'Fifty-six percent of respondents, including nearly six in 10 of those who voted either Republican or
Democratic in the last presidential election,
said they would approve (31 percent) or strongly approve (25 percent) of U.S. intervention in a crisis
across the Taiwan Strait, while 12 percent were against it.
U.S. public backing for direct involvement in a Taiwan contingency was up nine points from 47 percent in
mid-August 2022, while opposition remained the same, according to an April 4 Redfield and Wilton
Strategies survey of 1,500 eligible voting adults.
The fieldwork was done one day before House Speaker Kevin McCarthy hosted Taiwanese President Tsai
Ing-wen for talks on U.S. soil. China, which claims Taiwan as its own and calls Tsai a separatist, responded
to the meeting by launching three days of military drills around the island from April 8 to 10.
Alongside rising support for Taiwan's defense, the poll revealed a plurality who viewed China (41 percent)
as "the greatest threat" to American interests, followed by Russia (35 percent), North Korea (7 percent)
and Iran (3 percent). More GOP-leaning voters picked China over Russia (52 vs. 28 percent) than did
➡️Democratic-leaning voters (34 vs. 45 percent).'⬅️
Fifty percent of respondents in April's Newsweek survey believed the U.S. was "committed by treaty" to
defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack, including 48 percent of Republican and ➡️58 percent of Democratic
voters.'⬅️ https://www.newsweek.com/americans-warm-us-defense-taiwan-china-invades-1793738
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 12:59:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
'Fifty-six percent of respondents, including nearly six in 10 of those who voted either Republican or
Democratic in the last presidential election,
Republican or Democrat? Who? And 56% of those approve of intervention?
said they would approve (31 percent) or strongly approve (25 percent) of U.S. intervention in a crisis
across the Taiwan Strait, while 12 percent were against it.
U.S. public backing for direct involvement in a Taiwan contingency was up nine points from 47 percent in
mid-August 2022, while opposition remained the same, according to an April 4 Redfield and Wilton
Strategies survey of 1,500 eligible voting adults.
The fieldwork was done one day before House Speaker Kevin McCarthy hosted Taiwanese President Tsai
Ing-wen for talks on U.S. soil. China, which claims Taiwan as its own and calls Tsai a separatist, responded
to the meeting by launching three days of military drills around the island from April 8 to 10.
Alongside rising support for Taiwan's defense, the poll revealed a plurality who viewed China (41 percent)
as "the greatest threat" to American interests, followed by Russia (35 percent), North Korea (7 percent)
and Iran (3 percent). More GOP-leaning voters picked China over Russia (52 vs. 28 percent) than did
➡️Democratic-leaning voters (34 vs. 45 percent).'⬅️
Fifty percent of respondents in April's Newsweek survey believed the U.S. was "committed by treaty" to
defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack, including 48 percent of Republican and ➡️58 percent of Democratic
voters.'⬅️ https://www.newsweek.com/americans-warm-us-defense-taiwan-china-invades-1793738
(Or were YOU "mis"-informed?)
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 6:22:37 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:.
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 12:59:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:~ So 60% of 56% voted for 1 of the 2 popular parties. A full 40% voted for someone other that the
'Fifty-six percent of respondents, including nearly six in 10 of those who voted either Republican or
Democratic in the last presidential election,
Republican or Democrat? Who? And 56% of those approve of intervention?
How do you come up with '60% of 56%'? I'd like to try to understand your thinking..
.said they would approve (31 percent) or strongly approve (25 percent) of U.S. intervention in a crisis
across the Taiwan Strait, while 12 percent were against it.
U.S. public backing for direct involvement in a Taiwan contingency was up nine points from 47 percent in
mid-August 2022, while opposition remained the same, according to an April 4 Redfield and Wilton
Strategies survey of 1,500 eligible voting adults.
The fieldwork was done one day before House Speaker Kevin McCarthy hosted Taiwanese President Tsai
Ing-wen for talks on U.S. soil. China, which claims Taiwan as its own and calls Tsai a separatist, responded
to the meeting by launching three days of military drills around the island from April 8 to 10.
