• Re: Unicrown Forks

    From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Tom Kunich on Sat Dec 23 10:18:45 2023
    On 12/23/2023 9:57 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
    It has been passed along to me that Flunky or whatever pseudonym he is posting under today, claims that I said that unicrown forks collapse.

    With the usual and distortions I'm sure that everyone one has recognized this as the BS lying he is so well know for. I even mentioned that picture of that
    fork on his Bontrager appeared to have more clearance than a normal road bike m thus nullifying my warning about unicrown forks. This is because Bontrager apparently specifically built that bike to avoid the weakness of unicrown forks by using a
    short head tube.

    It must put Flunky in a terrible position when he has no argument so he has to make one up by lying. As if this wasn't his modus operandi.

    Short head tubes, all else being equal, are hard on headsets
    and steering columns.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to funkmasterxx@hotmail.com on Sat Dec 23 17:55:24 2023
    On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 15:13:44 -0800 (PST), "funkma...@hotmail.com" <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:

    I could go on, and on, and on, with your lies, distortions,
    and bullshit, but everyone who reads this forum is fully
    aware of your penchant for all three, including things like
    there was no recession before obama took office, the US
    never bombed cambodia, PWM is used to test cables, etc,
    etc...

    Ever wonder why Tom lies so often? I didn't really understand it
    until I noticed that he also didn't take anyone's advice or
    suggestions (unless he was trying to get into good graces with that
    person). The question is really "What problem is Tom trying to
    solve"? It's certainly not his latest repair disaster or eBay mess.
    If he wanted to solve those problems, he would have supplied
    sufficient information to analyze and solve the problem. Instead, he
    provides the absolute minimum necessary to complain, but never enough
    for someone else to solve the problem or offer suggestions. So, what
    problem is Tom trying to solve that required keeping the experts in
    the dark and withholding information?

    I can think of only one, but they may be others. Tom wants to "own"
    the problem. If someone else has the answer, it's no longer a problem
    and it no longer belongs to Tom. It now belongs to whomever knows how
    to solve the problem.

    However, that doesn't explain why he lies and invents numbers and
    amazing facts so often. If Tom presents an honest and accurate
    analysis of his latest problem, he's done. There is nothing more to
    say. The members of RBT will recite in unison "Yes, that's correct"
    and continue on to some other more contentious topic. There's little
    wrong with that since the alternative, where everyone agrees with
    everyone else, is as best a very dull and boring discussion.
    Therefore, telling the truth isn't going to help Tom "own" the
    discussion.

    However, if he lies and is caught lying, Tom gets everything he wants.
    Since the numbers and amazing facts are under Tom's control, he's in
    control of the discussion. People can point to articles on the web
    that contradict Tom's claims, but as long as Tom persists in defending
    his incorrect view, he can perpetuate the discussion forever. If Tom
    wants an endless discussion centered on Tom and his mistakes, lies and
    amazing facts are the way for Tom to "own" the topic. If, by some
    chance, everyone gets tired of Tom's topic, he can change the topic to something with which he's more familiar (Covid-19, politics, B-52
    bombers, connections with important people, vaccinations, Dr Faucci,
    Donald Trump, etc), throw in a few more lies and amazing facts, and
    continue the process forever.

    Some interesting examples of what happens if Tom doesn't "own" a topic
    and not taking advice occurred when I first ran into him in RBT. I
    offered to help edit his online resume. Besides overlapping employers
    and dates of employment, I found that he had confused XP (the
    operating system) with XT (the IBM PC model name). I point this out
    about 6 times, and Tom ignored it every time. Later, I pointed out
    the overlapping employment dates and Tom actually fixed most of them.
    However, he contrived his own dates resulting in two obvious overlaps.
    I pointed them out to Tom, and they have remained unchanged since the
    initial revision. He also went on to make changes to his LinkedIn
    settings that would make it difficult for someone to download his
    resume. My corrections and suggestions meant to Tom that he no longer
    "owned" those corrections and suggestions. Since he was not the
    owner, and any discussion would not give him the credit, he decided to
    have nothing to do with them and pretend that the corrections did not
    exist.

    I can provide links and more examples, but I haven't eaten anything
    today and I'm looking forward to a non-Kosher treif (Yiddish) or
    trefah (Hebrew) dinner. Probably a Romaine salad with some bacon and
    cheese bits:
    "Why Separating Meat and Dairy is Part of Keeping Kosher" <https://www.exploringjudaism.org/every-day/kashrut/what-is-kashrut/why-separating-meat-and-dairy-is-part-of-keeping-kosher/>



    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Radey Shouman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Sun Dec 24 16:38:58 2023
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 12/24/2023 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
    On Sunday, December 24, 2023 at 6:39:47 PM UTC+1, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>> On 12/23/2023 8:55 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    ... I haven't eaten anything
    today and I'm looking forward to a non-Kosher treif (Yiddish) or
    trefah (Hebrew) dinner. Probably a Romaine salad with some bacon and
    cheese bits:
    "Why Separating Meat and Dairy is Part of Keeping Kosher"
    <https://www.exploringjudaism.org/every-day/kashrut/what-is-kashrut/why-separating-meat-and-dairy-is-part-of-keeping-kosher/>
    On dietary restrictions: A woman who's a dear friend of mine has been
    vegetarian since her teens, even though her husband is a dedicated
    carnivore. She's not of any particular religious faith, so that's not a
    motivation as it is with some. IIRC, she has said she just doesn't like
    meat.

