On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 4:21:43 PM UTC-10, Ed P wrote:For a great many people in the Pacific, it's the Hawaiians that were the heroes.
https://imgur.com/gallery/j7WZcJV
For the Hawaiians and much of Polynesia, Cap'n Cook isn't much of a heroic figure. Who can blame them? Some alien comes to your town bringing diseases and death. The alien knows that this is going to kill off a lot of natives but he just didn't care.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agsiFcRGAQo
On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 4:21:43 PM UTC-10, Ed P wrote:For a great many people in the Pacific, it's the Hawaiians that were the heroes.
https://imgur.com/gallery/j7WZcJV
For the Hawaiians and much of Polynesia, Cap'n Cook isn't much of a heroic figure. Who can blame them? Some alien comes to your town bringing diseases and death. The alien knows that this is going to kill off a lot of natives but he just didn't care.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agsiFcRGAQo
On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 10:25:48 AM UTC-10, Cindy Hamilton wrote:For a great many people in the Pacific, it's the Hawaiians that were the heroes.
On 2024-02-15, dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 4:21:43 PM UTC-10, Ed P wrote:
https://imgur.com/gallery/j7WZcJV
For the Hawaiians and much of Polynesia, Cap'n Cook isn't much of a heroic figure. Who can blame them? Some alien comes to your town bringing diseases and death. The alien knows that this is going to kill off a lot of natives but he just didn't care.
It doesn't matter who the heroes were. Guns, germs, and steel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agsiFcRGAQo
carried the day.
--
Cindy Hamilton
You're wrong about that. It was rocks, wooden spears, and knives given to the Hawaiians by Cook, that carried the day.
On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 9:00:48 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:For a great many people in the Pacific, it's the Hawaiians that were the heroes.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:28:02 -0800 (PST), dsi1
<dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
For the Hawaiians and much of Polynesia, Cap'n Cook isn't much of a heroic figure. Who can blame them? Some alien comes to your town bringing diseases and death. The alien knows that this is going to kill off a lot of natives but he just didn't care.
their Kingdom.On 26 January 1788, Captain Cook first set foot on Australian soil.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agsiFcRGAQo
Chinese, Portuguese and Dutch had already been here, but didn't hang
around. January 26 is now a national holiday in Australia. It's called
Australia Day. Indigenous people and those on their side call the day
Invasion Day and want the date of Australia Day changed. I couldn't
agree more.
A lot of native Hawaiians are reluctant to call themselves "Americans." Things were a lot simpler back in the days when the history of the Kingdom of Hawaii was suppressed. My guess is that in the future, the Hawaiians will gain back the sovereignty of
Breakfast this morning was crepes. It was okay, I guess. I haven't made crepes since I was in high school. These were filled with sliced banana. If I had some Nutella, I'd have spread that on too. Nutella and bananas seem to be a thing in the US.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/ZweTUeM3xCqiGXDY7
On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 9:00:48 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:For a great many people in the Pacific, it's the Hawaiians that were the heroes.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:28:02 -0800 (PST), dsi1
<dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 4:21:43 PM UTC-10, Ed P wrote:
https://imgur.com/gallery/j7WZcJV
For the Hawaiians and much of Polynesia, Cap'n Cook isn't much of a heroic figure. Who can blame them? Some alien comes to your town bringing diseases and death. The alien knows that this is going to kill off a lot of natives but he just didn't care.
their Kingdom.On 26 January 1788, Captain Cook first set foot on Australian soil.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agsiFcRGAQo
Chinese, Portuguese and Dutch had already been here, but didn't hang
around. January 26 is now a national holiday in Australia. It's called
Australia Day. Indigenous people and those on their side call the day
Invasion Day and want the date of Australia Day changed. I couldn't
agree more.
A lot of native Hawaiians are reluctant to call themselves "Americans." Things were a lot simpler back in the days when the history of the Kingdom of Hawaii was suppressed. My guess is that in the future, the Hawaiians will gain back the sovereignty of
On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 11:16:12 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:care. For a great many people in the Pacific, it's the Hawaiians that were the heroes.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:31:44 -0800 (PST), dsi1
<dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 9:00:48 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:28:02 -0800 (PST), dsi1
<dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
For the Hawaiians and much of Polynesia, Cap'n Cook isn't much of a heroic figure. Who can blame them? Some alien comes to your town bringing diseases and death. The alien knows that this is going to kill off a lot of natives but he just didn't
of their Kingdom.On 26 January 1788, Captain Cook first set foot on Australian soil.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agsiFcRGAQo
Chinese, Portuguese and Dutch had already been here, but didn't hang
around. January 26 is now a national holiday in Australia. It's called
Australia Day. Indigenous people and those on their side call the day
Invasion Day and want the date of Australia Day changed. I couldn't
agree more.
A lot of native Hawaiians are reluctant to call themselves "Americans." Things were a lot simpler back in the days when the history of the Kingdom of Hawaii was suppressed. My guess is that in the future, the Hawaiians will gain back the sovereignty
have changed. A lot of people no longer have faith in our process of electing leaders or our constitution. My guess is our union is too far gone to survive.Most of the time countries refuse to give up any land area. They'd
Breakfast this morning was crepes. It was okay, I guess. I haven't made crepes since I was in high school. These were filled with sliced banana. If I had some Nutella, I'd have spread that on too. Nutella and bananas seem to be a thing in the US.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/ZweTUeM3xCqiGXDY7
rather go to war to increase their land area. The US and Europe don't
do that anymore, but why would the US let go of Hawaii?
Is that whipped cream or ice cream?
The Soviet Union broke apart into different countries. Didn't the UK break apart from the EU? Didn't Ireland break apart from the UK and Northern Ireland? The US could break apart into separate states too. This was unthinkable a decade ago but things
That's whipped cream and caramel sauce. Americans like their pancakes on the sweet side.
On 2024-02-15, dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 4:21:43 PM UTC-10, Ed P wrote:
https://imgur.com/gallery/j7WZcJV
For the Hawaiians and much of Polynesia, Cap'n Cook isn't much of a
heroic figure. Who can blame them? Some alien comes to your town
bringing diseases and death. The alien knows that this is going to
kill off a lot of natives but he just didn't care. For a great many
people in the Pacific, it's the Hawaiians that were the heroes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agsiFcRGAQo
It doesn't matter who the heroes were. Guns, germs, and steel
carried the day.
On 2024-02-15, dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:For a great many people in the Pacific, it's the Hawaiians that were the heroes.
On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 10:25:48 AM UTC-10, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-15, dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 4:21:43 PM UTC-10, Ed P wrote:
https://imgur.com/gallery/j7WZcJV
For the Hawaiians and much of Polynesia, Cap'n Cook isn't much of a heroic figure. Who can blame them? Some alien comes to your town bringing diseases and death. The alien knows that this is going to kill off a lot of natives but he just didn't care.
It doesn't matter who the heroes were. Guns, germs, and steel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agsiFcRGAQo
carried the day.
--
Cindy Hamilton
You're wrong about that. It was rocks, wooden spears, and knives given to the Hawaiians by Cook, that carried the day.
I meant in the long run.
https://imgur.com/gallery/j7WZcJV
On Friday 16 February 2024 at 03:00:48 UTC+8, Bruce wrote:For a great many people in the Pacific, it's the Hawaiians that were the heroes.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:28:02 -0800 (PST), dsi1
<dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
For the Hawaiians and much of Polynesia, Cap'n Cook isn't much of a heroic figure. Who can blame them? Some alien comes to your town bringing diseases and death. The alien knows that this is going to kill off a lot of natives but he just didn't care.
be changed, it has changed several times over the years. A large section of the Australian public is racist, either overtly or passively, after all the majority of Australians don't even want the first people recognised in the Constitution.On 26 January 1788, Captain Cook first set foot on Australian soil.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agsiFcRGAQo
Chinese, Portuguese and Dutch had already been here, but didn't hang
around. January 26 is now a national holiday in Australia. It's called
Australia Day. Indigenous people and those on their side call the day
Invasion Day and want the date of Australia Day changed. I couldn't
agree more.
Captain Cook landed in Australia 29th April 1770. 26th January 1788 was the date the first fleet landed at Sydney Cove and planted the flag to claim the land, having first arrived at Botany Bay on 20th January 1788. Yes the date of Australia Day should
If you're referring to the The Voice referendum, for which I voted
Yes, I don't think all No voters are racists. It was presented and
explained poorly and most people didn't really know what a Yes would
mean.
Bruce wrote:
...
If you're referring to the The Voice referendum, for which I voted
Yes, I don't think all No voters are racists. It was presented and
explained poorly and most people didn't really know what a Yes would
mean.
i think the constitution should be color blind (as it
should also not be dealing in religion) so to me having
some element of society set apart in a constitution adds
an element of class to the whole thing and that should
always be avoided.
Bruce wrote:
...
If you're referring to the The Voice referendum, for which I voted
Yes, I don't think all No voters are racists. It was presented and
explained poorly and most people didn't really know what a Yes would
mean.
i think the constitution should be color blind (as it
should also not be dealing in religion) so to me having
some element of society set apart in a constitution adds
an element of class to the whole thing and that should
always be avoided.
songbirdSpending money is a religious experience. It is stamped with "In God We
On Friday 16 February 2024 at 14:37:56 UTC+8, Bruce wrote:care. For a great many people in the Pacific, it's the Hawaiians that were the heroes.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:40:49 -0800 (PST), Golden One
<jpb...@westnet.com.au> wrote:
On Friday 16 February 2024 at 03:00:48 UTC+8, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:28:02 -0800 (PST), dsi1
<dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
For the Hawaiians and much of Polynesia, Cap'n Cook isn't much of a heroic figure. Who can blame them? Some alien comes to your town bringing diseases and death. The alien knows that this is going to kill off a lot of natives but he just didn't
should be changed, it has changed several times over the years. A large section of the Australian public is racist, either overtly or passively, after all the majority of Australians don't even want the first people recognised in the Constitution.On 26 January 1788, Captain Cook first set foot on Australian soil.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agsiFcRGAQo
Chinese, Portuguese and Dutch had already been here, but didn't hang
around. January 26 is now a national holiday in Australia. It's called
Australia Day. Indigenous people and those on their side call the day
Invasion Day and want the date of Australia Day changed. I couldn't
agree more.
Captain Cook landed in Australia 29th April 1770. 26th January 1788 was the date the first fleet landed at Sydney Cove and planted the flag to claim the land, having first arrived at Botany Bay on 20th January 1788. Yes the date of Australia Day
deliveries about 2 hours inland where it hit 53C. You won't see that temperature recorded anywhere, they don't have an official recorder.I stand corrected.
If you're referring to the The Voice referendum, for which I voted
Yes, I don't think all No voters are racists. It was presented and
explained poorly and most people didn't really know what a Yes would
mean.
I voted yes, too. I guess it depends where you live as to how much racism you see. I live in the midwest of WA where racism is rampant. Some people have no compunction about saying the most vile things openly.
Meanwhile, I don't know if I am going to make it through summer without melting. Hottest Feb on record. So far about 12 days over 40C, 8 of those 46+, topped out yesterday at 49.5, already 44 at 8.30 this morning. Yesterday I did some Foodbank
Had a fabulous kitchen sink salad for dinner, topped with grilled squid and a Thai inspired dressing of my own invention.
On Friday 16 February 2024 at 14:37:56 UTC+8, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:40:49 -0800 (PST), Golden One <jpb...@westnet.com.au> wrote:
If you're referring to the The Voice referendum, for which I voted
Yes, I don't think all No voters are racists. It was presented and explained poorly and most people didn't really know what a Yes
would mean.
I voted yes, too. I guess it depends where you live as to how much
racism you see. I live in the midwest of WA where racism is rampant.
Some people have no compunction about saying the most vile things
openly.
Meanwhile, I don't know if I am going to make it through summer
without melting. Hottest Feb on record. So far about 12 days over
40C, 8 of those 46+, topped out yesterday at 49.5, already 44 at 8.30
this morning. Yesterday I did some Foodbank deliveries about 2 hours
inland where it hit 53C. You won't see that temperature recorded
anywhere, they don't have an official recorder.
Had a fabulous kitchen sink salad for dinner, topped with grilled
squid and a Thai inspired dressing of my own invention.
JB
Those temperatures are terrible. I don't think anybody in Australia,
from farmers to greens, still denies climate change.
On 2024-02-19, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Those temperatures are terrible. I don't think anybody in Australia,
from farmers to greens, still denies climate change.
Nor did any of our ancient ancestors. They called it "the weather".
Starting in the mid-Seventies, meteorologists started calling themselves >climatologists and needed a cause. First, it was global cooling. I lost
my first career to that. Then, it was global warming. That didn't work
out well either.
So, now it's climate change. No Sh*t! The climate has experienced
continuous change since the planet formed. They can't go wrong with
that. Send them money! Promote the cause! After all, they're
"scientists", and junk science is a political win-win.
On 19 Feb 2024 21:13:40 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 2024-02-19, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Those temperatures are terrible. I don't think anybody in Australia,
from farmers to greens, still denies climate change.
Nor did any of our ancient ancestors. They called it "the weather". >>Starting in the mid-Seventies, meteorologists started calling themselves >>climatologists and needed a cause. First, it was global cooling. I lost
my first career to that. Then, it was global warming. That didn't work
out well either.
So, now it's climate change. No Sh*t! The climate has experienced >>continuous change since the planet formed. They can't go wrong with
that. Send them money! Promote the cause! After all, they're
"scientists", and junk science is a political win-win.
Back to Fox News with you, Leo.
On 2024-02-19, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 19 Feb 2024 21:13:40 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell >><leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Nor did any of our ancient ancestors. They called it "the weather". >>>Starting in the mid-Seventies, meteorologists started calling themselves >>>climatologists and needed a cause. First, it was global cooling. I lost >>>my first career to that. Then, it was global warming. That didn't work >>>out well either.
So, now it's climate change. No Sh*t! The climate has experienced >>>continuous change since the planet formed. They can't go wrong with
that. Send them money! Promote the cause! After all, they're >>>"scientists", and junk science is a political win-win.
Back to Fox News with you, Leo.
Yeah, I thought about telling him the difference between climate
and weather, but concluded it was pointless.
On 2024-02-19, Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
Yeah, I thought about telling him the difference between climate
and weather, but concluded it was pointless.
It's all a matter of time and prognostication. Have you visited Zoltar >lately? Your money would be better spent.
On 2024-02-19 4:13 p.m., Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
Nor did any of our ancient ancestors. They called it "the weather".
Starting in the mid-Seventies, meteorologists started calling themselves
climatologists and needed a cause. First, it was global cooling. I lost
my first career to that. Then, it was global warming. That didn't work
out well either.
So, now it's climate change. No Sh*t! The climate has experienced
continuous change since the planet formed. They can't go wrong with
that. Send them money! Promote the cause! After all, they're
"scientists", and junk science is a political win-win.
I am not denying that things seem to be getting warmer and the polar
ice caps are receding. I am just not sure what the cause is. We live on
a planet that is full of molten material and apparently undergoing
nuclear reactions, and at the same time it is subject to the endless
emission of light (energy/heat) from the sun. Fifteen thousand years ago >there were glaciers practically in my back yard
On 2024-02-19, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Those temperatures are terrible. I don't think anybody in Australia,
from farmers to greens, still denies climate change.
Nor did any of our ancient ancestors. They called it "the weather".
Starting in the mid-Seventies, meteorologists started calling themselves climatologists and needed a cause. First, it was global cooling. I lost
my first career to that. Then, it was global warming. That didn't work
out well either.
So, now it's climate change. No Sh*t! The climate has experienced
continuous change since the planet formed. They can't go wrong with
that. Send them money! Promote the cause! After all, they're
"scientists", and junk science is a political win-win.
We burn about 100 million tons of fuel every day for about 100 years.
Think that may do something?
On 2024-02-19 4:13 p.m., Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-19, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Those temperatures are terrible. I don't think anybody in Australia,
from farmers to greens, still denies climate change.
Nor did any of our ancient ancestors. They called it "the weather".
Starting in the mid-Seventies, meteorologists started calling themselves
climatologists and needed a cause. First, it was global cooling. I lost
my first career to that. Then, it was global warming. That didn't work
out well either.
So, now it's climate change. No Sh*t! The climate has experienced
continuous change since the planet formed. They can't go wrong with
that. Send them money! Promote the cause! After all, they're
"scientists", and junk science is a political win-win.
I am not denying that things seem to be getting warmer and the polar
ice caps are receding. I am just not sure what the cause is. We live on
a planet that is full of molten material and apparently undergoing
nuclear reactions, and at the same time it is subject to the endless
emission of light (energy/heat) from the sun. Fifteen thousand years ago there were glaciers practically in my back yard and they have been
receding every since. Over the last couple thousand years there have
been mini ice ages. It is not as if this is something new to us.
Yeah, I thought about telling him the difference between climate
and weather, but concluded it was pointless.
On 2024-02-19, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Those temperatures are terrible. I don't think anybody in Australia,
from farmers to greens, still denies climate change.
Nor did any of our ancient ancestors. They called it "the weather".
Starting in the mid-Seventies, meteorologists started calling themselves climatologists and needed a cause. First, it was global cooling. I lost
my first career to that. Then, it was global warming. That didn't work
out well either.
So, now it's climate change. No Sh*t! The climate has experienced
continuous change since the planet formed. They can't go wrong with
that. Send them money! Promote the cause! After all, they're
"scientists", and junk science is a political win-win.
On 2024-02-19 4:13 p.m., Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-19, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Those temperatures are terrible. I don't think anybody in
Australia, from farmers to greens, still denies climate change.
Nor did any of our ancient ancestors. They called it "the weather". Starting in the mid-Seventies, meteorologists started calling
themselves climatologists and needed a cause. First, it was global
cooling. I lost my first career to that. Then, it was global
warming. That didn't work out well either.
So, now it's climate change. No Sh*t! The climate has experienced continuous change since the planet formed. They can't go wrong with
that. Send them money! Promote the cause! After all, they're
"scientists", and junk science is a political win-win.
I am not denying that things seem to be getting warmer and the polar
ice caps are receding. I am just not sure what the cause is. We live
on a planet that is full of molten material and apparently undergoing
nuclear reactions, and at the same time it is subject to the endless
emission of light (energy/heat) from the sun. Fifteen thousand years
ago there were glaciers practically in my back yard and they have
been receding every since. Over the last couple thousand years there
have been mini ice ages. It is not as if this is something new to us.
