• Good news and bad news

    From pepstein5@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 20 01:46:24 2021
    I've seen a position very similar to the below misplayed at quite
    a high level. (I can't remember the name of the misplayer but I think
    he was somewhat well-known).
    When the main issue is whether or not you lose a gammon, and
    all the stay-back plays lose significant numbers of pips, staying back
    may still be correct anyway as a means of slowing down your opponent's
    bearoff. Leaving frees your opponent to leave blots.
    Staying back is correct in the position below.
    Admittedly, I haven't rolled it out, but I don't feel I need to.
    But the title of my post is "Good news and bad news."
    The title doesn't seem to fit the content of the post, does it?
    Ok, just be a bit patient -- the title justification comes now.
    The bad news: I did misplay the position by leaving.
    The good news: All my other plays were optimal or near-optimal,
    so I finished the game with a PR of approximately 2.0.

    Paul

    XGID=--AB-BDAC-A----------bAfc-:1:1:1:64:0:0:3:0:10
    X:Daniel O:eXtremeGammon

    Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game, Jacoby Beaver
    +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | | | O X O O |
    | | | O O O |
    | | | O O |
    | | | O |
    | | | 6 |
    | |BAR| |
    | | | |
    | | | X |
    | X | | X | +---+
    | X | | X X X | | 2 |
    | X X X | | X X X X | +---+
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 105 O: 23 X-O: 0-0
    Cube: 2, X own cube
    X to play 64

    1. XG Roller+ 10/4 8/4 eq:-1.040
    Player: 4.99% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Opponent: 95.01% (G:15.87% B:0.03%)

    2. XG Roller+ 22/16 10/6 eq:-1.097 (-0.057)
    Player: 0.00% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Opponent: 100.00% (G:9.71% B:0.00%)

    3. 4-ply 10/6 8/2 eq:-1.080 (-0.039)
    Player: 3.84% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Opponent: 96.16% (G:16.98% B:0.02%)

    4. 4-ply 8/4 8/2 eq:-1.081 (-0.041)
    Player: 4.93% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Opponent: 95.07% (G:19.82% B:0.03%)

    5. 3-ply 22/12 eq:-1.102 (-0.062)
    Player: 0.02% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Opponent: 99.98% (G:10.27% B:0.00%)


    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy Chow@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 20 08:49:22 2021
    On 12/20/2021 8:46 AM, I wrote:
    But the rollout below shows that XG runs at gammon save.

    More precisely, I should have said that the rollout below
    shows that XG *favors running* at gammon save. XG does
    in fact run at gammon save, but the rollout doesn't show
    that (in principle the top play of a gammon save rollout
    could differ from the move that XG plays at gammon save).

    ---
    Tim Chow

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy Chow@21:1/5 to peps...@gmail.com on Mon Dec 20 08:46:43 2021
    On 12/20/2021 4:46 AM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
    When the main issue is whether or not you lose a gammon, and
    all the stay-back plays lose significant numbers of pips, staying back
    may still be correct anyway as a means of slowing down your opponent's bearoff. Leaving frees your opponent to leave blots.

    It's an interesting position but I wouldn't analyze it this way.
    When you say that the main issue is whether or not you lose a
    gammon, it makes it sound like you would make the same play at
    gammon save. But the rollout below shows that XG runs at gammon save.

    Staying back and making a strong point in your board comes out ahead
    in your position because it gives you enough winning chances (by
    getting and hitting a shot) to compensate for the extra gammons lost.


    XGID=--AB-BDAC-A----------bAfc-:0:0:1:64:1:0:1:2:10

    X:Player 1 O:Player 2
    Score is X:1 O:0 2 pt.(s) match.
    +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
    | | | O X O O |
    | | | O O O |
    | | | O O |
    | | | O |
    | | | 6 |
    | |BAR| |
    | | | |
    | | | X |
    | X | | X |
    | X | | X X X |
    | X X X | | X X X X |
    +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
    Pip count X: 105 O: 23 X-O: 1-0/2 Crawford
    Cube: 1
    X to play 64

    1. Rollout¹ 22/16 10/6 eq:-1.190
    Player: 0.00% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Opponent: 100.00% (G:9.52% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (-1.191..-1.190) - [100.0%]

    2. Rollout¹ 22/12 eq:-1.200 (-0.010)
    Player: 0.00% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Opponent: 100.00% (G:10.00% B:0.00%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (-1.201..-1.199) - [0.0%]

    3. Rollout¹ 10/4 8/4 eq:-1.214 (-0.023)
    Player: 4.94% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
    Opponent: 95.06% (G:15.62% B:0.06%)
    Confidence: ±0.001 (-1.215..-1.212) - [0.0%]

    ¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
    Dice Seed: 271828
    Moves and cube decisions: XG Roller+
    Search interval: Huge

    eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.207.pre-release, MET: Kazaross XG2

    ---
    Tim Chow

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pepstein5@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Tim Chow on Mon Dec 20 08:24:45 2021
    On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 1:49:24 PM UTC, Tim Chow wrote:
    On 12/20/2021 8:46 AM, I wrote:
    But the rollout below shows that XG runs at gammon save.
    More precisely, I should have said that the rollout below
    shows that XG *favors running* at gammon save. XG does
    in fact run at gammon save, but the rollout doesn't show
    that (in principle the top play of a gammon save rollout
    could differ from the move that XG plays at gammon save).

    Yes, my analysis was messed up. It's hard to get these positions right and there's
    a fair amount of equity at stake.

    Thanks for your comments.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)