"Buying a specific set of 27 tickets for the UK National Lottery will mathematically guarantee that you win something" https://www.newscientist.com/article/2384455-mathematicians-find-27-tickets-that-guarantee-uk-national-lottery-win/
What?
These are the lines (to save you looking)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 7 8
1 2 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14
9 10 11 15 16 17
12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 26 27
18 19 22 23 30 31
18 19 24 25 28 29
20 21 22 23 28 29
20 21 24 25 30 31
22 23 24 25 26 27
26 27 28 29 30 31
32 33 34 35 40 41
32 33 36 37 44 45
32 33 38 39 42 43
34 35 36 37 42 43
34 35 38 39 44 45
36 37 38 39 40 41
40 41 42 43 44 45
46 47 48 49 54 55
46 47 50 51 58 59
46 47 52 53 56 57
48 49 50 51 56 57
48 49 52 53 58 59
50 51 52 53 54 55
54 55 56 57 58 59
But they say it only guarantees you a Lucky Dip. Hah ;-) The Lotto say that 1 line in 10.3 should give you a Lucky Dip.
I'd rather they had spent their time coming up with the top 27 lines of six number
sets.
Damn. Requires a subscription to read the article :-(
Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
"Buying a specific set of 27 tickets for the UK National Lottery will
mathematically guarantee that you win something"
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2384455-mathematicians-find-27-tickets-that-guarantee-uk-national-lottery-win/
What?
These are the lines (to save you looking)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 7 8
1 2 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14
9 10 11 15 16 17
12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 26 27
18 19 22 23 30 31
18 19 24 25 28 29
20 21 22 23 28 29
20 21 24 25 30 31
22 23 24 25 26 27
26 27 28 29 30 31
32 33 34 35 40 41
32 33 36 37 44 45
32 33 38 39 42 43
34 35 36 37 42 43
34 35 38 39 44 45
36 37 38 39 40 41
40 41 42 43 44 45
46 47 48 49 54 55
46 47 50 51 58 59
46 47 52 53 56 57
48 49 50 51 56 57
48 49 52 53 58 59
50 51 52 53 54 55
54 55 56 57 58 59
But they say it only guarantees you a Lucky Dip. Hah ;-) The Lotto say
that
1 line in 10.3 should give you a Lucky Dip.
I'd rather they had spent their time coming up with the top 27 lines of
six number
sets.
"nigel" <useweb@nospam.com> wrote in message news:Ja2cnSW0stqoflX5nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@brightview.co.uk...
Damn. Requires a subscription to read the article :-(
Does this help? https://metro.co.uk/2023/07/31/lottery-numbers-pick-mathematicians-guarantee-win-19221434/
Not sure it helped me. I wasn't prepared to come up with a sub to read the article..
MJ
Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
"nigel" <useweb@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:Ja2cnSW0stqoflX5nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@brightview.co.uk...
Damn. Requires a subscription to read the article :-(
Does this help?
https://metro.co.uk/2023/07/31/lottery-numbers-pick-mathematicians-guarantee-win-19221434/
Not sure it helped me. I wasn't prepared to come up with a sub to read
the article..
MJ
Thank you. That looks a very different process to the hard
number-crunching used by traditional wheel generation programs. I wonder whether that means 27 isn't set in stone and might be beaten.
Any wheelie people looking for a challenge?
The article says that you have to use exactly those numbers to win, but I believe it's the pattern that's important and the actual numbers are interchangeable.
Nigel
They would have been basing their analysis on what has happened in the last
n 6/59 draws. Which is a risk.
I put their numbers into a spreadsheet to monitor over the next n draws.
But I did also extract the top n doubles and then trebles; then made about the same number of lines with them and will be monitoring those too.
MJ
"nigel" <use...@nospam.com> wrote in message news:RO6dnXCyo5q-q1f5...@brightview.co.uk...
Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
"nigel" <use...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:Ja2cnSW0stqoflX5...@brightview.co.uk...
Damn. Requires a subscription to read the article :-(
Does this help?
https://metro.co.uk/2023/07/31/lottery-numbers-pick-mathematicians-guarantee-win-19221434/
Not sure it helped me. I wasn't prepared to come up with a sub to read
the article..
MJ
Thank you. That looks a very different process to the hard
number-crunching used by traditional wheel generation programs. I wonder whether that means 27 isn't set in stone and might be beaten.
Any wheelie people looking for a challenge?
The article says that you have to use exactly those numbers to win, but I believe it's the pattern that's important and the actual numbers are interchangeable.
Nigel
Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
"nigel" <use...@nospam.com> wrote in message news:Ja2cnSW0stqoflX5...@brightview.co.uk...
