• Othello 2023

    From Simon Woodhead@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 23 09:53:37 2023
    Othello 2023 (bglog version) is out now: http://itikawa.com/othello23www/othello2023www.html
    (also includes previous 9 quizzes)

    Regular version here:
    http://itikawa.com/fes2023quiz.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy Chow@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 22 22:58:39 2023
    So I got 7/10, and it seems that the top scorers of the real quiz
    also scored 7/10. But I had the benefit of taking the multiple
    choice version of the quiz, so maybe that boosted my score slightly.
    Also interesting to me is that if we judge the difficulty of a
    problem by the number of people who got it right, then I got the
    hardest problem right and one of the easiest problems wrong.

    ---
    Tim Chow

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy Chow@21:1/5 to Simon Woodhead on Mon May 22 22:38:53 2023
    On 5/22/2023 7:53 PM, Simon Woodhead wrote:
    Othello 2023 (bglog version) is out now: http://itikawa.com/othello23www/othello2023www.html
    (also includes previous 9 quizzes)

    Regular version here:
    http://itikawa.com/fes2023quiz.html


    1. White is well behind in the pip count with the better board,
    so he is looking to hit a shot. I would play 22/17 13/7 aiming
    to hit Red's straggler. Note that Red's 4's and 5's are duplicated
    to hit and cover. I don't think the score makes a big difference,
    but if anything, 4-away/3-away should encourage bold, gammonish play.

    2. Magriel's criteria all suggest a safe play, so even though 8/4
    6/1 is ugly, I'm going to play it, because the alternatives all
    expose fresh blots and look worse to me.

    3. I'm surprised to see 13/9*/3 as a candidate. That probably means
    that 13/9*/3 isn't the worst of the 6 plays, which in turn suggests
    to me that 13/9* is probably part of the top play. I'm going to try
    the blitzing play 13/9* 8/2*.

    4. The opponent's board is weak so breaking anchor carries little risk,
    and seems to me to be better than the non-anchor-breaking plays. So
    it's a choice between 22/13 and 22/18 13/8. I prefer to unstack with
    22/18 13/8 than to pile up on the already-heavy midpoint. Again, I'm
    not too worried about having my blots attacked given Red's weaknesses.

    5. 24/21 6/5 looks like the QF play. Red's stacks mean that we're
    hoping she'll be forced to expose a blot, and we want to anchor to
    avoid getting pointed on. Moves that don't anchor or that give up
    the 24pt look weaker to me, so 24/21 6/5 it is. The blots in our board
    are not serious weaknesses because our board is still plenty strong,
    and we have plenty of opportunities to re-make one or both of those
    points.

    6. I may get dinged hard for this play, but 23/17 13/12* is my instinct.
    The motivation is that even though we're 35 pips down before the roll,
    I think we have to play this as a priming battle and not a backgame.
    So I take the opportunity to jump a checker over the prime and send
    another checker behind my own prime. This also gives me some chances
    of extending my own prime to a five-prime. Red has 2's to hit back,
    but her 2's are duplicated, and I don't mind too much if she enters
    on my 2pt. The downside, of course, is that things could go poorly
    and I could get blitzed off the board, and it is gammon save after all.
    I'll go with 23/17 13/12* nonetheless.

    7. This is another one of those positions where we have a big race
    deficit and a stronger board, so I think we need to play to hit Red's straggler. I start with 21/16 and then is 13/10 too bold? It
    duplicates Red's 3's. I'll try it.

    8. I think we need the tempo. 6/1*. Even if Red hits back on my 1pt,
    she still has to get over my five-prime.

    9. Way behind in the pip count again. I go all in with 13/8 13/7. If
    Red doesn't roll a 6 then we gain hugely.

    10. We have an advantage here and are hoping to turn the cube next turn.
    So I think we don't want to get hit back. That means I'm choosing
    between bar/24 6/5*(3) and bar/24 6/5*/4*/3. Killing a checker to the
    3pt seems premature, so I'll go with bar/24 6/5*(3).

    ---
    Tim Chow

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Woodhead@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 23 14:02:04 2023
    On 23/05/2023 1:41 pm, MK wrote:

    On May 22, 2023 at 5:54:51 PM UTC-6, Simon Woodhead wrote:

    Othello 2023 (bglog version) is out now:

    I'm developing an interest in alternative rollouts
    lately. Are there XG ID's for these somewhere?

    They're in the regular version, could be added to the
    web version if Othello agrees. I'll ask.

    1. XGID=----CBBB-a--bD--A-de-bAa--:0:0:1:65:3:4:0:7:10
    2. XGID=--aCCbC-C---bB--a-bcbb--A-:0:0:1:54:0:0:1:0:10
    3. XGID=--a-C-CBCa--bB---bcd--bAA-:0:0:1:64:0:0:0:7:10
    4. XGID=---bB-DaB---bE--ac-e--Ba--:0:0:1:54:0:0:0:3:10
    5. XGID=-BBBB-B-----bB--bdbe-A--B-:1:-1:1:11:3:4:0:7:10
    6. XGID=--Ac-BBBB---aB-a--bbbbbBB-:1:1:1:61:6:3:0:7:10
    7. XGID=----BBCaB----D---bff-B----:0:0:1:53:0:0:3:0:10
    8. XGID=aa--BBCCB---aB---aabbbbAb-:0:0:1:32:4:2:0:7:10
    9. XGID=-a-BBBB--AA--Ca--cbd-b-bB-:0:0:1:65:0:0:0:7:10
    10 XGID=-BBBaaC-----cCa-Bb-c-bb--A:0:0:1:11:1:2:0:7:10

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MK@21:1/5 to Simon Woodhead on Mon May 22 20:41:52 2023
    On May 22, 2023 at 5:54:51 PM UTC-6, Simon Woodhead wrote:

    Othello 2023 (bglog version) is out now:

    I'm developing an interest in alternative rollouts
    lately. Are there XG ID's for these somewhere?

    MK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy Chow@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 22 23:56:13 2023
    On 5/22/2023 11:41 PM, MK wrote:
    On May 22, 2023 at 5:54:51 PM UTC-6, Simon Woodhead wrote:

    Othello 2023 (bglog version) is out now:

    I'm developing an interest in alternative rollouts
    lately. Are there XG ID's for these somewhere?

    http://itikawa.com/fesquiz2023/othello_quiz_2023_rollouts.pdf

    ---
    Tim Chow

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MK@21:1/5 to Simon Woodhead on Mon May 22 21:32:04 2023
    On May 22, 2023 at 10:03:36 PM UTC-6, Simon Woodhead wrote:

    On 23/05/2023 1:41 pm, MK wrote:

    I'm developing an interest in alternative rollouts
    lately. Are there XG ID's for these somewhere?

    They're in the regular version, could be added to the
    web version if Othello agrees. I'll ask.

    Thanks for the help Simon and Tim.

    MK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Woodhead@21:1/5 to Simon Woodhead on Thu May 25 11:06:36 2023
    On 23/05/2023 2:02 pm, Simon Woodhead wrote:

    They're in the regular version, could be added to the
    web version if Othello agrees. I'll ask.

    XGIDs are now displayed under the board.
    But only for the answers ;-)

    http://itikawa.com/othello23www/othello2023www.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)