In article <uckkgr$27r60$1@dont-email.me>,
Bertel Lund Hansen <gadekryds@lundhansen.dk> wrote:

Kenny McCormack wrote:

That's the problem with making all this stuff browser based. It always
ends up being browser-dependent, and usually ends up working only with MS's >> browser.

It was so much better when BBO ran as a normal Windows EXE file.

OK, I'll play.

Linux, Mac and OS/2 users wouldn't be so happy with that solution.

It is actually pretty easy to run (simple) Windows apps (including BBO)
on other OSes.

I have personally run BBO (via Windows emulation) on both Linux and Mac.

I've never been able to get the browser version to run under either of
those OSes - because, as I said, this stuff usually ends up only working (fully/correctly) with MS's browsers anyway.

And as for OS/2 users, you mean both of them, right? And note that I am speaking as a former big OS/2 user/supporter/advocate. OS/2 really doesn't exist anymore (in the consumer sphere). I think they're calling whatever remains of it "eCom station" (or something like that) nowadays.

And if you dream about a Windows program - then why are you unhappy with >things only working in a Windows browser?

See above. I knew someone would make this objection; failing to see that a Windows application is best, even if you don't run (or like) Windows.

Windows is (or should be) kind of a "lingua franca" or Esperanto-like thing.

--
The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4 lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remain in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:
http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/ForFoxViewers

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Kenny McCormack wrote:

Windows is (or should be) kind of a "lingua franca" or Esperanto-like thing.

At least they found a nice colour for their screen of death and screen
of wait 10 minutes and don't turn your computer off.

I'm glad I don't see them anymore.

--
Bertel, Denmark

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In article <ucklig$65tt$2@news.xmission.com>,
Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote:

In article <uckkgr$27r60$1@dont-email.me>,
Bertel Lund Hansen <gadekryds@lundhansen.dk> wrote:

Kenny McCormack wrote:

That's the problem with making all this stuff browser based. It always
ends up being browser-dependent, and usually ends up working only with MS's >>> browser.

It was so much better when BBO ran as a normal Windows EXE file.

OK, I'll play.

Linux, Mac and OS/2 users wouldn't be so happy with that solution.

Now that I think more about it, I suppose that, to be fair, I should note
that the real target of making it browser=based is people who are not
really running any OS at all (in the sense that us Usenet geeks understand
that term).

I.e., people using things like smartphones, tablets, iPads, Chromebooks,
etc.

So, there is that...

--
The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4 lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remain in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:
http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/Seriously

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)