On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 3:26:58 PM UTC-5, cshenk wrote:
Golden One wrote:
On Friday 16 February 2024 at 14:37:56 UTC+8, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:40:49 -0800 (PST), Golden One <jpb...@westnet.com.au> wrote:
If you're referring to the The Voice referendum, for which I
voted Yes, I don't think all No voters are racists. It was
presented and explained poorly and most people didn't really
know what a Yes would mean.
I voted yes, too. I guess it depends where you live as to howThis true but some folks live with their head in the sand and
much racism you see. I live in the midwest of WA where racism is
rampant. Some people have no compunction about saying the most
vile things openly.
that's true everywhere.
Meanwhile, I don't know if I am going to make it through summerOuch! I've never benn to austrailia in full summer nor inland.
without melting. Hottest Feb on record. So far about 12 days over
40C, 8 of those 46+, topped out yesterday at 49.5, already 44 at
8.30 this morning. Yesterday I did some Foodbank deliveries about
2 hours inland where it hit 53C. You won't see that temperature
recorded anywhere, they don't have an official recorder.
Darwin normally for me as the US Navy ships types that pull in
there are Amphibious assault types.
Whoa, Carol there you go, again. Wait a minute, now. Lets get this straight. Why do you keep talking about that stone age, Neanderthal
crap? All that 60s military stuff is now obsolete. Nothing more to
it. Nothing, more. Zip. Nada. Zilch. Everything now is robot,
drone guided, unmanned. Everyone stays in a trailer somewhere in
Florida. Look, Carol: its like ... I don't know: seeing chainsaws
with one or two small attachments flying through the air. That's all
the military is now. Those 'nam days are gone forever. I don't know
how many times I had to tell my Paw that, too.
I did 7 years homeported in Sabebo Japan on
2 amphibs, so saw Darwin a fair amount.
Had a fabulous kitchen sink salad for dinner, topped with grilled
squid and a Thai inspired dressing of my own invention.
JBGrin, welcome and if you want to keep posting, you'll neew to join
Eternal Sseptember and pickup a newsreader.
Its a few other ones, and like for $10 or $12 bucks a year to get
full usenet reading and posting. I even hear its less than that, now.
Thunderbird is most common but more complex to set up. Xananews
pretty much works out of the box but a heck of a lot easier to
setup. It's just as flexible and both are still currently
supported.
I can't believe you wouldn't mention Giganews or, well yeah, Eternal September. Oh Hey Carol also, over on Reddit, they're talking about
other Usenet providers at this website: --
Dave Smith wrote:
I am not denying that things seem to be getting warmer and the polar
ice caps are receding. I am just not sure what the cause is. We live
on a planet that is full of molten material and apparently undergoing
nuclear reactions, and at the same time it is subject to the endless
emission of light (energy/heat) from the sun. Fifteen thousand years
ago there were glaciers practically in my back yard and they have
been receding every since. Over the last couple thousand years there
have been mini ice ages. It is not as if this is something new to us.
I suspect we are in a mini-warming period.
His mind is made up. I guess this is what happens after watching only
Fox News for who knows how many years and getting the same nonsense
repeated and confirmed all that time.
I am not denying that things seem to be getting warmer and the polar
ice caps are receding. I am just not sure what the cause is. We live on
a planet that is full of molten material and apparently undergoing
nuclear reactions, and at the same time it is subject to the endless
emission of light (energy/heat) from the sun. Fifteen thousand years ago there were glaciers practically in my back yard and they have been
receding every since. Over the last couple thousand years there have
been mini ice ages. It is not as if this is something new to us.
On 2024-02-19, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
His mind is made up. I guess this is what happens after watching only
Fox News for who knows how many years and getting the same nonsense
repeated and confirmed all that time.
Do you still believe in Trump/Russia collusion? It has been thoroughly >debunked. That's four years of your life believing a delusion.
Do you think that Hunter's laptop was a conspiracy? I'm told [and have
never checked!] that you can see his "junk" online. I see him with a >crack-pipe in his mouth, passed out on Fox News. They blur the "junk"
pics.
Do you see any if this, or are your "news sources" protecting your
delicate sensibilities from reality?
Now Biden/Ukraine collusion is a very different story. Let's start with
him boasting about how he got a Ukrainian prosecutor fired on live TV
while Vice-President. OOps!
But I think one of the following will happen:
1. Politicians go over board with the martyrdom and sacrifice, so quality
of life for the common man and the financial destruction due to climate policys become so severe, that the public flips out and elects a dictator
who says "f*ck this" and goes too far in the other direction with
punishment of the climate priests and too few environmental laws and only focusing on industry.
2. Politicians realize that we cannot achieve our climate goals with sacrifice, and they also realize they were wrong, and the issue will just "fade out" and everyone continues as usual. Only a few fanatics will harp
on it but will be largely ignored. Climate change was a power grab by politicians, but the sacrifices weretoo severe so they dropped it.
3. Science will catch up with climate goals, and enable us to achieve them without too many sacrifices. Then the hysterics will be ignored, and the world will move on.
Given the authoritarian trend in europe I fear 1 in the near term but I
hope for a combination of 2 and 3.
On 2024-02-20, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
But I think one of the following will happen:
1. Politicians go over board with the martyrdom and sacrifice, so quality
of life for the common man and the financial destruction due to climate
policys become so severe, that the public flips out and elects a dictator
who says "f*ck this" and goes too far in the other direction with
punishment of the climate priests and too few environmental laws and only
focusing on industry.
2. Politicians realize that we cannot achieve our climate goals with
sacrifice, and they also realize they were wrong, and the issue will just
"fade out" and everyone continues as usual. Only a few fanatics will harp
on it but will be largely ignored. Climate change was a power grab by
politicians, but the sacrifices weretoo severe so they dropped it.
3. Science will catch up with climate goals, and enable us to achieve them >> without too many sacrifices. Then the hysterics will be ignored, and the
world will move on.
Given the authoritarian trend in europe I fear 1 in the near term but I
hope for a combination of 2 and 3.
The pendulum swings. It's tending to far-left now. Nobody likes the
middle.
On 2024-02-19, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
His mind is made up. I guess this is what happens after watching only
Fox News for who knows how many years and getting the same nonsense
repeated and confirmed all that time.
Do you still believe in Trump/Russia collusion? It has been thoroughly debunked. That's four years of your life believing a delusion.
Do you think that Hunter's laptop was a conspiracy? I'm told [and have
never checked!] that you can see his "junk" online. I see him with a crack-pipe in his mouth, passed out on Fox News. They blur the "junk"
pics.
Do you see any if this, or are your "news sources" protecting your
delicate sensibilities from reality?
Now Biden/Ukraine collusion is a very different story. Let's start with
him boasting about how he got a Ukrainian prosecutor fired on live TV
while Vice-President. OOps!
On 2024-02-20, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
But I think one of the following will happen:
1. Politicians go over board with the martyrdom and sacrifice, so quality
of life for the common man and the financial destruction due to climate
policys become so severe, that the public flips out and elects a dictator
who says "f*ck this" and goes too far in the other direction with
punishment of the climate priests and too few environmental laws and only
focusing on industry.
2. Politicians realize that we cannot achieve our climate goals with
sacrifice, and they also realize they were wrong, and the issue will just
"fade out" and everyone continues as usual. Only a few fanatics will harp
on it but will be largely ignored. Climate change was a power grab by
politicians, but the sacrifices weretoo severe so they dropped it.
3. Science will catch up with climate goals, and enable us to achieve them >> without too many sacrifices. Then the hysterics will be ignored, and the
world will move on.
Given the authoritarian trend in europe I fear 1 in the near term but I
hope for a combination of 2 and 3.
The pendulum swings. It's tending to far-left now. Nobody likes the
middle.
On 22 Feb 2024 00:40:55 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
The pendulum swings. It's tending to far-left now. Nobody likes the
middle.
In which country? In Europe it's mainly the right-wing that's in
power. France, Netherlands, UK, Italy, Hungary, all right-wing.
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
In which country? In Europe it's mainly the right-wing that's in
power. France, Netherlands, UK, Italy, Hungary, all right-wing.
In all Western countries. To the right of you does not constitute the
right. Perhaps Hungary, but I never considered Hungary as Western
European. Countries, not affiliated with the West, could give a crap
for our nonsense notions but give a thumbs up until they can take over.
Did you not know that?
When I was in high school, right-wingers were considered bad or at
least very misguided people. We all supported parties to the left of
the Dutch Labor party, except for a few geeks.
Most of my peers supported the Pacifist Socialist Party, that wanted
the Netherlands to leave NATO. This was their election poster, on the
right:
<https://zeistermagazine.nl/sites/default/files/field/image/Arend%20foto.GIF>
I thought that was dumb (leaving NATO, not the poster), so I supported
a party that was one step less left-wing.
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
When I was in high school, right-wingers were considered bad or at
least very misguided people. We all supported parties to the left of
the Dutch Labor party, except for a few geeks.
When I was in high school, politics were not discussed. Our county was
the only Democrat county in Nevada. Our economy revolved around a ammunition >depot with union labor.
Politics weren't an issue in the halls or classes of our school. That
was a good thing. Logical thinking and politics conflict in kids minds. >Looking back, I'm glad that I grew up when and where I did.
On 22 Feb 2024 07:53:09 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Well crap, it's in Dutch. I *do* like the section on the right. Vote
PSP!, whatever that means. ;)
It says:
"PSP
DISARMING"
PSP stands for Pacifist Socialist Party.
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Most of my peers supported the Pacifist Socialist Party, that wanted
the Netherlands to leave NATO. This was their election poster, on the
right: >><https://zeistermagazine.nl/sites/default/files/field/image/Arend%20foto.GIF>
I thought that was dumb (leaving NATO, not the poster), so I supported
a party that was one step less left-wing.
Well crap, it's in Dutch. I *do* like the section on the right. Vote
PSP!, whatever that means. ;)
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 22 Feb 2024 07:53:09 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell >><leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Well crap, it's in Dutch. I *do* like the section on the right. Vote >>>PSP!, whatever that means. ;)
It says:
"PSP
DISARMING"
PSP stands for Pacifist Socialist Party.
No! PSP stands for "naked babe". What young man wouldn't vote for that?
On 2024-02-20, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
But I think one of the following will happen:
1. Politicians go over board with the martyrdom and sacrifice, so quality
of life for the common man and the financial destruction due to climate
policys become so severe, that the public flips out and elects a dictator
who says "f*ck this" and goes too far in the other direction with
punishment of the climate priests and too few environmental laws and only
focusing on industry.
2. Politicians realize that we cannot achieve our climate goals with
sacrifice, and they also realize they were wrong, and the issue will just
"fade out" and everyone continues as usual. Only a few fanatics will harp
on it but will be largely ignored. Climate change was a power grab by
politicians, but the sacrifices weretoo severe so they dropped it.
3. Science will catch up with climate goals, and enable us to achieve them >> without too many sacrifices. Then the hysterics will be ignored, and the
world will move on.
Given the authoritarian trend in europe I fear 1 in the near term but I
hope for a combination of 2 and 3.
The pendulum swings. It's tending to far-left now. Nobody likes the
middle.
Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-20, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
But I think one of the following will happen:
1. Politicians go over board with the martyrdom and sacrifice, so quality >>> of life for the common man and the financial destruction due to climate
policys become so severe, that the public flips out and elects a dictator >>> who says "f*ck this" and goes too far in the other direction with
punishment of the climate priests and too few environmental laws and only >>> focusing on industry.
2. Politicians realize that we cannot achieve our climate goals with
sacrifice, and they also realize they were wrong, and the issue will just >>> "fade out" and everyone continues as usual. Only a few fanatics will harp >>> on it but will be largely ignored. Climate change was a power grab by
politicians, but the sacrifices weretoo severe so they dropped it.
3. Science will catch up with climate goals, and enable us to achieve them >>> without too many sacrifices. Then the hysterics will be ignored, and the >>> world will move on.
Given the authoritarian trend in europe I fear 1 in the near term but I
hope for a combination of 2 and 3.
The pendulum swings. It's tending to far-left now. Nobody likes the
middle.
Come november, it will swing to the far far right, and we may have our first dictator back in office.
On 22 Feb 2024 00:40:55 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 2024-02-20, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
But I think one of the following will happen:
1. Politicians go over board with the martyrdom and sacrifice, so quality >>> of life for the common man and the financial destruction due to climate
policys become so severe, that the public flips out and elects a dictator >>> who says "f*ck this" and goes too far in the other direction with
punishment of the climate priests and too few environmental laws and only >>> focusing on industry.
2. Politicians realize that we cannot achieve our climate goals with
sacrifice, and they also realize they were wrong, and the issue will just >>> "fade out" and everyone continues as usual. Only a few fanatics will harp >>> on it but will be largely ignored. Climate change was a power grab by
politicians, but the sacrifices weretoo severe so they dropped it.
3. Science will catch up with climate goals, and enable us to achieve them >>> without too many sacrifices. Then the hysterics will be ignored, and the >>> world will move on.
Given the authoritarian trend in europe I fear 1 in the near term but I
hope for a combination of 2 and 3.
The pendulum swings. It's tending to far-left now. Nobody likes the
middle.
In which country? In Europe it's mainly the right-wing that's in
power. France, Netherlands, UK, Italy, Hungary, all right-wing.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-20, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
But I think one of the following will happen:
1. Politicians go over board with the martyrdom and sacrifice, so quality >>> of life for the common man and the financial destruction due to climate
policys become so severe, that the public flips out and elects a dictator >>> who says "f*ck this" and goes too far in the other direction with
punishment of the climate priests and too few environmental laws and only >>> focusing on industry.
2. Politicians realize that we cannot achieve our climate goals with
sacrifice, and they also realize they were wrong, and the issue will just >>> "fade out" and everyone continues as usual. Only a few fanatics will harp >>> on it but will be largely ignored. Climate change was a power grab by
politicians, but the sacrifices weretoo severe so they dropped it.
3. Science will catch up with climate goals, and enable us to achieve them >>> without too many sacrifices. Then the hysterics will be ignored, and the >>> world will move on.
Given the authoritarian trend in europe I fear 1 in the near term but I
hope for a combination of 2 and 3.
The pendulum swings. It's tending to far-left now. Nobody likes the
middle.
True. I am worried about over reactions to the far right. Nationalists in >europe are gaining due to the enormous current left swing
, and even if I'm economically right, I don't want nazis going crazy on
the streets.
But yes, currently europe is way, way too far to the left.
Let's see after the election to the european parliament in june if the pendulum will start to
shift back.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
In which country? In Europe it's mainly the right-wing that's in
power. France, Netherlands, UK, Italy, Hungary, all right-wing.
That is due to the reaction to the leftism the past decade or two. France
I would not categorize a right-wing. France is center/left.
Marine Le Pen is trying but has not yet succeeded.
UK is not right-wing, it's the good old leftist "right" of europe that can >only be called "right" in europe. By american standards UK is thoroughly >democrat.
Italy is a recent swing.
Hungary you are right. They have been right/nationalist for a decade I
think, if not more.
Poland shifted from right/nationalist to center recently.
An important test for the swing of the pendulum will be the elections to
the european parliament. The left is getting so nervous that you are
starting to see (at least in my country) weird coalitions between
socialists and center (which in europe is called "right") parties to try
and stop the right/nationalists from gaining ground.
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
When I was in high school, right-wingers were considered bad or at
least very misguided people. We all supported parties to the left of
the Dutch Labor party, except for a few geeks.
When I was in high school, politics were not discussed. Our county was
the only Democrat county in Nevada. Our economy revolved around a ammunition depot with union labor.
Politics weren't an issue in the halls or classes of our school. That
was a good thing. Logical thinking and politics conflict in kids minds. Looking back, I'm glad that I grew up when and where I did.
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
The most important thing to me is that the US leaves all the climate >agreements so that china and india cannot keep using that to grow at the >expense of the western world. If that does not happen, in a generation or
two everyone will bow to chinese supremacy since everyone gullible in the >west dismantled all their industry.
On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 at 10:33:04 PM UTC-10, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:plant onto the rough Hawaiian asphalt. She doesn't remember a thing about the accident and she's having a problem with her short-term memory. My guess is that there's a good chance for her to have some personality changes. Hopefully, they'll be minor.
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Br...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 22 Feb 2024 07:53:09 GMT, Leonard BlaisdellNo! PSP stands for "naked babe". What young man wouldn't vote for that?
<leobla...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Well crap, it's in Dutch. I *do* like the section on the right. Vote
PSP!, whatever that means. ;)
It says:
"PSP
DISARMING"
PSP stands for Pacifist Socialist Party.
Speaking of which, we went to visit our neighbor, who was in a terrible accident, in the hospital yesterday. She got hit by a truck nearly a month ago. I was expecting the worst. What I wasn't expecting is that she looked pretty good. She did a head
The part of her legs that wasn't bandaged looked pretty healthy with good color and no discolorations. Strangely enough, they looked tanned. She's got a bunch of stitches somewhere but I didn't see any. She's a modest Christian lady and typically wearsmuumuus. I was quite taken by her good looking gams. Hopefully, nobody in the room noticed me gawking at them. Am I a bad person?
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
When I was in high school, right-wingers were considered bad or at
least very misguided people. We all supported parties to the left of
the Dutch Labor party, except for a few geeks.
When I was in high school, politics were not discussed. Our county was
the only Democrat county in Nevada. Our economy revolved around a ammunition >> depot with union labor.
Politics weren't an issue in the halls or classes of our school. That
was a good thing. Logical thinking and politics conflict in kids minds.
Looking back, I'm glad that I grew up when and where I did.
Sounds like heaven! Based on what I've heard, seen and read, in sweden
school is extremely politicized and extremely leftist. The children are >inculcated with the values of socialism and this is why sweden of course
has been in decline since after WW2.
But things are slowly improving due to technology. I had a colleague who >would not let her kids watch public television due to the indoctrination.
She would hand pick childrens programs with good, traditional values for
her children.
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
On 2024-02-19, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
His mind is made up. I guess this is what happens after watching only
Fox News for who knows how many years and getting the same nonsense
repeated and confirmed all that time.
Do you still believe in Trump/Russia collusion? It has been thoroughly debunked.
That's four years of your life believing a delusion.
Do you think that Hunter's laptop was a conspiracy?
I'm told [and have
never checked!] that you can see his "junk" online. I see him with a crack-pipe in his mouth, passed out on Fox News. They blur the "junk"
pics.
Do you see any if this, or are your "news sources" protecting your
delicate sensibilities from reality?
