaloniki olympiad due to excess smoke.

    I once played in a Canadian open in Quebec, where the lighting was fine,
    but the site - a sports arena - was very hot and humid. I did very badly
    and might have done worse except that my last round opponent was
    even more affected by the temperature than I was. A solid B player,
    he was soon down a pawn with a poor position and resigned, mainly so he
    could get out of the heat (it was much cooler outdoors!). I don't
    regard myself as having won that game. The heat did it for me.



    William Hyde

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)