• WE HAVE GOT TO STOP UNPLANNED PREGNANCY - WITHOUT ABSTINENCE!!

    From Voter@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 14 15:36:32 2017
    XPost: alt.activism.drug-war, talk.politics.drugs, uk.politics.drugs
    XPost: alt.drugs, rec.drugs.smart

    WE HAVE GOT TO STOP UNPLANNED PREGNANCY - WITHOUT ABSTINENCE!!

    Telling teens not to have sex, is like telling married couples not to have sex -
    just because _you_ think it's better. Would *you* listen? I WOULDN'T LISTEN. I'M NOT LISTENING TO ABSTINENCE, I'M LISTENING TO BIRTH CONTROL. Married couples
    are at just as great a risk of unplanned pregnancy when they don't want to have a
    child, as teens, and the average married couple has sex twice per week. It's just
    the potential cost that will be experienced if that accident occurs that is greater for teens.

    There is a 100% chance of getting pregnant in 1 year without birth control. There is a 100% chance of getting pregnant in 10 years with 1 type of birth control, alone.
    There is a <1%-<100% chance of getting pregnant in 100 years, 100! with 2 concurrent types of birth control.
    There is a 0% chance of getting pregnant in 100 years with 3 concurrent types of
    birth control.

    You could use the rhythm method, and on those days indicated it was safe, use the
    pull out method, and/or a condom or sponge or diaphragm. Then you could have 2 weeks of sex, and 2 weeks of no sex (including 1/2 week on the period safe).

    EXPLAIN TO TEENS, ALWAYS USE AT LEAST 2 TYPES OF BIRTH CONTROL, TOGETHER, OR YOU
    WILL GET PREGNANT.
    THE CONDOM; WITH THE SPONGE OR DIAPHRAGM; AND/OR WITH HORMONAL; FOR FEMALES. THE CONDOM; WITH THE PULL OUT METHOD; FOR MALES.
    TEENS SHOULD HAVE SEX IN THE COMFORT OF THEIR OWN FULL, QUEEN, OR KING SIZED BUNK
    BEDS. IN THEIR OWN ROOMS, WITH THEIR DOORS LOCKED.
    AND SEXUALITY IS THEIR HUMAN RIGHT.

    UNPLANNED CHILDBIRTHS ARE DESTROYING AMERICA LIKE IMMIGRATION IS.
    THERE ARE 4 MILLION BABIES BORN PER YEAR, 1.5 MILLION UNPLANNED,
    THAT'S 37.5% OF OUR BORN SOCIETY!
    NEXT TO 1 MILLION MORE PREGNANCIES TERMINATED IN ABORTION.

    EVERY UNPLANNED BABY OR IMMIGRANT COSTS OUR COUNTRY ABOUT $1 MILLION DOLLARS TO EMPLOY - THINK ABOUT IT, 10% OF $1 MILLION IS $100,000 - THE CAPITALIST TAKES SOME
    AND THERE'S NOT EVEN A 10% RETURN ALWAYS, SO IT MUST BE AT LEAST THAT - MAYBE $2
    MILLION, SO 1.5 MILLION UNPLANNED PEOPLE, EACH YEAR, X $1 MILLION DOLLARS = $1.5
    TRILLION IN CAPITAL EXTRA, NECESSARY, EACH YEAR.
    WE DON'T EVEN HAVE $100 TRILLION IN CAPITAL TOTAL YET AS A SOCIETY.

    60 MILLION PEOPLE HAVE COLLEGE DEGREES IN THE UNITED STATES.
    15 MILLION OF THOSE PEOPLE HAVE GRADUATE DEGREES.

    100 MILLION PEOPLE WORK FULL TIME AND MAKE OVER $16,000. OF THOSE:
    50 MILLION PEOPLE MAKE OVER $50,000
    30 MILLION PEOPLE MAKE OVER $75,000
    20 MILLION PEOPLE MAKE OVER $100,000
    5 MILLION PEOPLE MAKE OVER $200,000
    1 MILLION PEOPLE MAKE OVER $500,000
    300,000 PEOPLE MAKE OVER $1,000,000
    100,000 PEOPLE MAKE OVER $2,000,000
    15,000 PEOPLE MAKE OVER $10,000,000 - MANY OF THEM PASSIVE INCOME ON CENTAMILLIONS.


    IT'S PROPERTY VS. PEOPLE.
    IT'S CAPITAL VS. LABOR.

    WHEN CONSIDERING THE ECONOMY, POPULATION MUST ALWAYS BE CONSIDERED.

