• Re: Does posting FRP FAQs still make sense?

    From lkh@21:1/5 to kyonshi on Mon Jan 15 13:27:57 2024
    kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> wrote:
    FAQs used to be a common part of the Usenet experience.
    rec.games.frp.misc never seems to have had one, although I saw a few
    examples of e.g. a Fudge FAQ when searching old messages.

    If you found those old FAQs maybe reposting them would be interesting?

    Outside of providing answers to frequently asked questions they often
    were good in establishing context and a common netiquette for the
    newsgroup.

    That's certainly true, however if there are no questions beeing asked?

    E.g. the rec.games.frp.cyber FAQ which establishes the whole tag system
    that the few posters using it still use http://www.faqs.org/faqs/games/roleplay/cyber-faq/

    Would it make sense to resume posting them, or has this idea just
    outlived itself? Most of the last ones I have found are from 20 years ago.

    So my vote would be, see how things develop. If traffic should pick up
    notably posting an updated FAQ now and then might even make sense.

    Until then, post some historical FAQs?

    --
    Laurens Kils-Hütten * lkh@sdf-eu.org * @lkh@social.sdfeu.org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alex Schroeder@21:1/5 to kyonshi on Tue Jan 16 08:02:22 2024
    kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> wrote:

    That is in fact the case, there are no frequent questions here because there's barely anything frequent.
    But that never was the problem with FAQs, a lot basically were just informational documents.

    Well, posting something as a FAQ might stir some flame warriors back into action and at least there’d be a discussion about the FAQ, perhaps.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)