Now Biden/Ukraine collusion is a very different story. Let's start with
him boasting about how he got a Ukrainian prosecutor fired on live TV
while Vice-President. OOps!
On 2024-02-20, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
But I think one of the following will happen:
1. Politicians go over board with the martyrdom and sacrifice, so quality
of life for the common man and the financial destruction due to climate
policys become so severe, that the public flips out and elects a dictator
who says "f*ck this" and goes too far in the other direction with
punishment of the climate priests and too few environmental laws and only
focusing on industry.
2. Politicians realize that we cannot achieve our climate goals with
sacrifice, and they also realize they were wrong, and the issue will just
"fade out" and everyone continues as usual. Only a few fanatics will harp
on it but will be largely ignored. Climate change was a power grab by
politicians, but the sacrifices weretoo severe so they dropped it.
3. Science will catch up with climate goals, and enable us to achieve them >> without too many sacrifices. Then the hysterics will be ignored, and the
world will move on.
Given the authoritarian trend in europe I fear 1 in the near term but I
hope for a combination of 2 and 3.
The pendulum swings. It's tending to far-left now. Nobody likes the
middle.
On 2024-02-22, Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Now Biden/Ukraine collusion is a very different story. Let's start with
him boasting about how he got a Ukrainian prosecutor fired on live TV
while Vice-President. OOps!
The Ukrainian prosecutor was corrupt. I'd brag about getting him
fired, too.
On 2024-02-22, Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
The pendulum swings. It's tending to far-left now. Nobody likes the
middle.
Dear God, Leo. There's precious little far left in the U.S. Just >center-right and far-right.
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 22 Feb 2024 07:53:09 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Well crap, it's in Dutch. I *do* like the section on the right. Vote
PSP!, whatever that means. ;)
It says:
"PSP
DISARMING"
PSP stands for Pacifist Socialist Party.
No! PSP stands for "naked babe". What young man wouldn't vote for that?
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:29:18 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
The most important thing to me is that the US leaves all the climate
agreements so that china and india cannot keep using that to grow at the
expense of the western world. If that does not happen, in a generation or
two everyone will bow to chinese supremacy since everyone gullible in the
west dismantled all their industry.
Strange that right-wingers always want to destroy the planet even
faster then we're already destroying it. Don't y'all have children and grandchildren?
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
You're deluded. Trump focuses on Trump.
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
You're deluded. Trump focuses on Trump.
No I think you are deluded.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:29:18 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
The most important thing to me is that the US leaves all the climate
agreements so that china and india cannot keep using that to grow at the >>> expense of the western world. If that does not happen, in a generation or >>> two everyone will bow to chinese supremacy since everyone gullible in the >>> west dismantled all their industry.
Strange that right-wingers always want to destroy the planet even
faster then we're already destroying it. Don't y'all have children and
grandchildren?
There is no global warming dooms day. That is a myth fabricated by politicians to make the population afraid and to make them give away their freedom.
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the
planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
On 2/22/2024 4:29 AM, D wrote:
Thanks for that. Always good to start the day with a laugh.
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
You're deluded. Trump focuses on Trump.
No I think you are deluded.
All you have to do is look at his actions and listen to his words.
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:29:18 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
The most important thing to me is that the US leaves all the climate
agreements so that china and india cannot keep using that to grow at the >>>> expense of the western world. If that does not happen, in a generation or >>>> two everyone will bow to chinese supremacy since everyone gullible in the >>>> west dismantled all their industry.
Strange that right-wingers always want to destroy the planet even
faster then we're already destroying it. Don't y'all have children and
grandchildren?
There is no global warming dooms day. That is a myth fabricated by
politicians to make the population afraid and to make them give away their >> freedom.
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the
planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to
destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial
markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Look, D. Regardless of whether climate change is anthropogenic,
we're going to run out of oil someday.
I'd rather we boot up its replacement sooner rather than later.
Plus, it would be a terrific black eye for OPEC. I'd love to
see the whole lot of them become irrelevant.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
On 2/22/2024 4:29 AM, D wrote:Yes, Trump does spread the gospel of joy and good news! =) I always smile
Thanks for that. Always good to start the day with a laugh.
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
as well when I see the leader! ;)
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:29:18 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
The most important thing to me is that the US leaves all the climate
agreements so that china and india cannot keep using that to grow at the >>> expense of the western world. If that does not happen, in a generation or >>> two everyone will bow to chinese supremacy since everyone gullible in the >>> west dismantled all their industry.
Strange that right-wingers always want to destroy the planet even
faster then we're already destroying it. Don't y'all have children and
grandchildren?
There is no global warming dooms day. That is a myth fabricated by >politicians to make the population afraid and to make them give away their >freedom.
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the
planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to >destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial >markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
There is no global warming dooms day. That is a myth fabricated by
politicians to make the population afraid and to make them give away their >> freedom.
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the
planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to
destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial
markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Look, D. Regardless of whether climate change is anthropogenic,
we're going to run out of oil someday.
I'd rather we boot up its replacement sooner rather than later.
Plus, it would be a terrific black eye for OPEC. I'd love to
see the whole lot of them become irrelevant.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:29:18 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
The most important thing to me is that the US leaves all the climate >>>>> agreements so that china and india cannot keep using that to grow at the >>>>> expense of the western world. If that does not happen, in a generation or >>>>> two everyone will bow to chinese supremacy since everyone gullible in the >>>>> west dismantled all their industry.
Strange that right-wingers always want to destroy the planet even
faster then we're already destroying it. Don't y'all have children and >>>> grandchildren?
There is no global warming dooms day. That is a myth fabricated by
politicians to make the population afraid and to make them give away their >>> freedom.
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the
planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to
destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial
markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Look, D. Regardless of whether climate change is anthropogenic,
we're going to run out of oil someday.
I'd rather we boot up its replacement sooner rather than later.
Plus, it would be a terrific black eye for OPEC. I'd love to
see the whole lot of them become irrelevant.
Science and the markets will solve that. Didn't we have a km long thread about oil here? Or was that another group?
Regardless, peak oil has been fretted over for 100 years, and will be
fretted over atleast 50-100 years more without any problems to you and me.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:50:06 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:29:18 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
The most important thing to me is that the US leaves all the climate
agreements so that china and india cannot keep using that to grow at the >>>> expense of the western world. If that does not happen, in a generation or >>>> two everyone will bow to chinese supremacy since everyone gullible in the >>>> west dismantled all their industry.
Strange that right-wingers always want to destroy the planet even
faster then we're already destroying it. Don't y'all have children and
grandchildren?
There is no global warming dooms day. That is a myth fabricated by
politicians to make the population afraid and to make them give away their >> freedom.
Ah, conspiracy theories! A few years ago, there was a bad flooding
here. Overwhelmed people like you said that the government had been
tinkering with the weather, causing the flooding, to flush all the independent thinkers out of the hills, into the city, where they're
easier to control. Right :)
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the
planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
Good forbid that it's our fault and that we'd have to change our ways.
We can't have that! We want to continue stinking up the place! It's
our right!
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to
destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial
markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Climate hysterics... you mean 95% of the world's scientists?
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:37:25 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
On 2/22/2024 4:29 AM, D wrote:Yes, Trump does spread the gospel of joy and good news! =) I always smile
Thanks for that. Always good to start the day with a laugh.
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
as well when I see the leader! ;)
So what's your country or is that a secret?
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:53:47 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
You're deluded. Trump focuses on Trump.
No I think you are deluded.
People with normal intelligence know after 5 minutes that Trump's a
moronic egomaniac.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:30:16 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
<hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
There is no global warming dooms day. That is a myth fabricated by
politicians to make the population afraid and to make them give away their >>> freedom.
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the
planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to
destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial
markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Look, D. Regardless of whether climate change is anthropogenic,
we're going to run out of oil someday.
I'd rather we boot up its replacement sooner rather than later.
Plus, it would be a terrific black eye for OPEC. I'd love to
see the whole lot of them become irrelevant.
Yes, it would be good to see those sheiks run out of money to the
point that they start eating their towels.
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:29:18 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a >>>>>> dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own >>>>>> country.
The most important thing to me is that the US leaves all the climate >>>>>> agreements so that china and india cannot keep using that to grow at the >>>>>> expense of the western world. If that does not happen, in a generation or
two everyone will bow to chinese supremacy since everyone gullible in the
west dismantled all their industry.
Strange that right-wingers always want to destroy the planet even
faster then we're already destroying it. Don't y'all have children and >>>>> grandchildren?
There is no global warming dooms day. That is a myth fabricated by
politicians to make the population afraid and to make them give away their >>>> freedom.
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the
planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to >>>> destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial >>>> markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Look, D. Regardless of whether climate change is anthropogenic,
we're going to run out of oil someday.
I'd rather we boot up its replacement sooner rather than later.
Plus, it would be a terrific black eye for OPEC. I'd love to
see the whole lot of them become irrelevant.
Science and the markets will solve that. Didn't we have a km long thread
about oil here? Or was that another group?
Regardless, peak oil has been fretted over for 100 years, and will be
fretted over atleast 50-100 years more without any problems to you and me.
You don't want to see the House of Saud doomed to penury?
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:37:25 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
On 2/22/2024 4:29 AM, D wrote:Yes, Trump does spread the gospel of joy and good news! =) I always smile >>> as well when I see the leader! ;)
Thanks for that. Always good to start the day with a laugh.
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
So what's your country or is that a secret?
I'm swedish.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
Ah, conspiracy theories! A few years ago, there was a bad flooding
here. Overwhelmed people like you said that the government had been
tinkering with the weather, causing the flooding, to flush all the
independent thinkers out of the hills, into the city, where they're
easier to control. Right :)
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the
planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
Good forbid that it's our fault and that we'd have to change our ways.
We can't have that! We want to continue stinking up the place! It's
our right!
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to
destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial
markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Climate hysterics... you mean 95% of the world's scientists?
No, most scientists I've spoken with are actually more angry at being >misquoted and being used to stir up hysteria, so I'd say the naive masses
and most politicians.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:53:47 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:Touché! No, actually what I found out is that people with some kind of >intelligence at all, know after 5 minutes that Biden is a senile moronic >egomaniac.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a
dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own
country.
You're deluded. Trump focuses on Trump.
No I think you are deluded.
People with normal intelligence know after 5 minutes that Trump's a
moronic egomaniac.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:04:30 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
Ah, conspiracy theories! A few years ago, there was a bad flooding
here. Overwhelmed people like you said that the government had been
tinkering with the weather, causing the flooding, to flush all the
independent thinkers out of the hills, into the city, where they're
easier to control. Right :)
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the
planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
Good forbid that it's our fault and that we'd have to change our ways.
We can't have that! We want to continue stinking up the place! It's
our right!
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to >>>> destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial >>>> markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Climate hysterics... you mean 95% of the world's scientists?
No, most scientists I've spoken with are actually more angry at being
misquoted and being used to stir up hysteria, so I'd say the naive masses
and most politicians.
Most scientists you've spoken... Ghe ghe.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:06:16 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:53:47 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:Touché! No, actually what I found out is that people with some kind of
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a >>>>>> dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own >>>>>> country.
You're deluded. Trump focuses on Trump.
No I think you are deluded.
People with normal intelligence know after 5 minutes that Trump's a
moronic egomaniac.
intelligence at all, know after 5 minutes that Biden is a senile moronic
egomaniac.
He's too old, but if he can beat Trump I'd vote for him if I was
American. If Mickey Mouse can beat Trump, I'd vote for Mickey Mouse.
With a character like Trump's, you shouldn't even be the manager of a McDonald's, let alone of a superpower.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:06:16 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:53:47 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:Touché! No, actually what I found out is that people with some kind of >>intelligence at all, know after 5 minutes that Biden is a senile moronic >>egomaniac.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a >>>>>> dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own >>>>>> country.
You're deluded. Trump focuses on Trump.
No I think you are deluded.
People with normal intelligence know after 5 minutes that Trump's a
moronic egomaniac.
He's too old, but if he can beat Trump I'd vote for him if I was
American. If Mickey Mouse can beat Trump, I'd vote for Mickey Mouse.
With a character like Trump's, you shouldn't even be the manager of a McDonald's, let alone of a superpower.
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:06:16 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:53:47 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:Touché! No, actually what I found out is that people with some kind of
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a >>>>>>> dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own >>>>>>> country.
You're deluded. Trump focuses on Trump.
No I think you are deluded.
People with normal intelligence know after 5 minutes that Trump's a
moronic egomaniac.
intelligence at all, know after 5 minutes that Biden is a senile moronic >>> egomaniac.
He's too old, but if he can beat Trump I'd vote for him if I was
American. If Mickey Mouse can beat Trump, I'd vote for Mickey Mouse.
With a character like Trump's, you shouldn't even be the manager of a
McDonald's, let alone of a superpower.
If he hadn't been born rich, he'd be the finest used car salesman
in Queens.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:That tells me enough about YOUR character.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:06:16 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:53:47 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:Touché! No, actually what I found out is that people with some kind of
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a >>>>>>> dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own >>>>>>> country.
You're deluded. Trump focuses on Trump.
No I think you are deluded.
People with normal intelligence know after 5 minutes that Trump's a
moronic egomaniac.
intelligence at all, know after 5 minutes that Biden is a senile moronic >>> egomaniac.
He's too old, but if he can beat Trump I'd vote for him if I was
American. If Mickey Mouse can beat Trump, I'd vote for Mickey Mouse.
With a character like Trump's, you shouldn't even be the manager of a
McDonald's, let alone of a superpower.
Did you ever meet Trump or do you base your views on his character on
what you seen on the news?
I like Trumps character more than Biden, and would rather have Mickey
Mouse than Biden as the president. I think Mickey Mouse shows solid
character and has sound family values.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:Especially in Florida: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/florida-surgeon-general-defies-science-amid-measles-outbreak/ar-BB1iJJOI
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:04:30 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
Ah, conspiracy theories! A few years ago, there was a bad
flooding here. Overwhelmed people like you said that the
government had been tinkering with the weather, causing the
flooding, to flush all the independent thinkers out of the
hills, into the city, where they're easier to control. Right
:)
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not
destryoing the planet. Changes in climate have always
happened and are natural.
Good forbid that it's our fault and that we'd have to change
our ways. We can't have that! We want to continue stinking up
the place! It's our right!
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate
hysterics want to destroy civilization by increased infant
mortality, crashing financial markets and stop scientific
progress.
But I won't.
Climate hysterics... you mean 95% of the world's scientists?
No, most scientists I've spoken with are actually more angry at
being misquoted and being used to stir up hysteria, so I'd say
the naive masses and most politicians.
Most scientists you've spoken... Ghe ghe.
And do note that science is not a vote. That is also something which
is completely lost to most people today.
On 2024-02-23 2:56 a.m., D wrote:
Especially in Florida: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/florida-surgeon-general-defies-science-amid-measles-outbreak/ar-BB1iJJOI
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:04:30 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
Ah, conspiracy theories! A few years ago, there was a bad
flooding here. Overwhelmed people like you said that the
government had been tinkering with the weather, causing the
flooding, to flush all the independent thinkers out of the
hills, into the city, where they're easier to control. Right
:)
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not
destryoing the planet. Changes in climate have always
happened and are natural.
Good forbid that it's our fault and that we'd have to change
our ways. We can't have that! We want to continue stinking up
the place! It's our right!
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate
hysterics want to destroy civilization by increased infant
mortality, crashing financial markets and stop scientific
progress.
But I won't.
Climate hysterics... you mean 95% of the world's scientists?
No, most scientists I've spoken with are actually more angry at
being misquoted and being used to stir up hysteria, so I'd say
the naive masses and most politicians.
Most scientists you've spoken... Ghe ghe.
And do note that science is not a vote. That is also something which
is completely lost to most people today.
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:06:16 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:53:47 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:Touché! No, actually what I found out is that people with some kind of >>>intelligence at all, know after 5 minutes that Biden is a senile moronic >>>egomaniac.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I'm not american but I'm pro Trump. I do not think you will have a >>>>>>> dictator, but a strong and principled leader who focuses on his own >>>>>>> country.
You're deluded. Trump focuses on Trump.
No I think you are deluded.
People with normal intelligence know after 5 minutes that Trump's a
moronic egomaniac.
He's too old, but if he can beat Trump I'd vote for him if I was
American. If Mickey Mouse can beat Trump, I'd vote for Mickey Mouse.
With a character like Trump's, you shouldn't even be the manager of a
McDonald's, let alone of a superpower.
If he hadn't been born rich, he'd be the finest used car salesman
in Queens.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:50:06 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the >>planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
Good forbid that it's our fault and that we'd have to change our ways.
We can't have that! We want to continue stinking up the place! It's
our right!
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to >>destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial >>markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Climate hysterics... you mean 95% of the world's scientists?
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:50:06 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the >>>planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
Good forbid that it's our fault and that we'd have to change our ways.
We can't have that! We want to continue stinking up the place! It's
our right!
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to >>>destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial >>>markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Climate hysterics... you mean 95% of the world's scientists?
95% of the world's scientists depend upon government grants for their research. Government grants come with strings attached that benefit government assertions.
You may want to research my claim. It may only be 90%.
Back in the olden days, pre-1970, you could depend on science.
You still
can with repeatable physics and chemistry. Prognostication enters the equation, and forget about it.
"Studies show..." is the most junk remark uttered by the news.
Dear God, Leo. There's precious little far left in the U.S. Just center-right and far-right.
"Studies show..." is the most junk remark uttered by the news.
On 2024-02-23, Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
95% of the world's scientists depend upon government grants for their
research. Government grants come with strings attached that benefit
government assertions.
You may want to research my claim. It may only be 90%.
Back in the olden days, pre-1970, you could depend on science.
Why is 1970 the watershed year?
On 2024-02-23 3:55 p.m., Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
"Studies show..." is the most junk remark uttered by the news.
That's the favourite phrase of purveyors of acupuncture, homeopathy, chiropractic, naturopathy and other quackery use.
On 2024-02-22, Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
Dear God, Leo. There's precious little far left in the U.S. Just
center-right and far-right.
And yet the left has their own brown shirts, ready to protest, even with >violence, anywhere they're needed. Law and order is obviously breaking
down in every major Democrat city. Believe what you see, not what you're >told.
Yet, it's our fault?
Ain't politics fun? ;)
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:50:06 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the
planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
Good forbid that it's our fault and that we'd have to change our ways.
We can't have that! We want to continue stinking up the place! It's
our right!
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to
destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial
markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Climate hysterics... you mean 95% of the world's scientists?