Alongside rising support for Taiwan's defense, the poll revealed a plurality who viewed China (41 percent)
as "the greatest threat" to American interests, followed by Russia (35 percent), North Korea (7 percent)
and Iran (3 percent). More GOP-leaning voters picked China over Russia (52 vs. 28 percent) than did
➡️Democratic-leaning voters (34 vs. 45 percent).'⬅️
~ So how did you get your, “Poll shows Republicans better-informed than Democrats”?Fifty percent of respondents in April's Newsweek survey believed the U.S. was "committed by treaty" to
defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack, including 48 percent of Republican and ➡️58 percent of Democratic
voters.'⬅️ https://www.newsweek.com/americans-warm-us-defense-taiwan-china-invades-1793738
(Or were YOU "mis"-informed?)
Sorry that you STILL don't get it no matter how many arrows I use.
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 6:32:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 6:22:37 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:.
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 12:59:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:~ So 60% of 56% voted for 1 of the 2 popular parties. A full 40% voted for someone other that the
'Fifty-six percent of respondents, including nearly six in 10 of those who voted either Republican or
Democratic in the last presidential election,
Republican or Democrat? Who? And 56% of those approve of intervention?
How do you come up with '60% of 56%'? I'd like to try to understand your thinking..
Yea, we know. You use that all the time in order to dodge those tough questions...
.
.
.
said they would approve (31 percent) or strongly approve (25 percent) of U.S. intervention in a crisis
across the Taiwan Strait, while 12 percent were against it.
U.S. public backing for direct involvement in a Taiwan contingency was up nine points from 47 percent in
mid-August 2022, while opposition remained the same, according to an April 4 Redfield and Wilton
Strategies survey of 1,500 eligible voting adults.
The fieldwork was done one day before House Speaker Kevin McCarthy hosted Taiwanese President Tsai
Ing-wen for talks on U.S. soil. China, which claims Taiwan as its own and calls Tsai a separatist, responded
to the meeting by launching three days of military drills around the island from April 8 to 10.
Alongside rising support for Taiwan's defense, the poll revealed a plurality who viewed China (41 percent)
as "the greatest threat" to American interests, followed by Russia (35 percent), North Korea (7 percent)
and Iran (3 percent). More GOP-leaning voters picked China over Russia (52 vs. 28 percent) than did
➡️Democratic-leaning voters (34 vs. 45 percent).'⬅️
~ So how did you get your, “Poll shows Republicans better-informed than Democrats”?Fifty percent of respondents in April's Newsweek survey believed the U.S. was "committed by treaty" to
defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack, including 48 percent of Republican and ➡️58 percent of Democratic
voters.'⬅️ https://www.newsweek.com/americans-warm-us-defense-taiwan-china-invades-1793738
.(Or were YOU "mis"-informed?)
Sorry that you STILL don't get it no matter how many arrows I use.Yea, none of us 'get' answers to those tough questions. No matter how many **** I use.
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 12:59:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
'Fifty-six percent of respondents, including nearly six in 10 of those who voted either Republican orSo 60% of 56% voted for 1 of the 2 popular parties. A full 40% voted for someone other that the
Democratic in the last presidential election,
Republican or Democrat? Who? And 56% of those approve of intervention?
.
.
said they would approve (31 percent) or strongly approve (25 percent) of U.S. intervention in a crisis
across the Taiwan Strait, while 12 percent were against it.
U.S. public backing for direct involvement in a Taiwan contingency was up nine points from 47 percent in
mid-August 2022, while opposition remained the same, according to an April 4 Redfield and Wilton
Strategies survey of 1,500 eligible voting adults.
The fieldwork was done one day before House Speaker Kevin McCarthy hosted Taiwanese President Tsai
Ing-wen for talks on U.S. soil. China, which claims Taiwan as its own and calls Tsai a separatist, responded
to the meeting by launching three days of military drills around the island from April 8 to 10.
Alongside rising support for Taiwan's defense, the poll revealed a plurality who viewed China (41 percent)
as "the greatest threat" to American interests, followed by Russia (35 percent), North Korea (7 percent)
and Iran (3 percent). More GOP-leaning voters picked China over Russia (52 vs. 28 percent) than did
➡️Democratic-leaning voters (34 vs. 45 percent).'⬅️
Fifty percent of respondents in April's Newsweek survey believed the U.S. was "committed by treaty" toSo how did you get your, “Poll shows Republicans better-informed than Democrats”?
defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack, including 48 percent of Republican and ➡️58 percent of Democratic
voters.'⬅️ https://www.newsweek.com/americans-warm-us-defense-taiwan-china-invades-1793738
(Or were YOU "mis"-informed?)
