XGID=aBABBBCA--------A-b--dbAf-:1:1:1:00:11:21:3:0:X:Daniel O:eXtremeGammon 10
Score is X:11 O:21. Unlimited Game, Jacoby Beaver
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X O | | O O X O |
| O | | O O O |
| | | O O |
| | | O O |
| | | 6 |
| |BAR| |
| | O | |
| | | |
| | | X | +---+
| | | X X X X X | | 2 |
| X | | X X X X X X | +---+
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 92 O: 67 X-O: 11-21
Cube: 2, X own cube
X on roll, cube action
On 11/14/2021 10:02 AM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
XGID=aBABBBCA--------A-b--dbAf-:1:1:1:00:11:21:3:0:X:Daniel O:eXtremeGammon 10
Score is X:11 O:21. Unlimited Game, Jacoby Beaver +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+I don't understand the question in the subject line. Are you asking
| X O | | O O X O |
| O | | O O O |
| | | O O |
| | | O O |
| | | 6 |
| |BAR| |
| | O | |
| | | |
| | | X | +---+
| | | X X X X X | | 2 |
| X | | X X X X X X | +---+
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 92 O: 67 X-O: 11-21
Cube: 2, X own cube
X on roll, cube action
about the previous (undiagrammed) position when the bot doubled to 2?
In any case, this looks like a situation where XG would play on as X.
---
Tim Chow
Okay, I tried this. There was nothing wrong with the posted
position. But I still don't understand the question in the
subject line.
I never look at the garbled rgb text position but if you put this into XG the position is I assume correct. (taken from the posted XGID)
On 11/14/2021 10:02 AM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
XGID=aBABBBCA--------A-b--dbAf-:1:1:1:00:11:21:3:0:X:Daniel O:eXtremeGammon 10
Score is X:11 O:21. Unlimited Game, Jacoby Beaver +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+I don't understand the question in the subject line. Are you asking
| X O | | O O X O |
| O | | O O O |
| | | O O |
| | | O O |
| | | 6 |
| |BAR| |
| | O | |
| | | |
| | | X | +---+
| | | X X X X X | | 2 |
| X | | X X X X X X | +---+
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 92 O: 67 X-O: 11-21
Cube: 2, X own cube
X on roll, cube action
about the previous (undiagrammed) position when the bot doubled to 2?
In any case, this looks like a situation where XG would play on as X.
It's a failed attempt at a clever trick question.
The intended answer is "No, the bot should not have doubled because it wasn't the bot's turn."
On 11/15/2021 3:23 AM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a failed attempt at a clever trick question.Ah, I see. Or maybe, "No, the bot should not have doubled
The intended answer is "No, the bot should not have doubled because it wasn't the bot's turn."
because it didn't have cube access"? But your answer is
better.
By the way, when I read, "should the bot have doubled?" it
makes me think that the bot *did* in fact double, whereas
when I read, "should I have doubled?" it makes me think that
the human in question did not double. I never thought about
this point before, but I think it's because I think of people
as having free will whereas I don't think of bots as having
free will.
On 11/15/2021 3:23 AM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a failed attempt at a clever trick question.Ah, I see. Or maybe, "No, the bot should not have doubled
The intended answer is "No, the bot should not have doubled because it wasn't the bot's turn."
because it didn't have cube access"? But your answer is
better.
By the way, when I read, "should the bot have doubled?" it
makes me think that the bot *did* in fact double, whereas
when I read, "should I have doubled?" it makes me think that
the human in question did not double. I never thought about
this point before, but I think it's because I think of people
as having free will whereas I don't think of bots as having
free will.
---
Tim Chow
1. Rollout¹ 21/9 11/5 8/2* eq:+0.562
Player: 66.51% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
Opponent: 33.49% (G:1.91% B:0.09%)
Confidence: ±0.007 (+0.555..+0.569) - [100.0%]
Duration: 2 minutes 52 seconds
2. 4-ply 21/15 8/2*(2) 7/1 eq:+0.530 (-0.032)
Player: 66.52% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
Opponent: 33.48% (G:2.84% B:0.16%)
3. 4-ply 11/5 8/2*(2) 7/1 eq:+0.522 (-0.039)
Player: 66.47% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
Opponent: 33.53% (G:3.41% B:0.14%)
4. 4-ply 21/9 8/2*(2) eq:+0.517 (-0.045)
Player: 65.00% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
Opponent: 35.00% (G:1.21% B:0.04%)
5. 3-ply 21/15 11/5 8/2*(2) eq:+0.517 (-0.045)
Player: 65.10% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
Opponent: 34.90% (G:1.41% B:0.04%)
On 11/16/2021 6:13 PM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:Sorry, I posted it to the wrong thread. I have corrected the error.
1. Rollout¹ 21/9 11/5 8/2* eq:+0.562
Player: 66.51% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
Opponent: 33.49% (G:1.91% B:0.09%)
Confidence: ±0.007 (+0.555..+0.569) - [100.0%]
Duration: 2 minutes 52 seconds
2. 4-ply 21/15 8/2*(2) 7/1 eq:+0.530 (-0.032)
Player: 66.52% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
Opponent: 33.48% (G:2.84% B:0.16%)
3. 4-ply 11/5 8/2*(2) 7/1 eq:+0.522 (-0.039)
Player: 66.47% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
Opponent: 33.53% (G:3.41% B:0.14%)
4. 4-ply 21/9 8/2*(2) eq:+0.517 (-0.045)
Player: 65.00% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
Opponent: 35.00% (G:1.21% B:0.04%)
5. 3-ply 21/15 11/5 8/2*(2) eq:+0.517 (-0.045)What is this a rollout of? The original position you posted
Player: 65.10% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
Opponent: 34.90% (G:1.41% B:0.04%)
was a cube decision.
---
Tim Chow
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 286 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 89:33:58 |
Calls: | 6,496 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 12,100 |
Messages: | 5,277,448 |