On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 1:48:30 PM UTC, Tim Chow wrote:
XGID=--BBa-Db---B-D---bbdAc--a-:0:0:1:31:0:0:0:0:10
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X O O | | O X O O |
| X O O | | O O |
| X | | O O |
| X | | O |
| | | |
| |BAR| |
| | | |
| | | X |
| | | X |
| X O | | X X X |
| X O | | X O X X |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 128 O: 124 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 1
X to play 31
Here, I expect to be wrong because my answer is not at all QF-friendly. However, I'll explain my thinking anyway.
Getting hit is likely to be quite bad so I won't give any more shots.
Also, I may hit the opponent so I will preserve my inner board.
This leads me to 6/2.
Admittedly, this is much simpler reasoning than Szemeredi used when
he proved in
http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/aa/aa27/aa27132.pdf
that positive-density subsets of the natural numbers contain arbitrarily
long arithmetic progressions but we can't all be brillint all the time.
Here, not only am I not brilliant; I'm probably not even correct!
Is that semi-colon ok? It looks weird to me.
Paul
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)