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 6:38:48 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 6:32:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 6:22:37 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:.
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 12:59:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:~ So 60% of 56% voted for 1 of the 2 popular parties. A full 40% voted for someone other that the
'Fifty-six percent of respondents, including nearly six in 10 of those who voted either Republican or
Democratic in the last presidential election,
Republican or Democrat? Who? And 56% of those approve of intervention?
How do you come up with '60% of 56%'? I'd like to try to understand your thinking..
Yea, we know. You use that all the time in order to dodge those tough questions...
.
.
.
.said they would approve (31 percent) or strongly approve (25 percent) of U.S. intervention in a crisis
across the Taiwan Strait, while 12 percent were against it.
U.S. public backing for direct involvement in a Taiwan contingency was up nine points from 47 percent in
mid-August 2022, while opposition remained the same, according to an April 4 Redfield and Wilton
Strategies survey of 1,500 eligible voting adults.
The fieldwork was done one day before House Speaker Kevin McCarthy hosted Taiwanese President Tsai
Ing-wen for talks on U.S. soil. China, which claims Taiwan as its own and calls Tsai a separatist, responded
to the meeting by launching three days of military drills around the island from April 8 to 10.
Alongside rising support for Taiwan's defense, the poll revealed a plurality who viewed China (41 percent)
as "the greatest threat" to American interests, followed by Russia (35 percent), North Korea (7 percent)
and Iran (3 percent). More GOP-leaning voters picked China over Russia (52 vs. 28 percent) than did
➡️Democratic-leaning voters (34 vs. 45 percent).'⬅️
~ So how did you get your, “Poll shows Republicans better-informed than Democrats”?Fifty percent of respondents in April's Newsweek survey believed the U.S. was "committed by treaty" to
defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack, including 48 percent of Republican and ➡️58 percent of Democratic
voters.'⬅️ https://www.newsweek.com/americans-warm-us-defense-taiwan-china-invades-1793738
.(Or were YOU "mis"-informed?)
Sorry that you STILL don't get it no matter how many arrows I use.Yea, none of us 'get' answers to those tough questions. No matter how many **** I use.
How did you get to be a pudding-head? That's my question.
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 6:22:37 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:.
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 12:59:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
'Fifty-six percent of respondents, including nearly six in 10 of those who voted either Republican orSo 60% of 56% voted for 1 of the 2 popular parties. A full 40% voted for someone other that the
Democratic in the last presidential election,
Republican or Democrat? Who? And 56% of those approve of intervention?
.
.
said they would approve (31 percent) or strongly approve (25 percent) of U.S. intervention in a crisis
across the Taiwan Strait, while 12 percent were against it.
U.S. public backing for direct involvement in a Taiwan contingency was up nine points from 47 percent in
mid-August 2022, while opposition remained the same, according to an April 4 Redfield and Wilton
Strategies survey of 1,500 eligible voting adults.
The fieldwork was done one day before House Speaker Kevin McCarthy hosted Taiwanese President Tsai
Ing-wen for talks on U.S. soil. China, which claims Taiwan as its own and calls Tsai a separatist, responded
to the meeting by launching three days of military drills around the island from April 8 to 10.
Alongside rising support for Taiwan's defense, the poll revealed a plurality who viewed China (41 percent)
as "the greatest threat" to American interests, followed by Russia (35 percent), North Korea (7 percent)
and Iran (3 percent). More GOP-leaning voters picked China over Russia (52 vs. 28 percent) than did
➡️Democratic-leaning voters (34 vs. 45 percent).'⬅️
Fifty percent of respondents in April's Newsweek survey believed the U.S. was "committed by treaty" toSo how did you get your, “Poll shows Republicans better-informed than Democrats”?
defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack, including 48 percent of Republican and ➡️58 percent of Democratic
voters.'⬅️ https://www.newsweek.com/americans-warm-us-defense-taiwan-china-invades-1793738
(Or were YOU "mis"-informed?)
Do you think Russia is a greater threat ro the U.S. than China, Jerry? Do you think the U.S. is "committed.
by treaty" to defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack?