Damn. Requires a subscription to read the article :-(
Does this help? https://metro.co.uk/2023/07/31/lottery-numbers-pick-mathematicians-guarantee-win-19221434/
Not sure it helped me. I wasn't prepared to come up with a sub to read the article..
MJThank you. That looks a very different process to the hard
number-crunching used by traditional wheel generation programs. I wonder whether that means 27 isn't set in stone and might be beaten.
Any wheelie people looking for a challenge?
The article says that you have to use exactly those numbers to win, but
I believe it's the pattern that's important and the actual numbers are interchangeable.
Nigel
On Wednesday, 2 August 2023 at 11:55:43 UTC+1, nigel wrote:
Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
"nigel" <use...@nospam.com> wrote in messageThank you. That looks a very different process to the hard
news:Ja2cnSW0stqoflX5...@brightview.co.uk...
Damn. Requires a subscription to read the article :-(
Does this help?
https://metro.co.uk/2023/07/31/lottery-numbers-pick-mathematicians-guarantee-win-19221434/
Not sure it helped me. I wasn't prepared to come up with a sub to read
the
article..
MJ
number-crunching used by traditional wheel generation programs. I wonder
whether that means 27 isn't set in stone and might be beaten.
Any wheelie people looking for a challenge?
The article says that you have to use exactly those numbers to win, but
I believe it's the pattern that's important and the actual numbers are
interchangeable.
Nigel
pattern reminds me of fano planes / steiner triple systems.
"NN" <november.nihal@gmail.com> wrote in message news:afe4b167-efc8-42b4-a80e-07c47aeb11a4n@googlegroups.com...<snip>
On Wednesday, 2 August 2023 at 11:55:43 UTC+1, nigel wrote:
Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
I had to look that up, but yes you are right. Finite geometry. NeverMy mistake; they only had one LD.
used it myself.
They would only have had 2 Lucky Dips last night.
MJ
On Wednesday, 2 August 2023 at 11:55:43 UTC+1, nigel wrote:
Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
"nigel" <use...@nospam.com> wrote in message >>>news:Ja2cnSW0stqoflX5...@brightview.co.uk...
Damn. Requires a subscription to read the article :-(
Does this help? >>>https://metro.co.uk/2023/07/31/lottery-numbers-pick-mathematicians-guarantee-win-19221434/
Not sure it helped me. I wasn't prepared to come up with a sub to read the >>>article..
MJ
Thank you. That looks a very different process to the hard
number-crunching used by traditional wheel generation programs. I wonder >>whether that means 27 isn't set in stone and might be beaten.
Any wheelie people looking for a challenge?
The article says that you have to use exactly those numbers to win, but
I believe it's the pattern that's important and the actual numbers are >>interchangeable.
Nigel
pattern reminds me of fano planes / steiner triple systems.
NN wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 August 2023 at 11:55:43 UTC+1, nigel wrote:
Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
"nigel" <use...@nospam.com> wrote in message >>>>news:Ja2cnSW0stqoflX5...@brightview.co.uk...
Damn. Requires a subscription to read the article :-(
Does this help? >>>>https://metro.co.uk/2023/07/31/lottery-numbers-pick-mathematicians-guarantee-win-19221434/
Not sure it helped me. I wasn't prepared to come up with a sub to read >>>>the article..
MJ
Thank you. That looks a very different process to the hard >>>number-crunching used by traditional wheel generation programs. I wonder >>>whether that means 27 isn't set in stone and might be beaten.
Any wheelie people looking for a challenge?
The article says that you have to use exactly those numbers to win, but I >>>believe it's the pattern that's important and the actual numbers are >>>interchangeable.
Nigel
pattern reminds me of fano planes / steiner triple systems.
Can anyone remember the internet addresses of wheel repositories? I'd like
to know what their records are for 6/59 lotteries guaranteeing at least
one 2-match. (See, I can't even remember the proper jargon).
Nigel
"Buying a specific set of 27 tickets for the UK National Lottery will mathematically guarantee that you win something" https://www.newscientist.com/article/2384455-mathematicians-find-27-tickets-that-guarantee-uk-national-lottery-win/
What?
These are the lines (to save you looking)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 7 8
1 2 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14
9 10 11 15 16 17
12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 26 27
18 19 22 23 30 31
18 19 24 25 28 29
20 21 22 23 28 29
20 21 24 25 30 31
22 23 24 25 26 27
26 27 28 29 30 31
32 33 34 35 40 41
32 33 36 37 44 45
32 33 38 39 42 43
34 35 36 37 42 43
34 35 38 39 44 45
36 37 38 39 40 41
40 41 42 43 44 45
46 47 48 49 54 55
46 47 50 51 58 59
46 47 52 53 56 57
48 49 50 51 56 57
48 49 52 53 58 59
50 51 52 53 54 55
54 55 56 57 58 59
But they say it only guarantees you a Lucky Dip. Hah ;-) The Lotto say that 1 line in 10.3 should give you a Lucky Dip.
