• Blackjack Card Counting: (Curable) INSANITY

    From ionsaliu@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 21 14:34:29 2016
    From: blackjewelack

    It seems to me that every gambling forum is filled with psychotics, not only APs as you put it. I’ve been in the Zenzone and Norm’s and Wongs and a few other. But ZZ and Wattenberger’s are unbelievably mad. Both have a common character: Tthree.

    That Tthree hermaphrodite looked down on me in Wattenberger’s forums. I wanted to say something about his madness, but Norm “Gandhi” punishes you if you say something bad (but truthful) about Tthree. Norman Wattenberger’s indiscriminate about
    banning. He did ban big psychos like Boz, but also a decent poster KJ.

    A few of us thought Tthree was actually Norm Wattenberger. Both are obviously irrational clinically. But I think Norm is paranoid while Tthree is schizophrenic. Tthree is in deep hallucinatory states. Just look what and how he writes:

    “It is the amount of money you would take per hour guaranteed to not take the risk of winning and losing. It indicates the certainty of BR growth. Many feel CE is the most important stat to maximize. Others believe it is SCORE. While others maximize EV.
    My play is all about increasing certainty and I want the highest assurance my BR will grow steadily so I maximize CE. I do look closely at SCORE and EV though.”

    “Take the risk of winning and losing.” WHAT?

    blackjewelack
    “The best count is 1+2+3+4+5+6=21.”

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ionsaliu@gmail.com@21:1/5 to ions...@gmail.com on Thu Jul 21 16:49:01 2016
    On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 5:34:31 PM UTC-4, ions...@gmail.com wrote:
    From: blackjewelack

    It seems to me that every gambling forum is filled with psychotics, not only APs as you put it. I’ve been in the Zenzone and Norm’s and Wongs and a few other. But ZZ and Wattenberger’s are unbelievably mad. Both have a common character: Tthree.

    That Tthree hermaphrodite looked down on me in Wattenberger’s forums. I wanted to say something about his madness, but Norm “Gandhi” punishes you if you say something bad (but truthful) about Tthree. Norman Wattenberger’s indiscriminate about
    banning. He did ban big psychos like Boz (bipolar disorder), but also a decent poster KJ.

    A few of us thought Tthree was actually Norm Wattenberger. Both are obviously irrational clinically. But I think Norm is paranoid while Tthree is schizophrenic. Tthree is in deep hallucinatory states. Just look what and how he writes:

    “It is the amount of money you would take per hour guaranteed to not take the risk of winning and losing. It indicates the certainty of BR growth. Many feel CE is the most important stat to maximize. Others believe it is SCORE. While others maximize
    EV. My play is all about increasing certainty and I want the highest assurance my BR will grow steadily so I maximize CE. I do look closely at SCORE and EV though.”

    “Take the risk of winning and losing.” WHAT?

    blackjewelack
    “The best count is 1+2+3+4+5+6=21.”

    You right about it, axiomático. PSYCHOSIS IS RAMPANT IN GAMBLING FORUMS. No doubt about it, especially with regards blackjack card-counting. Losing a lot of money is TRAUMATIC. The losers get afflicted, by bipolar disorder and/or manic depression. The
    gambling addicts aggravate their condition by resorting heavily to drugs and alcohol.

    BTW: Your signature is right regarding blackjack, but wrong when it comes to lotto. 21 is the worst sum to play. The lottonistas debate that issue with the much ardor:
    http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/961.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ionsaliu@gmail.com@21:1/5 to ions...@gmail.com on Fri Aug 5 08:54:57 2016
    On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 7:49:02 PM UTC-4, ions...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 5:34:31 PM UTC-4, ions...@gmail.com wrote:
    From: blackjewelack

    It seems to me that every gambling forum is filled with psychotics, not only APs as you put it. I’ve been in the Zenzone and Norm’s and Wongs and a few other. But ZZ and Wattenberger’s are unbelievably mad. Both have a common character: Tthree.

    That Tthree hermaphrodite looked down on me in Wattenberger’s forums. I wanted to say something about his madness, but Norm “Gandhi” punishes you if you say something bad (but truthful) about Tthree. Norman Wattenberger’s indiscriminate about
    banning. He did ban big psychos like Boz (bipolar disorder), but also a decent poster KJ.

