• The new wire

    From Snag@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 22:17:24 2021
    Flux core 309L that is . Well , I can run a halfway decent bead but I
    don't like the way it looks ... I get good penetration if I vee the
    joint , but if I wander off center I don't get good fusion on both sides
    . I think it's going to come down to coating my joints with the Solar
    flux , tacking with the MIG , then finishing the weld on the bench with
    the TIG . My TIG welds ain't all that pretty , but they look a lot
    better than my welds with this wire . Some of the welds will need to be
    made on the truck , those will probably be done with the MIG . Though I
    haven't tried the OA rig for this yet ... I mean , if ya got it , try it !
    --
    Snag
    Let's Go Brandon !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 18 06:52:52 2021
    "Snag" wrote in message news:spjncp$lbh$1@dont-email.me...

    Flux core 309L that is . Well , I can run a halfway decent bead but I
    don't like the way it looks ... I get good penetration if I vee the
    joint , but if I wander off center I don't get good fusion on both sides
    . I think it's going to come down to coating my joints with the Solar
    flux , tacking with the MIG , then finishing the weld on the bench with
    the TIG . My TIG welds ain't all that pretty , but they look a lot
    better than my welds with this wire . Some of the welds will need to be
    made on the truck , those will probably be done with the MIG . Though I
    haven't tried the OA rig for this yet ... I mean , if ya got it , try it ! ---------------------

    https://medium.com/@3sketchjacob/types-of-mig-welding-techniques-overview-tips-39b4319afae6
    I spent several class nights practicing vertical up on a non-critical
    project. It was quite a bit easier with the school's Miller than with my
    little 75A Century.

    Either I forgot or no one ever told me there were different types of flux
    core meant to use with and without shielding gas. Could you have the wrong
    one?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Sat Dec 18 09:28:21 2021
    On 12/18/2021 5:52 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:spjncp$lbh$1@dont-email.me...

      Flux core 309L that is . Well , I can run a halfway decent bead but I don't like the way it looks ... I get good penetration if I vee the
    joint , but if I wander off center I don't get good fusion on both sides
    . I think it's going to come down to coating my joints with the Solar
    flux , tacking with the MIG , then finishing the weld on the bench with
    the TIG . My TIG welds ain't all that pretty , but they look a lot
    better than my welds with this wire . Some of the welds will need to be
    made on the truck , those will probably be done with the MIG . Though I haven't tried the OA rig for this yet ... I mean , if ya got it , try it ! ---------------------

    https://medium.com/@3sketchjacob/types-of-mig-welding-techniques-overview-tips-39b4319afae6

    I spent several class nights practicing vertical up on a non-critical project. It was quite a bit easier with the school's Miller than with my little 75A Century.

    Either I forgot or no one ever told me there were different types of
    flux core meant to use with and without shielding gas. Could you have
    the wrong one?


    No , this is not one of the dual-shield wires . The problem with the
    bead is that it is tall and narrow . I'm at max 88 amps (Lincoln Weldpak
    100) and varying the wire speed hasn't made much difference . The bead
    looks nice , minimal oxidation on top , a little on the back side . I'm actually more concerned with the lack of fusion than the bead profile .
    It may be that I just don't have the amps for SS with this machine ...
    --
    Snag
    Let's Go Brandon !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon Fisk@21:1/5 to Snag on Sat Dec 18 13:14:48 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:28:21 -0600
    Snag <Snag_one@msn.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    No , this is not one of the dual-shield wires . The problem with the
    bead is that it is tall and narrow . I'm at max 88 amps (Lincoln Weldpak
    100) and varying the wire speed hasn't made much difference . The bead
    looks nice , minimal oxidation on top , a little on the back side . I'm >actually more concerned with the lack of fusion than the bead profile .
    It may be that I just don't have the amps for SS with this machine ...

    Maybe try preheating the area some with a torch first?

    --
    Leon Fisk
    Grand Rapids MI

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 18 11:49:05 2021
    "Snag" wrote in message news:spkun1$7th$1@dont-email.me...