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀~ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀собака ............ ⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 3:22:37 AM UTC+2, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 12:59:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
'Fifty-six percent of respondents, including nearly six in 10 of those who voted either Republican orSo 60% of 56% voted for 1 of the 2 popular parties. A full 40% voted for someone other that the
Democratic in the last presidential election,
Republican or Democrat? Who? And 56% of those approve of intervention?
.
.
said they would approve (31 percent) or strongly approve (25 percent) of U.S. intervention in a crisis
across the Taiwan Strait, while 12 percent were against it.
U.S. public backing for direct involvement in a Taiwan contingency was up nine points from 47 percent in
mid-August 2022, while opposition remained the same, according to an April 4 Redfield and Wilton
Strategies survey of 1,500 eligible voting adults.
The fieldwork was done one day before House Speaker Kevin McCarthy hosted Taiwanese President Tsai
Ing-wen for talks on U.S. soil. China, which claims Taiwan as its own and calls Tsai a separatist, responded
to the meeting by launching three days of military drills around the island from April 8 to 10.
Alongside rising support for Taiwan's defense, the poll revealed a plurality who viewed China (41 percent)
as "the greatest threat" to American interests, followed by Russia (35 percent), North Korea (7 percent)
and Iran (3 percent). More GOP-leaning voters picked China over Russia (52 vs. 28 percent) than did
➡️Democratic-leaning voters (34 vs. 45 percent).'⬅️
Fifty percent of respondents in April's Newsweek survey believed the U.S. was "committed by treaty" toSo how did you get your, “Poll shows Republicans better-informed than Democrats”?
defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack, including 48 percent of Republican and ➡️58 percent of Democratic
voters.'⬅️ https://www.newsweek.com/americans-warm-us-defense-taiwan-china-invades-1793738
(Or were YOU "mis"-informed?)
~ On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 8:17:11 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
.(Or were YOU "mis"-informed?)
.Do you think Russia is a greater threat ro the U.S. than China, Jerry? Do you think the U.S. is "committed
by treaty" to defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack?
We'll take all that dodging as a, YES..
I asked 'How do you come up with '60% of 56%'.
(Or were YOU "mis"-informed?)
We'll take all that dodging as a, YES..
Your sort-of question…
incoherent ….
if how you came up with…
It seems you can't answer…
Yes. Someone is dodging questions
~ On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 8:17:11 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
~ We'll take all that dodging as a, YES..
I asked 'How do you come up with '60% of 56%'. Your subsequent sort-of question is incoherent without an explanation if how you came up with '60% of 56%'. It seems you can't answer that question which makes your sort-of question null and void.
You ALSO won't answer if you think Russia is a greater threat to the U.S. than China and if you think the U.S. is "committed by treaty" to defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack.
Yes. Someone is dodging questions and it's you, not me.
On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 3:19:06 PM UTC-4, risky biz wrote:
~ On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 8:17:11 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
~ We'll take all that dodging as a, YES..
I asked 'How do you come up with '60% of 56%'. Your subsequent sort-of question is incoherent without an explanation if how you came up with '60% of 56%'. It seems you can't answer that question which makes your sort-of question null and void.
You ALSO won't answer if you think Russia is a greater threat to the U.S. than China and if you think the U.S. is "committed by treaty" to defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack.
Yes. Someone is dodging questions and it's you, not me.The first line is, "Fifty-six percent of respondents, including nearly six in 10 of those who voted either Republican or Democratic in the last presidential election..." is sloppily written, but could be read that way.
Trying to parse it, I get that there was a sub-population who voted either D or R. 60% of those people were in the 56% that approved hypothetical action in Taiwan.
On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 2:09:43 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:.
On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 3:19:06 PM UTC-4, risky biz wrote:
~ On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 8:17:11 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
~ We'll take all that dodging as a, YES..
I asked 'How do you come up with '60% of 56%'. Your subsequent sort-of question is incoherent without an explanation if how you came up with '60% of 56%'. It seems you can't answer that question which makes your sort-of question null and void.
You ALSO won't answer if you think Russia is a greater threat to the U.S. than China and if you think the U.S. is "committed by treaty" to defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack.