    WHEN THE POOR GET RICHER, MUCH OF THE MONEY IS JUST SPENT. CONSUMED. THE FACTORY
    WEARS DOWN, AND ISN'T REPAIRED OR IMPROVED.

    WHEN THE RICH GET RICHER, HALF OF IT IS SAVED, WHICH BUILDS CAPITAL - AND THAT IS
    GOOD. BUT HALF OF IT IS SPENT ON MANSIONS AND BOATS AND LUXURIES, WHILE PEOPLE ARE POOR, AND THAT IS BAD. WE WANT AT LEAST EVERYTHING OVER $600,000, IN PRE-TAX
    INCOME, NOT TAXED, TO BE FORCED INTO A CAPITAL SAVINGS ACCOUNT, ONLY FOR INVESTMENT OR BUSINESS PURPOSES - SO THAT AT LEAST 100% OF WHAT THE RICH EARN OVER
    $600,000 WILL BE BUILT INTO THE CAPITAL WE NEED TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

    IMMIGRATION IS CHARITY TO OTHER NATIONS, WE TAKE THEIR POPULATION OFF THEIR HANDS
    AND EXPERIENCE LESSER DEGREES OF ABUNDANCE. WHILE OUR OWN PEOPLE ARE POOR AND EVEN REALLY STARVING. AND THIS IS BECAUSE OF UNPLANNED PREGNANCY ALL OVER THE WORLD, NOT A 1 CHILD PER WOMAN POLICY, AS EXISTED IN CHINA, BUT MERELY A STOP TO
    UNPLANNED PREGNANCY.

    USE BIRTH CONTROL!

    IT'S WHY SEX WAS SAID TO BE IMMORAL. AND SODOMY BECAUSE IT SPREAD DISEASE. IT'S
    NOT IMMORAL IF YOU USE SUFFICIENT PROTECTION! IN TODAY'S DAY AND AGE, PROTECTION
    IS SUFFICIENT! YOU CAN EVEN BE POLY-AMOROUS, AND YOUR WIFE WON'T BE BEARING THE
    BABY OF ANOTHER MAN!

    TELL THE POPE! MAKE THE POPE MORAL! AFRICA'S POPULATION HAS QUADRUPLED SINCE 1950*, WHILE EUROPE & THE U.S.'S POPULATION HAS INCREASED BY LESS THAN 50%. AFRICANS ARE HAVING 5-6 CHILDREN - WE'RE SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE FOR ALL OF THEM? WE
    DON'T HAVE THE CAPITAL. WE DON'T HAVE THE CAPITAL FOR OUR OWN PEOPLE. IF HEALTH
    CARE IS A RIGHT, PERHAPS BIRTH CONTROL SHOULD BE AS WELL, FOR EVERYONE ALL OVER THE WORLD.

    FOR EVERY BABY WE PREVENT FROM BEING BORN WE HAVE SAVED $1 MILLION IN CAPITAL! ISN'T THAT WORTH THE EXPENSE OF BIRTH CONTROL?

    YET ALL THE BIRTH CONTROL SHOULD SAY ON THE PACKAGING - USE WITH ANOTHER TYPE - FOR I READ THAT 50% OF THE UNPLANNED PREGNANCIES OCCUR IN PEOPLE WHO USE ONLY 1 TYPE AT A TIME. THINK ABOUT IT, THE RISK WITH THE PILL BY ITSELF IS 1 COUPLE IN
    12, TO 1 COUPLE IN 300, PER YEAR/PER 100 SEX ACTS (TYPICAL VS. PERFECT USE). IN
    10 YEARS, THAT 1 IS COUPLE IN 1.2, TO 1 COUPLE IN 30. YOU NEED BETTER BIRTH CONTROL THAN 1 TYPE ALONE, UNLESS IT IS THE IMPLANT. PREGNANCY IS THE GREATEST RISK SEX POSES, AND THE NEXT GREATEST RISK IS DISEASE, WHICH CONDOMS PROVIDE SOME
    PROTECTION AGAINST.


    *they think Africa's growth rate will slow, as Latin America's did eventually. But I'd bet on 4 billion Africans anytime soon.
    Population Increase map from 1950-2009: http://www.fooddeserts.org/images/PopulationGrowth.bmp
    Population Growth year 2011: http://cdn3.chartsbin.com/chartimages/l_3385_150e6f59e87c3a99d7d1b94a1fb46e7b

    --
    WHEN WE SPEAK THE TRUTH, WE SPEAK WITH AUTHORITY.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)