To uphold the Constitution one must oppose Trump's candidacy:
|
| Section 3.
|
| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
|
<https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv>
--bks
On Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 4:02:58 PM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
To uphold the Constitution one must oppose Trump's candidacy:
|
| Section 3.
|
| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
|
<https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv>
--bks
Indeed
...
...| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
If you "believe" "guilt" before "trial" is the "truth" ... blab might be
an expert on such truths.
...
On 3/19/2023 8:25 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:...
...
...| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
If you "believe" "guilt" before "trial" is the "truth" ... blab might be >>> an expert on such truths.
...
You mean this trial?
|
| Four members of the far-right Oath Keepers group were
| convicted of seditious conspiracy Monday, joining founder
| Stewart Rhodes in being found guilty by a jury of plotting
| to keep President Donald Trump in power by force.
| ...
Well ... since you were talking about "Trump" ... you should not have >referenced "that" trial. (There are others too, you know ... maybe you
do not).
...
da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
...
...| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
If you "believe" "guilt" before "trial" is the "truth" ... blab might be
an expert on such truths.
...
You mean this trial?
|
| Four members of the far-right Oath Keepers group were
| convicted of seditious conspiracy Monday, joining founder
| Stewart Rhodes in being found guilty by a jury of plotting
| to keep President Donald Trump in power by force.
|
| Seditious conspiracy charges are rarely used and even more
| rarely successful, making the verdict a significant victory
| for the Justice Department. Of the nearly 1,000 people
| charged with committing crimes at the Capitol on Jan. 6,
| 2021, fewer than 20 were charged with seditious conspiracy,
| identified by the Justice Department as not just
| participants in a violent mob but also leaders using
| brutality to further a political plot.
| ... <https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/01/23/oathkeepers-verdict-seditious-conspiracy-jan6-guilty/>
--bks
da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
On 3/19/2023 8:25 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:...
...
...| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
If you "believe" "guilt" before "trial" is the "truth" ... blab might be >>>> an expert on such truths.
...
You mean this trial?
|
| Four members of the far-right Oath Keepers group were
| convicted of seditious conspiracy Monday, joining founder
| Stewart Rhodes in being found guilty by a jury of plotting
| to keep President Donald Trump in power by force.
| ...
Well ... since you were talking about "Trump" ... you should not have
referenced "that" trial. (There are others too, you know ... maybe you
do not).
...
What part of "seditious conspiracy" do you not understand?
--bks
da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
On 3/19/2023 8:25 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:...
...
...| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
If you "believe" "guilt" before "trial" is the "truth" ... blab might be >>>> an expert on such truths.
...
You mean this trial?
|
| Four members of the far-right Oath Keepers group were
| convicted of seditious conspiracy Monday, joining founder
| Stewart Rhodes in being found guilty by a jury of plotting
| to keep President Donald Trump in power by force.
| ...
Well ... since you were talking about "Trump" ... you should not have
referenced "that" trial. (There are others too, you know ... maybe you
do not).
...
What part of "seditious conspiracy" do you not understand?
--bks
......
...| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
When you reference the conviction of Trump, you will be correct and
making sense.
da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
......
...| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
When you reference the conviction of Trump, you will be correct and
making sense.
Stop making sh.t up. There's nothing in the amendment about
conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the
insurrection.
--bks
On 3/19/2023 1:27 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
......
...| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, >>>>>>>>> | or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a >>>>>>>>> | member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, >>>>>>>>> | or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive >>>>>>>>> | or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or >>>>>>>>> | comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote >>>>>>>>> | of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
When you reference the conviction of Trump, you will be correct and
making sense.
Stop making sh.t up. There's nothing in the amendment about
conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the
insurrection.
You are falling upon your own sword.
Why are they talking about an indictment?
da pickle <jcpi...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
......
...| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, >>>>>>> | or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a >>>>>>> | member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive >>>>>>> | or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or >>>>>>> | comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
When you reference the conviction of Trump, you will be correct and
making sense.
conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the
insurrection.
--bks
risky biz <swing...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 11:27:15 AM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote: >> da pickle <jcpi...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
......
...| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
When you reference the conviction of Trump, you will be correct and
making sense.
~ Stop making sh.t up. There's nothing in the amendment about
conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the
insurrection.
By your reasoning then, Joe Biden's candidacy is unconstitutional if 'everyone knows' he engaged in a seditious conspiracy.
Trump.
a citation, produce it.
--bks
On Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 11:27:15 AM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
da pickle <jcpi...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
......
...| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
When you reference the conviction of Trump, you will be correct and
making sense.
~ Stop making sh.t up. There's nothing in the amendment about
conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the
insurrection.
By your reasoning then, Joe Biden's candidacy is unconstitutional if 'everyone knows' he engaged in a seditious conspiracy.
