This came up in match play, but I don't think the score mattered so
recasting it as unlimited without Jacoby.
Pure play? Mobility? Hybrid? Something else?
XGID=-a---BC-C---bB---cbdBcB-A-:0:0:1:21:0:0:0:0:10
X:Player 1 O:Player 2
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X O O | | O X O X X |
| X O O | | O X O X |
| O | | O O |
| | | O |
| | | |
| |BAR| |
| | | |
| | | |
| X | | X |
| O X | | X X |
| O X | | X X O |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 186 O: 124 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 1
X to play 21
On 7/6/2023 10:56 PM, ah....Clem wrote:
This came up in match play, but I don't think the score mattered so recasting it as unlimited without Jacoby.
Pure play? Mobility? Hybrid? Something else?
XGID=-a---BC-C---bB---cbdBcB-A-:0:0:1:21:0:0:0:0:10
X:Player 1 O:Player 2I'd try the pure priming play of 8/7 6/4. An alternative idea would
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X O O | | O X O X X |
| X O O | | O X O X |
| O | | O O |
| | | O |
| | | |
| |BAR| |
| | | |
| | | |
| X | | X |
| O X | | X X |
| O X | | X X O |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 186 O: 124 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 1
X to play 21
be to step up with 24/22, in order to be able to escape a back checker
with a 6, but I don't think we need to do that yet. That straggler is
giving us shot possibilities and is not in immediate danger of being attacked. If we're hit, we could make a third anchor, which would be helpful.
---
Tim Chow
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 13:55:31 |
Calls: | 6,667 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,214 |
Messages: | 5,336,557 |