    A few of us thought Tthree was actually Norm Wattenberger. Both are obviously irrational clinically. But I think Norm is paranoid while Tthree is schizophrenic. Tthree is in deep hallucinatory states. Just look what and how he writes:

    “It is the amount of money you would take per hour guaranteed to not take the risk of winning and losing. It indicates the certainty of BR growth. Many feel CE is the most important stat to maximize. Others believe it is SCORE. While others
    maximize EV. My play is all about increasing certainty and I want the highest assurance my BR will grow steadily so I maximize CE. I do look closely at SCORE and EV though.”

    “Take the risk of winning and losing.” WHAT?

    blackjewelack
    “The best count is 1+2+3+4+5+6=21.”

    You right about it, axiomático. PSYCHOSIS IS RAMPANT IN GAMBLING FORUMS. No doubt about it, especially with regards blackjack card-counting. Losing a lot of money is TRAUMATIC. The losers get afflicted, by bipolar disorder and/or manic depression. The
    gambling addicts aggravate their condition by resorting heavily to drugs and alcohol.


    Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) can be also caused by card-counting.

    Gamblers have very high expectations regarding counting cards in blackjack. They pay serious money in a plethora of training materials. The players also put up an extraordinary effort to learn card counting. It is really hard. Unscrupulous system vendors
    make card counting even more difficult by inventing all kinds of insane schemes named “systems”.

    After all that “concussion-inducing” training camp, the gamblers go to the casinos with extremely high-hopes. They lose big moneys, because that’s a mathematical law. They bet much higher in ALL plus-counts situations — and they lose a MAJORITY
    of such cases. The unscrupulous system vendors always shield themselves behind the “negative variance” syndrome. Of course, “negative variance” is an oxymoron. Variance is always a POSITIVE number: Equals the square of standard deviation:
    http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/274.html#deception

    Thusly, card-counting turns into a traumatic experience step by step –

    1) Pay big-money to acquire training materials in blackjack card-counting;
    2) Fry one’s brain in exhausting training, especially learning many insanely-difficult counting systems;
    3) Make ‘bonehead plays’ to follow another insane rule “Hide that one is a card-counter”;
    4) Lose big monies in actual casino play, while expecting big dividends.

    Card-counters could do a favor to society by donating their brains to medical research.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ionsaliu@gmail.com@21:1/5 to ions...@gmail.com on Fri Aug 5 08:52:18 2016
    On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 7:49:02 PM UTC-4, ions...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 5:34:31 PM UTC-4, ions...@gmail.com wrote:
    From: blackjewelack

    It seems to me that every gambling forum is filled with psychotics, not only APs as you put it. I’ve been in the Zenzone and Norm’s and Wongs and a few other. But ZZ and Wattenberger’s are unbelievably mad. Both have a common character: Tthree.

    That Tthree hermaphrodite looked down on me in Wattenberger’s forums. I wanted to say something about his madness, but Norm “Gandhi” punishes you if you say something bad (but truthful) about Tthree. Norman Wattenberger’s indiscriminate about
    banning. He did ban big psychos like Boz (bipolar disorder), but also a decent poster KJ.

    A few of us thought Tthree was actually Norm Wattenberger. Both are obviously irrational clinically. But I think Norm is paranoid while Tthree is schizophrenic. Tthree is in deep hallucinatory states. Just look what and how he writes:

    “It is the amount of money you would take per hour guaranteed to not take the risk of winning and losing. It indicates the certainty of BR growth. Many feel CE is the most important stat to maximize. Others believe it is SCORE. While others
    maximize EV. My play is all about increasing certainty and I want the highest assurance my BR will grow steadily so I maximize CE. I do look closely at SCORE and EV though.”

    “Take the risk of winning and losing.” WHAT?

    blackjewelack
    “The best count is 1+2+3+4+5+6=21.”

    You right about it, axiomático. PSYCHOSIS IS RAMPANT IN GAMBLING FORUMS. No doubt about it, especially with regards blackjack card-counting. Losing a lot of money is TRAUMATIC. The losers get afflicted, by bipolar disorder and/or manic depression. The
    gambling addicts aggravate their condition by resorting heavily to drugs and alcohol.


    Card Counting: The CTE of Gambling
    Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) can be also caused by card-counting.

    Gamblers have very high expectations regarding counting cards in blackjack. They pay serious money in a plethora of training materials. The players also put up an extraordinary effort to learn card counting. It is really hard. Unscrupulous system vendors
    make card counting even more difficult by inventing all kinds of insane schemes named “systems”.

