• Surely this is wrong!

    From graham@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 26 22:06:50 2019
    XPost: alt.bread.recipes

    I've just been reading "Baking artisan bread with natural starters" by a
    Mark Friend. who, judging by the bio, is an authoritative figure in the
    bread world.
    He states that San Francisco sourdough starter is *stiff* whereas a
    French levain is at 100% hydration.
    Every other book I've read, as well as multiple posts in the bread and sourdough groups, state exactly the opposite.
    As forgiving as bread is, it doesn't give me much confidence in his
    recipes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Boron Elgar@21:1/5 to graham on Sun Oct 27 10:33:22 2019
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 22:06:50 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    I've just been reading "Baking artisan bread with natural starters" by a
    Mark Friend. who, judging by the bio, is an authoritative figure in the
    bread world.
    He states that San Francisco sourdough starter is *stiff* whereas a
    French levain is at 100% hydration.
    Every other book I've read, as well as multiple posts in the bread and >sourdough groups, state exactly the opposite.
    As forgiving as bread is, it doesn't give me much confidence in his
    recipes.


    Without context, the claim itself is not understandable. I do not know
    of any standards for SF SD or French levains.

    I take ALL bread making books with a grain of salt, from older ones to
    newer ones. So many of them develop a technique that works for them
    and their bakeries, and you know me- I do not believe any one of these
    guys has the True Path to Perfect Bread.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From graham@21:1/5 to Boron Elgar on Mon Oct 28 12:56:11 2019
    On 2019-10-27 8:33 a.m., Boron Elgar wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 22:06:50 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    I've just been reading "Baking artisan bread with natural starters" by a
    Mark Friend. who, judging by the bio, is an authoritative figure in the
    bread world.
    He states that San Francisco sourdough starter is *stiff* whereas a
    French levain is at 100% hydration.
    Every other book I've read, as well as multiple posts in the bread and
    sourdough groups, state exactly the opposite.
    As forgiving as bread is, it doesn't give me much confidence in his
    recipes.


    Without context, the claim itself is not understandable. I do not know
    of any standards for SF SD or French levains.

    I take ALL bread making books with a grain of salt, from older ones to
    newer ones. So many of them develop a technique that works for them
    and their bakeries, and you know me- I do not believe any one of these
    guys has the True Path to Perfect Bread.


    I agree with you and I'm generally pretty casual about the SD recipe
    that I often make up on the fly.
    However, his statement flew in the face of everything I've learned over
    the last 45+ years of bread baking. The French use a stiff, 60% levain
    that results in a more subtle flavour. The instructors at the local
    Alliance Française told me that they hated the SF type which is much
    sourer. The 100% hydration SF starter AIUI promotes the propagation of
    the bacteria whereas the 60% French levain promotes the yeast.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to graham on Mon Oct 28 18:32:27 2019
    On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 12:56:11 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2019-10-27 8:33 a.m., Boron Elgar wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 22:06:50 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    I've just been reading "Baking artisan bread with natural starters" by a >>> Mark Friend. who, judging by the bio, is an authoritative figure in the
    bread world.
    He states that San Francisco sourdough starter is *stiff* whereas a
    French levain is at 100% hydration.
    Every other book I've read, as well as multiple posts in the bread and
    sourdough groups, state exactly the opposite.
    As forgiving as bread is, it doesn't give me much confidence in his
    recipes.


    Without context, the claim itself is not understandable. I do not know
    of any standards for SF SD or French levains.

    I take ALL bread making books with a grain of salt, from older ones to
    newer ones. So many of them develop a technique that works for them
    and their bakeries, and you know me- I do not believe any one of these
    guys has the True Path to Perfect Bread.


    I agree with you and I'm generally pretty casual about the SD recipe
    that I often make up on the fly.
    However, his statement flew in the face of everything I've learned over
    the last 45+ years of bread baking. The French use a stiff, 60% levain
    that results in a more subtle flavour. The instructors at the local
    Alliance Française told me that they hated the SF type which is much
    sourer. The 100% hydration SF starter AIUI promotes the propagation of
    the bacteria whereas the 60% French levain promotes the yeast.

