Not sure what Martha Beth meant, but I remember it from a class I took
from her last year too. I do both. I railroad occasionally when I want to pay special attention to a piece (I tend to keep the threads pretty
untwisted without railroading) and use a laying tool when I'm dealing with 3 or more strands of a fiber (usually floss) or a flat thread like Neon Rays.
I don't do both at the same time and don't use a laying tool for less than 3 strands. I'm not an especially picky stitcher, but seem to do OK, since I win ribbons at both county and state fair. Others, I'm sure will have a different opinion.
Di
"Allison Orange" <acorange@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:Si8i9.24942$1C2.1546461@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Hi, all,
I'd like to get some opinions on railroading vs. using a laying tool. I have been railroading my projects for some time, and it does improve coverage and keeps the plies aligned, however the one ply tends to twistand
the other to untwist. Does this bother anyone else?!
After watching Shay Pendray, I thought I would try using a laying tool instead of railroading. I am finding it kind of awkward, but I am goingto
persevere, since the plies lie side by side and there is no twisting.
Then I got out a notebook from a class I took by Martha Beth Lewis and she says, "Using a laying tool is not a substitute for railroading." Any idea of what that means?! Makes it seem like it is preferable to railroad or that you should do both railroading and use a laying tool. Is that even possible? And since a laying tool aligns the plies, why would you need to railroad too?
Any clarification about this would be welcome(!) and I would also like to know who railroads and who uses a laying tool.
Thanks,
Allie Orange
Tallahassee, FL
acorange@worldnet.att.net
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 70:22:44 |
Calls: | 6,656 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,200 |
Messages: | 5,332,148 |
Posted today: | 1 |