95% of the world's scientists depend upon government grants for their research. Government grants come with strings attached that benefit government assertions.
You may want to research my claim. It may only be 90%.
Back in the olden days, pre-1970, you could depend on science. You still
can with repeatable physics and chemistry. Prognostication enters the equation, and forget about it.
"Studies show..." is the most junk remark uttered by the news.
On 23 Feb 2024 22:55:26 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Good forbid that it's our fault and that we'd have to change our ways.
We can't have that! We want to continue stinking up the place! It's
our right!
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to >>>> destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial >>>> markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Climate hysterics... you mean 95% of the world's scientists?
95% of the world's scientists depend upon government grants for their
research. Government grants come with strings attached that benefit
government assertions.
You may want to research my claim. It may only be 90%.
Back in the olden days, pre-1970, you could depend on science. You still
can with repeatable physics and chemistry. Prognostication enters the
equation, and forget about it.
"Studies show..." is the most junk remark uttered by the news.
Trump zombies don't trust science and don't believe in facts, I know.
They live in a reality of their own making.
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:50:06 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the >>planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
Good forbid that it's our fault and that we'd have to change our ways.
We can't have that! We want to continue stinking up the place! It's
our right!
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to >>destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial >>markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Climate hysterics... you mean 95% of the world's scientists?
95% of the world's scientists depend upon government grants for their research. Government grants come with strings attached that benefit government assertions.
You may want to research my claim. It may only be 90%.
On 23 Feb 2024 23:09:47 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 2024-02-22, Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
Dear God, Leo. There's precious little far left in the U.S. Just
center-right and far-right.
And yet the left has their own brown shirts, ready to protest, even with >>violence, anywhere they're needed. Law and order is obviously breaking
down in every major Democrat city. Believe what you see, not what you're >>told.
Yet, it's our fault?
Ain't politics fun? ;)
Think! Think harder!
On 2024-02-22, Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
Dear God, Leo. There's precious little far left in the U.S. Just
center-right and far-right.
And yet the left has their own brown shirts, ready to protest, even with violence, anywhere they're needed.
Law and order is obviously breaking
down in every major Democrat city.
Believe what you see, not what you're
told.
Yet, it's our fault?
On 2024-02-23, Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2024-02-23, Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
95% of the world's scientists depend upon government grants for their
research. Government grants come with strings attached that benefit
government assertions.
You may want to research my claim. It may only be 90%.
Back in the olden days, pre-1970, you could depend on science.
Why is 1970 the watershed year?
Actually it was the early Seventies. I haven't bothered to look up the
year. That's when some "scientist" genius produced the evil of chlorofluorocarbons and created "global cooling". Politicians took note
and junk science flourished from then on. Oh, and meteorologists started calling themselves climatologists,
because that's where the money was.
I *do* know that no politics were discussed in any of my chemistry
courses in the Sixties.
I graduated in January of '69.
Remember, I lost my job as an aerosol chemist to that clown belief, so I
have skin _and_ animosity in the game.
And yet the left has their own brown shirts, ready to protest, even with violence, anywhere they're needed. Law and order is obviously breaking
down in every major Democrat city.
In article <l3sm2uF2o0oU5@mid.individual.net>,
leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net says...
On 2024-02-22, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:50:06 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
No, I don't want to destroy the planet, but we are not destryoing the
planet. Changes in climate have always happened and are natural.
Good forbid that it's our fault and that we'd have to change our ways.
We can't have that! We want to continue stinking up the place! It's
our right!
I could reverse the accusations and say that climate hysterics want to >>>> destroy civilization by increased infant mortality, crashing financial >>>> markets and stop scientific progress.
But I won't.
Climate hysterics... you mean 95% of the world's scientists?
95% of the world's scientists depend upon government grants for their
research. Government grants come with strings attached that benefit
government assertions.
You may want to research my claim. It may only be 90%.
I'd like you to provide a credible source of your
claim.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
95% of the world's scientists depend upon government grants for their
research. Government grants come with strings attached that benefit
government assertions.
You may want to research my claim. It may only be 90%.
Back in the olden days, pre-1970, you could depend on science. You still
can with repeatable physics and chemistry. Prognostication enters the
equation, and forget about it.
"Studies show..." is the most junk remark uttered by the news.
Let me add to this, that of the scientists with the least degree of belief
in doomsday scenarios, most tend to be engineers. The ones who are most >pro-dooms day are gender-scientists, social scientists, eco scientists
etc. with very little knowledge about physics and math.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
Trump zombies don't trust science and don't believe in facts, I know.
They live in a reality of their own making.
Why do you call him Trump zombie? He did not call you a Biden zombie.
Leonard Blaisdell wrote :
And yet the left has their own brown shirts, ready to protest, even with
violence, anywhere they're needed. Law and order is obviously breaking
down in every major Democrat city.
Am looking forward to the 2024 Democratic National Convention in
Chicago, IL. Can't wait to see the reaction when Big Money fails to
support Biden for the nomination. Expect chaos will reign in the
convention and the streets.
On 2024-02-22, Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
Dear God, Leo. There's precious little far left in the U.S. Just
center-right and far-right.
And yet the left has their own brown shirts, ready to protest, even with violence, anywhere they're needed. Law and order is obviously breaking
down in every major Democrat city. Believe what you see, not what you're told.
Yet, it's our fault?
Ain't politics fun? ;)
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:12:49 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
Trump zombies don't trust science and don't believe in facts, I know.
They live in a reality of their own making.
Why do you call him Trump zombie? He did not call you a Biden zombie.
Trump followers are zombies. The Zombie Apocalypse has started in the
US. <https://static.independent.co.uk/2021/11/17/19/CAPITOLIO-ASALTANTE-SENTENCIA_12846.jpg?quality=75&width=990&crop=3%3A2%2Csmart&auto=webp>
Leonard Blaisdell wrote :
And yet the left has their own brown shirts, ready to protest, even with
violence, anywhere they're needed. Law and order is obviously breaking
down in every major Democrat city.
Am looking forward to the 2024 Democratic National Convention in
Chicago, IL. Can't wait to see the reaction when Big Money fails to
support Biden for the nomination. Expect chaos will reign in the
convention and the streets.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:09:33 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
95% of the world's scientists depend upon government grants for their
research. Government grants come with strings attached that benefit
government assertions.
You may want to research my claim. It may only be 90%.
Back in the olden days, pre-1970, you could depend on science. You still >>> can with repeatable physics and chemistry. Prognostication enters the
equation, and forget about it.
"Studies show..." is the most junk remark uttered by the news.
Let me add to this, that of the scientists with the least degree of belief >> in doomsday scenarios, most tend to be engineers. The ones who are most
pro-dooms day are gender-scientists, social scientists, eco scientists
etc. with very little knowledge about physics and math.
Leo and "D", two peas in a Fox News pod.
Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-22, Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
Dear God, Leo. There's precious little far left in the U.S. Just
center-right and far-right.
And yet the left has their own brown shirts, ready to protest, even with
violence, anywhere they're needed. Law and order is obviously breaking
down in every major Democrat city. Believe what you see, not what you're
told.
Yet, it's our fault?
Ain't politics fun? ;)
Throughout the Middle East, there are these large mounds, large hills, that rise above the landscape. They are called Tells, “an artificial topographical
feature, a mound consisting of the accumulated and stratified debris of a succession of consecutive settlements at the same site, the refuse of generations of people who built and inhabited them and natural sediment.”...
Archeologists start digging into these tells and they find ancient civilizations, often that no one remembers, that no one has remembered for thousands of years. This is how the capital of the Hittites, Hattusa, was discovered; outside of a few honorable mentions in the Bible, they had all but been forgotten...
That’s us. There is no fixing this. You have a short life here on this planet
and you make do with what you have. The USA is in a state in decline, a doom loop, and there’s nothing you or I can do about it. The Democrats are aiming
for a progressive utopia, and as part of "building" that utopia, they are tearing this country down right to the foundations...
The vile alliance between the deep state and tech platforms, combined with mainstream media’s corruption, have left most of the public entirely unaware
of how deeply US democracy has been undermined, and how corrupt the progressive establishment is...
Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:12:49 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:You may need to start wondering if the Orange man
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
Trump zombies don't trust science and don't believe in facts, I know.
They live in a reality of their own making.
Why do you call him Trump zombie? He did not call you a Biden zombie.
Trump followers are zombies. The Zombie Apocalypse has started in the
US.
<https://static.independent.co.uk/2021/11/17/19/CAPITOLIO-ASALTANTE-SENTENCIA_12846.jpg?quality=75&width=990&crop=3%3A2%2Csmart&auto=webp>
likes Aussie people, or not.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:03:04 -0500, George Sulzbach
<g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:12:49 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:You may need to start wondering if the Orange man
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
Trump zombies don't trust science and don't believe in facts, I know. >>>>> They live in a reality of their own making.
Why do you call him Trump zombie? He did not call you a Biden zombie.
Trump followers are zombies. The Zombie Apocalypse has started in the
US.
<https://static.independent.co.uk/2021/11/17/19/CAPITOLIO-ASALTANTE-SENTENCIA_12846.jpg?quality=75&width=990&crop=3%3A2%2Csmart&auto=webp>
likes Aussie people, or not.
Why does that matter?
Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:03:04 -0500, George SulzbachTrump says if he's elected again the USA won't protect any
<g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
You may need to start wondering if the Orange man
likes Aussie people, or not.
Why does that matter?
Country that doesn't pay its military protection dues, as
there are some delinquent accounts now.
Are you folks current?
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:28:37 -0500, George Sulzbach
<g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:03:04 -0500, George SulzbachTrump says if he's elected again the USA won't protect any
<g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
You may need to start wondering if the Orange man
likes Aussie people, or not.
Why does that matter?
Country that doesn't pay its military protection dues, as
there are some delinquent accounts now.
Are you folks current?
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:28:37 -0500, George Sulzbach
<g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:03:04 -0500, George SulzbachTrump says if he's elected again the USA won't protect any
<g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
You may need to start wondering if the Orange man
likes Aussie people, or not.
Why does that matter?
Country that doesn't pay its military protection dues, as
there are some delinquent accounts now.
Are you folks current?
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
Bruce wrote:
I think you already know no one really knows what might
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
happen if the Orange man is in charge again, I'm just
paraphrasing what he said is *part* of his plan.
There's very many white American people that agree with
*some* of what he says.
I wish my choices were better than an old guy that seems
to be somewhat of a puppet, and a lying criminal. :-)
On 2024-02-24, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:28:37 -0500, George Sulzbach >><g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Trump says if he's elected again the USA won't protect any
Country that doesn't pay its military protection dues, as
there are some delinquent accounts now.
Are you folks current?
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
Because Trump does not give half a fuck for anybody but himself.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:49:53 -0500, George Sulzbach
<g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Bruce wrote:
I think you already know no one really knows what might
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
happen if the Orange man is in charge again, I'm just
paraphrasing what he said is *part* of his plan.
There's very many white American people that agree with
*some* of what he says.
I wish my choices were better than an old guy that seems
to be somewhat of a puppet, and a lying criminal. :-)
A lying criminal? Oh wait, you're another candidate for the Fox News
Award.
But I agree with you about one thing. Is old Joe Biden really the best candidate the Democrats could come up with? Of course, everybody's
better than Trump, but they had years to find a fitter, younger
Democrat. Was there nobody at all?
Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:49:53 -0500, George SulzbachI was describing the Orange man, not Biden. I should have added
<g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
I wish my choices were better than an old guy that seems
to be somewhat of a puppet, and a lying criminal. :-)
A lying criminal? Oh wait, you're another candidate for the Fox News
Award.
old to the lying criminal reference, my bad, they're both old
fucks.
But I agree with you about one thing. Is old Joe Biden really the bestYou'd sure think so, and having Kamala one heart beat away from
candidate the Democrats could come up with? Of course, everybody's
better than Trump, but they had years to find a fitter, younger
Democrat. Was there nobody at all?
being in charge isn't exactly comforting to some folks.
When you think about it, when was the last time you really
endorsed a politician, I mean put on the bumper sticker
kind of guy?
On 2024-02-24, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:28:37 -0500, George Sulzbach >><g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:03:04 -0500, George SulzbachTrump says if he's elected again the USA won't protect any
<g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
You may need to start wondering if the Orange man
likes Aussie people, or not.
Why does that matter?
Country that doesn't pay its military protection dues, as
there are some delinquent accounts now.
Are you folks current?
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
Because Trump does not give half a fuck for anybody but himself.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 21:02:53 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
<hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2024-02-24, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
Because Trump does not give half a fuck for anybody but himself.
I agree whole heartedly but was stunned to hear even him compare
himself with Alexe Navalgny - he wouldn't be worth even a toe nail
clipping from Navalgny.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:49:53 -0500, George Sulzbach
<g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Bruce wrote:
I think you already know no one really knows what might
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
happen if the Orange man is in charge again, I'm just
paraphrasing what he said is *part* of his plan.
There's very many white American people that agree with
*some* of what he says.
I wish my choices were better than an old guy that seems
to be somewhat of a puppet, and a lying criminal. :-)
A lying criminal? Oh wait, you're another candidate for the Fox News
Award.
But I agree with you about one thing. Is old Joe Biden really the best >candidate the Democrats could come up with? Of course, everybody's
better than Trump, but they had years to find a fitter, younger
Democrat. Was there nobody at all?
Incidentally, crime is considerably down since 1990. https://www.statista.com/statistics/191219/reported-violent-crime-rate-in-the-usa-since-1990/
You're the one who introduced talk of crime. I rarely think of it,
although you seem to dwell on it. It's not your fault, Leo. It's
the way your brain is constructed.
Am looking forward to the 2024 Democratic National Convention in
Chicago, IL. Can't wait to see the reaction when Big Money fails to
support Biden for the nomination. Expect chaos will reign in the
convention and the streets.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 21:02:53 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
<hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2024-02-24, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:28:37 -0500, George Sulzbach
<g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Trump says if he's elected again the USA won't protect any
Country that doesn't pay its military protection dues, as
there are some delinquent accounts now.
Are you folks current?
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
Because Trump does not give half a fuck for anybody but himself.
Why is that obvious to you and me, but 50% of American voters can't
see it?
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
Leo and "D", two peas in a Fox News pod.
Thank you for the valuable contribution. That is noted!
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:09:18 +1100, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
But I agree with you about one thing. Is old Joe Biden really the best
candidate the Democrats could come up with? Of course, everybody's
better than Trump, but they had years to find a fitter, younger
Democrat. Was there nobody at all?
I had hoped when Biden was elected he intended to groom Kamala for
this election, but I guess not. He has kept her in obscurity.
On 2024-02-24, Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
Incidentally, crime is considerably down since 1990.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/191219/reported-violent-crime-rate-in-the-usa-since-1990/
Isn't it amazing how statistics can be manipulated by altering the
criteria of what constitutes a crime? Your politicians need you to
believe that they're doing great. They aren't.
You're the one who introduced talk of crime. I rarely think of it,
although you seem to dwell on it. It's not your fault, Leo. It's
the way your brain is constructed.
Probably. The first concept of government is to protect those governed. That's how one knows how they're doing. Not too good by my reckoning.
Have you learned Spanish yet?
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 21:02:53 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
<hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2024-02-24, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:28:37 -0500, George Sulzbach >>><g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Trump says if he's elected again the USA won't protect any
Country that doesn't pay its military protection dues, as
there are some delinquent accounts now.
Are you folks current?
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
Because Trump does not give half a fuck for anybody but himself.
Why is that obvious to you and me, but 50% of American voters can't
see it?
On 2024-02-24, Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
Incidentally, crime is considerably down since 1990.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/191219/reported-violent-crime-rate-in-the-usa-since-1990/
Isn't it amazing how statistics can be manipulated by altering the
criteria of what constitutes a crime? Your politicians need you to
believe that they're doing great. They aren't.
You're the one who introduced talk of crime. I rarely think of it,
although you seem to dwell on it. It's not your fault, Leo. It's
the way your brain is constructed.
Probably. The first concept of government is to protect those governed. That's how one knows how they're doing. Not too good by my reckoning.
Have you learned Spanish yet?
On 2/24/2024 4:10 PM, Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 21:02:53 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
<hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
Because Trump does not give half a fuck for anybody but himself.
Why is that obvious to you and me, but 50% of American voters can't
see it?
Talking with a friend this morning, we discussed that. What makes some >people so attractive to others? What charisma do they have?
Not just politicians, the news had Joel Osteen on about the shooting at
his church. He creeps me out just looking at him but people donate lots
of money to him.
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:09:18 +1100, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:49:53 -0500, George Sulzbach >><g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Bruce wrote:
I think you already know no one really knows what might
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
happen if the Orange man is in charge again, I'm just
paraphrasing what he said is *part* of his plan.
There's very many white American people that agree with
*some* of what he says.
I wish my choices were better than an old guy that seems
to be somewhat of a puppet, and a lying criminal. :-)
A lying criminal? Oh wait, you're another candidate for the Fox News
Award.
But I agree with you about one thing. Is old Joe Biden really the best >>candidate the Democrats could come up with? Of course, everybody's
better than Trump, but they had years to find a fitter, younger
Democrat. Was there nobody at all?
I had hoped when Biden was elected he intended to groom Kamala for
this election, but I guess not. He has kept her in obscurity.
On 2024-02-24, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
Leo and "D", two peas in a Fox News pod.
Thank you for the valuable contribution. That is noted!
Welcome to the "Pod", D. You'll notice that the furniture is exquisite
and our menu is top of the line. Here's your membership card to the >cognoscenti. You've earned it. ;)
On 2024-02-24, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 21:02:53 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
<hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2024-02-24, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:28:37 -0500, George Sulzbach >>>><g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Trump says if he's elected again the USA won't protect any
Country that doesn't pay its military protection dues, as
there are some delinquent accounts now.
Are you folks current?
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
Because Trump does not give half a fuck for anybody but himself.
Why is that obvious to you and me, but 50% of American voters can't
see it?
They are poorly educated and self-centered. All they see is that
he professes to hate the same people they hate. He holds out
the promise of making life fair for them and unfair for others,
without realizing he has no interest in doing so and could not
manage it even if the wanted to.
On 2024-02-24, Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
Incidentally, crime is considerably down since 1990.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/191219/reported-violent-crime-rate-in-the-usa-since-1990/
Isn't it amazing how statistics can be manipulated by altering the
criteria of what constitutes a crime? Your politicians need you to
believe that they're doing great. They aren't.
