• Did Kit Woolsey write a sequel -- "How NOT to play tournament backgammo

    From pepstein5@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 23 06:22:50 2023
    https://youtu.be/F-xHT9yiDzc?t=2923

    I can't believe Olsen's drop above.
    Sure, it's a money drop. But with such a deficit,
    and on a high cube, you've got to take a bit deep.

    Four checkers removed is quite a few and we do have
    an open point to aim at.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy Chow@21:1/5 to peps...@gmail.com on Mon Jul 24 07:47:19 2023
    On 7/23/2023 9:22 AM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    https://youtu.be/F-xHT9yiDzc?t=2923

    I can't believe Olsen's drop above.
    Sure, it's a money drop. But with such a deficit,
    and on a high cube, you've got to take a bit deep.

    Four checkers removed is quite a few and we do have
    an open point to aim at.

    It's three checkers not four, but XG agrees with you.

    XGID=-FBaC--------a---b-bbbcb-A:1:-1:-1:00:1:6:0:11:10

    Score is X:1 O:6 11 pt.(s) match.
    +-1--2--3--4--5--6-------7--8--9-10-11-12-+
    | O O O O O | | O O | +---+
    | O O O O O | | O | | 2 |
    | O | | | +---+
    | | | |
    | | X | |
    | |BAR| |
    | 6 | | |
    | X | | |
    | X X | | |
    | X X X | | |
    | X X O X | | |
    +24-23-22-21-20-19------18-17-16-15-14-13-+
    Pip count X: 47 O: 93 X-O: 1-6/11
    Cube: 2, O own cube
    O on roll, cube action

    Analyzed in Rollout
    No redouble
    Player Winning Chances: 82.87% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Opponent Winning Chances: 17.13% (G:1.11% B:0.01%)
    Redouble/Take
    Player Winning Chances: 83.23% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Opponent Winning Chances: 16.77% (G:1.08% B:0.00%)

    Cubeful Equities:
    No redouble: +0.905
    Redouble/Take: +0.870 (-0.036)
    Redouble/Pass: +1.000 (+0.095)

    Best Cube action: No redouble / Take
    Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 27.3%

    Rollout:
    1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
    Confidence No Double: ± 0.004 (+0.901..+0.910)
    Confidence Double: ± 0.007 (+0.863..+0.877)

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.211.pre-release, MET: Kazaross XG2

    ---
    Tim Chow

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pepstein5@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Timothy Chow on Mon Jul 24 12:23:31 2023
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 12:47:22 PM UTC+1, Timothy Chow wrote:
    On 7/23/2023 9:22 AM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    https://youtu.be/F-xHT9yiDzc?t=2923

    I can't believe Olsen's drop above.
    Sure, it's a money drop. But with such a deficit,
    and on a high cube, you've got to take a bit deep.

    Four checkers removed is quite a few and we do have
    an open point to aim at.
    It's three checkers not four, but XG agrees with you.

    XGID=-FBaC--------a---b-bbbcb-A:1:-1:-1:00:1:6:0:11:10

    Score is X:1 O:6 11 pt.(s) match. +-1--2--3--4--5--6-------7--8--9-10-11-12-+
    | O O O O O | | O O | +---+
    | O O O O O | | O | | 2 |
    | O | | | +---+
    | | | |
    | | X | |
    | |BAR| |
    | 6 | | |
    | X | | |
    | X X | | |
    | X X X | | |
    | X X O X | | |
    +24-23-22-21-20-19------18-17-16-15-14-13-+
    Pip count X: 47 O: 93 X-O: 1-6/11
    Cube: 2, O own cube
    O on roll, cube action

    Analyzed in Rollout
    No redouble
    Player Winning Chances: 82.87% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Opponent Winning Chances: 17.13% (G:1.11% B:0.01%)
    Redouble/Take
    Player Winning Chances: 83.23% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Opponent Winning Chances: 16.77% (G:1.08% B:0.00%)

    Cubeful Equities:
    No redouble: +0.905
    Redouble/Take: +0.870 (-0.036)
    Redouble/Pass: +1.000 (+0.095)

    Best Cube action: No redouble / Take
    Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 27.3%

    Rollout:
    1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
    Confidence No Double: ± 0.004 (+0.901..+0.910)
    Confidence Double: ± 0.007 (+0.863..+0.877)

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.211.pre-release, MET: Kazaross XG2

    Thanks. I saw that I miscounted the checkers off immediately after I'd posted, but it still looked like bad play.

    I never thought it was a hold, though. I saw it as RD/T.
    Fancy passing a no-double, at that rarefied level!!

    The players are apparently friends and they chat constantly about the plays during the match.
    However, it didn't occur to either of them to question this cube action.

    I think the players have very similar abilities and are both Giants or near-Giants so it
    isn't one of these skill-diff things.

    Of course, Jason may have thought "It might not be a double and it's an easy take but
    he might wrongly drop."

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy Chow@21:1/5 to peps...@gmail.com on Tue Jul 25 00:08:42 2023
    On 7/24/2023 3:23 PM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    I think the players have very similar abilities and are both Giants or near-Giants so it
    isn't one of these skill-diff things.

    Olsen did make the 2022 Giants list and the BMAB gives his
    current PR as about 3.7 (on the high side for a Giant). Jason
    Pack's PR is listed as about 5.0 and I don't think people would
    call him a "near-Giant." But I think you're right that the skill
    difference is not large enough to justify any major deviation from
    what either player would play against an equal opponent.

    ---
    Tim Chow

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pepstein5@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Timothy Chow on Tue Jul 25 05:47:37 2023
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 5:08:46 AM UTC+1, Timothy Chow wrote:
    On 7/24/2023 3:23 PM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    I think the players have very similar abilities and are both Giants or near-Giants so it
    isn't one of these skill-diff things.
    Olsen did make the 2022 Giants list and the BMAB gives his
    current PR as about 3.7 (on the high side for a Giant). ...

    This leads to an interesting (to me) ambiguity.
    Who has the higher tennis ranking among Chris Eubanks and Jannik Sinner?

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stick Rice@21:1/5 to peps...@gmail.com on Thu Sep 21 10:24:06 2023
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:47:40 AM UTC-4, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 5:08:46 AM UTC+1, Timothy Chow wrote:
    On 7/24/2023 3:23 PM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    I think the players have very similar abilities and are both Giants or near-Giants so it
    isn't one of these skill-diff things.
    Olsen did make the 2022 Giants list and the BMAB gives his
    current PR as about 3.7 (on the high side for a Giant). ...

    This leads to an interesting (to me) ambiguity.
    Who has the higher tennis ranking among Chris Eubanks and Jannik Sinner?

    Paul

    Nobody would refer to Pack as a near Giant and 1.5PR is clearly enough under the right circumstances to adjust one's decisions.

    As for Eubanks/Sinner, I don't get the interesting ambiguity. Sinner has the higher ranking I'd assume no matter how you mean it.

    Stick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MK@21:1/5 to peps...@gmail.com on Fri Sep 22 01:17:32 2023
    On July 23, 2023 at 7:22:52 AM UTC-6, peps...@gmail.com wrote:

    I can't believe Olsen's drop above.

    Was this post supposed to say something
    about the same Kit Foolsy, (the 8 feet tall
    gamblegammon giant book peddler), who
    had said that "there are 21 possible dice
    rolls at every turn"..?

    Did he have a math PHD like Tim also..??

    In RGB, Tim's "21^7 < 2^32 < 21^8" "math"
    will be as familiar as "e=mc2" for you, the
    pack of sick dogs of gamblegammon and
    will surely be Tim's epitaph... ;)

    MK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)