On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 1:16:01 PM UTC+1, Timothy Chow wrote:
XGID=-CCDaDa---b------Abbbbc---:1:-1:1:22:0:0:0:0:10
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X O | | O O O O | +---+
| O | | O O O O | | 2 |
| | | O | +---+
| | | |
| | | |
| |BAR| |
| | | |
| | | X X |
| | | X X X X |
| O | | X X X X |
| O | | O X O X X X |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 58 O: 123 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 2, O own cube
X to play 22
---
Tim Chow
17/9 is my play.
This gives 25/36 hitting probability for the opponent.
But the 11/36 misses give us a lot of gammon chances.
Waiting seriously compromises our gammon potential for
no clear gain.
The opponent can outwait us. We are forced to advance with
any 5 or 6, and it's not at all clear that we can give the opponent
an eventual-hitting probability of less than 25/36 and the extra
gammon potential from running now makes the running play clear.
Let's compare this to plays with some running component.
Clearly, if we completely wait, the opponent doesn't have that many hits
but we can't sustain a complete wait for another roll.
If we move to 15, the opponent has 5/9 immediate hits.
So it seems unlikely that when you add the eventual hits to the immediate hits, our safetying
chances are better than 11/36.
If we move to 13, we again give 5/9 immediate hits and I reach the same conclusion
as above. If we move to 11, then we give the opponent 2/3 immediate hits which is better than 25/36. So this does come into consideration. But the wastage of 2 pips
hurts our gammon chances. Also, if we are missed after 17/11, we are in more jeopardy
from rolling small and not escaping on our next roll.
17/9. Normally I'd have a fair degree of confidence about this, but it's hard for me to sustain
this after an avalanche of my idiotic answers.
Paul
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)