    No , this is not one of the dual-shield wires . The problem with the
    bead is that it is tall and narrow . I'm at max 88 amps (Lincoln Weldpak
    100) and varying the wire speed hasn't made much difference . The bead
    looks nice , minimal oxidation on top , a little on the back side . I'm actually more concerned with the lack of fusion than the bead profile .
    It may be that I just don't have the amps for SS with this machine ... --------------------------

    I get a thinner, taller bead dragging the gun and a wider, flatter one
    pushing it, with the same settings.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Snag on Sat Dec 18 11:22:09 2021
    On 12/18/2021 8:28 AM, Snag wrote:
    On 12/18/2021 5:52 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:spjncp$lbh$1@dont-email.me...

       Flux core 309L that is . Well , I can run a halfway decent bead but I >> don't like the way it looks ... I get good penetration if I vee the
    joint , but if I wander off center I don't get good fusion on both sides
    . I think it's going to come down to coating my joints with the Solar
    flux , tacking with the MIG , then finishing the weld on the bench with
    the TIG . My TIG welds ain't all that pretty , but they look a lot
    better than my welds with this wire . Some of the welds will need to be
    made on the truck , those will probably be done with the MIG . Though I
    haven't tried the OA rig for this yet ... I mean , if ya got it , try
    it !
    ---------------------

    https://medium.com/@3sketchjacob/types-of-mig-welding-techniques-overview-tips-39b4319afae6

    I spent several class nights practicing vertical up on a non-critical
    project. It was quite a bit easier with the school's Miller than with
    my little 75A Century.

    Either I forgot or no one ever told me there were different types of
    flux core meant to use with and without shielding gas. Could you have
    the wrong one?


      No , this is not one of the dual-shield wires . The problem with the
    bead is that it is tall and narrow . I'm at max 88 amps (Lincoln Weldpak
    100) and varying the wire speed hasn't made much difference . The bead
    looks nice , minimal oxidation on top , a little on the back side . I'm actually more concerned with the lack of fusion than the bead profile .
    It may be that I just don't have the amps for SS with this machine ...

    Well, just pop on over to the shop, and try it on the Miller 212. I'm
    not using it today.

    Is it possible your wire speed just might be a little fast.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 18 23:58:53 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 13:14:48 -0400, Leon Fisk <lfiskgr@gmail.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:28:21 -0600
    Snag <Snag_one@msn.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    No , this is not one of the dual-shield wires . The problem with the
    bead is that it is tall and narrow . I'm at max 88 amps (Lincoln Weldpak >>100) and varying the wire speed hasn't made much difference . The bead >>looks nice , minimal oxidation on top , a little on the back side . I'm >>actually more concerned with the lack of fusion than the bead profile .
    It may be that I just don't have the amps for SS with this machine ...

    Maybe try preheating the area some with a torch first?
    Stainless shouldn't nees that much heat as it is a TERRIBLE heat
    sink / conductor - particularly with metal that thin.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Bob La Londe on Tue Dec 21 06:58:08 2021
    On 12/18/2021 12:22 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
    On 12/18/2021 8:28 AM, Snag wrote:
    On 12/18/2021 5:52 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:spjncp$lbh$1@dont-email.me...

       Flux core 309L that is . Well , I can run a halfway decent bead but I >>> don't like the way it looks ... I get good penetration if I vee the
    joint , but if I wander off center I don't get good fusion on both sides >>> . I think it's going to come down to coating my joints with the Solar
    flux , tacking with the MIG , then finishing the weld on the bench with
    the TIG . My TIG welds ain't all that pretty , but they look a lot
    better than my welds with this wire . Some of the welds will need to be
    made on the truck , those will probably be done with the MIG . Though I
    haven't tried the OA rig for this yet ... I mean , if ya got it , try
    it !
    ---------------------

    https://medium.com/@3sketchjacob/types-of-mig-welding-techniques-overview-tips-39b4319afae6

    I spent several class nights practicing vertical up on a non-critical
    project. It was quite a bit easier with the school's Miller than with
    my little 75A Century.

    Either I forgot or no one ever told me there were different types of
    flux core meant to use with and without shielding gas. Could you have
    the wrong one?


