Someone in a Facebook BG groups had posted
an example from a game in 2012 where several
jokers were rolled in a row, three 61's to escape
and hit without getting hit back.

What a coincidence that we were talking about
rolling 61's in here a few days ago. Surely those
gamblegammon elites wouldn't be reading what
is posted in RGB, would they..?

Someone suggested to send the news article to
all the "riggies" and the author replied that it was
aimed at them to begin with.

How come mentally ill gambler are so incapable
of logic or inversely so capable of false logic..?

Okay, so now, if we observe three 61's in a row in
game on a server or bot, we are not to suspect it
being rigged just because it happens OTB also..?

Actually, three 61's in row type super duper jokers
are much less likely to happen on servers or bots,
because they are rigged to cheat inconspicuously
and may actually suppress them from happening
truely randomly, in order to reduce suspicions.

A cheating server or a bot would never fall behind
so much to need three 61's in a row. The first 61,
at the proper moment, would change/determine
the fate of the game enough to leave no need for
two more in a row.

What's worse is that the half-brained morons think
that they're smarter than the "riggies" and that they
somehow have the right to castigate and insult any
people, (most likely new to the game that they want
to popularize so badly), at the slightest opportunity.
By doing so, they probably turn people off, causing
them to stay away from the abrasive AH's that they
come across as...

MK

PS: AH = A.ss H.ole in case you didn't get it last time ;)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)