I'd rather they had spent their time coming up with the top 27 lines of six number
sets.
--
MJ
On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 3:19:44 PM UTC+3, Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
"Buying a specific set of 27 tickets for the UK National Lottery will >>mathematically guarantee that you win something" >>https://www.newscientist.com/article/2384455-mathematicians-find-27-tickets-that-guarantee-uk-national-lottery-win/
What?
These are the lines (to save you looking)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 7 8
1 2 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14
9 10 11 15 16 17
12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 26 27
18 19 22 23 30 31
18 19 24 25 28 29
20 21 22 23 28 29
20 21 24 25 30 31
22 23 24 25 26 27
26 27 28 29 30 31
32 33 34 35 40 41
32 33 36 37 44 45
32 33 38 39 42 43
34 35 36 37 42 43
34 35 38 39 44 45
36 37 38 39 40 41
40 41 42 43 44 45
46 47 48 49 54 55
46 47 50 51 58 59
46 47 52 53 56 57
48 49 50 51 56 57
48 49 52 53 58 59
50 51 52 53 54 55
54 55 56 57 58 59
But they say it only guarantees you a Lucky Dip. Hah ;-) The Lotto say that >>1 line in 10.3 should give you a Lucky Dip.
I'd rather they had spent their time coming up with the top 27 lines of six >>number
sets.
--
MJ
Martsopolleahk:days of the 2000s! O tempora! O mores!
Axiomate, ain’t it great to be alive? How about them axiomates Kotkoduck, and Kokostirk, and Kotskarr, et al.? Especially Kotskarr, Doollow’s uncle, should have jumped right in. It’s about odds and calculations, after all! I remember the glory
I presume you mean “2 out of 6” by “Lucky Dip”. Here are the odds for your “6 of 59” lotto game:draws.
The odds calculated as EXACTLY in a lotto game '6/59':
~ 0 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 1.96
~ 1 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 2.62
~ 2 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 10.26
~ 3 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 96.17
~ 4 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 2179.85
~ 5 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 141690.17
~ 6 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 45057474
The odds calculated as AT LEAST in a lotto game '6/59':
~ 0 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 1
~ 1 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 2.04
~ 2 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 9.23
~ 3 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 92.05
~ 4 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 2146.72
~ 5 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 141246
~ 6 of 6 in 6 from 59 -> 1 in 45057474
The odds of ‘at least 2 of 6’ are the equivalent of the odds of ‘winning any prize’ (that being your infamous ‘Lucky Dip’).
The lotto wheel you posted does, indeed, guarantee ‘2 of 6 from 59’. I checked it with my grandiose piece of software known world-over as ‘WheelCheck.exe’. In real-life, that wheel will assure some 20-22 ‘Lucky Dips’ if played in 10 lottery
To have a wheel matching the ‘1 in 10’ odds, one must apply a ‘lexicographical’ wheel. Again, another grandiose piece of software comes in play. It is known world-over as ‘LexicoWheels.exe’. It generates an 11-line lotto wheel to match the1 in 10.3’ odds to get ‘exactly 2 out of 6’. The minimum guarantee is not assured by the lexicowheel. However, if you play the wheel in 10 lottery draws, you will get 10 ‘Lucky Dips’. The lower cost is the advantage of this type of lotto
1 3 11 41 50 53
2 4 5 14 19 57
3 5 21 40 43 49
4 9 11 19 25 31
5 15 37 43 48 54
7 9 25 27 44 48
8 30 37 41 54 59
11 13 18 45 46 57
14 15 17 21 41 42
18 22 30 32 36 45
30 32 35 44 52 59
The best — indubitably the best — strategy of lotto wheeling is exposed right here, in this famous and grandiose community. Read the thread started by Kotkoduck, the famed lotto-wheeling pioneer:
• https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.lottery/c/O6MrMoK0Pwg?hl=en
• “Super 18,6,4,6 42 Wheel”.
It is kind of messy, since many readers posted all manner of stuff. The method, however, is neatly presented on a dedicated webpage:
• https://saliu.com/bbs/best-18-number-lotto-wheels.html
• “The Best Lotto Wheels for 9, 12, 18, 21 Numbers: 4-in-6 Minimum Guarantee”.