    BUT: When at a dinner gathering in someone's home, when she'll eat only
    vegetables and such, she always asks that the serving utensils she uses
    to serve herself be separate from the utensils used for the dishes
    containing meat. Apparently she doesn't want to ingest a molecule of meat. >>>
    Her behavior seems way beyond a "don't like" preference. And I guess
    this behavior is fairly common among vegetarians, even those who are
    atheists.

    It strikes me as very closely parallel to some kosher regulations.

    -- - Frank Krygowski
    Most vegetarians I know are vegetarians because they oppose against
    the way how the meat is produced not out of some kind of religion. I
    can understand that.

    I know a couple who made that same choice based on environmental
    grounds. The choice if fine with me, whatever the motivation, although
    I do eat meat.

    But "not one molecule of meat on the spoon" still seems a bit weird
    and illogical to me. It seems quasi-religious, but (usually) without
    any theological justification.

    If you were at a dinner where cat meat was being served. Would you
    partake? If not, would you want whatever you were eating served with
    the cat meat utensils?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to frkrygow@sbcglobal.net on Sun Dec 24 13:29:32 2023
    On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 12:39:40 -0500, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 12/23/2023 8:55 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    ... I haven't eaten anything
    today and I'm looking forward to a non-Kosher treif (Yiddish) or
    trefah (Hebrew) dinner. Probably a Romaine salad with some bacon and
    cheese bits:
    "Why Separating Meat and Dairy is Part of Keeping Kosher"
    <https://www.exploringjudaism.org/every-day/kashrut/what-is-kashrut/why-separating-meat-and-dairy-is-part-of-keeping-kosher/>

    On dietary restrictions: A woman who's a dear friend of mine has been >vegetarian since her teens, even though her husband is a dedicated
    carnivore. She's not of any particular religious faith, so that's not a >motivation as it is with some. IIRC, she has said she just doesn't like
    meat.

    BUT: When at a dinner gathering in someone's home, when she'll eat only >vegetables and such, she always asks that the serving utensils she uses
    to serve herself be separate from the utensils used for the dishes
    containing meat. Apparently she doesn't want to ingest a molecule of meat.

    Her behavior seems way beyond a "don't like" preference. And I guess
    this behavior is fairly common among vegetarians, even those who are >atheists.

    It strikes me as very closely parallel to some kosher regulations.

    Kinda reminds me of my early aversion to eating Jell-o. My logic was
    that Jell-o wiggles and moves. Anything that does that must be alive
    and I didn't want to eat anything that was still alive.

    Kosher was an early attempt at sanitation and avoiding parasitic
    infections. In biblical times, due to a shortage of microscopes, this
    was done by observation. It didn't take much for an observant
    individual to notice that those who ate pig meat soon developed
    trichinosis (roundworm): <https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/trichinosis/symptoms-causes/syc-20378583>
    Since no cures for trichinosis was available, the best solution was
    simply to not eat pig meat.

    The biblical Hebrews also suffered from a shortage of thermometers and therefore did not notice that cooking pig meat above 160 F (71 C)
    would kill the roundworms. Rather than risk infection, they banned
    all forms of pig meat instead of banning just undercooked pig meat.
    That was the correct policy as even today, there are problems with
    parasites due to the uneven heating found in microwave ovens.

    In the 1960's it was fashionable to be a vegetarian. So, I decided to
    be a fashionable teenager and join the thundering herd of vegetarians.
    Living on a strict vegetarian diet was easy and financially beneficial
    because meat was fairly expensive. Just one problem. I became rather
    sick and fairly weak after about 6 months. The doctors couldn't find
    a caused. Finally, one doctor suggested I give up the vegetarian
    diet. My condition improved immediately and after a brief backslide
    as my digestive tract familiarized itself with processed foods and
    chemical additives, I was back to normal in about a month.

    Two of my friends have been vegan and vegetarian for at least 40
    years. Before restaurant prices went through the roof, we would have
    meals at some of the local restaurants and diners. They would eat
    mostly vegan or vegetarian, while I would act the part of cannibal. Of
    course, I had to endure endless criticism about my lifestyle and
    dietary choices. The word "mostly" is important, because they both
    were sneaking in non-vegetarian items. Apparently, it was acceptable
    to temporarily break a vegetarian diet as long as the meal was
    attended by a non-vegetarian. I suspected that asking for
    clarification was not acceptable behavior, so I remain mystified by
    this odd dietary protocol. Since then, I've noticed that other
    vegetarians sometimes sneak in an occasional banned items.