.....
| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Those court verdicts of seditious conspiracy 'involved' every Democrat
in Congress, also. So their candidacies are unconstitutional?
...
risky biz <swing...@gmail.com> wrote:
.....
| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, >> >> >>>>>>> | or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a >> >> >>>>>>> | member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, >> >> >>>>>>> | or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive >> >> >>>>>>> | or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or >> >> >>>>>>> | comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote >> >> >>>>>>> | of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Those court verdicts of seditious conspiracy 'involved' every Democrat
in Congress, also. So their candidacies are unconstitutional?
...
| ...
| Four members of the far-right Oath Keepers group were
| convicted of seditious conspiracy Monday, joining founder
| Stewart Rhodes in being found guilty by a jury of plotting
| to keep President Donald Trump in power by force.
| ...
--bks
da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
On 3/19/2023 1:27 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
......
...| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, >>>>>>>>>> | or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a >>>>>>>>>> | member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, >>>>>>>>>> | or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive >>>>>>>>>> | or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in >>>>>>>>>> | insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or >>>>>>>>>> | comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote >>>>>>>>>> | of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
When you reference the conviction of Trump, you will be correct and
making sense.
Stop making sh.t up. There's nothing in the amendment about
conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the
insurrection.
You are falling upon your own sword.
Why are they talking about an indictment?
Who are "they"?
--bks
On Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 4:55:00 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
risky biz <swing...@gmail.com> wrote:If
.....
| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, >>>>>>>>>>>>> | or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any >>>>>>>>>>>>> | office, civil or military, under the United States, or >>>>>>>>>>>>> | under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a >>>>>>>>>>>>> | member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, >>>>>>>>>>>>> | or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive >>>>>>>>>>>>> | or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in >>>>>>>>>>>>> | insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or >>>>>>>>>>>>> | comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote >>>>>>>>>>>>> | of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Those court verdicts of seditious conspiracy 'involved' every Democrat
in Congress, also. So their candidacies are unconstitutional?
...
~ Bullshit. Read it again, slowly:
| ...
| Four members of the far-right Oath Keepers group were
| convicted of seditious conspiracy Monday, joining founder
| Stewart Rhodes in being found guilty by a jury of plotting
| to keep President Donald Trump in power by force.
| ...
--bks
Suggestion: stop doubling down on dense.
On Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 4:55:00 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
risky biz <swing...@gmail.com> wrote:
.....
| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, >> >> >>>>>>> | or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in >> >> >>>>>>> | insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote >> >> >>>>>>> | of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Those court verdicts of seditious conspiracy 'involved' every Democrat >in Congress, also. So their candidacies are unconstitutional?
...
~ Bullshit. Read it again, slowly:
| ...Suggestion: stop doubling down on dense.
| Four members of the far-right Oath Keepers group were
| convicted of seditious conspiracy Monday, joining founder
| Stewart Rhodes in being found guilty by a jury of plotting
| to keep President Donald Trump in power by force.
| ...
--bks
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 12:32:17 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 4:55:00 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote: >>> risky biz <swing...@gmail.com> wrote:
~ Bullshit. Read it again, slowly:.....
| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> | or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any >>>>>>>>>>>>>> | office, civil or military, under the United States, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> | under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> | member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> | or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive >>>>>>>>>>>>>> | or judicial officer of any state, to support the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> | insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> | comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote >>>>>>>>>>>>>> | of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Those court verdicts of seditious conspiracy 'involved' every Democrat >>>> in Congress, also. So their candidacies are unconstitutional?
...
| ...Suggestion: stop doubling down on dense.
| Four members of the far-right Oath Keepers group were
| convicted of seditious conspiracy Monday, joining founder
| Stewart Rhodes in being found guilty by a jury of plotting
| to keep President Donald Trump in power by force.
| ...
--bks
See, Bradley? He's going into the "Golly, you're 'dense' and it doesn't make 'sense,' running mode.
"Bradley K. Sherman" wrote in message news:tv55da$m3$1...@panix3.panix.com... To uphold the Constitution one must oppose Trump's candidacy:
|
| Section 3.
|
| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote
| of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
|
<https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv>
--bks
______________
At least you now understand why the Left uses that language.
Now you'll notice it every time you watch MSNBC and CNN.
"Bradley K. Sherman" wrote in message news:tv7k5s$1ro$2...@reader2.panix.com...
Stop making sh.t up. There's nothing in the amendment about
conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the
insurrection.
--bks
_________________
You're usually smarter than this.
"Bradley K. Sherman" wrote in message news:tv7k5s$1ro$2...@reader2.panix.com...
Stop making sh.t up. There's nothing in the amendment about
conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the
insurrection.