       No , this is not one of the dual-shield wires . The problem with
    the bead is that it is tall and narrow . I'm at max 88 amps (Lincoln
    Weldpak 100) and varying the wire speed hasn't made much difference .
    The bead looks nice , minimal oxidation on top , a little on the back
    side . I'm actually more concerned with the lack of fusion than the
    bead profile . It may be that I just don't have the amps for SS with
    this machine ...

    Well, just pop on over to the shop, and try it on the Miller 212.  I'm
    not using it today.

    Is it possible your wire speed just might be a little fast.


    No , if I slow it down it burns back . I think it really needs just a
    few more amps , which I ain't got . Interesting though , the bead
    flattens a little after the first half inch or so . It's hard for me to
    run a bead much longer than about an inch and a half on this round stuff
    so they all look like crap ... at least my TIG beads look uniformly
    crappy !
    --
    Snag
    Let's Go Brandon !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Snag on Tue Dec 21 15:54:43 2021
    On 12/21/2021 5:58 AM, Snag wrote:
    On 12/18/2021 12:22 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
    On 12/18/2021 8:28 AM, Snag wrote:
    On 12/18/2021 5:52 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:spjncp$lbh$1@dont-email.me...

       Flux core 309L that is . Well , I can run a halfway decent bead
    but I
    don't like the way it looks ... I get good penetration if I vee the
    joint , but if I wander off center I don't get good fusion on both
    sides
    . I think it's going to come down to coating my joints with the Solar
    flux , tacking with the MIG , then finishing the weld on the bench with >>>> the TIG . My TIG welds ain't all that pretty , but they look a lot
    better than my welds with this wire . Some of the welds will need to be >>>> made on the truck , those will probably be done with the MIG . Though I >>>> haven't tried the OA rig for this yet ... I mean , if ya got it ,
    try it !
    ---------------------

    https://medium.com/@3sketchjacob/types-of-mig-welding-techniques-overview-tips-39b4319afae6

    I spent several class nights practicing vertical up on a
    non-critical project. It was quite a bit easier with the school's
    Miller than with my little 75A Century.

    Either I forgot or no one ever told me there were different types of
    flux core meant to use with and without shielding gas. Could you
    have the wrong one?


       No , this is not one of the dual-shield wires . The problem with
    the bead is that it is tall and narrow . I'm at max 88 amps (Lincoln
    Weldpak 100) and varying the wire speed hasn't made much difference .
    The bead looks nice , minimal oxidation on top , a little on the back
    side . I'm actually more concerned with the lack of fusion than the
    bead profile . It may be that I just don't have the amps for SS with
    this machine ...

    Well, just pop on over to the shop, and try it on the Miller 212.  I'm
    not using it today.

    Is it possible your wire speed just might be a little fast.


      No , if I slow it down it burns back . I think it really needs just a
    few more amps , which I ain't got . Interesting though , the bead
    flattens a little after the first half inch or so . It's hard for me to
    run a bead much longer than about an inch and a half on this round stuff
    so they all look like crap ... at least my TIG beads look uniformly
    crappy !



    Sounds like preheat might just do the job for you then. Yeah, welding a
    round piece is a pain. Did some six inch well casing a while back.
    Fortunately the duty cycle of the cheap stick welder I was using made me
    stop halfway around anyway. LOL.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 22 07:34:02 2021
    "Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:sptlvi$sop$1@gioia.aioe.org...

    ...Fortunately the duty cycle of the cheap stick welder I was using made me stop halfway around anyway. LOL.

    -------------------

    After buying a Stick/TIG Lincoln I found a better use for my 50A buzz box
    arc welder as the transformer in a homebrew 12-24V 30A battery charger. It needed a Variac to tame it. If necessary I can still reconfigure it as a
    120V stick welder.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Thu Dec 23 07:44:09 2021
    On 12/22/2021 5:34 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:sptlvi$sop$1@gioia.aioe.org...

    ...Fortunately the duty cycle of the cheap stick welder I was using made me stop halfway around anyway.  LOL.

    -------------------

    After buying a Stick/TIG Lincoln I found a better use for my 50A buzz
    box arc welder as the transformer in a homebrew 12-24V 30A battery
    charger. It needed a Variac to tame it. If necessary I can still
    reconfigure it as a 120V stick welder.



