RESULTS - WLC 2022 Round 1 - UK LOTTO 659 Wed, Sat, Jan 1, 2022
From
=?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb@21:1/5 to
All on Sat Jan 1 17:55:13 2022
Winning Numbers
14 29 31 41 43 56 +42
I will not count bonus number this year.
Last year, I designed and played in two AI competitors, Leela and AlphaZero, which used random patterns and human-adjusted patterns to learn from mistakes and data.
Results after Round 1:
1.Leela(AI) 53
2.NN 44
3.Jerome 38
4.Random 33
5.AlphaZero(AI) 30
6.Constant 21
7.Nigel 19
8.MJ 19
9.Nan 15
MJ
2 30 6 45 20 57 33 26 23 28 3 24 31* 12 27 59 13 14* 51 54 17 42 15 52
=7+12=19
JEROME
53 13 34 55 3 17 29* 47 59 1 44 31* 11 23 2 8 40 21 5 41* 19 37 43* 7 =2+5+13+18=38
Constant
02 04 38 06 32 46 52 15 44 18 35 05 01 31* 41* 21 24 58 28 45 54 22 42 25 =10+11=21
Random
1,59,2,57,5,52,10,51,14*,49, 17, 19, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29*, 30, 31*, 32, 39, 43*, 44, 45,
=3+6+8+16=33
Leela(AI)
1,56*,3,55,4,52,5,49,7,41*,9,38,11,34,12,29*,13,25,14*,24,17,23,20,22 =6+9+15+23=53
Nan
1,57,4,55,6,51,11,49,13,48,15,47,17,45,19,43*,20,37,25,31*,27,30,28,29* =1+5+9=15
AlphaZero(AI) 1,56*,3,53,6,48,7,47,8,44,15,42,16,38,17,35,19,34,21,31*,22,30,28,29* =1+6+23=30
Nigel
30,35,15,45,52,51,37,17,34,24,13,58,14*,1,42,7,59,4,48,28,43*,31*,6,16, =3+4+12=19
NN
5, 48, 45, 11, 53, 27, 8, 12, 56*, 54, 31*, 51, 46, 58, 25, 29*, 33, 1, 32, 41*, 37, 22, 23, 40
=5+9+14+16=44
Any mistakes, please let me know.
Nan
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
From
Marmaduke Jinks@21:1/5 to
All on Sun Jan 2 17:04:19 2022
"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <
lotteryprediction@gmail.com> wrote in message news:
9b768ca7-3c09-4674-b6d3-9c01ce28434en@googlegroups.com...
? 2022?1?2???? UTC+8 19:45:05,<Marmaduke Jinks> ??:
"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <lotteryp...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:68654bd5-0890-49d1...@googlegroups.com...
Winning Numbers
14 29 31 41 43 56 +42
I will not count bonus number this year.
Last year, I designed and played in two AI competitors, Leela and
AlphaZero,
which used random patterns and human-adjusted patterns to learn from
mistakes and data.
~~~~~
So Nan, you say that your two AI competitors used human-adjusted patterns. Did they actually show any AI in choosing numbers, rather than using human direction to choose?
You can think of AI as the matrix's savior and the human designer as the matrix's creator. Although the entire universe is designed by the designer
in the film, the creator does not rule out the possibility of breaking the balance and the occurrence of bugs. Overall, the AI creates data from a big amount of pseudo-random data screening and does self-analysis and adjustment based on a certain amount of human random data screening. Importantly,
rather than depending on human self-awareness indoctrination, this analysis
is based on the AI's own assessment. There are numerous elements that go
into the decision, which are difficult to disclose here, but they are not as straightforward as statistics.
To draw an analogy, imagine that the matrix is manipulating the reality that humans live in, and the lottery outcomes are just a virtual replica of the
real world. Then we can think and experiment in the opposite direction,
putting ourselves in the position of God and developing conscious robots
that make their own decisions. We can then deduce that if the universe is virtual, then the virtual programs we construct can find the realities of
the real world. If AI surpasses human performance, the possibility of us
living in a virtual environment cannot be excluded.
How many did they get wrong?
Debating whether the lottery's randomness can be solved is as pointless as debating whether God created the cosmos. Statistics aren't very useful in
this situation. Instead, we can pretend the existence of a designer and
engage in a conversation to inquire about the possibility of specific events
by number, which is a means to test whether randomness has a solution.
MJ
Nan
~
Hmm, yes.
We're not on the same page. Artificial Intelligence is where the machine develops it's own intelligence without relying on the natural intelligence
of humans. The history of AI shows lots of mistakes along the way. An AI
that has not made any mistakes is surely incredible. But that's not a bad thing per se, we learn from mistakes.
I'm intrigued by your two AIs. I wish them well.
MJ
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)