    After all that “concessional” training camp, the gamblers go to the casinos with extremely high-hopes. They lose big moneys, because that’s a mathematical law. They bet much higher in ALL plus-counts situations — and they lose a MAJORITY of such
    cases. The unscrupulous system vendors always shield themselves behind the “negative variance” syndrome. Of course, “negative variance” is an oxymoron. Variance is always a POSITIVE number: Equals the square of standard deviation:
    http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/274.html#deception

    Thusly, card-counting turns into a traumatic experience step by step –

    1) Pay big-money to acquire training materials in blackjack card-counting;
    2) Fry one’s brain in exhausting training, especially learning many insanely-difficult counting systems;
    3) Make ‘bonehead plays’ to follow another insane rule “Hide that one is a card-counter”;
    4) Lose big monies in actual casino play, while expecting big dividends.

    Card-counters could do a favor to society by donating their brains to medical research.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to Ion Saliu on Mon Jul 24 16:47:01 2017
    On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 11:54:58 AM UTC-4, Ion Saliu wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 7:49:02 PM UTC-4, ions...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 5:34:31 PM UTC-4, ions...@gmail.com wrote:
    From: blackjewelack

    It seems to me that every gambling forum is filled with psychotics, not only APs as you put it. I’ve been in the Zenzone and Norm’s and Wongs and a few other. But ZZ and Wattenberger’s are unbelievably mad. Both have a common character:
    Tthree.

    That Tthree hermaphrodite looked down on me in Wattenberger’s forums. I wanted to say something about his madness, but Norm “Gandhi” punishes you if you say something bad (but truthful) about Tthree. Norman Wattenberger’s indiscriminate
    about banning. He did ban big psychos like Boz (bipolar disorder), but also a decent poster KJ.

    A few of us thought Tthree was actually Norm Wattenberger. Both are obviously irrational clinically. But I think Norm is paranoid while Tthree is schizophrenic. Tthree is in deep hallucinatory states. Just look what and how he writes:

    “It is the amount of money you would take per hour guaranteed to not take the risk of winning and losing. It indicates the certainty of BR growth. Many feel CE is the most important stat to maximize. Others believe it is SCORE. While others
    maximize EV. My play is all about increasing certainty and I want the highest assurance my BR will grow steadily so I maximize CE. I do look closely at SCORE and EV though.”

    “Take the risk of winning and losing.” WHAT?

    blackjewelack
    “The best count is 1+2+3+4+5+6=21.”

    You right about it, axiomático. PSYCHOSIS IS RAMPANT IN GAMBLING FORUMS. No doubt about it, especially with regards blackjack card-counting. Losing a lot of money is TRAUMATIC. The losers get afflicted, by bipolar disorder and/or manic depression.
    The gambling addicts aggravate their condition by resorting heavily to drugs and alcohol.


    Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) can be also caused by card-counting.

    Gamblers have very high expectations regarding counting cards in blackjack. They pay serious money in a plethora of training materials. The players also put up an extraordinary effort to learn card counting. It is really hard. Unscrupulous system
    vendors make card counting even more difficult by inventing all kinds of insane schemes named “systems”.

    After all that “concussion-inducing” training camp, the gamblers go to the casinos with extremely high-hopes. They lose big moneys, because that’s a mathematical law. They bet much higher in ALL plus-counts situations — and they lose a MAJORITY
    of such cases. The unscrupulous system vendors always shield themselves behind the “negative variance” syndrome. Of course, “negative variance” is an oxymoron. Variance is always a POSITIVE number: Equals the square of standard deviation:
    http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/274.html#deception

    Thusly, card-counting turns into a traumatic experience step by step –

    1) Pay big-money to acquire training materials in blackjack card-counting;
    2) Fry one’s brain in exhausting training, especially learning many insanely-difficult counting systems;
    3) Make ‘bonehead plays’ to follow another insane rule “Hide that one is a card-counter”;
    4) Lose big monies in actual casino play, while expecting big dividends.

    Card-counters could do a favor to society by donating their brains to medical research.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to Ion Saliu on Thu Jan 25 14:00:07 2018
    On Friday, October 24, 2014 at 7:16:41 PM UTC-4, Ion Saliu wrote:
    On Friday, October 24, 2014 2:23:21 PM UTC-4, rea...@saliu.com wrote:
    Axiomatic Colleagues of Mine:

    Them card-counting afflicts (APs!!!) have always conducted wars against one another!