    I thought temperature was the main factor.

    https://aem.asm.org/content/aem/64/7/2616.full-text.pdf

    //The parameter estimates for the effect of temperature on the growth
    of L. sanfranciscensis and C. milleri determined in our work are in
    good agreement with literature data. Bocker et al. and Spicher
    reported that strains of L. sanfranciscensis have a T opt in the range
    between 30 and 37°C. C. milleri and S. exiguus do not grow at
    temperatures above 35°C. The observation that L. sanfranciscensis
    LTH2581 and LTH1729 and C. milleri LTH H198 exhibit the same response
    to temperatures below 26°C provides an explanation for the stable
    association of these organisms in a sourdough for more than 20 years.
    Our data are furthermore in agreement with the "baker's rule" that low temperatures during sourdough fermentations (20 to 26°C) are better
    for yeast growth than higher temperatures.//
    (references numbers removed)

    Lower temperatures = more yeast (mild).
    Higher temperatures = more bacteria (sour).
    (within reasonable limits, of course, or I'd be eating
    sulphuric acid grade sour - temp is 36C ATM)

    PS The document above courtesy of Samartha's webpage.
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From graham@21:1/5 to Shadow on Mon Oct 28 16:46:59 2019
    On 2019-10-28 3:32 p.m., Shadow wrote:
    On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 12:56:11 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2019-10-27 8:33 a.m., Boron Elgar wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 22:06:50 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    I've just been reading "Baking artisan bread with natural starters" by a >>>> Mark Friend. who, judging by the bio, is an authoritative figure in the >>>> bread world.
    He states that San Francisco sourdough starter is *stiff* whereas a
    French levain is at 100% hydration.
    Every other book I've read, as well as multiple posts in the bread and >>>> sourdough groups, state exactly the opposite.
    As forgiving as bread is, it doesn't give me much confidence in his >>>> recipes.


    Without context, the claim itself is not understandable. I do not know
    of any standards for SF SD or French levains.

    I take ALL bread making books with a grain of salt, from older ones to
    newer ones. So many of them develop a technique that works for them
    and their bakeries, and you know me- I do not believe any one of these
    guys has the True Path to Perfect Bread.


    I agree with you and I'm generally pretty casual about the SD recipe
    that I often make up on the fly.
    However, his statement flew in the face of everything I've learned over
    the last 45+ years of bread baking. The French use a stiff, 60% levain
    that results in a more subtle flavour. The instructors at the local
    Alliance Française told me that they hated the SF type which is much
    sourer. The 100% hydration SF starter AIUI promotes the propagation of
    the bacteria whereas the 60% French levain promotes the yeast.

    I thought temperature was the main factor.

    https://aem.asm.org/content/aem/64/7/2616.full-text.pdf

    //The parameter estimates for the effect of temperature on the growth
    of L. sanfranciscensis and C. milleri determined in our work are in
    good agreement with literature data. Bocker et al. and Spicher
    reported that strains of L. sanfranciscensis have a T opt in the range between 30 and 37°C. C. milleri and S. exiguus do not grow at
    temperatures above 35°C. The observation that L. sanfranciscensis
    LTH2581 and LTH1729 and C. milleri LTH H198 exhibit the same response
    to temperatures below 26°C provides an explanation for the stable association of these organisms in a sourdough for more than 20 years.
    Our data are furthermore in agreement with the "baker's rule" that low temperatures during sourdough fermentations (20 to 26°C) are better
    for yeast growth than higher temperatures.//
    (references numbers removed)

    Lower temperatures = more yeast (mild).
    Higher temperatures = more bacteria (sour).
    (within reasonable limits, of course, or I'd be eating
    sulphuric acid grade sour - temp is 36C ATM)

    PS The document above courtesy of Samartha's webpage.
    []'s

    Thanks!!!!! It has been a long time since I read Samartha!! Probably
    when this was a really active group.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Boron Elgar@21:1/5 to graham on Mon Oct 28 20:35:17 2019
    On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 12:56:11 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2019-10-27 8:33 a.m., Boron Elgar wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 22:06:50 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    I've just been reading "Baking artisan bread with natural starters" by a >>> Mark Friend. who, judging by the bio, is an authoritative figure in the
    bread world.
    He states that San Francisco sourdough starter is *stiff* whereas a
    French levain is at 100% hydration.
    Every other book I've read, as well as multiple posts in the bread and
    sourdough groups, state exactly the opposite.
    As forgiving as bread is, it doesn't give me much confidence in his
    recipes.