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:09:18 +1100, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>
But I agree with you about one thing. Is old Joe Biden really the best
candidate the Democrats could come up with? Of course, everybody's
better than Trump, but they had years to find a fitter, younger
Democrat. Was there nobody at all?
I had hoped when Biden was elected he intended to groom Kamala for
this election, but I guess not. He has kept her in obscurity.
On 2024-02-24, heyjoe <address@is.invalid> wrote:
Am looking forward to the 2024 Democratic National Convention in
Chicago, IL. Can't wait to see the reaction when Big Money fails to
support Biden for the nomination. Expect chaos will reign in the
convention and the streets.
Frankly, I expect chaos at both conventions. I'll be surprised if there aren't one or two new third-parties created between now and the
election. If it's Biden vs. Trump in the General, I'll be shocked.
We live in interesting times, and we're forced to stay tuned.
On 2/24/2024 4:10 PM, Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 21:02:53 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
<hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2024-02-24, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:28:37 -0500, George Sulzbach
<g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Trump says if he's elected again the USA won't protect any
Country that doesn't pay its military protection dues, as
there are some delinquent accounts now.
Are you folks current?
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
Because Trump does not give half a fuck for anybody but himself.
Why is that obvious to you and me, but 50% of American voters can't
see it?
Talking with a friend this morning, we discussed that. What makes some people so attractive to others? What charisma do they have?
Not just politicians, the news had Joel Osteen on about the shooting at his church. He creeps me out just looking at him but people donate lots of
money to him.
On 2024-02-24, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 21:02:53 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
<hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2024-02-24, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:28:37 -0500, George Sulzbach >>>><g.sulzbach@myplace.net> wrote:
Trump says if he's elected again the USA won't protect any
Country that doesn't pay its military protection dues, as
there are some delinquent accounts now.
Are you folks current?
Yes. But apart from that, what if the Baltic states are behind? Will
the orange moron just give them to Putin? The UK's going through a
recession. What if they're behind on their payments (which are not
payments to the US, by the way)? Is Putin welcome to take it? Why
weaken NATO by making such retarded statements?
Because Trump does not give half a fuck for anybody but himself.
Why is that obvious to you and me, but 50% of American voters can't
see it?
They are poorly educated and self-centered. All they see is that
he professes to hate the same people they hate. He holds out
the promise of making life fair for them and unfair for others,
without realizing he has no interest in doing so and could not
manage it even if the wanted to.
On 2024-02-24 4:58 p.m., lucretia@florence.it wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:09:18 +1100, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>
But I agree with you about one thing. Is old Joe Biden really the best
candidate the Democrats could come up with? Of course, everybody's
better than Trump, but they had years to find a fitter, younger
Democrat. Was there nobody at all?
I had hoped when Biden was elected he intended to groom Kamala for
this election, but I guess not. He has kept her in obscurity.
You're right. We haven't heard much about her. That should leave us
wondering if it is because she hasn't stepped up to take on any major assignments, if Biden for one reason or another has not given her any
extra assignments, of if the press has had so much fodder with Biden's
senior moments that the press has lost interest in her. I don't know,
but those are the possibilities that I see.
Sadly, there is no one from either party that I'd really want to vote
for.
Ed P wrote :
Sadly, there is no one from either party that I'd really want to vote
for.
Isn't that the truth! I do not want to see a replay of the 2020
Presidential election. Unfortunately "none of the above" will not be
on the ballot and choosing not to vote for President is a nonstarter.
Personally, Bidenomics is killing my budget. Utilities, food and
gasoline have increased every time I pay a bill and I blame Biden's
war on fossil fuels as the cause. Energy drives our economy and
personal comfort. Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
Ed P wrote :
Sadly, there is no one from either party that I'd really want to vote
for.
Isn't that the truth! I do not want to see a replay of the 2020
Presidential election. Unfortunately "none of the above" will not be
on the ballot and choosing not to vote for President is a nonstarter.
Personally, Bidenomics is killing my budget. Utilities, food and
gasoline have increased every time I pay a bill and I blame Biden's
war on fossil fuels as the cause. Energy drives our economy and
personal comfort. Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
On 2/25/2024 8:59 AM, heyjoe wrote:
Ed P wrote :
Sadly, there is no one from either party that I'd really want to vote
for.
Isn't that the truth! I do not want to see a replay of the 2020
Presidential election. Unfortunately "none of the above" will not be
on the ballot and choosing not to vote for President is a nonstarter.
Personally, Bidenomics is killing my budget. Utilities, food and
gasoline have increased every time I pay a bill and I blame Biden's
war on fossil fuels as the cause. Energy drives our economy and
personal comfort. Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
So Biden controls Europe too? He must as they are having the same
situation.
Oil is a finite material. It won't run out in our lifetime, but perhaps
our grandchildren. Should we start planning alternatives now or wait
until it is gone in 40 or 50 years?
On 2024-02-24, Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
Incidentally, crime is considerably down since 1990.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/191219/reported-violent-crime-rate-in-the-usa-since-1990/
Isn't it amazing how statistics can be manipulated by altering the
criteria of what constitutes a crime? Your politicians need you to
believe that they're doing great. They aren't.
You're the one who introduced talk of crime. I rarely think of it,
although you seem to dwell on it. It's not your fault, Leo. It's
the way your brain is constructed.
Probably. The first concept of government is to protect those governed. That's how one knows how they're doing. Not too good by my reckoning.
Have you learned Spanish yet?
On 2024-02-24, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
Leo and "D", two peas in a Fox News pod.
Thank you for the valuable contribution. That is noted!
Welcome to the "Pod", D. You'll notice that the furniture is exquisite
and our menu is top of the line. Here's your membership card to the cognoscenti. You've earned it. ;)
Ed P wrote :
Sadly, there is no one from either party that I'd really want to vote
for.
Isn't that the truth! I do not want to see a replay of the 2020
Presidential election. Unfortunately "none of the above" will not be
on the ballot and choosing not to vote for President is a nonstarter.
Personally, Bidenomics is killing my budget. Utilities, food and
gasoline have increased every time I pay a bill and I blame Biden's
war on fossil fuels as the cause. Energy drives our economy and
personal comfort. Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-24, heyjoe <address@is.invalid> wrote:
Am looking forward to the 2024 Democratic National Convention in
Chicago, IL. Can't wait to see the reaction when Big Money fails to
support Biden for the nomination. Expect chaos will reign in the
convention and the streets.
Frankly, I expect chaos at both conventions. I'll be surprised if there
aren't one or two new third-parties created between now and the
election. If it's Biden vs. Trump in the General, I'll be shocked.
We live in interesting times, and we're forced to stay tuned.
Do you think trump will stage another coup? He probably learned from the last one.
Do you think trump will stage another coup?
He probably learned from the last one.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024, Hank Rogers wrote:
Leonard Blaisdell wrote:What coup? Oh, you mean regular political meetings!
On 2024-02-24, heyjoe <address@is.invalid> wrote:
Am looking forward to the 2024 Democratic National Convention in
Chicago, IL. Can't wait to see the reaction when Big Money fails to
support Biden for the nomination. Expect chaos will reign in the
convention and the streets.
Frankly, I expect chaos at both conventions. I'll be surprised if there
aren't one or two new third-parties created between now and the
election. If it's Biden vs. Trump in the General, I'll be shocked.
We live in interesting times, and we're forced to stay tuned.
Do you think trump will stage another coup? He probably learned from the
last one.
... Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 13:59:57 -0000 (UTC), heyjoe <address@is.invalid>
wrote:
Ed P wrote :
Sadly, there is no one from either party that I'd really want to vote
for.
Isn't that the truth! I do not want to see a replay of the 2020 >>Presidential election. Unfortunately "none of the above" will not be
on the ballot and choosing not to vote for President is a nonstarter.
Personally, Bidenomics is killing my budget. Utilities, food and
gasoline have increased every time I pay a bill and I blame Biden's
war on fossil fuels as the cause. Energy drives our economy and
personal comfort. Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
Severe inflation is world wide. But if you feel better having a
scapegoat, enjoy!
On 2/25/2024 8:59 AM, heyjoe wrote:
Ed P wrote :
Sadly, there is no one from either party that I'd really want to vote
for.
Isn't that the truth! I do not want to see a replay of the 2020
Presidential election. Unfortunately "none of the above" will not be
on the ballot and choosing not to vote for President is a nonstarter.
Personally, Bidenomics is killing my budget. Utilities, food and
gasoline have increased every time I pay a bill and I blame Biden's
war on fossil fuels as the cause. Energy drives our economy and
personal comfort. Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
So Biden controls Europe too? He must as they are having the same
situation.
Oil is a finite material. It won't run out in our lifetime, but perhaps
our grandchildren. Should we start planning alternatives now or wait
until it is gone in 40 or 50 years?
What is your plan?
On 2024-02-25, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 13:59:57 -0000 (UTC), heyjoe <address@is.invalid>
wrote:
Isn't that the truth! I do not want to see a replay of the 2020 >>>Presidential election. Unfortunately "none of the above" will not be
on the ballot and choosing not to vote for President is a nonstarter.
Personally, Bidenomics is killing my budget. Utilities, food and >>>gasoline have increased every time I pay a bill and I blame Biden's
war on fossil fuels as the cause. Energy drives our economy and
personal comfort. Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
Severe inflation is world wide. But if you feel better having a
scapegoat, enjoy!
In fact, inflation in the U.S. has been lower than in many parts
of the world.
Ed P wrote :
Sadly, there is no one from either party that I'd really want to vote
for.
Isn't that the truth! I do not want to see a replay of the 2020
Presidential election. Unfortunately "none of the above" will not be
on the ballot and choosing not to vote for President is a nonstarter.
Personally, Bidenomics is killing my budget. Utilities, food and
gasoline have increased every time I pay a bill and I blame Biden's
war on fossil fuels as the cause. Energy drives our economy and
personal comfort. Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
heyjoe wrote:
...
... Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
the best price for much in energy now is wind, solar
and battery storage. include more transmission lines to
spread the footprint and that means cheap energy from
anyplace else is available for the price of wheeling
and transmission losses. it is much cheaper to ship
electrons than coal or oil.
short-sighted thinking though, well, it's going to suck
for later generation when they have to pay the bills to
rebuild further inland or try to protect places from
storms. pay now or pay later at a compounded rate.
songbird
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 18:39:36 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024, Hank Rogers wrote:
Leonard Blaisdell wrote:What coup? Oh, you mean regular political meetings!
On 2024-02-24, heyjoe <address@is.invalid> wrote:
Am looking forward to the 2024 Democratic National Convention in
Chicago, IL. Can't wait to see the reaction when Big Money fails to >>>>> support Biden for the nomination. Expect chaos will reign in the
convention and the streets.
Frankly, I expect chaos at both conventions. I'll be surprised if there >>>> aren't one or two new third-parties created between now and the
election. If it's Biden vs. Trump in the General, I'll be shocked.
We live in interesting times, and we're forced to stay tuned.
Do you think trump will stage another coup? He probably learned from the >>> last one.
D's definition of a regular political meeting: <https://s7d2.scene7.com/is/image/TWCNews/new_project_-_2021-11-17t131531536_11172021>
On 2024-02-25 6:59 a.m., heyjoe wrote:
Ed P wrote :It was Covid that fucked up the economies of every civilised nation**.
Sadly, there is no one from either party that I'd really want to vote
for.
Isn't that the truth! I do not want to see a replay of the 2020
Presidential election. Unfortunately "none of the above" will not be
on the ballot and choosing not to vote for President is a nonstarter.
Personally, Bidenomics is killing my budget. Utilities, food and
gasoline have increased every time I pay a bill and I blame Biden's
war on fossil fuels as the cause. Energy drives our economy and
personal comfort. Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
Biden is NOT responsible for the price increases we see for just about everything.
**(I sometimes have my doubts about whether the US is civilised)
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 18:39:36 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024, Hank Rogers wrote:
Leonard Blaisdell wrote:What coup? Oh, you mean regular political meetings!
On 2024-02-24, heyjoe <address@is.invalid> wrote:
Am looking forward to the 2024 Democratic National Convention in
Chicago, IL. Can't wait to see the reaction when Big Money fails to >>>>>> support Biden for the nomination. Expect chaos will reign in the
convention and the streets.
Frankly, I expect chaos at both conventions. I'll be surprised if there >>>>> aren't one or two new third-parties created between now and the
election. If it's Biden vs. Trump in the General, I'll be shocked.
We live in interesting times, and we're forced to stay tuned.
Do you think trump will stage another coup? He probably learned from the >>>> last one.
D's definition of a regular political meeting:
<https://s7d2.scene7.com/is/image/TWCNews/new_project_-_2021-11-17t131531536_11172021>
I don't know how old you are but put on your glasses. Donald Trump is not
in that photo.
That's green socialism for you! Welcome to team Trump! ;)
Oil is a finite material. It won't run out in our lifetime, but perhaps
our grandchildren. Should we start planning alternatives now or wait
until it is gone in 40 or 50 years?
What is your plan?
Energy storage based on batteries at national level is impossible with
todays technology.
Wind and solar are great, as long as there is wind and sun. When not, it
is horribly bad.
Ed P wrote :
Oil is a finite material. It won't run out in our lifetime, but perhaps
our grandchildren. Should we start planning alternatives now or wait
until it is gone in 40 or 50 years?
What is your plan?
Let a free market, without government intervention, carry the ball.
At some point, the demand for oil will pass the supply, prices will
rise and alternate energies will be cheaper. That will happen before
we run out of fossil fuels.
Ed P wrote :
Oil is a finite material. It won't run out in our lifetime, but perhaps
our grandchildren. Should we start planning alternatives now or wait
until it is gone in 40 or 50 years?
What is your plan?
Let a free market, without government intervention, carry the ball.
At some point, the demand for oil will pass the supply, prices will
rise and alternate energies will be cheaper. That will happen before
we run out of fossil fuels.
On 2/26/2024 8:47 AM, heyjoe wrote:
Ed P wrote :
Oil is a finite material. It won't run out in our lifetime, but perhaps >>> our grandchildren. Should we start planning alternatives now or wait
until it is gone in 40 or 50 years?
What is your plan?
Let a free market, without government intervention, carry the ball.
At some point, the demand for oil will pass the supply, prices will
rise and alternate energies will be cheaper. That will happen before
we run out of fossil fuels.
Sometimes the free market need a nudge. Should we do away with all regulation? Sure, some is excessive, but look at the safety aspects of the automobile. Should we bring back leaded gas and let the market decide?
On 2/26/2024 5:53 AM, D wrote:
Energy storage based on batteries at national level is impossible with
todays technology.
Wind and solar are great, as long as there is wind and sun. When not, it is >> horribly bad.
You say "today's technology" and that is correct. Tomorrow is a new story.
https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/04/12/solar-energy-can-now-be-stored-for-up-to-18-years-say-scientists
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
On 2/26/2024 8:47 AM, heyjoe wrote:
Ed P wrote :
Oil is a finite material. It won't run out in our lifetime, but
perhaps
our grandchildren. Should we start planning alternatives now or wait >>>> until it is gone in 40 or 50 years?
What is your plan?
Let a free market, without government intervention, carry the ball.
At some point, the demand for oil will pass the supply, prices will
rise and alternate energies will be cheaper. That will happen before
we run out of fossil fuels.
Sometimes the free market need a nudge. Should we do away with all
regulation? Sure, some is excessive, but look at the safety aspects
of the automobile. Should we bring back leaded gas and let the market
decide?
If the market demands leaded gas, then why not?
Best regards,
Daniel
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
On 2/26/2024 5:53 AM, D wrote:
Energy storage based on batteries at national level is impossible
with todays technology.
Wind and solar are great, as long as there is wind and sun. When not,
it is horribly bad.
You say "today's technology" and that is correct. Tomorrow is a new
story.
https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/04/12/solar-energy-can-now-be-stored-for-up-to-18-years-say-scientists
Yes, those articles do pop up every year, but until something can be purchased on the market, it is better to disregard such stories.
I've lost count on the number of "battery breakthrough" articles I've
seen, and not to speak about fusion power. It is good, and let the
science roam free, but until I see something like that on the market, I
won't worry or count on it.
On 2/26/2024 8:47 AM, heyjoe wrote:
Ed P wrote :
Oil is a finite material. It won't run out in our lifetime, but perhaps >>> our grandchildren. Should we start planning alternatives now or wait
until it is gone in 40 or 50 years?
What is your plan?
Let a free market, without government intervention, carry the ball.
At some point, the demand for oil will pass the supply, prices will
rise and alternate energies will be cheaper. That will happen before
we run out of fossil fuels.
Sometimes the free market need a nudge. Should we do away with all regulation? Sure, some is excessive, but look at the safety aspects of
the automobile. Should we bring back leaded gas and let the market decide?
On 2024-02-26, Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 8:47 AM, heyjoe wrote:
Ed P wrote :
Oil is a finite material. It won't run out in our lifetime, but perhaps >>>> our grandchildren. Should we start planning alternatives now or wait
until it is gone in 40 or 50 years?
What is your plan?
Let a free market, without government intervention, carry the ball.
At some point, the demand for oil will pass the supply, prices will
rise and alternate energies will be cheaper. That will happen before
we run out of fossil fuels.
Sometimes the free market need a nudge. Should we do away with all
regulation? Sure, some is excessive, but look at the safety aspects of
the automobile. Should we bring back leaded gas and let the market decide?
The free market has always gotten nudges. From the railroads to
the interstates, the government has always thrown money at the
private sector like a drunken sailor at a titty bar.
Doesn't a "coup" involve [...] violence [...],
threats of such,
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
I bet if everyone had your attitude we'd still be lining in 1850s
conditions as we ignore what science is doing.
I bet we'd have more scientific break throughs and a more productive
society since people would be focused on solving actual problems instead
of wasting time with moon shots.
On 2/26/2024 9:28 AM, D wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
On 2/26/2024 5:53 AM, D wrote:
Energy storage based on batteries at national level is impossible with >>>> todays technology.
Wind and solar are great, as long as there is wind and sun. When not, it >>>> is horribly bad.
You say "today's technology" and that is correct. Tomorrow is a new
story.
https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/04/12/solar-energy-can-now-be-stored-for-up-to-18-years-say-scientists
Yes, those articles do pop up every year, but until something can be
purchased on the market, it is better to disregard such stories.
I've lost count on the number of "battery breakthrough" articles I've seen, >> and not to speak about fusion power. It is good, and let the science roam >> free, but until I see something like that on the market, I won't worry or >> count on it.