    (snip)

    Gambling Psychosis

    The aforementioned characters here call themselves APs. Their forums have also places designated as AP. Normal people, who are not in the blackjack card-counting cult, might wonder what AP stands for.

    AP = Arithmetical Psychotic.

    The so-called Arithmetic Psychotics (APs) are those weird people you might have seen praying in the casino (even in the restrooms!) If you can discreetly come close to an AP, you might hear their famous "The Prayer of High Count". The AP prayer goes
    like this:

    "Lordy, Lordy,
    Gimme PLUS 40!"

    Ion Saliu,
    Founder of Blackjack Mathematics
    http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/274.html
    ("Blackjack, Gambling Mathematics, Card Counting Deception, Mythology")

    The fraud of card-counting has been exposed in this very blackjack newsgroup: https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.blackjack/g9Iaj0I1yNI
    (Card Counter Catchers Speak!)

    The author was himself a card-counter, even instructor of blackjack counting systems, even developer of card-counting systems:

    “Also consider THIS DEPOSITION WAS TAKEN IN 1994. Since that date, the casinos have gone high-tech. So if you thought that Max Rubin's description of how suspect card counters were identified then, you should hear how much easier it is for casinos
    today to label anyone a card counter in less than five minutes.

    Card counting systems are a BIG CON. Max Rubin's (a.k.a. Mike Riordan) sworn testimony (and dozens of other similar depositions provided to the courts by other-card counter catchers during the Campione case) provides irrefutable proof that the authors
    and software hucksters have been lying all along. They are using the fraudulent claim that card counting systems can still win to sell their worthless and dangerous systems, books and software.

    This post provides clear proof the con men hucksters and casino agents are lying to this newsgroup and their sucker clients.”

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 4 15:11:17 2018
    The gambling forums, especially those dedicated to blackjack and card counting are absolutely PATHETIC these days. Some of them had the decency to close down. But one notable gambling forum founded on the decrepit card counting is noisier than ever. It
    even makes terroristic threats against those “idealists” who dare to deviate from the counting-cards catechism:

    https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.blackjack/ALKEZOXuqU4

    Textbook delirious speech is rampant, especially lamentables such as Lady Three, ZenMasterFlush (the toilet?), Don Schlesinger… of course, the master of the madhouse himself, Norman Wattenberger (royalty name Shkiottorban)…

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to Ion Saliu on Fri Nov 30 15:10:20 2018
    On Friday, October 24, 2014 at 7:16:41 PM UTC-4, Ion Saliu wrote:
    On Friday, October 24, 2014 2:23:21 PM UTC-4, rea...@saliu.com wrote:

    … updating links to HTTPS…

    Them card-counting afflicts (APs!!!) have always conducted wars against one another!

    (snip)

    Gambling Psychosis

    The aforementioned characters here call themselves APs. Their forums have also places designated as AP. Normal people, who are not in the blackjack card-counting cult, might wonder what AP stands for.

    AP = Arithmetical Psychotic.

    The so-called Arithmetic Psychotics (APs) are those weird people you might have seen praying in the casino (even in the restrooms!) If you can discreetly come close to an AP, you might here their famous "The Prayer of High Count". The AP prayer goes
    like this:

    "Lordy, Lordy,
    Gimme PLUS 40!"

    Ion Saliu,
    Founder of Blackjack Mathematics
    https://saliu.com/bbs/messages/274.html
    "Blackjack, Gambling Mathematics, Card Counting Deception, Mythology".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to Ion Saliu on Tue Feb 12 11:38:45 2019
    On Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 5:00:09 PM UTC-5, Ion Saliu wrote:
    On Friday, October 24, 2014 at 7:16:41 PM UTC-4, Ion Saliu wrote:
    On Friday, October 24, 2014 2:23:21 PM UTC-4, rea...@saliu.com wrote:
    Axiomatic Colleagues of Mine:

    Them card-counting afflicts (APs!!!) have always conducted wars against one another!

    (snip)

    Gambling Psychosis

    The aforementioned characters here call themselves APs. Their forums have also places designated as AP. Normal people, who are not in the blackjack card-counting cult, might wonder what AP stands for.