    Without context, the claim itself is not understandable. I do not know
    of any standards for SF SD or French levains.

    I take ALL bread making books with a grain of salt, from older ones to
    newer ones. So many of them develop a technique that works for them
    and their bakeries, and you know me- I do not believe any one of these
    guys has the True Path to Perfect Bread.


    I agree with you and I'm generally pretty casual about the SD recipe
    that I often make up on the fly.
    However, his statement flew in the face of everything I've learned over
    the last 45+ years of bread baking. The French use a stiff, 60% levain
    that results in a more subtle flavour. The instructors at the local
    Alliance Française told me that they hated the SF type which is much
    sourer. The 100% hydration SF starter AIUI promotes the propagation of
    the bacteria whereas the 60% French levain promotes the yeast.

    I think the sour tang comes as much from how the dough is
    made/fermented as much as from the starter.

    Now, I should add that I have made loaves that take 3-4 days to make
    and the initial starter can be enhanced or toned down that way.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dusty@21:1/5 to graham on Thu Oct 31 08:03:11 2019
    XPost: alt.bread.recipes

    On 26-Oct-19 21:06, graham wrote:
    I've just been reading "Baking artisan bread with natural starters" by a
    Mark Friend. who, judging by the bio, is an authoritative figure in the
    bread world.
    He states that San Francisco sourdough starter is *stiff* whereas a
    French levain is at 100% hydration.
    Every other book I've read, as well as multiple posts in the bread and sourdough groups, state exactly the opposite.
     As forgiving as bread is, it doesn't give me much confidence in his recipes.
    It's probably just me not having a clue, but that statement seems odd.
    In order to understand it, one needs to have a basis in % of hydration,
    for what "stiff" means. And in my admittedly sparse experience across
    the breadth and depth of the many ways to make sourdough bread, I've
    never run across such a comparison (at least not that I recollect in
    that manner).

    Take care and be well all,
    Dusty
    --
    "If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then
    you are doomed to live under the rule of fools."--Plato

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to boron_elgar@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 2 22:11:25 2019
    On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:35:17 -0400, Boron Elgar
    <boron_elgar@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 12:56:11 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2019-10-27 8:33 a.m., Boron Elgar wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 22:06:50 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    I've just been reading "Baking artisan bread with natural starters" by a >>>> Mark Friend. who, judging by the bio, is an authoritative figure in the >>>> bread world.
    He states that San Francisco sourdough starter is *stiff* whereas a
    French levain is at 100% hydration.
    Every other book I've read, as well as multiple posts in the bread and >>>> sourdough groups, state exactly the opposite.
    As forgiving as bread is, it doesn't give me much confidence in his
    recipes.


    Without context, the claim itself is not understandable. I do not know
    of any standards for SF SD or French levains.

    I take ALL bread making books with a grain of salt, from older ones to
    newer ones. So many of them develop a technique that works for them
    and their bakeries, and you know me- I do not believe any one of these
    guys has the True Path to Perfect Bread.


    I agree with you and I'm generally pretty casual about the SD recipe
    that I often make up on the fly.
    However, his statement flew in the face of everything I've learned over
    the last 45+ years of bread baking. The French use a stiff, 60% levain
    that results in a more subtle flavour. The instructors at the local >>Alliance Française told me that they hated the SF type which is much >>sourer. The 100% hydration SF starter AIUI promotes the propagation of
    the bacteria whereas the 60% French levain promotes the yeast.

    I think the sour tang comes as much from how the dough is
    made/fermented as much as from the starter.