    That is fascinating. I do have a variac on the shelf that was planned
    for a sheet plastic bending tool, nut since I discovered I could bend
    poly carbonate on the brake I haven't really played with the original
    idea much. My buzzbox is AC only so to use it as a charger or power
    supply I'd need to add a huge bridge rectifier and some serious power
    caps. Not that I couldn't. That's essentially what I did for the servo
    power supply on the Hurco mill. Well the transformer wasn't quite that
    big, but...

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 23 11:30:40 2021
    On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 07:44:09 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 12/22/2021 5:34 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:sptlvi$sop$1@gioia.aioe.org...

    ...Fortunately the duty cycle of the cheap stick welder I was using made me >> stop halfway around anyway.  LOL.

    -------------------

    After buying a Stick/TIG Lincoln I found a better use for my 50A buzz
    box arc welder as the transformer in a homebrew 12-24V 30A battery
    charger. It needed a Variac to tame it. If necessary I can still
    reconfigure it as a 120V stick welder.



    That is fascinating. I do have a variac on the shelf that was planned
    for a sheet plastic bending tool, nut since I discovered I could bend
    poly carbonate on the brake I haven't really played with the original
    idea much. My buzzbox is AC only so to use it as a charger or power
    supply I'd need to add a huge bridge rectifier and some serious power
    caps. Not that I couldn't. That's essentially what I did for the servo
    power supply on the Hurco mill. Well the transformer wasn't quite that
    big, but...
    For battery charging unfiltered is every bit as good as filtered -
    and many "experts" would say better as the "pilsed charge" helps break
    up suphate deposits, agitates the electrolyte, and dislodges bubbles.
    Using it as a charger at up to 50 amps doesn't erven take a HUGE
    rectifier. A full wave bridge that handles 50 amps is only about 1 1/2
    inches square and 3/8" thick. AMd only costs a few bucks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Clare Snyder on Thu Dec 23 11:22:01 2021
    On 12/23/2021 9:30 AM, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 07:44:09 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 12/22/2021 5:34 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:sptlvi$sop$1@gioia.aioe.org...

    ...Fortunately the duty cycle of the cheap stick welder I was using made me >>> stop halfway around anyway.  LOL.

    -------------------

    After buying a Stick/TIG Lincoln I found a better use for my 50A buzz
    box arc welder as the transformer in a homebrew 12-24V 30A battery
    charger. It needed a Variac to tame it. If necessary I can still
    reconfigure it as a 120V stick welder.



    That is fascinating. I do have a variac on the shelf that was planned
    for a sheet plastic bending tool, nut since I discovered I could bend
    poly carbonate on the brake I haven't really played with the original
    idea much. My buzzbox is AC only so to use it as a charger or power
    supply I'd need to add a huge bridge rectifier and some serious power
    caps. Not that I couldn't. That's essentially what I did for the servo
    power supply on the Hurco mill. Well the transformer wasn't quite that
    big, but...
    For battery charging unfiltered is every bit as good as filtered -
    and many "experts" would say better as the "pilsed charge" helps break
    up suphate deposits, agitates the electrolyte, and dislodges bubbles.
    Using it as a charger at up to 50 amps doesn't erven take a HUGE
    rectifier. A full wave bridge that handles 50 amps is only about 1 1/2
    inches square and 3/8" thick. AMd only costs a few bucks.



    I'm running a 100amp rectifier on the Hurco mill. With a decent size
    heat sink it was around 20 dollars if I recall. It was enough I had to
    count it, but not enough I worried about it. The big power caps were a
    lot more.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Thu Dec 23 13:15:42 2021
    "Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:sq21vq$1d3v$1@gioia.aioe.org...

    On 12/22/2021 5:34 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:sptlvi$sop$1@gioia.aioe.org...

    ...Fortunately the duty cycle of the cheap stick welder I was using made
    me
    stop halfway around anyway. LOL.

    -------------------

    After buying a Stick/TIG Lincoln I found a better use for my 50A buzz box
    arc welder as the transformer in a homebrew 12-24V 30A battery charger. It needed a Variac to tame it. If necessary I can still reconfigure it as a
    120V stick welder.



