• A common bearoff dilemma

    From Timothy Chow@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 30 08:40:49 2021
    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:1:-1:1:43:0:0:0:0:10

    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
    +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O | +---+
    | | | O O O O | | 2 |
    | | | O O | +---+
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-0
    Cube: 2, O own cube
    X to play 43

    ---
    Tim Chow

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pepstein5@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Tim Chow on Mon Aug 30 06:29:30 2021
    On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 1:40:51 PM UTC+1, Tim Chow wrote:
    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:1:-1:1:43:0:0:0:0:10

    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
    +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O | +---+
    | | | O O O O | | 2 |
    | | | O O | +---+
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-0
    Cube: 2, O own cube
    X to play 43

    ---
    Tim Chow
    At the risk of being anti-QF, I'd really rather not remove any checkers right now, thanks.
    The alternative play might bear off very slightly faster but it blots to 61/51/41 which seems not worth it.

    My play is uniquely defined as the only play that doesn't blot and that doesn't remove any checkers.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pepstein5@gmail.com@21:1/5 to peps...@gmail.com on Tue Aug 31 05:01:21 2021
    On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 2:29:32 PM UTC+1, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 1:40:51 PM UTC+1, Tim Chow wrote:
    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:1:-1:1:43:0:0:0:0:10

    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O | +---+
    | | | O O O O | | 2 |
    | | | O O | +---+
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-0
    Cube: 2, O own cube
    X to play 43

    ---
    Tim Chow
    At the risk of being anti-QF, I'd really rather not remove any checkers right now, thanks.
    The alternative play might bear off very slightly faster but it blots to 61/51/41 which seems not worth it.

    My play is uniquely defined as the only play that doesn't blot and that doesn't remove any checkers.

    Paul
    Not changing my play by any means (although I'm less than 90% confident in it). But I do have further comments.
    Parity arguments are very important in these postions where we want a speedy bearoff (for the gammon, in this case.)
    I believe that, although the greedy play blots too often in my judgement, the parity (whether we have an even number
    or odd number of checkers when it matters) actually points in favour of the greedy play.
    I'll explain why. We are big underdogs for the gammon and will need the opponent to dance on our four point board.
    After that dance, we can expect to remove exactly one checker -- half of the roll is used for safety.
    We will then have 11 checkers left in my variation, but 10 in the greedy variation so the greedy play is considerably faster.
    Note however that, in the greedy variation, it's not only an immediate 61/51/41 that blots. Other aces subject us to a risk
    of 61/51/41 afterwards.

    Still playing safe rather than greedy though -- I'm playing the DMP way.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From badgolferman@21:1/5 to Timothy Chow on Wed Sep 1 12:22:16 2021
    Timothy Chow wrote:

    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:1:-1:1:43:0:0:0:0:10

    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
    +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O | +---+
    | | | O O O O | | 2 |
    | | | O O | +---+
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X | +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-0
    Cube: 2, O own cube
    X to play 43

    ---
    Tim Chow


    Two points are acceptable to me. The chance of getting four points
    isn't worth the risk of leaving a blot on the next turn, especially
    since O's home board is strong.

    5/1, 5/2

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J R@21:1/5 to Tim Chow on Wed Sep 1 11:02:43 2021
    On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 8:40:51 AM UTC-4, Tim Chow wrote:
    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:1:-1:1:43:0:0:0:0:10

    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
    +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O | +---+
    | | | O O O O | | 2 |
    | | | O O | +---+
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-0
    Cube: 2, O own cube
    X to play 43

    ---
    Tim Chow

    If it's common (and esp. if it's during the bearoff) it should be nowhere near a dilemma.

    Stick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy Chow@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 2 13:39:43 2021
    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:1:-1:1:43:0:0:0:0:10

    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
    +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O | +---+
    | | | O O O O | | 2 |
    | | | O O | +---+
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-0
    Cube: 2, O own cube
    X to play 43

    There's a tradeoff between wins and gammons here, but according to XG
    it's about a 1:1 tradeoff rather than the 1:2 tradeoff that we are
    looking for in a money game.

    1. Rollout¹ 5/2 5/1 eq:+1.117
    Player: 99.79% (G:12.18% B:0.03%)
    Opponent: 0.21% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (+1.116..+1.118) - [100.0%]

    2. Rollout¹ 4/1 4/Off eq:+1.069 (-0.048)
    Player: 96.58% (G:15.27% B:0.06%)
    Opponent: 3.42% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.002 (+1.067..+1.071) - [0.0%]

    ¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.207.pre-release

    ---------
    Gammon go
    ---------

    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:0:0:1:43:0:1:1:2:10

    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:1 2 pt.(s) match.
    +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O |
    | | | O O O O |
    | | | O O |
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-1/2 Crawford
    Cube: 1
    X to play 43

    1. Rollout¹ 5/2 5/1 eq:+1.240
    Player: 99.80% (G:12.18% B:0.09%)
    Opponent: 0.20% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (+1.238..+1.241) - [99.9%]