    Dough is really just a "big" starter. The bugs in there have
    not developed tools yet to discover how big their "world" is, so they
    just carry on doing what they do,

    Now, I should add that I have made loaves that take 3-4 days to make
    and the initial starter can be enhanced or toned down that way.

    A mixture of flour/water/yeast/bacteria that takes 3-4 days to
    rise is probably in a cold environment. That would favor the yeast
    over the "sour" bacteria. IOW, would produce a mild taste.
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Boron Elgar@21:1/5 to Shadow on Sat Nov 2 21:46:42 2019
    On Sat, 02 Nov 2019 22:11:25 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:

    On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:35:17 -0400, Boron Elgar
    <boron_elgar@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 12:56:11 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2019-10-27 8:33 a.m., Boron Elgar wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 22:06:50 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    I've just been reading "Baking artisan bread with natural starters" by a >>>>> Mark Friend. who, judging by the bio, is an authoritative figure in the >>>>> bread world.
    He states that San Francisco sourdough starter is *stiff* whereas a
    French levain is at 100% hydration.
    Every other book I've read, as well as multiple posts in the bread and >>>>> sourdough groups, state exactly the opposite.
    As forgiving as bread is, it doesn't give me much confidence in his >>>>> recipes.


    Without context, the claim itself is not understandable. I do not know >>>> of any standards for SF SD or French levains.

    I take ALL bread making books with a grain of salt, from older ones to >>>> newer ones. So many of them develop a technique that works for them
    and their bakeries, and you know me- I do not believe any one of these >>>> guys has the True Path to Perfect Bread.


    I agree with you and I'm generally pretty casual about the SD recipe
    that I often make up on the fly.
    However, his statement flew in the face of everything I've learned over >>>the last 45+ years of bread baking. The French use a stiff, 60% levain >>>that results in a more subtle flavour. The instructors at the local >>>Alliance Française told me that they hated the SF type which is much >>>sourer. The 100% hydration SF starter AIUI promotes the propagation of >>>the bacteria whereas the 60% French levain promotes the yeast.

    I think the sour tang comes as much from how the dough is
    made/fermented as much as from the starter.

    Dough is really just a "big" starter. The bugs in there have
    not developed tools yet to discover how big their "world" is, so they
    just carry on doing what they do,

    What does that indicate?

    How one *creates* that final dough- the starter and any pre-ferments
    and the proportions of that in the final dough as well as time/temp
    variations on the dough are what can create the flavor.


    Now, I should add that I have made loaves that take 3-4 days to make
    and the initial starter can be enhanced or toned down that way.

    A mixture of flour/water/yeast/bacteria that takes 3-4 days to
    rise is probably in a cold environment. That would favor the yeast
    over the "sour" bacteria. IOW, would produce a mild taste.
    []'s

    It doesn't,as a final dough, take 3-4 days to rise.

    The final dough incorporates a series of pre-ferments which ultimately
    get incorporated into the final dough.

    The pre-ferments are at room temp, the final dough always spends some
    time in a fridge- for how long,though,depends on many things.

    I can make a loaf that is tangy or mild or sweet or savory and do it
    over 3-4 days. Depends on the ripeness of the starter(s) I use, the
    flours, the time and the temps.

    This ain't rocket science after all these years, but I have control
    over the taste of the final product.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From graham@21:1/5 to Boron Elgar on Sat Nov 2 21:35:06 2019
    On 2019-11-02 7:46 p.m., Boron Elgar wrote:
    On Sat, 02 Nov 2019 22:11:25 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:

    On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:35:17 -0400, Boron Elgar
    <boron_elgar@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 12:56:11 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2019-10-27 8:33 a.m., Boron Elgar wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 22:06:50 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote: >>>>>
    I've just been reading "Baking artisan bread with natural starters" by a >>>>>> Mark Friend. who, judging by the bio, is an authoritative figure in the >>>>>> bread world.
    He states that San Francisco sourdough starter is *stiff* whereas a >>>>>> French levain is at 100% hydration.
    Every other book I've read, as well as multiple posts in the bread and >>>>>> sourdough groups, state exactly the opposite.
    As forgiving as bread is, it doesn't give me much confidence in his >>>>>> recipes.