    AP = Arithmetical Psychotic.

    The so-called Arithmetic Psychotics (APs) are those weird people you might have seen praying in the casino (even in the restrooms!) If you can discreetly come close to an AP, you might hear their famous "The Prayer of High Count". The AP prayer goes
    like this:

    "Lordy, Lordy,
    Gimme PLUS 40!"

    Ion Saliu,
    Founder of Blackjack Mathematics
    http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/274.html
    ("Blackjack, Gambling Mathematics, Card Counting Deception, Mythology")

    The fraud of card-counting has been exposed in this very blackjack newsgroup: https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.blackjack/g9Iaj0I1yNI
    (Card Counter Catchers Speak!)

    The author was himself a card-counter, even instructor of blackjack counting systems, even developer of card-counting systems:

    “Also consider THIS DEPOSITION WAS TAKEN IN 1994. Since that date, the casinos have gone high-tech. So if you thought that Max Rubin's description of how suspect card counters were identified then, you should hear how much easier it is for casinos
    today to label anyone a card counter in less than five minutes.

    Card counting systems are a BIG CON. Max Rubin's (a.k.a. Mike Riordan) sworn testimony (and dozens of other similar depositions provided to the courts by other-card counter catchers during the Campione case) provides irrefutable proof that the authors
    and software hucksters have been lying all along. They are using the fraudulent claim that card counting systems can still win to sell their worthless and dangerous systems, books and software.

    This post provides clear proof the con men hucksters and casino agents are lying to this newsgroup and their sucker clients.”

    Still, so many suckers out there who fall for what the crooks and cuckoos featured in this thread sell!

    https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-best-method-of-counting-cards-while-playing
    • What's the best method of counting cards while playing?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to Ion Saliu on Mon Apr 22 10:59:00 2019
    On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 at 6:11:18 PM UTC-4, Ion Saliu wrote:
    The gambling forums, especially those dedicated to blackjack and card counting are absolutely PATHETIC these days. Some of them had the decency to close down. But one notable gambling forum founded on the decrepit card counting is noisier than ever. It
    even makes terroristic threats against those “idealists” who dare to deviate from the counting-cards catechism:

    https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.blackjack/ALKEZOXuqU4

    Textbook delirious speech is rampant, especially lamentables such as Lady Three, ZenMasterFlush (the toilet?), Don Schlesinger… of course, the master of the madhouse himself, Norman Wattenberger (royalty name Shkiottorban)…

    The “hit-and-stand-in-hole” psycho described his residence best — the “Norman Bates Motel”:

    "THE LUNATICS ARE BEGINNING TO RUN THE ASYLUM."

    An asylum, indeed. Proofs here:

    https://www.blackjacktheforum.com/showthread.php?42153-Why-bother-doubling

    https://saliu.com/ScreenImgs/NormW/DSchlesAsylum.gif

    The Don of psychosis refers to new lunatics. He is chronic and he’s been running that asylum for over a decade now. He proves his protracted condition in that very thread. Psychodon, a blackjack “Hall of Famer”, states that doubling down results in
    more losing hands but winning more money!!! How is that for mathematics from a self-proclaimed “expert” blackjack mathematician??? Lose more hands but win more money!

    In truth, doubling down in blackjack results in around 60% winning hands. That’s the reason doubling down is strongly advised under clear circumstances. Read real mathematics:

    https://forums.saliu.com/card-counting-blackjack.html#reversedcounting Blackjack Double-Down Hands, Reversed Count.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 22 17:59:43 2019

    The “hit-and-stand-in-hole” psycho described his residence best — the “Norman Bates Motel”:

    "THE LUNATICS ARE BEGINNING TO RUN THE ASYLUM."

    An asylum, indeed. Proofs here:

    https://www.blackjacktheforum.com/showthread.php?42153-Why-bother-doubling

    https://saliu.com/ScreenImgs/NormW/DSchlesAsylum.gif

    The Don of psychosis refers to new lunatics. He is chronic and he’s been running that asylum for over a decade now. He proves his protracted condition in that very thread. Psychodon, a blackjack “Hall of Famer”, states that doubling down results
    in more losing hands but winning more money!!! How is that for mathematics from a self-proclaimed “expert” blackjack mathematician??? Lose more hands but win more money!

