Thanks for listening. And thank you
just as much if you didn't listen at all.
On October 14, 2023 at 6:08:18 PM UTC-6, peps...@gmail.com wrote:Thanks for your feedback.
Thanks for listening. And thank youIn either case, you must be thanking
just as much if you didn't listen at all.
"a certain Tim" for listening or not, as
your subject title infers that everyone
else are lesser players who might not
be interested, just like I wasn't ;).
And I have this hunch that "your Tim"
is the one with a math PHD; "RGB's
infamous Tim The Math-Giver" who
gave us "The 21^7 < 2^32 < 21^8"... :)
If that's the case, then I have a strange
suspicion that you intended to give him
a private math lesson by discouraging
everyone else as lesser players, (which
adds injury to insult), but you sent your
email to RGB by mistake... ;)
MK
On October 15, 2023 at 5:18:48 AM UTC+1, MK wrote:
On October 14, 2023 at 6:08:18 PM UTC-6, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for listening. And thank you
just as much if you didn't listen at all.
And I have this hunch that "your Tim"
is the one with a math PHD; "RGB's
infamous Tim The Math-Giver" who
gave us "The 21^7 < 2^32 < 21^8"... :)
If that's the case, then I have a strange
suspicion that you intended to give him
a private math lesson by discouraging
everyone else as lesser players, (which
adds injury to insult), but you sent your
email to RGB by mistake... ;)
Thanks for your feedback.
I didn't mean what you thought I meant.
I will change the title of the thread.
I had complained many times in the past
that you start very interesting threads but
that you don't pursue them to fruition and
one of my frustrations with you is thay you
are not adverserial enough with the likes
of Tim, Axel, etc... :(
It may be because of your shit-licking dog
personality towards the members of your
pack of ilks, whom you will nibble at but
not bite, even though I consider you more
capable of analytical and logical thinking
than them half-brained PHD math-shitters.
Despite my being snide in my previous post,
I did indeed find your symmetrical examples
interesting. Ever since I stuffed our "Tim The
Math-Giver" into donkey's ass, I doubt that
you will hear from him even though you were
serviently reaching out to him specifically. :(
But I think you yourself will be capable of
developing further on what you posted. So,
I will encourage you to do that by asking you
whether the numbers you gave were based
on Botsight or Isight..??
Since I never considered anything to know
about, I know nothing about Isight and I
would more specifically like to hear what
Isight says about your examples...??
82.333 > 76: Redouble, pass in all 3 positions
Unless I misunderstand it, it looks like Axel's
Isight is a pile of horse-muffins...?
And the reason why nobody publicly followed
up to your original post, as well as the reason
why you haven't responded to my questions...?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 14:04:14 |
Calls: | 6,667 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,214 |
Messages: | 5,336,558 |