I bet if everyone had your attitude we'd still be lining in 1850s conditions as we ignore what science is doing.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 18:39:36 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024, Hank Rogers wrote:
Leonard Blaisdell wrote:What coup? Oh, you mean regular political meetings!
On 2024-02-24, heyjoe <address@is.invalid> wrote:
Am looking forward to the 2024 Democratic National Convention in
Chicago, IL. Can't wait to see the reaction when Big Money fails to >>>>>> support Biden for the nomination. Expect chaos will reign in the
convention and the streets.
Frankly, I expect chaos at both conventions. I'll be surprised if there >>>>> aren't one or two new third-parties created between now and the
election. If it's Biden vs. Trump in the General, I'll be shocked.
We live in interesting times, and we're forced to stay tuned.
Do you think trump will stage another coup? He probably learned from the >>>> last one.
D's definition of a regular political meeting:
<https://s7d2.scene7.com/is/image/TWCNews/new_project_-_2021-11-17t131531536_11172021>
I don't know how old you are but put on your glasses. Donald Trump is not
in that photo.
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, Graham wrote:
It was Covid that fucked up the economies of every civilised nation**.
Biden is NOT responsible for the price increases we see for just about
everything.
**(I sometimes have my doubts about whether the US is civilised)
Incorrect. It was the politicians response to corona that messed up the >economics. What was a common cold led to complete shut down of all markets
+ massive political fingering of the markets. We are now seeing the result
of this socialism.
On 2024-02-26, GM wrote:
Doesn't a "coup" involve [...] violence [...],
threats of such,
"Kill Mike Pence"
On 2024-02-26 10:18 a.m., D wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
I bet if everyone had your attitude we'd still be lining in 1850s
conditions as we ignore what science is doing.
I bet we'd have more scientific break throughs and a more productive
society since people would be focused on solving actual problems
instead of wasting time with moon shots.
A lot of our modern products were first developed in the space program.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:56:10 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, Graham wrote:
It was Covid that fucked up the economies of every civilised nation**.
Biden is NOT responsible for the price increases we see for just about
everything.
**(I sometimes have my doubts about whether the US is civilised)
Incorrect. It was the politicians response to corona that messed up the
economics. What was a common cold led to complete shut down of all markets >> + massive political fingering of the markets. We are now seeing the result >> of this socialism.
A common cold? I know people who died from covid. I don't know anybody
who died from the common cold. Where do you get your information? Do
you watch Fox News?
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:56:10 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, Graham wrote:
It was Covid that fucked up the economies of every civilised nation**. >>>> Biden is NOT responsible for the price increases we see for just about >>>> everything.
**(I sometimes have my doubts about whether the US is civilised)
Incorrect. It was the politicians response to corona that messed up the
economics. What was a common cold led to complete shut down of all markets >>> + massive political fingering of the markets. We are now seeing the result >>> of this socialism.
A common cold? I know people who died from covid. I don't know anybody
who died from the common cold. Where do you get your information? Do
you watch Fox News?
I know people who died from bananas and common cold. And yes, Fox is the >ultimate source of truth in case you didn't know it, so in case you don't >follow Fox I cannot take you seriously.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:51:49 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 18:39:36 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024, Hank Rogers wrote:
Leonard Blaisdell wrote:What coup? Oh, you mean regular political meetings!
On 2024-02-24, heyjoe <address@is.invalid> wrote:
Am looking forward to the 2024 Democratic National Convention in >>>>>>> Chicago, IL. Can't wait to see the reaction when Big Money fails to >>>>>>> support Biden for the nomination. Expect chaos will reign in the >>>>>>> convention and the streets.
Frankly, I expect chaos at both conventions. I'll be surprised if there >>>>>> aren't one or two new third-parties created between now and the
election. If it's Biden vs. Trump in the General, I'll be shocked. >>>>>> We live in interesting times, and we're forced to stay tuned.
Do you think trump will stage another coup? He probably learned from the >>>>> last one.
D's definition of a regular political meeting:
<https://s7d2.scene7.com/is/image/TWCNews/new_project_-_2021-11-17t131531536_11172021>
I don't know how old you are but put on your glasses. Donald Trump is not
in that photo.
It's a regular political meeting of Trump zombies.
On 2/26/2024 10:44 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-26 10:18 a.m., D wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
I bet if everyone had your attitude we'd still be lining in 1850s
conditions as we ignore what science is doing.
I bet we'd have more scientific break throughs and a more productive
society since people would be focused on solving actual problems instead >>> of wasting time with moon shots.
A lot of our modern products were first developed in the space program.
Seems D wants to wallow in ignorance
What are NASA spinoffs everyday products from NASA?
Many technologies developed for space have found uses on Earth. Sunglasses, the computer mouse, magnetic resonance imaging, smoke detectors, quartz watches and bar codes are just a few of the 30,000 commercial applications of space technology that have entered the consumer market since the 1950s.
https://www.businessinsider.com/guides/tech/consumer-products-nasa-helped-invent
Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2024-02-26, GM wrote:
Doesn't a "coup" involve [...] violence [...],
threats of such,
"Kill Mike Pence"
Nancy Pelosi made that up, Mike...
On 2024-02-26 11:27 a.m., D wrote:
A common cold? I know people who died from covid. I don't know anybody
who died from the common cold. Where do you get your information? Do
you watch Fox News?
I know people who died from bananas and common cold. And yes, Fox is the
ultimate source of truth in case you didn't know it, so in case you
don't follow Fox I cannot take you seriously.
And as you follow Fox, I can't take you seriously.
BTW it's obvious that you apply "socialism" to anything you don't like.
I suggest you do some reading on the subject.
A common cold? I know people who died from covid. I don't know anybody
who died from the common cold. Where do you get your information? Do
you watch Fox News?
I know people who died from bananas and common cold. And yes, Fox is the ultimate source of truth in case you didn't know it, so in case you
don't follow Fox I cannot take you seriously.
But what we can tell is that all government projects would have
been more economically and/or better done by the private sector.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:56:10 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
Incorrect. It was the politicians response to corona that messed up the >>economics. What was a common cold led to complete shut down of all markets >>+ massive political fingering of the markets. We are now seeing the result >>of this socialism.
A common cold? I know people who died from covid. I don't know anybody
who died from the common cold. Where do you get your information? Do
you watch Fox News?
I think you also have geothermal in california, but I don't know if it is possible and financially meaningful to build out the capability.
On 2024-02-26 11:27 a.m., D wrote:
A common cold? I know people who died from covid. I don't know anybody
who died from the common cold. Where do you get your information? Do
you watch Fox News?
I know people who died from bananas and common cold. And yes, Fox is the
ultimate source of truth in case you didn't know it, so in case you don't
follow Fox I cannot take you seriously.
And as you follow Fox, I can't take you seriously.
BTW it's obvious that you apply "socialism" to anything you don't like.
I suggest you do some reading on the subject.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:33:32 -0700, Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:
On 2024-02-26 11:27 a.m., D wrote:
A common cold? I know people who died from covid. I don't know anybody >>>> who died from the common cold. Where do you get your information? Do
you watch Fox News?
I know people who died from bananas and common cold. And yes, Fox is the >>> ultimate source of truth in case you didn't know it, so in case you
don't follow Fox I cannot take you seriously.
And as you follow Fox, I can't take you seriously.
BTW it's obvious that you apply "socialism" to anything you don't like.
I suggest you do some reading on the subject.
He's the Swedish Leonard. These people live in their own reality. Any discussion is useless.
On 2024-02-26, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
He's the Swedish Leonard. These people live in their own reality. Any
discussion is useless.
Thank you! Anything that separates us from the sticky glob of sheeple is
a win-win. Cults and sheeple, what is the World coming to?
On 2024-02-26, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:56:10 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
Incorrect. It was the politicians response to corona that messed up the >>>economics. What was a common cold led to complete shut down of all markets >>>+ massive political fingering of the markets. We are now seeing the result >>>of this socialism.
A common cold? I know people who died from covid. I don't know anybody
who died from the common cold. Where do you get your information? Do
you watch Fox News?
When the "common cold" first washed over mankind, there's no telling how
many people died. Any google answers on this are B.S., because nobody
has a clue when that happened. Some speculate that they do. They don't.
On 2024-02-26, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
He's the Swedish Leonard. These people live in their own reality. Any
discussion is useless.
Thank you! Anything that separates us from the sticky glob of sheeple is
a win-win. Cults and sheeple, what is the World coming to?
He's the Swedish Leonard. These people live in their own reality. Any discussion is useless.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, heyjoe wrote:
Neither Biden, nor Trump are good choices for POTUS in 2024.
Not sure I can pinch my nose hard enough to vote for either of those
two.
Wow, this seems like a very uncommon balanced and realistic position. In a completely ideal scenario I'd vote for Ron Paul myself.
On 2024-02-26, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, heyjoe wrote:
Neither Biden, nor Trump are good choices for POTUS in 2024.
Not sure I can pinch my nose hard enough to vote for either of those
two.
Wow, this seems like a very uncommon balanced and realistic position. In a >> completely ideal scenario I'd vote for Ron Paul myself.
Ron Paul for President! But I want Kristi Noem as Vice President. How do
we get 'em both? I'd also be happy with vice versa.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, heyjoe wrote:
D wrote :
That's green socialism for you! Welcome to team Trump! ;)
I'm not on Team Trump. Trump is not a nice person and should he be
elected POTUS, he'll be a lame duck from day one. Even more
handicapped than he was in his first term.
Biden is a professional politician. We've already got waay too many
of those in Washington, DC. Let Biden get out on the campaign
trail, in front of voters, so they can judge for themselves whether
or not he's still capable of being the leader of the US. That will
not happen.
Neither Biden, nor Trump are good choices for POTUS in 2024.
Not sure I can pinch my nose hard enough to vote for either of those
two.
Wow, this seems like a very uncommon balanced and realistic position.
In a completely ideal scenario I'd vote for Ron Paul myself.
I find it very interesting that this election seems to be revolving
around which side is better at defeating its nausea. ;)
On 2024-02-26, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, heyjoe wrote:
Neither Biden, nor Trump are good choices for POTUS in 2024.
Not sure I can pinch my nose hard enough to vote for either of those
two.
Wow, this seems like a very uncommon balanced and realistic position. In a >> completely ideal scenario I'd vote for Ron Paul myself.
Ron Paul for President! But I want Kristi Noem as Vice President. How do
we get 'em both? I'd also be happy with vice versa.
heyjoe wrote:
...
... Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
the best price for much in energy now is wind, solar
and battery storage. include more transmission lines to
spread the footprint and that means cheap energy from
anyplace else is available for the price of wheeling
and transmission losses. it is much cheaper to ship
electrons than coal or oil.
short-sighted thinking though, well, it's going to suck
for later generation when they have to pay the bills to
rebuild further inland or try to protect places from
storms. pay now or pay later at a compounded rate.
songbird
D wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, heyjoe wrote:
D wrote :
That's green socialism for you! Welcome to team Trump! ;)
I'm not on Team Trump. Trump is not a nice person and should he be
elected POTUS, he'll be a lame duck from day one. Even more
handicapped than he was in his first term.
Biden is a professional politician. We've already got waay too many
of those in Washington, DC. Let Biden get out on the campaign
trail, in front of voters, so they can judge for themselves whether
or not he's still capable of being the leader of the US. That will
not happen.
Neither Biden, nor Trump are good choices for POTUS in 2024.
Not sure I can pinch my nose hard enough to vote for either of those
two.
Wow, this seems like a very uncommon balanced and realistic position.
In a completely ideal scenario I'd vote for Ron Paul myself.
I find it very interesting that this election seems to be revolving
around which side is better at defeating its nausea. ;)
Oh he has company. I don't like either choice. Biden is already
showing signs of memory failure. We voted in Reagan for a second term
but he seemed solid then. 2 years later the issues came up. Biden
doesn't have a reasonable fall back. The VP's main action was to
refuse her only real task (visit the border for him). She'll be a
waste.
Trump won't get any cooperation from inside or outside the USA so will
be ineffective. Now I *know* it won't happen but if he straightend up
and Nikki Halley ran with him as VP (won't happen, his ego is too big)
that team might work well to give us an alternative. Nice
dream....*sigh*.
On 2024-02-26, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
But you are one of the sheeple. You're a Trump zombie. You can't get
more 'sheeple' than that.
Sticks and stones, Bubbly Boo, sticks and stones. If I called you a
zombie, you'd scream, "Bullying!" like a stuck pig.
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, songbird wrote:
heyjoe wrote:
...
... Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
the best price for much in energy now is wind, solar
and battery storage. include more transmission lines to
spread the footprint and that means cheap energy from
anyplace else is available for the price of wheeling
and transmission losses. it is much cheaper to ship
electrons than coal or oil.
short-sighted thinking though, well, it's going to suck
for later generation when they have to pay the bills to
rebuild further inland or try to protect places from
storms. pay now or pay later at a compounded rate.
songbird
Energy storage based on batteries at national level is impossible
with todays technology.
Wind and solar are great, as long as there is wind and sun. When not,
it is horribly bad.
I think a combination of nuclear for predictable base load, coupled
with wind, solar both at a company level and individual level is the
way to go.
I think you also have geothermal in california, but I don't know if
it is possible and financially meaningful to build out the capability.
But you are one of the sheeple. You're a Trump zombie. You can't get
more 'sheeple' than that.
Dude, I saw it on TV.
D wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, songbird wrote:
heyjoe wrote:
...
... Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
the best price for much in energy now is wind, solar
and battery storage. include more transmission lines to
spread the footprint and that means cheap energy from
anyplace else is available for the price of wheeling
and transmission losses. it is much cheaper to ship
electrons than coal or oil.
short-sighted thinking though, well, it's going to suck
for later generation when they have to pay the bills to
rebuild further inland or try to protect places from
storms. pay now or pay later at a compounded rate.
songbird
Energy storage based on batteries at national level is impossible
with todays technology.
Wind and solar are great, as long as there is wind and sun. When not,
it is horribly bad.
I think a combination of nuclear for predictable base load, coupled
with wind, solar both at a company level and individual level is the
way to go.
I think you also have geothermal in california, but I don't know if
it is possible and financially meaningful to build out the capability.
Virginia is going the multi-source route. No useful geothermal here.
Some wind areas blocked by shipping routes (yes, we are a *major*
shipping port plus a huge amount of Navy bases and ships).
On 26 Feb 2024 20:49:42 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 2024-02-26, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
He's the Swedish Leonard. These people live in their own reality. Any
discussion is useless.
Thank you! Anything that separates us from the sticky glob of sheeple is
a win-win. Cults and sheeple, what is the World coming to?
But you are one of the sheeple. You're a Trump zombie. You can't get
more 'sheeple' than that.
On 2024-02-26, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
I think you also have geothermal in california, but I don't know if it is
possible and financially meaningful to build out the capability.
Nevada, where I live, has 26 geothermal plants according to google. I
know where two are and haven't paid attention to the rest.
Can you imagine utilizing Yellowstone? That would tap the vast energy
there and maybe reduce the devastation when the next "big one" erupts
and demonstrates what "climate change" really means.
On 2024-02-26, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, heyjoe wrote:
Neither Biden, nor Trump are good choices for POTUS in 2024.
Not sure I can pinch my nose hard enough to vote for either of those
two.
Wow, this seems like a very uncommon balanced and realistic position. In a >> completely ideal scenario I'd vote for Ron Paul myself.
Ron Paul for President! But I want Kristi Noem as Vice President. How do
we get 'em both? I'd also be happy with vice versa.
D wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, heyjoe wrote:
D wrote :
That's green socialism for you! Welcome to team Trump! ;)
I'm not on Team Trump. Trump is not a nice person and should he be
elected POTUS, he'll be a lame duck from day one. Even more
handicapped than he was in his first term.
Biden is a professional politician. We've already got waay too many
of those in Washington, DC. Let Biden get out on the campaign
trail, in front of voters, so they can judge for themselves whether
or not he's still capable of being the leader of the US. That will
not happen.
Neither Biden, nor Trump are good choices for POTUS in 2024.
Not sure I can pinch my nose hard enough to vote for either of those
two.
Wow, this seems like a very uncommon balanced and realistic position.
In a completely ideal scenario I'd vote for Ron Paul myself.
I find it very interesting that this election seems to be revolving
around which side is better at defeating its nausea. ;)
Oh he has company. I don't like either choice. Biden is already
showing signs of memory failure. We voted in Reagan for a second term
but he seemed solid then. 2 years later the issues came up. Biden
doesn't have a reasonable fall back. The VP's main action was to
refuse her only real task (visit the border for him). She'll be a
waste.
Trump won't get any cooperation from inside or outside the USA so will
be ineffective. Now I *know* it won't happen but if he straightend up
and Nikki Halley ran with him as VP (won't happen, his ego is too big)
that team might work well to give us an alternative. Nice
dream....*sigh*.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 21:44:44 +0000, "cshenk"
<cshenk@virginia-beach.net> wrote:
D wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, heyjoe wrote:
D wrote :
That's green socialism for you! Welcome to team Trump! ;)
I'm not on Team Trump. Trump is not a nice person and should he be
elected POTUS, he'll be a lame duck from day one. Even more
handicapped than he was in his first term.
Biden is a professional politician. We've already got waay too many
of those in Washington, DC. Let Biden get out on the campaign
trail, in front of voters, so they can judge for themselves whether
or not he's still capable of being the leader of the US. That will
not happen.
Neither Biden, nor Trump are good choices for POTUS in 2024.
Not sure I can pinch my nose hard enough to vote for either of those
two.
Wow, this seems like a very uncommon balanced and realistic position.
In a completely ideal scenario I'd vote for Ron Paul myself.
I find it very interesting that this election seems to be revolving
around which side is better at defeating its nausea. ;)
Oh he has company. I don't like either choice. Biden is already
showing signs of memory failure. We voted in Reagan for a second term
but he seemed solid then. 2 years later the issues came up. Biden
doesn't have a reasonable fall back. The VP's main action was to
refuse her only real task (visit the border for him). She'll be a
waste.
Trump won't get any cooperation from inside or outside the USA so will
be ineffective. Now I *know* it won't happen but if he straightend up
and Nikki Halley ran with him as VP (won't happen, his ego is too big)
that team might work well to give us an alternative. Nice
dream....*sigh*.
If Trump straightened up... sounds like... if a dog had six legs.
cshenk wrote:
D wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, songbird wrote:
heyjoe wrote:
...
