Timothy Chow wrote:
Having said that, I'll note that eXtremeGammon actually recommends
redoubling, so I'm a little surprised at the GNU rollout results.
See below. Maybe you're using a different match equity table.
I don't know how to verify this. Regardless though, should there be
such a difference between gnubg calling this double a whopper and xg
calling it good?
On 7/30/2021 9:29 AM, badgolferman wrote:
Timothy Chow wrote:
Having said that, I'll note that eXtremeGammon actually recommends >>>redoubling, so I'm a little surprised at the GNU rollout results.
See below. Maybe you're using a different match equity table.
I don't know how to verify this. Regardless though, should there be
such a difference between gnubg calling this double a whopper and xg >>calling it good?
You can go to Analyze -> Match equity table to see what the name of
your MET is. Also, what version of GNU are you using? (Go to
Help -> About GNU Backgammon -> Build info.)
When I roll it out using my version of GNU, I get similar results to
what I get with XG.
On 8/1/2021 7:34 AM, badgolferman wrote:
met/zadeh.xml
That's the explanation. The Zadeh MET dates from 1977. Click on
the "Load Table" button and load some other table (one with the
name "Kazaross" in it if there is one).
met/zadeh.xml
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 286 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 85:02:11 |
Calls: | 6,495 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 12,097 |
Messages: | 5,276,965 |