    That is fascinating. I do have a variac on the shelf that was planned
    for a sheet plastic bending tool, nut since I discovered I could bend
    poly carbonate on the brake I haven't really played with the original
    idea much. My buzzbox is AC only so to use it as a charger or power
    supply I'd need to add a huge bridge rectifier and some serious power
    caps. Not that I couldn't. That's essentially what I did for the servo
    power supply on the Hurco mill. Well the transformer wasn't quite that
    big, but...

    -------------------

    The rectifier is an MDQ-100A, $12.99 on Amazon. I found the 78000uF cap at a ham radio flea market. A BeesClover 100V/100A DC meter displays the output voltage and current. I buy from Amazon to minimize exposure of my credit
    card, not because they are a great parts source. Amazon is like Radio Shack, wide variety, uncertain availability, questionable quality.

    The welder transformer has substantial uncoupled self inductance that gives
    it a constant-current output curve, enough that the ripple is only about 1V
    p-p at 20A DC out. The down side is poor output voltage regulation, it
    droops from 57V at no load to 30V at 30A, which is still enough to charge
    24V batteries but makes it dangerous to leave unattended since the voltage won't stop rising as the battery nears full charge.

    If you want lab-quality voltage and current regulation from it, add a
    DPS5020 digital regulator. https://www.electronics-lab.com/ruideng-dps5020-50v-20a-power-supply-module-review/

    Without the regulator the supply can deliver up to 70A long enough to test circuit breakers etc before its 30A output breaker trips. I have a surface mount breaker in my solar power system that's rated for 30A but actually
    trips below 19. The supply's output current limitation is from overheating, especially the Variac's brush which may be hard to replace. I had to make
    one by milling and filing a motor brush. The welder transformer I used
    begins to saturate at a little over 120V in. The no-load input current rose
    to 5A at 138V in, so you may want to connect the Variac for 0-120V out
    instead of 0-140V.
    -jsw

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 23 16:36:43 2021
    "Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:sq2eo9$1b0g$1@gioia.aioe.org...

    I'm running a 100amp rectifier on the Hurco mill. With a decent size
    heat sink it was around 20 dollars if I recall. It was enough I had to
    count it, but not enough I worried about it. The big power caps were a
    lot more.

    ----------------------

    The limit I couldn't work around was heating of the primary winding.
    Although it's rated for 50A at 25 arc volts the duty cycle is 20%. I found
    that an output of 30A for a few minutes followed by ~22A for half an hour
    would heat it to 70C at the outer windings, measured by jamming in a fine thermocouple after finding the hottest spot with an IR thermometer. AFAICT 20-30A is the max recommended charging current for my 105Ah marine
    batteries, so I stopped trying to push the output higher. There's a current shunt and an anti-backflow diode that also warm up, plus a reverse diode to trip the breaker instead of blowing up the cap if it's connected to a
    battery backwards.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Engelhardt@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Fri Dec 24 08:09:23 2021
    On 12/23/2021 4:36 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    The limit I couldn't work around was heating of the primary winding.
    Although it's rated for 50A at 25 arc volts the duty cycle is 20%. I
    found that an output of 30A for a few minutes followed by ~22A for half
    an hour would heat it to 70C at the outer windings, measured by jamming
    in a fine thermocouple after finding the hottest spot with an IR
    thermometer.
    ...

    A good way to measure the temperature of the coil is with the change in resistance. Measure the resistance cold, run some low-ish current for a
    while, measure the resistance again. Keep cycling with higher currents.

    Copper's tempco is +0.393 percent per degree C. Which isn't very much, especially with the heavy winding of a stick welder. You'd likely need
    to use a Wheatstone bridge.

    Wouldn't distinguish the hot spots, though. But the hot spots would be internal and indistinguishable anyhow. There's probably a rule of thumb
    for the temperature gradient in a transformer.

    [End of meander]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Fri Dec 24 09:38:01 2021
    "Bob Engelhardt" wrote in message news:7EjxJ.109593$SR4.54928@fx43.iad...

    On 12/23/2021 4:36 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    The limit I couldn't work around was heating of the primary winding.
    Although it's rated for 50A at 25 arc volts the duty cycle is 20%. I found that an output of 30A for a few minutes followed by ~22A for half an hour would heat it to 70C at the outer windings, measured by jamming in a fine thermocouple after finding the hottest spot with an IR thermometer.
    ...