... Green is great, but not to the exclusion of what
works at the best price.
the best price for much in energy now is wind, solar
and battery storage. include more transmission lines to
spread the footprint and that means cheap energy from
anyplace else is available for the price of wheeling
and transmission losses. it is much cheaper to ship
electrons than coal or oil.
short-sighted thinking though, well, it's going to suck
for later generation when they have to pay the bills to
rebuild further inland or try to protect places from
storms. pay now or pay later at a compounded rate.
songbird
Energy storage based on batteries at national level is impossible
with todays technology.
blatantly false.
how many GWH do you consider national?
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:33:32 -0700, Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:
On 2024-02-26 11:27 a.m., D wrote:
A common cold? I know people who died from covid. I don't know anybody >>>> who died from the common cold. Where do you get your information? Do
you watch Fox News?
I know people who died from bananas and common cold. And yes, Fox is the >>> ultimate source of truth in case you didn't know it, so in case you
don't follow Fox I cannot take you seriously.
And as you follow Fox, I can't take you seriously.
BTW it's obvious that you apply "socialism" to anything you don't like.
I suggest you do some reading on the subject.
He's the Swedish Leonard. These people live in their own reality. Any discussion is useless.
Trump won't get any cooperation from inside or outside the USA so will
be ineffective.
In article
<iqqdnZYWZ53Rm0D4nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>,
cshenk@virginia-beach.net says...
Trump won't get any cooperation from inside or outside the USA so will
be ineffective.
Are you so thick you can't see why that's so hugely
dangerous?
January 6 was just a practise run, a rehearsal
for Trumps second term home-game.
America crippled at home and abroad by a second term of
President Trump is the dream scenario that plays straight
into the hands of Putin, Russia, China, all your
opponents round the world.
He's already given Putin the green light to attack Nato.
On 2/26/2024 3:05 PM, Bruce wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:33:32 -0700, Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:
On 2024-02-26 11:27 a.m., D wrote:
A common cold? I know people who died from covid. I don't know anybody >>>>> who died from the common cold. Where do you get your information? Do >>>>> you watch Fox News?
I know people who died from bananas and common cold. And yes, Fox is the >>>> ultimate source of truth in case you didn't know it, so in case you
don't follow Fox I cannot take you seriously.
And as you follow Fox, I can't take you seriously.
BTW it's obvious that you apply "socialism" to anything you don't like.
I suggest you do some reading on the subject.
He's the Swedish Leonard. These people live in their own reality. Any
discussion is useless.
And you don't? ;)
On 2/26/2024 3:05 PM, Bruce wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:33:32 -0700, Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:
On 2024-02-26 11:27 a.m., D wrote:
A common cold? I know people who died from covid. I don't know anybody >>>>> who died from the common cold. Where do you get your information? Do >>>>> you watch Fox News?
I know people who died from bananas and common cold. And yes, Fox is the >>>> ultimate source of truth in case you didn't know it, so in case you
don't follow Fox I cannot take you seriously.
And as you follow Fox, I can't take you seriously.
BTW it's obvious that you apply "socialism" to anything you don't like.
I suggest you do some reading on the subject.
He's the Swedish Leonard. These people live in their own reality. Any
discussion is useless.
And you don't? ;)
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach europe. Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi.
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach europe. >> Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi.
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South >Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach europe. >> Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi.
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Haza7DQxr50>
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach
europe.
Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi.
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South
Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Haza7DQxr50>
Brilliant! Oh the day I would see a political commercial like this in
sweden, that would be the day!
But I thought new hampshire was the freest state due to their free state project? Is South dakota cathing up? Maybe South Dakota is where I
should retire? =)
On 2/27/2024 1:34 PM, D wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach
europe.
Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi.
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South
Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Haza7DQxr50>
Brilliant! Oh the day I would see a political commercial like this in
sweden, that would be the day!
But I thought new hampshire was the freest state due to their free state
project? Is South dakota cathing up? Maybe South Dakota is where I should
retire? =)
Sure, but they don't have enough medical people to take care of you if needed.
Nine states have no income tax.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
On 2/27/2024 1:34 PM, D wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach
europe.
Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi.
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South >>>> Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Haza7DQxr50>
Brilliant! Oh the day I would see a political commercial like this in
sweden, that would be the day!
But I thought new hampshire was the freest state due to their free
state project? Is South dakota cathing up? Maybe South Dakota is
where I should retire? =)
Sure, but they don't have enough medical people to take care of you if
needed.
Nine states have no income tax.
But does that leave Federal income tax and tax on capital gains and
dividens on the federal level?
On 2/27/2024 3:41 PM, D wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
On 2/27/2024 1:34 PM, D wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach >>>>>> europe.
Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi. >>>>>
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South >>>>> Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Haza7DQxr50>
Brilliant! Oh the day I would see a political commercial like this in
sweden, that would be the day!
But I thought new hampshire was the freest state due to their free
state project? Is South dakota cathing up? Maybe South Dakota is
where I should retire? =)
Sure, but they don't have enough medical people to take care of you if
needed.
Nine states have no income tax.
But does that leave Federal income tax and tax on capital gains and
dividens on the federal level?
Yes, and that is equal in every state. Some cities also have a wage tax.
On 27 Feb 2024 17:57:46 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach europe. >>> Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi.
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South >>Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
Leo, does she support the idea of blacks in the back of the bus?
cshenk wrote:
Virginia is going the multi-source route. No useful geothermal
here. Some wind areas blocked by shipping routes (yes, we are a
major shipping port plus a huge amount of Navy bases and ships).
if they can do offshore it will often be the cheapest source
possible and they are still making larger and larger ones so
that means fewer turbines per GW.
songbird
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, cshenk wrote:
Oh he has company. I don't like either choice. Biden is already
showing signs of memory failure. We voted in Reagan for a second
term but he seemed solid then. 2 years later the issues came up.
Biden doesn't have a reasonable fall back. The VP's main action
was to refuse her only real task (visit the border for him).
She'll be a waste.
Trump won't get any cooperation from inside or outside the USA so
will be ineffective. Now I know it won't happen but if he
straightend up and Nikki Halley ran with him as VP (won't happen,
his ego is too big) that team might work well to give us an
alternative. Nice dream....*sigh*.
Trump and Nikki cooperating? Wow, that would be very surprising! I
wonder how all political commentators would take that? I could also
imagine that Nikki would quit after a few weeks. ;)
On 2024-02-27, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 27 Feb 2024 17:57:46 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach europe. >>>> Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi.
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South
Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
Leo, does she support the idea of blacks in the back of the bus?
She supports a lot of regressive stuff. Tax cuts for the rich,
offshore oil drilling, permit-free carry of concealed weapons,
school prayer. Hydroxychloroquine.
She opposes a lot of progressive stuff. Gay marriage. Obamacare.
Abortion. Protests against the Keystone Pipeline. COVID restrictions. Marijuana legalization.
Of course she thinks the 2020 election was characterized by widespread
voter fraud.
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
On 2/27/2024 5:06 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-27, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 27 Feb 2024 17:57:46 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach europe.
Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi.
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South >>>> Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
Leo, does she support the idea of blacks in the back of the bus?
She supports a lot of regressive stuff. Tax cuts for the rich,
offshore oil drilling, permit-free carry of concealed weapons,
school prayer. Hydroxychloroquine.
She opposes a lot of progressive stuff. Gay marriage. Obamacare.
Abortion. Protests against the Keystone Pipeline. COVID restrictions.
Marijuana legalization.
Of course she thinks the 2020 election was characterized by widespread
voter fraud.
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
Wow, a century ago she would be a big winner. She does not entice me to
move to ND.
On 2024-02-27, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Leo, does she support the idea of blacks in the back of the bus?
She supports a lot of regressive stuff. Tax cuts for the rich,
offshore oil drilling, permit-free carry of concealed weapons,
school prayer. Hydroxychloroquine.
She opposes a lot of progressive stuff. Gay marriage. Obamacare.
Abortion. Protests against the Keystone Pipeline. COVID restrictions. >Marijuana legalization.
Of course she thinks the 2020 election was characterized by widespread
voter fraud.
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
On 2024-02-27, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 27 Feb 2024 17:57:46 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach europe. >>>> Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi.
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South
Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
Leo, does she support the idea of blacks in the back of the bus?
She supports a lot of regressive stuff. Tax cuts for the rich,
offshore oil drilling, permit-free carry of concealed weapons,
school prayer. Hydroxychloroquine.
She opposes a lot of progressive stuff. Gay marriage. Obamacare.
Abortion. Protests against the Keystone Pipeline. COVID restrictions. Marijuana legalization.
Of course she thinks the 2020 election was characterized by widespread
voter fraud.
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
On 2/27/2024 3:41 PM, D wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
On 2/27/2024 1:34 PM, D wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach >>>>>> europe.
Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi. >>>>>
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South >>>>> Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Haza7DQxr50>
Brilliant! Oh the day I would see a political commercial like this in
sweden, that would be the day!
But I thought new hampshire was the freest state due to their free state >>>> project? Is South dakota cathing up? Maybe South Dakota is where I should >>>> retire? =)
Sure, but they don't have enough medical people to take care of you if
needed.
Nine states have no income tax.
But does that leave Federal income tax and tax on capital gains and
dividens on the federal level?
Yes, and that is equal in every state. Some cities also have a wage tax.
https://www.thebalancemoney.com/cities-that-levy-income-taxes-3193246
On 2/27/2024 5:06 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2024-02-27, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 27 Feb 2024 17:57:46 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach
europe.
Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi.
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South >>>> Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
Leo, does she support the idea of blacks in the back of the bus?
She supports a lot of regressive stuff. Tax cuts for the rich,
offshore oil drilling, permit-free carry of concealed weapons,
school prayer. Hydroxychloroquine.
She opposes a lot of progressive stuff. Gay marriage. Obamacare.
Abortion. Protests against the Keystone Pipeline. COVID restrictions.
Marijuana legalization.
Of course she thinks the 2020 election was characterized by widespread
voter fraud.
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
Wow, a century ago she would be a big winner. She does not entice me to move to ND.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:36:06 -0500, Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:41 PM, D wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Ed P wrote:
On 2/27/2024 1:34 PM, D wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-02-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
As for Kristi, she has never made enough media head lines to reach >>>>>>> europe.
Ron Paul has been in the european news a few times but never Kristi. >>>>>>
She's a ranch girl who is now the Governor of South Dakota and a
terrific spokesman for the State. She does commercials promoting South >>>>>> Dakota. Here's one. There's a bunch more.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Haza7DQxr50>
Brilliant! Oh the day I would see a political commercial like this in >>>>> sweden, that would be the day!
But I thought new hampshire was the freest state due to their free
state project? Is South dakota cathing up? Maybe South Dakota is
where I should retire? =)
Sure, but they don't have enough medical people to take care of you if >>>> needed.
Nine states have no income tax.
But does that leave Federal income tax and tax on capital gains and
dividens on the federal level?
Yes, and that is equal in every state. Some cities also have a wage tax.
Damn, where can he move now?
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 22:06:00 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
<hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2024-02-27, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Leo, does she support the idea of blacks in the back of the bus?
She supports a lot of regressive stuff. Tax cuts for the rich,
offshore oil drilling, permit-free carry of concealed weapons,
school prayer. Hydroxychloroquine.
She opposes a lot of progressive stuff. Gay marriage. Obamacare. >>Abortion. Protests against the Keystone Pipeline. COVID restrictions. >>Marijuana legalization.
Of course she thinks the 2020 election was characterized by widespread >>voter fraud.
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
Horrible. I can't believe someone with a working brain can support
that woman. That only leaves one possible conclusion.
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
On 2024-02-27, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 22:06:00 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
<hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2024-02-27, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Leo, does she support the idea of blacks in the back of the bus?
She supports a lot of regressive stuff. Tax cuts for the rich,
offshore oil drilling, permit-free carry of concealed weapons,
school prayer. Hydroxychloroquine.
She opposes a lot of progressive stuff. Gay marriage. Obamacare. >>>Abortion. Protests against the Keystone Pipeline. COVID restrictions. >>>Marijuana legalization.
Of course she thinks the 2020 election was characterized by widespread >>>voter fraud.
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
Horrible. I can't believe someone with a working brain can support
that woman. That only leaves one possible conclusion.
Meth. They're on it.
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the
worst possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the
worst possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the
worst possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the
worst possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
blowhard with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
songbird wrote:
Dave Smith wrote:
...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the
worst possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
is he a sexist thug and conman who has zero morals?
has he ignored the foundational documents of his
country? has he tried to bribe or influence those who
are bound by laws? has be promised pardons and
punishments?
i was watching a video today which claimed that Trump
has a 140+ IQ. no f'n way... also the shrubs... um,
nope...
songbird
It doesn't matter if trump has any brains at all. The only criterion is whether enough voters can put him in power once again. If so, he will
become dictator for life, same as Julius Caesar so many years ago.
Dave Smith wrote:
...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the
worst possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
is he a sexist thug and conman who has zero morals?
has he ignored the foundational documents of his
country? has he tried to bribe or influence those who
are bound by laws? has be promised pardons and
punishments?
i was watching a video today which claimed that Trump
has a 140+ IQ. no f'n way... also the shrubs... um,
nope...
songbird
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the
worst possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
blowhard with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the
worst possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
blowhard with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two
evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the
worst possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
blowhard with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two
evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
On 2024-02-28 3:51 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:I'm also fed up with JT but in my nearly 49 years in Canada,
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan >>>>>> was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the
worst possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
blowhard with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two
evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
Conservative administrations have proved disastrous.
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy blowhard >>> with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan >>>>>> was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the worst >>>> possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two evils.
I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just
look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of how >damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy blowhard >> with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the worst >>> possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:22:09 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy blowhard >>>> with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan >>>>>>> was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the worst >>>>> possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two evils.
I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just
look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of how >> damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know that you won't be
happy until a country is run by the Ku Klux Clan.
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two
evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just
look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of
how damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
On 2024-02-29 3:22 a.m., D wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two
evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just look >> at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of how
damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
Jordan Peterson has become a hero to the people who are fed up with the woke movement.
On 2024-02-29, D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know
?
Bruce is well-known for expressing opinions on
things about which he is willfully ignorant.
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know
?
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:22:09 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy blowhard >>>> with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan >>>>>>> was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the worst >>>>> possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two evils.
I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just
look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of how >> damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know that you won't be
happy until a country is run by the Ku Klux Clan.
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-29 3:22 a.m., D wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two >>>> evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just look >>> at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of how
damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
Jordan Peterson has become a hero to the people who are fed up with the woke >> movement.
I think not only in Canada, but in the whole world. People feel as if
there's no one on their side, and when that finally happens, we see how
the establishment in canada is reacting.
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:22:09 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy blowhard
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan >>>>>>>> was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the worst
possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two evils.
I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just
look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of how >>> damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know that you won't be
happy until a country is run by the Ku Klux Clan.
?
On 2024-02-29, D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know
?
Bruce is well-known for expressing opinions on
things about which he is willfully ignorant.
On 2024-02-29 1:29 a.m., Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:22:09 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy blowhard
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan >>>>>>>> was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the worst
possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two evils.
I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just
look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of how >>> damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know that you won't be
happy until a country is run by the Ku Klux Clan.
He's a nutcase beloved by the ultra-right wingers.
On 2024-02-29 1:29 a.m., Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:22:09 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan >>>>>>>> was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for
the worst
possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
blowhard
with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of
two evils.
I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just
look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent
of how
damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know that you won't be
happy until a country is run by the Ku Klux Clan.
He's a nutcase beloved by the ultra-right wingers.
On 2024-02-29 11:04 a.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-29 1:29 a.m., Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:22:09 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose >>>>>>>>> slogan
was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for
the worst
possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
blowhard
with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of
two evils.
I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just >>>> look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent
of how
damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know that you won't be
happy until a country is run by the Ku Klux Clan.
He's a nutcase beloved by the ultra-right wingers.
He is anything but a nut case. He is a very calm, rational and well
qualified man who speaks out against the nonsense of political
correctness and wokeness. He fuses to used the nonsense self
identification and non gender specific pronouns. He is extremely
articulate and he is willing to stand up and defy the woke idiots who
spend their lives trying to shut him down.
On 2024-02-29 10:43 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
He is anything but a nut case. He is a very calm, rational and wellBut he mixes it with religious nonsense.
qualified man who speaks out against the nonsense of political
correctness and wokeness. He fuses to used the nonsense self
identification and non gender specific pronouns. He is extremely
articulate and he is willing to stand up and defy the woke idiots who
spend their lives trying to shut him down.
On 2024-02-29, D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know
?
Bruce is well-known for expressing opinions on
things about which he is willfully ignorant.
Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2024-02-29, D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know
?
Bruce is well-known for expressing opinions on
things about which he is willfully ignorant.
And insulting people who disagree with him. I don't think he's missed
anyone now. He's getting really popular in killfiles now.
D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-29 3:22 a.m., D wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two >>>>> evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just >>>> look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of >>>> how damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
Jordan Peterson has become a hero to the people who are fed up with the
woke movement.
I think not only in Canada, but in the whole world. People feel as if
there's no one on their side, and when that finally happens, we see how
the establishment in canada is reacting.
The exact same thing is happening in Germany (amongst other European nations), the US...
D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-29 3:22 a.m., D wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two >>>>> evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just >>>> look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of >>>> how damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
Jordan Peterson has become a hero to the people who are fed up with the
woke movement.
I think not only in Canada, but in the whole world. People feel as if
there's no one on their side, and when that finally happens, we see how the >> establishment in canada is reacting.
The exact same thing is happening in Germany (amongst other European nations), the US...
Here are the concerns many in Germany have:
- hare - brained "Net Zero" energy policies, these include the shuttering of all nuclear plants, dependence on Russian gas imports (OOPS - how did THAT work out...!!!???), thus sky - high energy prices, leading to many business closing/cutting back, unemployment, and the government having to spend billions of Euros to assist citizens in paying their utiligy bills. Economically, this had made Germany a "Dead Man Walking", the German economy is contracting, and a number of firms are leaving to set up shop overseas. Also, google "German farmer protests"...
- hare - brained "immigration" policies, in that over a million under - educated from MENA states have poured in since 2015. These are primarily shiftless unemployed young men who are ardent islamists, who are sucking off of the German state welfare teat, and they have no incentive to integrate into the larger German national culture, let alone work. Because of this "immigration", rape is skyrocketing in Germany...
And like in Canada, the US and elswhere, the leftist German "traffic light" ruling coaition* is demonising the oppesition, in this case the AfD party... *[In German politics, a traffic light coalition (German: Ampelkoalition) is a coalition government of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), the Free Democratic Party (FDP) and Alliance 90/The Greens. It is named after the parties' traditional colours, respectively red, yellow, and green, matching the colour sequence of a traffic light (Ampel)...]
