• WLC 2022 Round 3 - UK LOTTO 659 Sat, Jan 8, 2022

    From =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 5 17:09:30 2022
    Post your 24 numbers here.

    Note: Given the second round of Nigel's doubts about the revised data' fairness, it would be preferable if everyone posted their own numbers as late as possible, or tried to verify that they will not be modified at random.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 5 17:09:52 2022
    Constant
    02 04 38 06 32 46 52 15 44 18 35 05 01 31 41 21 24 58 28 45 54 22 42 25

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 5 18:06:19 2022
    Alphazero
    57,9,55,53,44,56,11,23,50,54,52,3,33,27,41,19,40,26,22,28,34,48,43,37

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 5 17:45:33 2022
    Random
    57 03 52 19 18 56 09 45 05 11 50 22 25 55 02 15 21 23 26 33 35 41 42 43

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 5 17:56:19 2022
    Leela
    12,50,7,20,1,59,57,16,23,5,11,48,58,27,29,18,14,21,25,42,36,28,45,17

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nigel@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 6 13:02:56 2022
    王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:
    Post your 24 numbers here.

    Someone (mentioning no names even though it's me) programmed a subscript
    error into the program calculating their predictions. As it happens, my
    scores in both rounds would have been slightly higher if I'd posted the
    correct numbers. Oh well, hopefully I've done it right this time.

    51,35,15,28,24,13,45,31,58,1,34,59,42,37,6,20,7,4,48,32,8,16,43,39,

    Good luck,

    Evil Nigel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marmaduke Jinks@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 6 18:03:10 2022
    "nigel" <useweb@nospam.com> wrote in message news:5aKdnazA1dvjdUv8nZ2dnUU78SnNnZ2d@brightview.co.uk...
    ??? Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:
    Post your 24 numbers here.

    Someone (mentioning no names even though it's me) programmed a subscript error into the program calculating their predictions. As it happens, my scores in both rounds would have been slightly higher if I'd posted the correct numbers. Oh well, hopefully I've done it right this time.

    51,35,15,28,24,13,45,31,58,1,34,59,42,37,6,20,7,4,48,32,8,16,43,39,

    Good luck,

    Evil Nigel


    If only you'd used AI Nigel ;-)

    MJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 6 18:00:56 2022
    在 2022年1月7日星期五 UTC+8 02:04:45,<Marmaduke Jinks> 写道:
    "nigel" <use...@nospam.com> wrote in message news:5aKdnazA1dvjdUv8...@brightview.co.uk...
    ??? Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:
    Post your 24 numbers here.

    Someone (mentioning no names even though it's me) programmed a subscript error into the program calculating their predictions. As it happens, my scores in both rounds would have been slightly higher if I'd posted the correct numbers. Oh well, hopefully I've done it right this time.

    51,35,15,28,24,13,45,31,58,1,34,59,42,37,6,20,7,4,48,32,8,16,43,39,

    Good luck,

    Evil Nigel

    If only you'd used AI Nigel ;-)

    MJ
    If only he talked to our Godness, and she told me she would make some good numbers for him. :-

    Nan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 6 18:02:46 2022
    Nan
    24,40,25,31,29,34,28,36,27,3,59,5,58,7,57,10,56,13,55,17,48,20,41,38

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NN@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 6 19:22:38 2022
    [25, 12, 16, 21, 30, 42, 7, 59, 38, 43, 58, 49, 50, 10, 47, 45, 9, 26, 18, 56, 33, 31, 32, 4]

    NN

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nigel@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 7 12:37:53 2022
    王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:



    If only he talked to our Godness, and she told me she would make some good numbers for him. :-

    Nan

    Can you recall the year we had that whole 'goddess' thing during the WLC?

    Evil Nigel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nigel@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 7 12:36:23 2022
    王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:

    Note: Given the second round of Nigel's doubts about the revised
    data' fairness, it would be preferable if everyone posted their own
    numbers as late as possible, or tried to verify that they will not be modified at random.

    You've borrowed from human selections previously and nobody seemed too
    cut up about it. I'd like to see you keep one of your sets of selections
    (say Nan) as personal choice and be open about how your AI system
    selections are generated if they borrow from other entrants.

    Good luck,

    Evil Nigel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 7 06:01:21 2022
    在 2022年1月7日星期五 UTC+8 20:39:24,<nigel> 写道:
    王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:



    If only he talked to our Godness, and she told me she would make some good numbers for him. :-

    Nan
    Can you recall the year we had that whole 'goddess' thing during the WLC?

    Evil Nigel

    The year of 2019 ;-)

    Hurry up, this is your perfect chance to get a good score.