    A good way to measure the temperature of the coil is with the change in resistance. Measure the resistance cold, run some low-ish current for a
    while, measure the resistance again. Keep cycling with higher currents.

    Copper's tempco is +0.393 percent per degree C. Which isn't very much, especially with the heavy winding of a stick welder. You'd likely need
    to use a Wheatstone bridge.

    Wouldn't distinguish the hot spots, though. But the hot spots would be internal and indistinguishable anyhow. There's probably a rule of thumb
    for the temperature gradient in a transformer.

    [End of meander]

    -----------------

    I have the instruments to measure tenths of milliOhms which would still give
    me only the average temperature. The primary is 198(?) turns of 10 AWG at 1 milliOhm per foot, rated for 17A, the secondary is 6 AWG and runs cooler.
    The thermocouple let me graph the temperature rise on a laptop to observe
    its approach to a steady state, and check by briefly raising the current and then seeing if the temperature peaked and decreased. The temperature rise rating is 115C but I wanted some margin for running safely enclosed instead
    of open, accessible and hazardous. The fans on my APC inverter and T60
    freezer are loud enough that I can't hear whether anything else is running
    or not, like a fridge or the fan in the power supply.

    The datalog spreadsheet shows that at 25V, 25A out the transformer reached 73.4C at 31 minutes, rising 0.5C per minute, and cooled slightly afterwards
    at 20V, 20A, open and without the fan.

    It should be fine at 20A continuously, 30A for ~10 minutes, and all it can deliver for brief experiments. The 30A output breaker will pass 70A for
    about 5 seconds and the ammeter reads to 100A.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 24 17:57:53 2021
    "Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news:sq4m19$isu$1@dont-email.me...

    I noticed that after swapping Variacs/Powerstats and heatsinks to eliminate lower limits, the square of the max continuous current was approximately the duty cycle (0.2) times the square of the welding current. This makes sense
    if the limit is I^2*R heating.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Engelhardt@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Sat Dec 25 08:18:04 2021
    On 12/24/2021 9:38 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:

    I have the instruments to measure tenths of milliOhms which would still
    give me only the average temperature. The primary is 198(?) turns of 10
    AWG at 1 milliOhm per foot, rated for 17A, the secondary is 6 AWG and
    runs cooler. The thermocouple let me graph the temperature rise on a
    laptop to observe its approach to a steady state, and check by briefly raising the current and then seeing if the temperature peaked and
    decreased. The temperature rise rating is 115C but I wanted some margin
    for running safely enclosed instead of open, accessible and hazardous.
    The fans on my APC inverter and T60 freezer are loud enough that I can't
    hear whether anything else is running or not, like a fridge or the fan
    in the power supply.

    The datalog spreadsheet shows that at 25V, 25A out the transformer
    reached 73.4C at 31 minutes, rising 0.5C per minute, and cooled slightly afterwards at 20V, 20A, open and without the fan.

    It should be fine at 20A continuously, 30A for ~10 minutes, and all it
    can deliver for brief experiments. The 30A output breaker will pass 70A
    for about 5 seconds and the ammeter reads to 100A.


    Cool!! I can see that you're well beyond any "advice" I might have
    about finding temperature with resistance. I misread your "... measured
    by jamming in a fine thermocouple ...".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 25 17:53:06 2021
    "Bob Engelhardt" wrote in message news:jSExJ.51318$xe2.38289@fx16.iad...

    Cool!! I can see that you're well beyond any "advice" I might have
    about finding temperature with resistance. I misread your "... measured
    by jamming in a fine thermocouple ...".
    -------------------------

    For automated production testing the resistance measurement would be fine, because it could be done in a tenth of a second or less without disturbing
    the rate of rise measurement, and wouldn't require the operator to
    (mis)place the thermocouple. There should be separate force and sense connections to the winding ends to eliminate variable contact resistance.
    The measurement will between the inner contacts, whether they are force or sense. Can you guess why?

    For bench testing the interruption would be long enough to disturb the rate.

    The forward voltage drop of a diode, such as a transistor base-emitter junction, is another good indicator of temperature.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)