There is NO easier way for you to win that big lotto game, Martsopolleahk, Doollow, Kotskarr, Strumelleahg, et al. May Mnezău help you!
Ion “Axiomatic Parpaluck” Saliu
Founder of Lottery Mathematics
Founder of Axiomaticism … and many other important endeavors https://saliu.com/axiomatic.html
But can your wheeling software reduce the number of tickets to 26?
"Buying a specific set of 27 tickets for the UK National Lottery will mathematically guarantee that you win something" https://www.newscientist.com/article/2384455-mathematicians-find-27-tickets-that-guarantee-uk-national-lottery-win/
What?
These are the lines (to save you looking)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 7 8
1 2 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14
9 10 11 15 16 17
12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 26 27
18 19 22 23 30 31
18 19 24 25 28 29
20 21 22 23 28 29
20 21 24 25 30 31
22 23 24 25 26 27
26 27 28 29 30 31
32 33 34 35 40 41
32 33 36 37 44 45
32 33 38 39 42 43
34 35 36 37 42 43
34 35 38 39 44 45
36 37 38 39 40 41
40 41 42 43 44 45
46 47 48 49 54 55
46 47 50 51 58 59
46 47 52 53 56 57
48 49 50 51 56 57
48 49 52 53 58 59
50 51 52 53 54 55
54 55 56 57 58 59
But they say it only guarantees you a Lucky Dip. Hah ;-) The Lotto say
that
1 line in 10.3 should give you a Lucky Dip.
I'd rather they had spent their time coming up with the top 27 lines of
six number
sets.
--
MJ
"Marmaduke Jinks" <Ji...@Totopoly.co.uk> wrote in message news:ua88st$396gp$1...@dont-email.me...
"Buying a specific set of 27 tickets for the UK National Lottery will mathematically guarantee that you win something" https://www.newscientist.com/article/2384455-mathematicians-find-27-tickets-that-guarantee-uk-national-lottery-win/
What?
These are the lines (to save you looking)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 7 8
1 2 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14
9 10 11 15 16 17
12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 26 27
18 19 22 23 30 31
18 19 24 25 28 29
20 21 22 23 28 29
20 21 24 25 30 31
22 23 24 25 26 27
26 27 28 29 30 31
32 33 34 35 40 41
32 33 36 37 44 45
32 33 38 39 42 43
34 35 36 37 42 43
34 35 38 39 44 45
36 37 38 39 40 41
40 41 42 43 44 45
46 47 48 49 54 55
46 47 50 51 58 59
46 47 52 53 56 57
48 49 50 51 56 57
48 49 52 53 58 59
50 51 52 53 54 55
54 55 56 57 58 59
But they say it only guarantees you a Lucky Dip. Hah ;-) The Lotto say that
1 line in 10.3 should give you a Lucky Dip.
I'd rather they had spent their time coming up with the top 27 lines of six number
sets.
--
MJ
Since the article was published I've tracked the 27 lines. It won't come as any surprise to know that there is a deficit of -£279 (based on the reported
Match3 being £51 last time, in a must-be-won Lotto). But the scientists have had 2 x Match3s.
I put together 2 entries. One based on 30 lines (based on the top trebles) and it has also had 2 x Match3s but with a deficit of -£313. The other was 28 lines (based on top doubles) but it has only had 1 Match3, deficit -£323.
MJ
"Buying a specific set of 27 tickets for the UK National Lottery will mathematically guarantee that you win something" https://www.newscientist.com/article/2384455-mathematicians-find-27-tickets-that-guarantee-uk-national-lottery-win/
What?
These are the lines (to save you looking)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 7 8
1 2 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14
9 10 11 15 16 17
12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 26 27
18 19 22 23 30 31
18 19 24 25 28 29
20 21 22 23 28 29
20 21 24 25 30 31
22 23 24 25 26 27
26 27 28 29 30 31
32 33 34 35 40 41
32 33 36 37 44 45
32 33 38 39 42 43
34 35 36 37 42 43
34 35 38 39 44 45
36 37 38 39 40 41
40 41 42 43 44 45
46 47 48 49 54 55
46 47 50 51 58 59
46 47 52 53 56 57
48 49 50 51 56 57
48 49 52 53 58 59
50 51 52 53 54 55
54 55 56 57 58 59
But they say it only guarantees you a Lucky Dip. Hah ;-) The Lotto say
that
1 line in 10.3 should give you a Lucky Dip.
I'd rather they had spent their time coming up with the top 27 lines of
six number sets.
--
MJ
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 95:55:20 |
Calls: | 6,698 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 12,232 |
Messages: | 5,349,201 |