    In truth, doubling down in blackjack results in around 60% winning hands. That’s the reason doubling down is strongly advised under clear circumstances. Read real mathematics:

    https://forums.saliu.com/card-counting-blackjack.html#reversedcounting Blackjack Double-Down Hands, Reversed Count.

    Norman Wattenberger und Don Schlesinger form the “Berlin Wall” of The Asylum.

    Norman Bates is also in the habit of dumping evidence in the swamp nearby. Therefore saving proofs is in tall order. Here is how PsychoDon reckons the “math” of doubling down in blackjack:

    • “If there is more money to be made by doubling, do you have a different goal? Would you prefer to win more hands but less money or FEWER HANDS AND MORE MONEY? Do you derive your satisfaction from winning the greatest number of hands or the most
    amount of money? If not the latter, consider quitting the game.”

    It ain’t “fewer” hands, stupidiot! The players WIN around 60% of their double-down hands. That means they WIN MORE DOUBLE-DOWN HANDS. And that’s why they WIN MORE MONEY WHEN DOUBLING DOWN! 60% is greater than 50%.

    https://saliu.com/ScreenImgs/NormW/DSchlesDoublingMadness.gif

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 5 02:59:45 2019
    Still, so many suckers out there who fall for what the crooks and cuckoos featured in this thread sell! You simply can’t win with the traditional counting method. You increase your bet in all “plus-count” situations. In fact, you lose because the
    losing situations are more numerous than the winning cases. One of the reasons: multiple players at the same table.

    https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-best-method-of-counting-cards-while-playing
    • What's the best method of counting cards while playing?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 5 05:38:50 2020
    You can get lost easily in public forums like this Usenet group. THERE ARE WAY TOO MANY POSTS!!!

    To solve the problem, I created a thread referring to the most relevant articles, materials, debates, systems, fights, etc. I keep it updated and make sure it shows at the top of this Google group:

    https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.blackjack/yHJJBp0F9OU
    • The Best RGB Posts All-Matters Blackjack, Strategies, Systems, Card Counting, Inevitable Fights.

    Ion Saliu (royalty-name: Parpaluck),
    Founder of Blackjack Mathematics

    https://saliu.com/bbs/messages/274.html
    • Blackjack Card Counting: Systems, Gambling Mathematics, Cult, Fraud, Deception.

    https://saliu.com/card-counter-catchers.html
    • Developers, authors, vendors of card counting systems for blackjack make money by testifying against… card-counters!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 20 08:39:38 2020
    At least, some (in)famous krookoos fess up.

    Sez BJ Bishop Arnold Snyder, “Casino Player Magazine, November 1997”:

    “When I self-published my first book, ‘The Blackjack Formula’, in 1980, and advertised it in Gambling Times magazine with the catchy, upbeat slogan: ‘Card Counters Beware’ … stating in the ad that most of the blackjack games available in the
    casinos of the world were unbeatable with any card counting system … It is easier to make a living writing about this game [blackjack] than it is playing it. I have tried both, and I much prefer the keyboard to the cold green felt.”

    https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rec.gambling.blackjack/pcDm82yV56A
    • “The Candor of Famous Blackjack Card Counters”

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to Ion Saliu on Sun Mar 26 04:49:25 2023
    On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 6:39:39 PM UTC+3, Ion Saliu wrote:
    At least, some (in)famous krookoos fess up.

    Sez BJ Bishop Arnold Snyder, “Casino Player Magazine, November 1997”:

    “When I self-published my first book, ‘The Blackjack Formula’, in 1980, and advertised it in Gambling Times magazine with the catchy, upbeat slogan: ‘Card Counters Beware’ … stating in the ad that most of the blackjack games available in
    the casinos of the world were unbeatable with any card counting system … It is easier to make a living writing about this game [blackjack] than it is playing it. I have tried both, and I much prefer the keyboard to the cold green felt.”

    https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rec.gambling.blackjack/pcDm82yV56A
    • “The Candor of Famous Blackjack Card Counters”

    Search-engine programming advanced with rapid paces. Now, they can interact with Netizens almost like human beings. There are AI chatbots that behave in the manner of human researchers. I tested two AI chatbots on ‘Ion Saliu’ and ‘Blackjack,
    Gambling’.

    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.blackjack/c/DmzAO0X3GMw
    • Artificial Intelligence, Blackjack, Gambling: Chatbots, Ion Saliu.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)