On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 11:46:19 AM UTC+1, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
Here, I played 7/4 which is the bot's choice (no rollout).
However, it involved a few interesting (to me) changes of mind.
I made the play very quickly, probably focused on clearing my 7 point.
The instant after I played it, I hugely regretted it, seeing that there were now quite a lot of shotleavers for me that could have been avoided
by 4/1. I was expecting to be battered by the evaluations.
I was pleasantly surprised though, when my unthinking carelessness
was rewarded, by XG opining that I got it right after all.
I know there's not much equity involved but I'd be interested to hear other comments.
Paul
XGID=-CCbE--C--a-a-----bbcb-bA-:2:1:1:43:0:0:3:0:10
X:Daniel O:eXtremeGammon
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game, Jacoby Beaver +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| O | | O O O O X |
| O | | O O O O |
| | | O |
| | | |
| | | |
| |BAR| |
| | | X |
| | | X |
| X | | X X X | +---+
| X | | X O X X | | 4 |
| O O X | | X O X X | +---+
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 74 O: 125 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 4, X own cube
X to play 43
1. 4-ply 7/4 eq:-0.595
Player: 20.78% (G:3.45% B:0.02%)
Opponent: 79.22% (G:11.46% B:0.46%)
2. 4-ply 4/1 eq:-0.613 (-0.018)
Player: 20.76% (G:3.23% B:0.01%)
Opponent: 79.24% (G:13.00% B:0.43%)
eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10One point is that I didn't actually count the shotleavers.
So my intuition that 4/1 is better for immediate shot jeopardy might be wrong.
Paul
Here, I played 7/4 which is the bot's choice (no rollout).
However, it involved a few interesting (to me) changes of mind.
I made the play very quickly, probably focused on clearing my 7 point.
The instant after I played it, I hugely regretted it, seeing that there
were now quite a lot of shotleavers for me that could have been avoided
by 4/1. I was expecting to be battered by the evaluations.
I was pleasantly surprised though, when my unthinking carelessness
was rewarded, by XG opining that I got it right after all.
I know there's not much equity involved but I'd be interested to hear other comments.
Paul
XGID=-CCbE--C--a-a-----bbcb-bA-:2:1:1:43:0:0:3:0:10
X:Daniel O:eXtremeGammon
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game, Jacoby Beaver +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| O | | O O O O X |
| O | | O O O O |
| | | O |
| | | |
| | | |
| |BAR| |
| | | X |
| | | X |
| X | | X X X | +---+
| X | | X O X X | | 4 |
| O O X | | X O X X | +---+
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 74 O: 125 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 4, X own cube
X to play 43
1. 4-ply 7/4 eq:-0.595
Player: 20.78% (G:3.45% B:0.02%)
Opponent: 79.22% (G:11.46% B:0.46%)
2. 4-ply 4/1 eq:-0.613 (-0.018)
Player: 20.76% (G:3.23% B:0.01%)
Opponent: 79.24% (G:13.00% B:0.43%)
eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10
Here, I played 7/4 which is the bot's choice (no rollout).
However, it involved a few interesting (to me) changes of mind.
I made the play very quickly, probably focused on clearing my 7 point.
The instant after I played it, I hugely regretted it, seeing that there
were now quite a lot of shotleavers for me that could have been avoided
by 4/1. I was expecting to be battered by the evaluations.
I was pleasantly surprised though, when my unthinking carelessness
was rewarded, by XG opining that I got it right after all.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 17:56:29 |
Calls: | 6,667 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,216 |
Messages: | 5,336,945 |