GNU Backgammon Position ID: bdsBAOCdOQAAAA
Match ID : QYnuAAAAAAAE
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+ O: gnubg (Cube: 2)
| | | O O O O O O | O 0 points
| | | O O O O O | O
| | | O | O
| | | |
| | | |
v| |BAR| | 7 points match
| | | |
| | | X |
| | | X X X | X
| | | X X X X | X Rolled 53
| | | X X X X | X 0 points
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+ X: nasti
Pip counts: O 47, X 36
GNU Backgammon Position ID: bdsBAOCdOQAAAA
Match ID : QYnuAAAAAAAE
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+ O: gnubg (Cube: 2)
| | | O O O O O O | O 0 points
| | | O O O O O | O
| | | O | O
| | | |
| | | |
v| |BAR| | 7 points match
| | | |
| | | X |
| | | X X X | X
| | | X X X X | X Rolled 53
| | | X X X X | X 0 points
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+ X: nasti
Pip counts: O 47, X 36
On December 8, 2022 at 11:31:59 AM UTC-5, Nasti Chestikov wrote:
GNU Backgammon Position ID: bdsBAOCdOQAAAA
Match ID : QYnuAAAAAAAE
X Rolled 53
Dupes 4s so yes, otherwise no basically.
Do you know how GNU defines lucky
and unlucky rolls? If not, RTFM. If so,
why are you asking a question you
already know the answer to?
On December 8, 2022 at 2:33:44 PM UTC-7, Stick Rice wrote:
On December 8, 2022 at 11:31:59 AM UTC-5, Nasti Chestikov wrote:
GNU Backgammon Position ID: bdsBAOCdOQAAAA
Match ID : QYnuAAAAAAAE
X Rolled 53
Dupes 4s so yes, otherwise no basically.
It is not a "yes/no" but a "why" question.
So "yes" what? "Yes lucky"? "Yes unlucky"?
Are you so lazy to type one more word to
make what you write clearly meaningful?
Because it dropped out of law school.
On December 9, 2022 at 6:51:38 AM UTC-7, Tim Chow wrote:
Because it dropped out of law school.
Please do something good for yourself.
Go seek help. You are sick! :((
Because Nasti had used two negatives
in his question, (i.e. "doesn't" and "unlucky")
it's easy to misunderstand it and I think
that's what stick did. So, he answered
back by saying, in effect, "yes it's unlucky
because it dupes 4's"... :))
Yet, in other words, you help you all
understand, if stick was right (which
he was!) in his comment in his erased
post, then there must be a problem with
Gnubg's marking rolls lucky/unlucky
(which is true!)...
MK
On 12/10/2022 4:33 AM, MK wrote:
Because Nasti had used two negativesI think Stick just accidentally posted in the wrong thread.
in his question, (i.e. "doesn't" and "unlucky")
it's easy to misunderstand it and I think
that's what stick did. So, he answered
back by saying, in effect, "yes it's unlucky
because it dupes 4's"... :))
It happens.
---
Tim Chow
On December 10, 2022 at 8:39:00 AM UTC-5, Tim Chow wrote:
On 12/10/2022 4:33 AM, MK wrote:
So, he answered back by saying, in effect,
"yes it's unlucky because it dupes 4's"... :))
I think Stick just accidentally posted in the
wrong thread. It happens.
Yes, as noted before, my reader garbles things
up at times and things are in the wrong place
or at least appear in the wrong place to me
so I double posted basically.
On November 21, 2021 at 10:40:05 PM UTC-7, J R wrote:
On November 21, 2021 at 4:39:52 AM UTC-5, MK wrote:
Anyway, I was getting tired of the game and deleted
a few of my posts in this thread but as I said before,
you are sick and can't just let go of it.
Deleting posts ... the weakest of sauces.
Look who is talking about deleting posts!
At least I deleted my own posts, for a good reason,
as opposed to you who deleted/censored other
people's posts in your forum for bad reasons!
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 13:18:38 |
Calls: | 6,667 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,214 |
Messages: | 5,336,512 |