I have thought up a set of rules for how we can compete
against each other in money play against XG. Please let
me know what you think of the concept, or would like to
suggest alternative rules.
1) Choose any common sense setting that you like.
Obviously, let XG perform at near-optimal world-class level.
5) A win is defined as "undeserved" if the following three
conditions all hold:
A) Your PR for that game was worse than 5.00
B) Either there was a time when you doubled where.....
C) You were not able to counter XG's verdict under B)
by rollout.
6) The reason 5) is necessary is to prevent massively
escalating the stakes until you get lucky.
7) Simply report your points total for the session, using
adjustments (if any) from clause 5).
On May 21, 2022 at 5:44:16 AM UTC-6, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
I have thought up a set of rules for how we can
compete against each other in money play against
XG. Please let me know what you think of the
concept, or would like to suggest alternative rules.
1) Choose any common sense setting that you like.
If you really mean "compete against one another".....
then everyone needs to use the same settings and
the same sequence of dice rolls.
5) A win is defined as "undeserved" if the following
three conditions all hold:
Ha ha! :) This is amusing. Now we have a new concept
in gamblegammon: "undeserved win"... Ha ha! Funny. :)
7) Simply report your points total for the session....
Will be interesting to see who will be the idiots to
participate in such a "competition"...
We can get into more details if there is any interest at all.
Some bot and/or online game site developers/operators
could get into this as the next step in online playing..??
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 295 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 08:59:22 |
Calls: | 6,642 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,190 |
Messages: | 5,326,324 |