On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:36:37 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 6/9/2023 1:35 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
On Friday, June 9, 2023 at 9:47:43 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Friday, June 9, 2023 at 7:36:32 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 6:09:59 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
In other news: Democrats still can't figure out why so many Americans vote Republican.
.
Yea, me either. I've asked here a number of times, "Why would you vote Republican." No answers.
.
~ It appears the person that votes Republican can't figure out why. Can you?
Oh, don't worry, they know why.
I assure you, I’m not worried, they are. So why did you print that they didn’t?
Because Democrats are braying moo-cows.
Heh. So Republicans vote Republican because you think Democrats are “braying moo-cows?”
Is that right?
(Still looking for that answer; and as to why a person would vote to lose their Social Security
Medicare and let medical insurance companies drop you for preexisting conditions).
.
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
You join the others here in not being able to admit you can’t back the Republican Party Platform, but can’t bring yourself to admit you can’t voter Republican.
Don’t be too embarrassed. It’s what the Democrats did in the midterms. While the GQP expressed how they knew they’d ‘shellack’ the Democrats; the Democrats (finally) used RQP talking points to show the Party Platform. GQP lost the Senate and
damn near the House.
Mitch McConnell blasted Rick Scott for publishing the party platform and blamed him for the upset. But Rick Scott is as stupid (not a racial profile) as the rest of the MAGAts and said it didn’t matter.
So join the others in not being able to answer my (and the Democrats’) simply question:
“Why are you supporting the Republican Party when they admit they want to take your Social Security and Medicare?” (And refuse to address their insistence medical insurance companies should drop you for preexisting conditions).
(Oh, and LOL @ MOOO, whatever the fuck that's supposed to mean)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)