• Because children believe what their parents tell them

    From pepstein5@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 16 03:16:25 2022
    Here, the bot play looked natural to me.
    But I had a clear memory of reading "Don't slot and split"
    and I have no memory of this adage being overturned.
    I think it's Robertie who said that.
    So I avoid the slot-and-split and played 11/10.
    This was a rare error in an otherwise superb game where
    I got a PR of 2.5. Furthermore, I felt like I knew what I was doing --
    it's possible to choose the right plays by chance but that's not what
    happened here.

    So what is it with this don't-slot-and-split thing? Is this just
    now-rejected folklore along with UTG, or is there some merit to the
    saying that I'm not understanding?

    Paul

    XGID=-b----E-C--AdDa--bae----AA:0:0:1:21:1:0:3:0:10
    X:Daniel O:eXtremeGammon

    Score is X:1 O:0. Unlimited Game, Jacoby Beaver
    +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | X O O O | | O X |
    | X O | | O |
    | X | | O |
    | X | | O |
    | | X | O |
    | |BAR| |
    | | | X |
    | O | | X |
    | O X | | X |
    | O X | | X O |
    | O X X | | X O |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 166 O: 164 X-O: 1-0
    Cube: 1
    X to play 21

    1. XG Roller+ Bar/23 6/5 eq:-0.072
    Player: 48.98% (G:13.08% B:0.65%)
    Opponent: 51.02% (G:16.64% B:0.86%)

    2. XG Roller+ Bar/23 11/10 eq:-0.099 (-0.027)
    Player: 47.71% (G:12.98% B:0.63%)
    Opponent: 52.29% (G:15.19% B:0.67%)

    3. 4-ply Bar/24 13/11 eq:-0.086 (-0.015)
    Player: 47.77% (G:13.08% B:0.74%)
    Opponent: 52.23% (G:15.40% B:0.71%)

    4. 4-ply Bar/22 eq:-0.109 (-0.037)
    Player: 47.52% (G:12.26% B:0.61%)
    Opponent: 52.48% (G:15.55% B:0.65%)

    5. 3-ply Bar/23 24/23 eq:-0.135 (-0.063)
    Player: 46.25% (G:12.20% B:0.59%)
    Opponent: 53.75% (G:14.65% B:0.63%)


    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy Chow@21:1/5 to peps...@gmail.com on Sat Jul 16 08:54:19 2022
    On 7/16/2022 6:16 AM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    So what is it with this don't-slot-and-split thing? Is this just now-rejected folklore along with UTG, or is there some merit to the
    saying that I'm not understanding?

    It's still a good rule of thumb. Nack Ballard calls such plays "wild." Typically, one of the drawbacks of such moves is that they open yourself
    up to an attack. If you get double hit, or hit on the opposite side of
    the board when you're unanchored, then you can get into trouble quickly.

    When is a wild play nevertheless a good play? I've found that the most
    common indicator is duplication of 4's. If you play 6/5 then usually
    that means your opponent's best 4 is 24/20*. If your opponent has good
    4's elsewhere then the wild play is probably not as risky as usual.
    Here, of course, your opponent has a good 4 in the form of 11/7.

    ---
    Tim Chow

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stick Rice@21:1/5 to peps...@gmail.com on Tue Jul 19 13:06:19 2022
    On Saturday, July 16, 2022 at 6:16:26 AM UTC-4, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    Here, the bot play looked natural to me.
    But I had a clear memory of reading "Don't slot and split"
    and I have no memory of this adage being overturned.
    I think it's Robertie who said that.
    So I avoid the slot-and-split and played 11/10.
    This was a rare error in an otherwise superb game where
    I got a PR of 2.5. Furthermore, I felt like I knew what I was doing --
    it's possible to choose the right plays by chance but that's not what happened here.

    So what is it with this don't-slot-and-split thing? Is this just now-rejected folklore along with UTG, or is there some merit to the
    saying that I'm not understanding?

    Paul

    XGID=-b----E-C--AdDa--bae----AA:0:0:1:21:1:0:3:0:10
    X:Daniel O:eXtremeGammon

    Score is X:1 O:0. Unlimited Game, Jacoby Beaver +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | X O O O | | O X |
    | X O | | O |
    | X | | O |
    | X | | O |
    | | X | O |
    | |BAR| |
    | | | X |
    | O | | X |
    | O X | | X |
    | O X | | X O |
    | O X X | | X O |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 166 O: 164 X-O: 1-0
    Cube: 1
    X to play 21

    1. XG Roller+ Bar/23 6/5 eq:-0.072
    Player: 48.98% (G:13.08% B:0.65%)
    Opponent: 51.02% (G:16.64% B:0.86%)

    2. XG Roller+ Bar/23 11/10 eq:-0.099 (-0.027)
    Player: 47.71% (G:12.98% B:0.63%)
    Opponent: 52.29% (G:15.19% B:0.67%)

    3. 4-ply Bar/24 13/11 eq:-0.086 (-0.015)
    Player: 47.77% (G:13.08% B:0.74%)
    Opponent: 52.23% (G:15.40% B:0.71%)

    4. 4-ply Bar/22 eq:-0.109 (-0.037)
    Player: 47.52% (G:12.26% B:0.61%)
    Opponent: 52.48% (G:15.55% B:0.65%)

    5. 3-ply Bar/23 24/23 eq:-0.135 (-0.063)
    Player: 46.25% (G:12.20% B:0.59%)
    Opponent: 53.75% (G:14.65% B:0.63%)


    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10

    I have a set of criteria for when splotting is likely correct but I've never put it to paper. Duplication, as Tim mentions, can be part of that. Another major factor will be 5 men (or more) still on your 6 point. The opponent also almost never has
    improved his board. More to it but that's a bare backbones structure. Typically the split is deep (harder for the opponent to attack) and of course the slot is mainly the 5 point but rare cases of the 4 point. (In instances where we have no new inner
    board points made either)

    Stick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)