    2. Rollout¹ 4/1 4/Off eq:+1.236 (-0.003)
    Player: 96.65% (G:15.17% B:0.17%)
    Opponent: 3.35% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.002 (+1.235..+1.238) - [0.1%]

    ¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.207.pre-release, MET: Kazaross XG2

    ---
    Tim Chow

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J R@21:1/5 to peps...@gmail.com on Thu Sep 2 16:32:33 2021
    On Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 7:26:15 PM UTC-4, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 6:39:45 PM UTC+1, Tim Chow wrote:
    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:1:-1:1:43:0:0:0:0:10

    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O | +---+
    | | | O O O O | | 2 |
    | | | O O | +---+
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-0
    Cube: 2, O own cube
    X to play 43
    There's a tradeoff between wins and gammons here, but according to XG
    it's about a 1:1 tradeoff rather than the 1:2 tradeoff that we are
    looking for in a money game.

    1. Rollout¹ 5/2 5/1 eq:+1.117
    Player: 99.79% (G:12.18% B:0.03%)
    Opponent: 0.21% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (+1.116..+1.118) - [100.0%]

    2. Rollout¹ 4/1 4/Off eq:+1.069 (-0.048)
    Player: 96.58% (G:15.27% B:0.06%)
    Opponent: 3.42% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.002 (+1.067..+1.071) - [0.0%]

    ¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.207.pre-release

    ---------
    Gammon go
    ---------

    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:0:0:1:43:0:1:1:2:10
    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:1 2 pt.(s) match. +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O |
    | | | O O O O |
    | | | O O |
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-1/2 Crawford
    Cube: 1
    X to play 43

    1. Rollout¹ 5/2 5/1 eq:+1.240
    Player: 99.80% (G:12.18% B:0.09%)
    Opponent: 0.20% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (+1.238..+1.241) - [99.9%]

    2. Rollout¹ 4/1 4/Off eq:+1.236 (-0.003)
    Player: 96.65% (G:15.17% B:0.17%)
    Opponent: 3.35% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.002 (+1.235..+1.238) - [0.1%]

    ¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.207.pre-release, MET: Kazaross XG2

    ---
    Tim Chow
    And, of course, as Stick says, the fact that it's only a 1-1 tradeoff
    and not worth the greedy play is trivially obvious.
    Not a dilemma at all.
    Easiest bg quiz since bacon was invented.

    Paul

    That's not even the ballpark of what I said. (iks)

    Stick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pepstein5@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Tim Chow on Thu Sep 2 16:26:14 2021
    On Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 6:39:45 PM UTC+1, Tim Chow wrote:
    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:1:-1:1:43:0:0:0:0:10

    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
    +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O | +---+
    | | | O O O O | | 2 |
    | | | O O | +---+
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-0
    Cube: 2, O own cube
    X to play 43
    There's a tradeoff between wins and gammons here, but according to XG
    it's about a 1:1 tradeoff rather than the 1:2 tradeoff that we are
    looking for in a money game.

    1. Rollout¹ 5/2 5/1 eq:+1.117
    Player: 99.79% (G:12.18% B:0.03%)
    Opponent: 0.21% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (+1.116..+1.118) - [100.0%]

    2. Rollout¹ 4/1 4/Off eq:+1.069 (-0.048)
    Player: 96.58% (G:15.27% B:0.06%)
    Opponent: 3.42% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.002 (+1.067..+1.071) - [0.0%]

    ¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.207.pre-release

    ---------
    Gammon go
    ---------

    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:0:0:1:43:0:1:1:2:10
    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:1 2 pt.(s) match.
    +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O |
    | | | O O O O |
    | | | O O |
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-1/2 Crawford
    Cube: 1
    X to play 43

    1. Rollout¹ 5/2 5/1 eq:+1.240
    Player: 99.80% (G:12.18% B:0.09%)
    Opponent: 0.20% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (+1.238..+1.241) - [99.9%]

    2. Rollout¹ 4/1 4/Off eq:+1.236 (-0.003)
    Player: 96.65% (G:15.17% B:0.17%)
    Opponent: 3.35% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.002 (+1.235..+1.238) - [0.1%]

    ¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.207.pre-release, MET: Kazaross XG2

    ---
    Tim Chow
    And, of course, as Stick says, the fact that it's only a 1-1 tradeoff
    and not worth the greedy play is trivially obvious.
    Not a dilemma at all.
    Easiest bg quiz since bacon was invented.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pepstein5@gmail.com@21:1/5 to J R on Fri Sep 3 02:57:33 2021
    On Friday, September 3, 2021 at 12:32:34 AM UTC+1, J R wrote:
    On Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 7:26:15 PM UTC-4, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 6:39:45 PM UTC+1, Tim Chow wrote:
    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:1:-1:1:43:0:0:0:0:10

    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O | +---+
    | | | O O O O | | 2 |
    | | | O O | +---+
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-0
    Cube: 2, O own cube
    X to play 43
    There's a tradeoff between wins and gammons here, but according to XG it's about a 1:1 tradeoff rather than the 1:2 tradeoff that we are looking for in a money game.