    Without context, the claim itself is not understandable. I do not know >>>>> of any standards for SF SD or French levains.

    I take ALL bread making books with a grain of salt, from older ones to >>>>> newer ones. So many of them develop a technique that works for them
    and their bakeries, and you know me- I do not believe any one of these >>>>> guys has the True Path to Perfect Bread.


    I agree with you and I'm generally pretty casual about the SD recipe
    that I often make up on the fly.
    However, his statement flew in the face of everything I've learned over >>>> the last 45+ years of bread baking. The French use a stiff, 60% levain >>>> that results in a more subtle flavour. The instructors at the local
    Alliance Française told me that they hated the SF type which is much
    sourer. The 100% hydration SF starter AIUI promotes the propagation of >>>> the bacteria whereas the 60% French levain promotes the yeast.

    I think the sour tang comes as much from how the dough is
    made/fermented as much as from the starter.

    Dough is really just a "big" starter. The bugs in there have
    not developed tools yet to discover how big their "world" is, so they
    just carry on doing what they do,

    What does that indicate?

    How one *creates* that final dough- the starter and any pre-ferments
    and the proportions of that in the final dough as well as time/temp variations on the dough are what can create the flavor.


    Now, I should add that I have made loaves that take 3-4 days to make
    and the initial starter can be enhanced or toned down that way.

    A mixture of flour/water/yeast/bacteria that takes 3-4 days to
    rise is probably in a cold environment. That would favor the yeast
    over the "sour" bacteria. IOW, would produce a mild taste.
    []'s

    It doesn't,as a final dough, take 3-4 days to rise.

    The final dough incorporates a series of pre-ferments which ultimately
    get incorporated into the final dough.

    The pre-ferments are at room temp, the final dough always spends some
    time in a fridge- for how long,though,depends on many things.

    I can make a loaf that is tangy or mild or sweet or savory and do it
    over 3-4 days. Depends on the ripeness of the starter(s) I use, the
    flours, the time and the temps.

    This ain't rocket science after all these years, but I have control
    over the taste of the final product.

    Can you produce a loaf with a thinnish crust? Yesterday, I gave a loaf
    of SD to a friend who suffers from IBS. She liked the bread but found
    the crust to be too thick and tough. It was a 66% hydration loaf but
    judging by the dough, the flour bin at the bulk store had been
    mis-labelled and was not a bread flour but softer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dick Adams@21:1/5 to T'was on Sat Nov 2 22:36:23 2019
    T'was said:

    I can make a loaf that is tangy or mild or sweet or savory and do it
    over 3-4 days. Depends on the ripeness of the starter(s) I use, the
    flours, the time and the temps.

    I cannot imagine 4 days. If I start starter refreshment this morning,
    I expect to bake the day after tomorrow in the morning, or, in the
    summertime, tomorrow evening.

    For instance: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10217949908807373&set=gm.334925257126208&type=3&theater

    Gas is lost through the dough surface, more for longer rise.

    Activity is easier to assess in a thicker starter, which rises,
    not just bubbles.

    Long rise gives more sour that oven push.

    So it seems to me, for what its worth.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Boron Elgar@21:1/5 to DickyA29@gmail.com on Sun Nov 3 09:43:19 2019
    On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 22:36:23 -0700 (PDT), Dick Adams
    <DickyA29@gmail.com> wrote:

    T'was said:

    I can make a loaf that is tangy or mild or sweet or savory and do it
    over 3-4 days. Depends on the ripeness of the starter(s) I use, the
    flours, the time and the temps.

    I cannot imagine 4 days. If I start starter refreshment this morning,
    I expect to bake the day after tomorrow in the morning, or, in the >summertime, tomorrow evening.

    For instance: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10217949908807373&set=gm.334925257126208&type=3&theater

    Sorry, I dropped FB years ago. Wish I could see it. Can you C&P it
    into a jpeg and tinypic a link?