    Nan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 7 06:10:47 2022
    在 2022年1月7日星期五 UTC+8 20:36:36,<nigel> 写道:
    王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:

    Note: Given the second round of Nigel's doubts about the revised
    data' fairness, it would be preferable if everyone posted their own numbers as late as possible, or tried to verify that they will not be modified at random.
    You've borrowed from human selections previously and nobody seemed too
    cut up about it. I'd like to see you keep one of your sets of selections (say Nan) as personal choice and be open about how your AI system
    selections are generated if they borrow from other entrants.

    Good luck,

    Evil Nigel
    This year, I did not use other forecasters' numbers and make my predictions, as evidenced by the fact that I always posted my predictions ahead of everyone else.

    Although I have previously scored 100 points by combining the core numbers of other contestants, and that score is nearly unbreakable. However, I don't believe this improves the performance of my AI. The main reason for this is not out of sportsmanship,
    but rather because I believe that human predictions are not the best screening numbers.

    My AI predictions were derived by filtering random data from RANDOM.ORG, and anyone could have easily copied my method and excelled. I'd have the random.org site produce 100 sets of 24 numbers, and if I found any same numbers in the 15th through 17th
    digits from the the last drawing's winning numbers, that set of 24 numbers would be included in the selection.

    Try it for yourself if you don't trust me.

    Nan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 7 06:42:02 2022
    Then you might wonder why the 15th to 17th digit of each of the 24 integers is employed as a screening criterion. Because the golden rule point of the 24 numbers is at the 15th number (24*0.618=14.832), according to the Golden Rule principle. The Golden
    Rule practicality is more widespread because this method is typically used to discover the likely location of line faults.

    The second point to consider is why must the prior drawing's numbers be utilized for screening if the lottery is random? First, presuming a predictor has the ability or possibility to predict the next lottery number in advance, the future will obviate
    that possibility. The speed of light, for example, is limited by the cosmos, shutting out the possibility of traveling into the future. Time can hence be viewed as either non-existent or a static, constant object. The most likely form of the object next
    to it is then determined by its proximity to this object.

    As a result, the screening approach that best fits the prediction model is using the previous drawing's numbers to predict the numbers based on those generated by randomization.

    Nan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 7 06:26:38 2022
    I'd like to see you keep one of your sets of selections
    (say Nan) as personal choice and be open about how your AI system
    selections are generated if they borrow from other entrants.

    Good luck,

    Evil Nigel
    By screening the 15th to 17th digit numbers in the 100 sets of random data, it is possible to filter a vast amount of data on a wide scale. The remaining data sets go through a secondary filtering procedure, which is a fine-tuning step. The distribution
    of lottery numbers among the 24 numbers is used by the AI to optimize the next prediction.

    The principle is that, if the following number yields the same six numbers as the previous round, how should 24 numbers be prioritized so that the lottery numbers be ranked as close to the front in the 24 numbers as possible?

    This is the issue that AI must address. Because the priority arrangement varies from draw to draw, we can always find a pseudo-law to anticipate. In this way, the challenge of picking six numbers out of 59 is reduced to a far more manageable and data-
    observable complexity.

    Nan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 7 07:24:14 2022
    In summary, one of the golden rules of prediction is that if a set of random numbers contains as many lottery numbers from the previous draw as feasible, that set is more likely to contain as many lottery numbers for the most future draw. We would 
    choose a group of 24 numbers for the  6/59 lottery. We chose a group of 12 numbers for the 6/33 lottery.


    The best technique is to buy the whole combination if the pool numbers have been lowered to 12 numbers and you have a history of correctly predicting all 12 numbers to hit all the lottery numbers. Because buying the whole combination of 24 numbers on 6/
    59 tickets is impractical, the ideal option to play is to play the full match3 combination of the top 7 numbers (35 tickets in total) in hot picks, with a reward of £800.

    Nan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marmaduke Jinks@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 8 11:15:47 2022
    "??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <lotteryprediction@gmail.com> wrote in message news:070943aa-5391-47cd-851b-37351c5fc0d4n@googlegroups.com...
    Post your 24 numbers here.

    Note: Given the second round of Nigel's doubts about the revised data' fairness, it would be preferable if everyone posted their own numbers as
    late as possible, or tried to verify that they will not be modified at
    random.

    Jinks Picks:
    20 21 5 41 42 59 6 17 26 52 3 45 43 57 14 30 31 28 24 13 56 15 18 29

    MJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jerome Fandor@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 8 11:15:40 2022
    "??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <lotteryprediction@gmail.com> wrote in message news:070943aa-5391-47cd-851b-37351c5fc0d4n@googlegroups.com...
    Post your 24 numbers here.

    Note: Given the second round of Nigel's doubts about the revised data' fairness, it would be preferable if everyone posted their own numbers as
    late as possible, or tried to verify that they will not be modified at
    random.

    Jerome:
    44 8 11 13 34 41 19 5 2 1 29 47 7 53 17 21 43 3 31 55 40 23 59 37

    Jerome F

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)