--bks
_________________
You're usually smarter than this.
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 12:11:37 PM UTC-4, Mossingen wrote:
"Bradley K. Sherman" wrote in message news:tv7k5s$1ro$2...@reader2.panix.com...
Stop making sh.t up. There's nothing in the amendment about
conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the
insurrection.
--bks
_________________
You're usually smarter than this.
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 12:11:37 PM UTC-4, Mossingen wrote:
"Bradley K. Sherman" wrote in message
news:tv7k5s$1ro$2...@reader2.panix.com...
Stop making sh.t up. There's nothing in the amendment about
conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the
insurrection.
You're usually smarter than this.
~ What does this clause mean? "or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."
It means there is a very good case to convict him. But he hasn't been yet.
...
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 12:11:37 PM UTC-4, Mossingen wrote:
"Bradley K. Sherman" wrote in message news:tv7k5s$1ro$2...@reader2.panix.com...
Stop making sh.t up. There's nothing in the amendment about
conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the insurrection.
--bks
_________________
~ What does this clause mean? "or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."You're usually smarter than this.
It means there is a very good case to convict him. But he hasn't been yet.
The time to act was January 7th, 2021:
'If George Washington had been commander of the Army on January 6th, 2021 Donald Trump would have been hanging by his neck from a rope on January 7th, 2021.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/bIPCc7XQ5T8/m/cCjvH65gAgAJ
On Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 12:54:35 AM UTC-4, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 12:11:37 PM UTC-4, Mossingen wrote:~ What does this clause mean? "or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."
"Bradley K. Sherman" wrote in message
news:tv7k5s$1ro$2...@reader2.panix.com...
Stop making sh.t up. There's nothing in the amendment about
conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the
insurrection.
--bks
_________________
You're usually smarter than this.
It means there is a very good case to convict him. But he hasn't been yet. >>
The time to act was January 7th, 2021:
'If George Washington had been commander of the Army on January 6th, 2021 Donald Trump would have been hanging by his neck from a rope on January 7th, 2021.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/bIPCc7XQ5T8/m/cCjvH65gAgAJ
That is my question. Does invoking that clause require a criminal case?
On Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 12:54:35 AM UTC-4, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 12:11:37 PM UTC-4, Mossingen wrote:
"Bradley K. Sherman" wrote in message news:tv7k5s$1ro$2...@reader2.panix.com...
Stop making sh.t up. There's nothing in the amendment about conviction. Everyone reading this knows Trump engaged in the insurrection.
--bks
_________________
~ What does this clause mean? "or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."You're usually smarter than this.
It means there is a very good case to convict him. But he hasn't been yet.
The time to act was January 7th, 2021:
'If George Washington had been commander of the Army on January 6th, 2021 Donald Trump would have been hanging by his neck from a rope on January 7th, 2021.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/bIPCc7XQ5T8/m/cCjvH65gAgAJ
| Section 3.
| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or <https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv>
At least you now understand why the Left uses that language. Now you'll notice it every time you watch MSNBC and CNN.
On March 20, Mossingen wrote:.
| Section 3.
| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or <https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv>
At least you now understand why the Left uses that language. Now you'll notice it every time you watch MSNBC and CNN.The Constitution is ambiguous whether 'officer' extends to
the president. All references to officers suggest they are
appointed by the president. He doesn't appoint himself.
If Drumpf runs, you can bet the legal beagles will go to
town on this question - more Drumpf theater, hurrah!
His reign was a continuous circus -
PS The Constitution doesn't disqualify a person from
moving the Oval Office to a jail cell.
--
Rich
On 3/20/2023 10:01 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 12:32:17 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 4:55:00 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote: >>>> risky biz <swing...@gmail.com> wrote:
~ Bullshit. Read it again, slowly:.....
| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | office, civil or military, under the United States, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | or as a member of any state legislature, or as an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aid or
| comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Those court verdicts of seditious conspiracy 'involved' every Democrat >>>>> in Congress, also. So their candidacies are unconstitutional?
...
| ...Suggestion: stop doubling down on dense.
| Four members of the far-right Oath Keepers group were
| convicted of seditious conspiracy Monday, joining founder
| Stewart Rhodes in being found guilty by a jury of plotting
| to keep President Donald Trump in power by force.
| ...
--bks
See, Bradley? He's going into the "Golly, you're 'dense' and it
doesn't make 'sense,' running mode.
The word "gullible" is NOT in the dictionary.
| Section 3.
| No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
| or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any
| office, civil or military, under the United States, or
| under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
| member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
| or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
| or judicial officer of any state, to support the
| Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
| insurrection or rebellion against the same, or
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 20:52:43 |
| Calls: | 6,707 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,239 |
| Messages: | 5,351,731 |