• Re: "Federal judge rules against Oath Keepers, upholding felony charge"

    From Mike Pervis@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 24 03:19:14 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns

    On 23 Dec 2021, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> posted some


    On 12/23/2021 3:08 PM, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell Lamey
    FNVW Pig-Fucker lied:

    On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:43:30 -0800, Rudy Canoza
    <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/23/2021 2:31 PM, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell Lamey
    FNVW Pig-Fucker lied:

    On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:28:17 -0800, Rudy Canoza
    <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/23/2021 2:24 PM, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell Lamey
    FNVW Pig-Fucker lied:

    On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:03:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza
    <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/23/2021 1:58 PM, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell
    Lamey FNVW Pig-Fucker lied:

    On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:53:28 -0800, Rudy Canoza
    <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/22/2021 6:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/586723- federal-judge-rules-against-oath-keepers-upholding-felony-count


    {...}
    A federal judge denied a legal challenge against the
    heaviest charge that has
    been brought against Capitol riot defendants, upholding
    the felony count that
    federal prosecutors have relied on in the months since
    the attack.

    U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled Monday night that
    prosecutors will be
    allowed to move forward with the obstruction of an
    official proceeding charge
    against 17 defendants affiliated with the right-wing
    paramilitary group the Oath
    Keepers.

    Yes, because it absolutely is the correct charge. The
    seditious
    insurrectionists were trying to *prevent* Congress from
    certifying Biden's
    victory. That's obstructing an official proceeding of
    Congress.


    In a 49-page opinion, Mehta, an Obama appointee, rejected
    the defendants'
    various arguments, including that the obstruction charge
    is unconstitutionally
    vague and that the prosecutors' application of it in the
    context of the riot
    imperils First Amendment protections for demonstrators.

    The charge is not vague, and obstructing an official
    proceeding of Congress is
    not constitutionally protected. There is no first
    amendment issue here.

    ...
    The count is among the most serious that have been
    brought by the Justice
    Department in response to the attack. If a defendant is
    found guilty of
    obstructing an official proceeding, it carries a maximum
    possible prison
    sentence of 20 years.

    And is this is why no one has been charged with
    insurrection, even though it is
    abundantly clear that a seditious insurrection occurred.
    Insurrection carries
    only a 10 year maximum sentence, and has obvious political implications.
    Obstruction of an official proceeding has a 20 year
    maximum sentence, does not
    have the political baggage, and is an easier charge to
    prove.


    Was it as "peaceful" as the riots and looting like Pelosi
    said?

    Nancy Pelosi did not defend any "riots and looting," Jack-
    Off Skeeter
    Shit-4-Braincell Lamey FNVW Pig-Fucker. There is no
    comparison between the
    unfocused, random George Floyd protests, only a few of which
    spawned violence,
    and the highly focused Jan 06 Trump insurrection that
    *began* as a violent
    action intended to prevent Congress from carrying out the certification. No,
    there is no comparison at all, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-
    Braincell Lamey FNVW
    Pig-Fucker, and you know it. Hartung knows it, too. All
    you right-wingnut
    seditionists know it, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell
    Lamey FNVW Pig-Fucker.


    https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-kamala-harris- late-show-rio-idUSKBN27E34P

    You were talking about Pelosi, then you changed it to Harris.
    Did you think we
    wouldn't notice the switch, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell
    Lamey FNVW Pig-Fucker?

    Harris said she supports protests, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-
    Braincell Lamey FNVW
    Pig-Fucker, not riots. You lose again, Jack-Off Skeeter
    Shit-4-Braincell Lamey
    FNVW Pig-Fucker.

    You don't have much time left, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-
    Braincell Lamey FNVW
    Pig-Fucker.

    Why is that?

    Why do you think that is, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell
    Lamey FNVW Pig-Fucker?

    I figured you were full of shit again.

    No, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell Lamey FNVW Pig-Fucker.
    *Think* about it,
    Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell Lamey FNVW Pig-Fucker.


    Pelosi and Harris both support peaceful protests and they said
    so.

    That's right, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell Lamey FNVW Pig-
    Fucker. And both
    of them oppose rioting and looting, and they said so, Jack-Off
    Skeeter
    Shit-4-Braincell Lamey FNVW Pig-Fucker.

    I knew you was wrong

    Yes, I lose,
    I will Jack-Off Skeeter again.

    Oh look. Rudy's lips and butthole must be sore from all his losing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)