Yes. Someone is dodging questions and it's you, not me.The first line is, "Fifty-six percent of respondents, including nearly six in 10 of those who voted either Republican or Democratic in the last presidential election..." is sloppily written, but could be read that way.
Trying to parse it, I get that there was a sub-population who voted either D or R. 60% of those people were in the 56% that approved hypothetical action in Taiwan.
Bullshit poll.
Anyone with pretty much any IQ can see how us defending Taiwan from a Chinese invasaion is full on WW3..
And, I'm guessing pretty much nobody wants WW3 except maybe the people paid to rig this poll.
On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 3:19:06 PM UTC-4, risky biz wrote:
~ On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 8:17:11 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
~ We'll take all that dodging as a, YES..
I asked 'How do you come up with '60% of 56%'. Your subsequent sort-of question is incoherent without an explanation if how you came up with '60% of 56%'. It seems you can't answer that question which makes your sort-of question null and void.
You ALSO won't answer if you think Russia is a greater threat to the U.S. than China and if you think the U.S. is "committed by treaty" to defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack.
Yes. Someone is dodging questions and it's you, not me.
Trying to parse it, I get that there was a sub-population who voted either D or R. 60% of those people were in the 56% that approved hypothetical action in Taiwan.
On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 2:09:43 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:hypothetically, only 10 out of the 1,500 respondents.
On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 3:19:06 PM UTC-4, risky biz wrote:
~ On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 8:17:11 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
~ We'll take all that dodging as a, YES..
I asked 'How do you come up with '60% of 56%'. Your subsequent sort-of question is incoherent without an explanation if how you came up with '60% of 56%'. It seems you can't answer that question which makes your sort-of question null and void.
You ALSO won't answer if you think Russia is a greater threat to the U.S. than China and if you think the U.S. is "committed by treaty" to defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack.
~ The first line is, "Fifty-six percent of respondents, including nearly six in 10 of those who voted either Republican or Democratic in the last presidential election..." is sloppily written, but could be read that way.Yes. Someone is dodging questions and it's you, not me.
Trying to parse it, I get that there was a sub-population who voted either D or R. 60% of those people were in the 56% that approved hypothetical action in Taiwan.Only of it's read incorrectly. 56% is a percentage. '6 in 10' isn't expressed as a percentage of those who hypotherically approve of a Taiwan Strait intervention. It indicates a percentrage of those respondents who voted. That could have been,
Jerry's question:.
'So 60% of 56% voted for 1 of the 2 popular parties. A full 40% voted for someone other that the
Republican or Democrat? Who?'
It's incoherent.
He also doesn't seem to grasp that not voting Democrat or Republican most likely means....
Isn't it obvious why so many of his 'questons' aren't answered?
On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 7:11:36 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:hypothetically, only 10 out of the 1,500 respondents.
On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 2:09:43 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 3:19:06 PM UTC-4, risky biz wrote:
~ On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 8:17:11 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
~ We'll take all that dodging as a, YES..
I asked 'How do you come up with '60% of 56%'. Your subsequent sort-of question is incoherent without an explanation if how you came up with '60% of 56%'. It seems you can't answer that question which makes your sort-of question null and void.
You ALSO won't answer if you think Russia is a greater threat to the U.S. than China and if you think the U.S. is "committed by treaty" to defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack.
~ The first line is, "Fifty-six percent of respondents, including nearly six in 10 of those who voted either Republican or Democratic in the last presidential election..." is sloppily written, but could be read that way.Yes. Someone is dodging questions and it's you, not me.
Trying to parse it, I get that there was a sub-population who voted either D or R. 60% of those people were in the 56% that approved hypothetical action in Taiwan.Only of it's read incorrectly. 56% is a percentage. '6 in 10' isn't expressed as a percentage of those who hypotherically approve of a Taiwan Strait intervention. It indicates a percentrage of those respondents who voted. That could have been,
.
Jerry's question:
'So 60% of 56% voted for 1 of the 2 popular parties. A full 40% voted for someone other that the
Republican or Democrat? Who?'
It's incoherent..
Only to you, kid....
(Which is another reason *** you couldn't answer ***)
.
.
He also doesn't seem to grasp that not voting Democrat or Republican most likely means....
"... most likely means ..." Heh... "grasp" that...
.
.
.
someone didn't vote at all rather than that they voted for someone other than a Republican or Democrat.
