3/4/2024 5:39 PM, Steve Wertz wrote:
I regret to inform you that I have already removed H-E-B
Prepaid (NOT a mis-spelling) from the list of defendants.
See attached. Service had already been sent out before
the judge approved my motion to remove H-E-B from the
case.
Netspend, Inc had already sent enough letterhead to the
courts and myself personally to reasonably admit taking
credit for this charade and exclude your client from from
the case. I felt it prudent and expedient to give you a
pass for now. The case has already been set for a
hearing on April 12th.
My dismissing H-E-B Prepaid does not revolve your client
of any liability in the least. Should I miraculously
lose this charade, you will definitely see me again. I
still urge you you to actually LOOK at the evidence, and
heaven forbid, D The Right Thing and encourage H-E-B to
make good on their contracts with myself. And that
includes the Prepaid Contract. Because there is a lot
more at stake since the original contract regarding the
effects of the pharmacy incident.
You should just intervene now in the best interests of
your client. It's so simple to do the right thing and
make this go away (again). I'm already documenting this
in a Internet Forum dear to H-E-B. There will be no
take-downs per any agreements.
Sincerely,
Steven Wertz
We can remove H-E-B Prepaid as a defendant in this case
since Netspend has responded acknowledging their part.
And since San Antonio is dicking me around on serving the
other party (HEB).
I'd like to set it on the calendar for a hearing ASAP.
I'm ready. No discovery or motions from me.
On 2/20/2024 1:00 PM, Steve Wertz wrote:
I just received defendants answer. I would like to
modify the monetary value of the claim since evidence
has come to light after I filed the original petition.
Can I do that in open court/hearing or do I need to
submit a revised petition? How informal is this?
The defendant did not indicate I could communicate with
them electronically, unlike I graciously indicated upon
myself. Do I have to formally service them again on any
revisions to the petition (if the above is not generally
considered?)
If I can petition for modification of damages in open
court, lets put it on the calendar. No other motions or
discovery needed. They must have bumped their widdle
heads.
-sw
Subject:
Re: CAUSE NO. J3-CV-24-000232
From:
Steve Wertz <sqwertzme@gmail.com>
Date:
3/5/2024, 2:44 AM
To:
Alexis Adams <aadams@satx.law>, vcarrasco@ouro.com,
sperkins@netspend.com, JP3Civil
<JP3Civil@traviscountytx.gov>
I've been advised to re-instate H-E-B as a defendant after
our graciously removing them from the complaint.
I am sorry to waste the court's time on this again. I'm also
including my prior conversation (below) with your office for
the defendants' knowledge and have CC'd them on this
message.
Bryan, I don't see your salsa any more. Pick another one,
from heb.com and make it quick!
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 12:50:41 |
Calls: | 6,667 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,214 |
Messages: | 5,336,511 |