    1. Rollout¹ 5/2 5/1 eq:+1.117
    Player: 99.79% (G:12.18% B:0.03%)
    Opponent: 0.21% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (+1.116..+1.118) - [100.0%]

    2. Rollout¹ 4/1 4/Off eq:+1.069 (-0.048)
    Player: 96.58% (G:15.27% B:0.06%)
    Opponent: 3.42% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.002 (+1.067..+1.071) - [0.0%]

    ¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.207.pre-release

    ---------
    Gammon go
    ---------

    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:0:0:1:43:0:1:1:2:10
    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:1 2 pt.(s) match. +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O |
    | | | O O O O |
    | | | O O |
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-1/2 Crawford
    Cube: 1
    X to play 43

    1. Rollout¹ 5/2 5/1 eq:+1.240
    Player: 99.80% (G:12.18% B:0.09%)
    Opponent: 0.20% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (+1.238..+1.241) - [99.9%]

    2. Rollout¹ 4/1 4/Off eq:+1.236 (-0.003)
    Player: 96.65% (G:15.17% B:0.17%)
    Opponent: 3.35% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.002 (+1.235..+1.238) - [0.1%]

    ¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.207.pre-release, MET: Kazaross XG2

    ---
    Tim Chow
    And, of course, as Stick says, the fact that it's only a 1-1 tradeoff
    and not worth the greedy play is trivially obvious.
    Not a dilemma at all.
    Easiest bg quiz since bacon was invented.

    Paul
    That's not even the ballpark of what I said. (iks)

    It depends on how you interpret "if it's common".
    If you mean "I agree that it's common" and therefore it's not a dilemma,
    you are kind of saying the problem is trivially easy.

    But you might mean "I don't think it's common, actually. Because if it was common, it wouldn't be a dilemma (which it is)."
    Under this interpretation, yes, I was wrong about what you said.

    What did you mean?

    Did I miss some other interpretation?

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pepstein5@gmail.com@21:1/5 to J R on Fri Sep 3 02:52:54 2021
    On Friday, September 3, 2021 at 12:32:34 AM UTC+1, J R wrote:
    On Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 7:26:15 PM UTC-4, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 6:39:45 PM UTC+1, Tim Chow wrote:
    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:1:-1:1:43:0:0:0:0:10

    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O | +---+
    | | | O O O O | | 2 |
    | | | O O | +---+
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-0
    Cube: 2, O own cube
    X to play 43
    There's a tradeoff between wins and gammons here, but according to XG it's about a 1:1 tradeoff rather than the 1:2 tradeoff that we are looking for in a money game.

    1. Rollout¹ 5/2 5/1 eq:+1.117
    Player: 99.79% (G:12.18% B:0.03%)
    Opponent: 0.21% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (+1.116..+1.118) - [100.0%]

    2. Rollout¹ 4/1 4/Off eq:+1.069 (-0.048)
    Player: 96.58% (G:15.27% B:0.06%)
    Opponent: 3.42% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.002 (+1.067..+1.071) - [0.0%]

    ¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.207.pre-release

    ---------
    Gammon go
    ---------

    XGID=aCCBBB-------a----adcbba--:0:0:1:43:0:1:1:2:10
    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:0 O:1 2 pt.(s) match. +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | O O | | O O O O O |
    | | | O O O O |
    | | | O O |
    | | | O |
    | | | |
    | |BAR| |
    | | O | |
    | | | |
    | | | X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    | | | X X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 33 O: 99 X-O: 0-1/2 Crawford
    Cube: 1
    X to play 43

    1. Rollout¹ 5/2 5/1 eq:+1.240
    Player: 99.80% (G:12.18% B:0.09%)
    Opponent: 0.20% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (+1.238..+1.241) - [99.9%]

    2. Rollout¹ 4/1 4/Off eq:+1.236 (-0.003)
    Player: 96.65% (G:15.17% B:0.17%)
    Opponent: 3.35% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.002 (+1.235..+1.238) - [0.1%]

    ¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.207.pre-release, MET: Kazaross XG2

    ---
    Tim Chow
    And, of course, as Stick says, the fact that it's only a 1-1 tradeoff
    and not worth the greedy play is trivially obvious.
    Not a dilemma at all.
    Easiest bg quiz since bacon was invented.

    Paul
    That's not even the ballpark of what I said. (iks)

    Stick
    What does iks mean?

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy Chow@21:1/5 to peps...@gmail.com on Fri Sep 3 08:00:15 2021
    On 9/3/2021 5:52 AM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, September 3, 2021 at 12:32:34 AM UTC+1, J R wrote:
    That's not even the ballpark of what I said. (iks)

    Stick
    What does iks mean?

    It's an acronym for the International Kolping Society.

    ---
    Tim Chow

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)