An excellent read, some excerpts below:
"Rather than being valorised as a model nation, perhaps Germany ought to be seen as a cautionary tale – of how a cosy elite consensus, untroubled by democracy, can take even a powerful, successful country to the brink... In this sense, the farmers’ uprising last week strikes at the heart of modern Germany’s malaise. It challenges the elites’ devotion to greenism at all costs.."
Germany: so much for the ‘grown-up country’
The model nation for centrist liberals is in political and economic turmoil.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/01/21/germany-so-much-for-the-grown-up-country/
"Germany has long occupied a special place in the liberal-elite imagination. Over the past few decades, and especially since the world was upended by the votes for Brexit and Trump, Germany has been held up by the great and good as a model nation. As the rest of the West lost their minds, or so the story goes, Germany remained a paragon of economic efficiency, political maturity and environmental stewardship. The last bulwark of the liberal order in an age of rising populism...
This elite Germanophilia is best embodied in John Kampfner’s 'Why the Germans
Do it Better: Notes From a Grown-Up Country'. First published in August 2020, it became an unlikely bestseller in the UK. It received rave reviews and was declared ‘book of the year’ by the Guardian, the New Statesman and The Economist. Its central claim is that Germany has forged ‘a new paradigm in stability’ that the rest of the world ought to follow...
It is hard to think of any book that has aged quite so badly, quite so quickly...
Indeed, the news coming out of Germany lately paints a wholly different picture: one of economic collapse and interminable political strife...
Even though 2024 is just a few weeks old, Germany has already been rocked by huge farmers’ protests, with thousands of tractors blocking cities and motorway junctions this past week alone. It has been crippled by transport workers’ and doctors’ strikes. Factories in its much-vaunted manufacturing
sector are shutting down and shipping production elsewhere. The federal government is struggling to reckon with a budget crisis and is ushering in a new age of austerity. Data released this week showed that Germany had the worst economic performance last year of any major economy. In the year ahead, it is predicted to have the slowest growth in the G20, apart from Argentina...
Major firms like BASF – a chemical giant that is older than the German state
itself – are now closing their factories and offshoring production. Even ‘green’ industries cannot cope. This week, Germany’s largest solar-panel
producer, Meyer Burger, threatened to shut down its factory in Saxony and relocate to the US..."
Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2024-02-29, D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know
?
Bruce is well-known for expressing opinions on
things about which he is willfully ignorant.
And insulting people who disagree with him. I don't think he's missed
anyone now. He's getting really popular in killfiles now.
On 2024-02-29 11:04 a.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-29 1:29 a.m., Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:22:09 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan >>>>>>>>> was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for the >>>>>>> worst
possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
blowhard
with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two >>>>> evils.
I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just >>>> look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of >>>> how
damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know that you won't be
happy until a country is run by the Ku Klux Clan.
He's a nutcase beloved by the ultra-right wingers.
He is anything but a nut case. He is a very calm, rational and well qualified man who speaks out against the nonsense of political correctness and wokeness. He fuses to used the nonsense self identification and non gender specific pronouns. He is extremely articulate and he is willing to stand up and defy the woke idiots who spend their lives trying to shut him down.
On 2024-02-29 11:04 a.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-29 1:29 a.m., Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:22:09 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan >>>>>>>>> was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for
the worst
possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
blowhard
with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of
two evils.
I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just >>>> look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent
of how
damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know that you won't be
happy until a country is run by the Ku Klux Clan.
He's a nutcase beloved by the ultra-right wingers.
He is anything but a nut case. He is a very calm, rational and well
qualified man who speaks out against the nonsense of political
correctness and wokeness. He fuses to used the nonsense self
identification and non gender specific pronouns. He is extremely
articulate and he is willing to stand up and defy the woke idiots who
spend their lives trying to shut him down.
GM wrote:
D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-29 3:22 a.m., D wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two >>>>>> evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just >>>>> look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of >>>>> how damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
Jordan Peterson has become a hero to the people who are fed up with the >>>> woke movement.
I think not only in Canada, but in the whole world. People feel as if
there's no one on their side, and when that finally happens, we see how
the establishment in canada is reacting.
The exact same thing is happening in Germany (amongst other European
nations), the US...
What we need is for trump to be installed as emperor of the world.
Hank Rogers wrote:
GM wrote:
D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-29 3:22 a.m., D wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of >>>>>>> two evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden.
Just look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the
extent of how damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership. >>>>>
Jordan Peterson has become a hero to the people who are fed up with
the woke movement.
I think not only in Canada, but in the whole world. People feel as if
there's no one on their side, and when that finally happens, we see how >>>> the establishment in canada is reacting.
The exact same thing is happening in Germany (amongst other European
nations), the US...
What we need is for trump to be installed as emperor of the world.
I SURE will be a HAPPY Camper when THE DONALD wins again, Hank...!!!
Even now I'm quivering with so much excitement at the prospect that God
said to me, "Greg, if you get TOO excited you're going to 'vibrate' your
way straight up to Heaven...!!!"
;-D
On 2024-02-29, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
On 2024-02-29 11:04 a.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-29 1:29 a.m., Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:22:09 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy >>>>>>> blowhard
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan >>>>>>>>>> was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the
worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for >>>>>>>> the worst
possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of >>>>>> two evils.
I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just >>>>> look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent
of how
damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know that you won't be
happy until a country is run by the Ku Klux Clan.
He's a nutcase beloved by the ultra-right wingers.
He is anything but a nut case. He is a very calm, rational and well
qualified man who speaks out against the nonsense of political
correctness and wokeness. He fuses to used the nonsense self
identification and non gender specific pronouns. He is extremely
articulate and he is willing to stand up and defy the woke idiots who
spend their lives trying to shut him down.
This Jordan Peterson?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Peterson
He's a low-grade nutbar. Not flamboyant enough to really be
successful as a media personality.
Oh, this is rich:
Peterson believes that order is masculine and chaos is feminine, and
that these qualities are inherent to human existence. To
Peterson, culture is "symbolically, archetypally, mythically male,"
while "chaos—the unknown—is symbolically associated with the feminine."
And, since this is rec.food.cooking: Since 2018 he allegedly stopped
eathing anything but meat, salt, and water.
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:27:57 +0000, "cshenk"
<cshenk@virginia-beach.net> wrote:
Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2024-02-29, D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know
?
Bruce is well-known for expressing opinions on
things about which he is willfully ignorant.
And insulting people who disagree with him. I don't think he's missed >>anyone now. He's getting really popular in killfiles now.
You're the one who gets all weird when someone disagrees with you.
You've lived in Japan for too long. You now think, like dsi1 did, that
you lose face if you admit being wrong about something. Which is a
problem, because you're wrong half the time you say something.
On Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:41:46 +1100, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:27:57 +0000, "cshenk"
<cshenk@virginia-beach.net> wrote:
Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2024-02-29, D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know
?
Bruce is well-known for expressing opinions on
things about which he is willfully ignorant.
And insulting people who disagree with him. I don't think he's missed
anyone now. He's getting really popular in killfiles now.
You're the one who gets all weird when someone disagrees with you.
You've lived in Japan for too long. You now think, like dsi1 did, that
you lose face if you admit being wrong about something. Which is a
problem, because you're wrong half the time you say something.
Don't blame the Japanese for her - she didn't really 'live' in Japan,
she was there with the USN.
On Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:41:46 +1100, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:27:57 +0000, "cshenk"
<cshenk@virginia-beach.net> wrote:
And insulting people who disagree with him. I don't think he's missed >>>anyone now. He's getting really popular in killfiles now.
You're the one who gets all weird when someone disagrees with you.
You've lived in Japan for too long. You now think, like dsi1 did, that
you lose face if you admit being wrong about something. Which is a
problem, because you're wrong half the time you say something.
Don't blame the Japanese for her - she didn't really 'live' in Japan,
she was there with the USN.
On 2/29/2024 6:43 PM, lucretia@florence.it wrote:
On Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:41:46 +1100, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:27:57 +0000, "cshenk"
<cshenk@virginia-beach.net> wrote:
Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2024-02-29, D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know
?
Bruce is well-known for expressing opinions on
things about which he is willfully ignorant.
And insulting people who disagree with him. I don't think he's missed >>>> anyone now. He's getting really popular in killfiles now.
You're the one who gets all weird when someone disagrees with you.
You've lived in Japan for too long. You now think, like dsi1 did, that
you lose face if you admit being wrong about something. Which is a
problem, because you're wrong half the time you say something.
Don't blame the Japanese for her - she didn't really 'live' in Japan,
she was there with the USN.
It's kind of amusing how often she brings up Sasebo considering how long
ago it was they lived there. It definitely had a strong influence on her.
Jill
On 2024-02-29 3:22 a.m., D wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two
evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just
look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of
how damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
Jordan Peterson has become a hero to the people who are fed up with the
woke movement.
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:36:07 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
<hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2024-02-29, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
On 2024-02-29 11:04 a.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-29 1:29 a.m., Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:22:09 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 5:34 p.m., Graham wrote:
On 2024-02-28 11:37 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-28 12:05 p.m., songbird wrote:But is the alternative any better? He's just a pro-trucker convoy >>>>>>>> blowhard
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
...
The best, though, was her anti-meth awareness campaign whose slogan >>>>>>>>>>> was "Meth. We're on it."
lol based upon how many right-wingers vote for the >>>>>>>>>> worst possible people and think they're just great,
yeah, we're on it...
Yeah, right, as if right wingers are the only ones who vote for >>>>>>>>> the worst
possible candidate. Look at the idiot running Canada.
with a disciple doing her best to fuck-up Alberta.
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of >>>>>>> two evils.
I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just >>>>>> look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent >>>>>> of how
damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know that you won't be >>>>> happy until a country is run by the Ku Klux Clan.
He's a nutcase beloved by the ultra-right wingers.
He is anything but a nut case. He is a very calm, rational and well
qualified man who speaks out against the nonsense of political
correctness and wokeness. He fuses to used the nonsense self
identification and non gender specific pronouns. He is extremely
articulate and he is willing to stand up and defy the woke idiots who
spend their lives trying to shut him down.
This Jordan Peterson?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Peterson
He's a low-grade nutbar. Not flamboyant enough to really be
successful as a media personality.
Oh, this is rich:
Peterson believes that order is masculine and chaos is feminine, and
that these qualities are inherent to human existence. To
Peterson, culture is "symbolically, archetypally, mythically male,"
while "chaos—the unknown—is symbolically associated with the feminine."
And, since this is rec.food.cooking: Since 2018 he allegedly stopped
eathing anything but meat, salt, and water.
A complete idiot. Trust Dave "Mucus" Smith and "D" to love him.
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Bruce wrote:
A complete idiot. Trust Dave "Mucus" Smith and "D" to love him.
Not at all. Just look at your wife or female friends and you'll see that
it is true. Females are more chaotic than men who are more rational and >orderly. This is based on biology and brain setup. Oh, and there are two >genders determined by X and Y chromosomes.
Don't be chocked Bruce, deep inside you knew all along! ;)
On 2024-02-29, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
On 2024-02-29 3:22 a.m., D wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser of two >>>> evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden. Just
look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the extent of
how damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership.
Jordan Peterson has become a hero to the people who are fed up with the
woke movement.
Do you know what the "woke movement" really is about? Being fair
to people who are different from oneself and not hurting them,
mentally or physically.
Stay woke, people.
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
Do you know what the "woke movement" really is about? Being fair
to people who are different from oneself and not hurting them,
mentally or physically.
Stay woke, people.
No, that is incorrect. Woke is an off shoot of socialism trying to exploit >differences in groups for political gain.
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 10:44:29 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Bruce wrote:
A complete idiot. Trust Dave "Mucus" Smith and "D" to love him.
Not at all. Just look at your wife or female friends and you'll see that
it is true. Females are more chaotic than men who are more rational and
orderly. This is based on biology and brain setup. Oh, and there are two
genders determined by X and Y chromosomes.
Don't be chocked Bruce, deep inside you knew all along! ;)
Dinosaur boomer talk. Enjoy!
PS: I'm not chocked. Thanks for caring, though.
Hank Rogers wrote:
GM wrote:
D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-02-29 3:22 a.m., D wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Dave Smith wrote:
I think we can agree that is seems to be a matter of the lesser
of two evils. I guess we just disagree on which is worse.
No, the idiot running canada is far worse. Even worse than Biden.
Just look at how Jordan Peterson is treated there and you see the
extent of how damaged canada is as a country due to its leadership. >>>>>
Jordan Peterson has become a hero to the people who are fed up with
the woke movement.
I think not only in Canada, but in the whole world. People feel as
if there's no one on their side, and when that finally happens, we
see how the establishment in canada is reacting.
The exact same thing is happening in Germany (amongst other European
nations), the US...
What we need is for trump to be installed as emperor of the world.
I SURE will be a HAPPY Camper when THE DONALD wins again, Hank...!!!
Even now I'm quivering with so much excitement at the prospect that God
said to me, "Greg, if you get TOO excited you're going to 'vibrate' your
way straight up to Heaven...!!!"
;-D
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 10:44:29 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Bruce wrote:
A complete idiot. Trust Dave "Mucus" Smith and "D" to love him.
Not at all. Just look at your wife or female friends and you'll see that
it is true. Females are more chaotic than men who are more rational and >>orderly. This is based on biology and brain setup. Oh, and there are two >>genders determined by X and Y chromosomes.
Don't be chocked Bruce, deep inside you knew all along! ;)
Dinosaur boomer talk. Enjoy!
On 2024-03-01, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 10:44:29 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Bruce wrote:
A complete idiot. Trust Dave "Mucus" Smith and "D" to love him.
Not at all. Just look at your wife or female friends and you'll see that >>> it is true. Females are more chaotic than men who are more rational and
orderly. This is based on biology and brain setup. Oh, and there are two >>> genders determined by X and Y chromosomes.
Don't be chocked Bruce, deep inside you knew all along! ;)
Dinosaur boomer talk. Enjoy!
I don't think D knows any women.
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 10:48:31 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
Do you know what the "woke movement" really is about? Being fair
to people who are different from oneself and not hurting them,
mentally or physically.
Stay woke, people.
No, that is incorrect. Woke is an off shoot of socialism trying to exploit >> differences in groups for political gain.
It has absolutely nothing to do with socialism. I know that Trump
zombies think it has, but I didn't know a Swede could also be this
poorly informed. Do you live in the US, perhaps?
Do you know what the "woke movement" really is about? Being fair
to people who are different from oneself and not hurting them,
mentally or physically.
Stay woke, people.
I know many beautiful women! I'm married
to one and she cooks for me!
On 2024-03-01, D wrote:
I know many beautiful women! I'm married
to one and she cooks for me!
Excellent! Now we have a food-related subject we
can use to drive a wedge into your guts.
So the question is IKEA cafeteria Swedish Meatballs
vs. the ones your wife cooks for you. Your opinion?
On 2024-03-01, D wrote:
I know many beautiful women! I'm married
to one and she cooks for me!
Excellent! Now we have a food-related subject we
can use to drive a wedge into your guts.
So the question is IKEA cafeteria Swedish Meatballs
vs. the ones your wife cooks for you. Your opinion?
On 2024-03-01 4:36 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
Do you know what the "woke movement" really is about? Being fair
to people who are different from oneself and not hurting them,
mentally or physically.
Stay woke, people.
It has gone a little overboard.
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2024-03-01, D wrote:
I know many beautiful women! I'm married
to one and she cooks for me!
Excellent! Now we have a food-related subject we
can use to drive a wedge into your guts.
So the question is IKEA cafeteria Swedish Meatballs
vs. the ones your wife cooks for you. Your opinion?
Wifes, always. Ikea are ok but not great.
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Bruce wrote:
It has absolutely nothing to do with socialism. I know that Trump
zombies think it has, but I didn't know a Swede could also be this
poorly informed. Do you live in the US, perhaps?
It has everything to do with socialism. It is just a more refined
methodology since it doesn't work today, thanks to the blessings of >capitalism, to exploit the worker/capitalist rivalry. Workers today have
it too good to care.
So new fronts are opened as per the message earlier.
No not US, I left the hell-hole that is sweden (Trump was right btw, in
his "last night in sweden" speech mainstream media to the contrary) for
a more libertarian/conservative heaven in eastern europe. =)
Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2024-03-01, D wrote:
I know many beautiful women! I'm married
to one and she cooks for me!
Excellent! Now we have a food-related subject we
can use to drive a wedge into your guts.
So the question is IKEA cafeteria Swedish Meatballs
vs. the ones your wife cooks for you. Your opinion?
"Only in the 1970s and 1980s did Sweden expand government dramatically... many of Sweden’s most important businesses, like IKEA and Tetra Pak, fled the
country..."
Au contraire, Mike... let's keep this situation "on - topic", as I'd like to see D's opinion about the following: https://www.fraserinstitute.org/profile/johan-norberg...
Recent Research by Johan Norberg
The Mirage of Swedish Socialism: The Economic History of a Welfare State
creating new companies and increasing real wages..."
Also, didya know that Sweden ranks *higher* on the Index of Economic Freedom than does the United States...and so does CANADA...???
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom:
The Index of Economic Freedom is an annual index and ranking created in 1995
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, cshenk wrote:
Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2024-02-29, D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know
?
Bruce is well-known for expressing opinions on
things about which he is willfully ignorant.
And insulting people who disagree with him. I don't think he's
missed anyone now. He's getting really popular in killfiles now.
I find him mildly entertaining. He has nothing rational to say, so I
can't say I bother that much to read what he actually says, but his
insults and dismissals when he has no arguments are quite fun. ;)
D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, cshenk wrote:
Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2024-02-29, D wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Bruce wrote:
I don't know who Jordan Peterson is, but I do know
?
Bruce is well-known for expressing opinions on
things about which he is willfully ignorant.
And insulting people who disagree with him. I don't think he's
missed anyone now. He's getting really popular in killfiles now.
I find him mildly entertaining. He has nothing rational to say, so I
can't say I bother that much to read what he actually says, but his
insults and dismissals when he has no arguments are quite fun. ;)
Maybe but I'm over it.
On 2024-03-01 4:36 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
Do you know what the "woke movement" really is about? Being fair
to people who are different from oneself and not hurting them,
mentally or physically.
Stay woke, people.
It has gone a little overboard.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 14:06:40 |
| Calls: | 6,667 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,214 |
| Messages: | 5,336,558 |