Isn't it obvious why so many of his 'questons' aren't answered?
Or *** Knew you couldn't answer ***
.
.
~ On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 7:32:41 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
.Isn't it obvious why so many of his 'questons' aren't answered?
Yea, because "It's incoherent?" and you "couldn't grasp" it?
Or *** Knew you couldn't answer ***
.. a shitmess of words
.... which was nothing more ...
.... than an admission that Republicans who responded to this poll were better informed than Democrats who responded.
On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 11:04:54 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
~ On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 7:32:41 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:And you cut:
Isn't it obvious why so many of his 'questons' aren't answered?
.Yea, because "It's incoherent?" and you "couldn't grasp" it?
Or *** Knew you couldn't answer ***
.
.. a shitmess of wordsThat you thought was "incoherent?' And you "couldn't grasp?" and "couldn't answer?"
* LOL *
.... which was nothing more ...
Yea, we know...
.... than an admission that Republicans who responded to this poll were better informed than Democrats who responded.Yet you , *** Couldn't show ***
Heh..
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 1:18:12 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 11:04:54 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
~ On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 7:32:41 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:And you cut:
Isn't it obvious why so many of his 'questons' aren't answered?
.Yea, because "It's incoherent?" and you "couldn't grasp" it?
Or *** Knew you couldn't answer ***
.
.. a shitmess of wordsThat you thought was "incoherent?' And you "couldn't grasp?" and "couldn't answer?"
* LOL *
.... which was nothing more ...
Yea, we know...
..... than an admission that Republicans who responded to this poll were better informed than Democrats who responded.Yet you , *** Couldn't show ***
Heh..
I showed that EVERY single Republican who responded to that poll is better informed than you..
Turn off that MS☭NBC crap. The DemoQrats have turned your mind into an abandoned parking lot.
And keep running.
"It's incoherent,"
"I couldn't grasp it."
"I Can't answer it."
"It's meaningless!"
"It's too long!"
“A shitmess of words.”
“LOL”
“???”
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 2:55:54 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 1:18:12 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 11:04:54 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
~ On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 7:32:41 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:And you cut:
Isn't it obvious why so many of his 'questons' aren't answered?
.Yea, because "It's incoherent?" and you "couldn't grasp" it?
Or *** Knew you couldn't answer ***
.
.. a shitmess of wordsThat you thought was "incoherent?' And you "couldn't grasp?" and "couldn't answer?"
* LOL *
.... which was nothing more ...
Yea, we know...
.... than an admission that Republicans who responded to this poll wereYet you , *** Couldn't show ***
better informed than Democrats who responded.
.Heh..
I showed that EVERY single Republican who responded to that poll is better informed than you..
No, actually you didn’t. And you can’t show that you did..
.
I win.Turn off that MS☭NBC crap. The DemoQrats have turned your mind into an abandoned parking lot.
And keep running.Says the guy that runs… After posting:
"It's incoherent,"
"I couldn't grasp it."
"I Can't answer it."
"It's meaningless!"
"It's too long!"
“A shitmess of words.”
“LOL”
“???”
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 7:16:58 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 2:55:54 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 1:18:12 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 11:04:54 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
~ On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 7:32:41 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:And you cut:
Isn't it obvious why so many of his 'questons' aren't answered?
.Yea, because "It's incoherent?" and you "couldn't grasp" it?
Or *** Knew you couldn't answer ***
.
.. a shitmess of wordsThat you thought was "incoherent?' And you "couldn't grasp?" and "couldn't answer?"
* LOL *
.... which was nothing more ...
Yea, we know...
..... than an admission that Republicans who responded to this poll wereYet you , *** Couldn't show ***
better informed than Democrats who responded.
.Heh..
.I showed that EVERY single Republican who responded to that poll is better informed than you..
No, actually you didn’t. And you can’t show that you did..
.Turn off that MS☭NBC crap. The DemoQrats have turned your mind into an abandoned parking lot.
And keep running.Says the guy that runs… After posting:
"It's incoherent,"
"I couldn't grasp it."
"I Can't answer it."
"It's meaningless!"
"It's too long!"
“A shitmess of words.”
“LOL”
“???”
I win.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 17:18:48 |
| Calls: | 6,707 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,239 |
| Messages: | 5,351,358 |