    Gas is lost through the dough surface, more for longer rise.

    Do not think in terms of longer rise, because that makes you think of
    one dough rising for aeons. That isn't it. Think in terms of several pre-ferment stages.. Remember the cocodrillo, with two separate
    pre-ferments going at once (at least if I recall correctly)? That is a variation on this theme. Diff flours. Diff starters. Diff timings.

    Activity is easier to assess in a thicker starter, which rises,
    not just bubbles.

    Some of the pre-ferments will be lower hydration, some higher. Depends
    on the flours I am going to use.

    Long rise gives more sour that oven push.

    So it seems to me, for what its worth.


    For some loaves, I start with pre-ferment build(s), often with
    different flours, sometimes incorporating one into the next, sometimes
    just keeping one or two separate ones going by adding small amounts of
    flour.

    There is never one continuous build of one starter/flour/water over
    the time frame and that itself becomes the greatest portion of the
    main and final dough.

    I sometimes use 2-3 different starters and that will ultimately be
    mixed into one final dough, too - this is done over the course of
    those several pre-ferments.

    Most of this is done not to achieve tang, but to develop/deepen the
    flavor of each of the flours. It isn't something I do for all breads,
    either.

    And long rises CAN be managed to achieve tang, but that is usually for
    the final dough, and if one is careful and having "fun with chemistry"
    with all the starters and pre-ferments, one can produce a loaf without commercial yeast, without pronounced tang, but with a really complex,
    deep flavor.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Boron Elgar@21:1/5 to graham on Sun Nov 3 09:23:12 2019
    On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 21:35:06 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2019-11-02 7:46 p.m., Boron Elgar wrote:


    This ain't rocket science after all these years, but I have control
    over the taste of the final product.

    Can you produce a loaf with a thinnish crust? Yesterday, I gave a loaf
    of SD to a friend who suffers from IBS. She liked the bread but found
    the crust to be too thick and tough. It was a 66% hydration loaf but
    judging by the dough, the flour bin at the bulk store had been
    mis-labelled and was not a bread flour but softer.


    I have never tried to do that. My first thought would be softer
    flour, but that does not seem to do it as you mention it. My ryes and
    mixed grain breads have chewier crusts and plain white SD seems to
    have a thinner one, but I have never attributed it to anything other
    than the flours and whatever mix I am using. It is nothing I seek or
    plan for one way or the other.

    It would take experimentation in deviating from what you normally do.
    You might also google a bit for what's out there online these days
    about what makes a chewy crust and see if you can find any pattern
    that might prevent it.

    As we have spoken of in the past, freezing sometimes makes the outer
    crust slough off. Though that prevents fresh-baked loaves, maybe that
    is a work-around that could make the bread more palatable.

    I am absolutely clueless on this.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to graham on Tue Nov 5 14:41:37 2019
    On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 21:35:06 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    Can you produce a loaf with a thinnish crust?

    Oil will give you a softer bread with a thinner crust. Add
    olive (or soy) oil to the recipe. You can even spray oil on the dough
    before baking.

    Personally I like a crunchy crust, so I use little oil and
    spray the oven with water while baking (after the bread is "set" or it
    might collapse).

    Yesterday, I gave a loaf of SD to a friend who suffers from IBS.

    I don't think crusts affect IBS.
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From graham@21:1/5 to Shadow on Tue Nov 5 11:29:48 2019
    On 2019-11-05 10:41 a.m., Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 21:35:06 -0600, graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    Can you produce a loaf with a thinnish crust?

    Oil will give you a softer bread with a thinner crust. Add
    olive (or soy) oil to the recipe. You can even spray oil on the dough
    before baking.

    Personally I like a crunchy crust, so I use little oil and
    spray the oven with water while baking (after the bread is "set" or it
    might collapse).

    Yesterday, I gave a loaf of SD to a friend who suffers from IBS.

    I don't think crusts affect IBS.
    []'s

    That wasn't the point. She is very fussy and only white SD would do. She
    liked the flavour but found the crust too tough.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)