    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Jeff Liebermann on Sun Dec 24 17:51:32 2023
    On 12/24/2023 3:29 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 12:39:40 -0500, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 12/23/2023 8:55 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    ... I haven't eaten anything
    today and I'm looking forward to a non-Kosher treif (Yiddish) or
    trefah (Hebrew) dinner. Probably a Romaine salad with some bacon and
    cheese bits:
    "Why Separating Meat and Dairy is Part of Keeping Kosher"
    <https://www.exploringjudaism.org/every-day/kashrut/what-is-kashrut/why-separating-meat-and-dairy-is-part-of-keeping-kosher/>

    On dietary restrictions: A woman who's a dear friend of mine has been
    vegetarian since her teens, even though her husband is a dedicated
    carnivore. She's not of any particular religious faith, so that's not a
    motivation as it is with some. IIRC, she has said she just doesn't like
    meat.

    BUT: When at a dinner gathering in someone's home, when she'll eat only
    vegetables and such, she always asks that the serving utensils she uses
    to serve herself be separate from the utensils used for the dishes
    containing meat. Apparently she doesn't want to ingest a molecule of meat. >>
    Her behavior seems way beyond a "don't like" preference. And I guess
    this behavior is fairly common among vegetarians, even those who are
    atheists.

    It strikes me as very closely parallel to some kosher regulations.

    Kinda reminds me of my early aversion to eating Jell-o. My logic was
    that Jell-o wiggles and moves. Anything that does that must be alive
    and I didn't want to eat anything that was still alive.

    Kosher was an early attempt at sanitation and avoiding parasitic
    infections. In biblical times, due to a shortage of microscopes, this
    was done by observation. It didn't take much for an observant
    individual to notice that those who ate pig meat soon developed
    trichinosis (roundworm): <https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/trichinosis/symptoms-causes/syc-20378583>
    Since no cures for trichinosis was available, the best solution was
    simply to not eat pig meat.

    The biblical Hebrews also suffered from a shortage of thermometers and therefore did not notice that cooking pig meat above 160 F (71 C)
    would kill the roundworms. Rather than risk infection, they banned
    all forms of pig meat instead of banning just undercooked pig meat.
    That was the correct policy as even today, there are problems with
    parasites due to the uneven heating found in microwave ovens.

    In the 1960's it was fashionable to be a vegetarian. So, I decided to
    be a fashionable teenager and join the thundering herd of vegetarians.
    Living on a strict vegetarian diet was easy and financially beneficial because meat was fairly expensive. Just one problem. I became rather
    sick and fairly weak after about 6 months. The doctors couldn't find
    a caused. Finally, one doctor suggested I give up the vegetarian
    diet. My condition improved immediately and after a brief backslide
    as my digestive tract familiarized itself with processed foods and
    chemical additives, I was back to normal in about a month.

    Two of my friends have been vegan and vegetarian for at least 40
    years. Before restaurant prices went through the roof, we would have
    meals at some of the local restaurants and diners. They would eat
    mostly vegan or vegetarian, while I would act the part of cannibal. Of course, I had to endure endless criticism about my lifestyle and
    dietary choices. The word "mostly" is important, because they both
    were sneaking in non-vegetarian items. Apparently, it was acceptable
    to temporarily break a vegetarian diet as long as the meal was
    attended by a non-vegetarian. I suspected that asking for
    clarification was not acceptable behavior, so I remain mystified by
    this odd dietary protocol. Since then, I've noticed that other
    vegetarians sometimes sneak in an occasional banned items.


    Plenty of wildlife in human comestibles then besides
    trichina worms:

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/ancient-toilet-unearthed-in-jerusalem-shows-elite-were-plagued-by-intestinal-worms-180979436/
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to John B. on Sun Dec 24 17:56:03 2023
    On 12/24/2023 4:57 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 16:38:58 -0500, Radey Shouman
    <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:

    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 12/24/2023 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
    On Sunday, December 24, 2023 at 6:39:47?PM UTC+1, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>>> On 12/23/2023 8:55 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    ... I haven't eaten anything
    today and I'm looking forward to a non-Kosher treif (Yiddish) or
    trefah (Hebrew) dinner. Probably a Romaine salad with some bacon and >>>>>> cheese bits:
    "Why Separating Meat and Dairy is Part of Keeping Kosher"
    <https://www.exploringjudaism.org/every-day/kashrut/what-is-kashrut/why-separating-meat-and-dairy-is-part-of-keeping-kosher/>
    On dietary restrictions: A woman who's a dear friend of mine has been >>>>> vegetarian since her teens, even though her husband is a dedicated
    carnivore. She's not of any particular religious faith, so that's not a >>>>> motivation as it is with some. IIRC, she has said she just doesn't like >>>>> meat.

    BUT: When at a dinner gathering in someone's home, when she'll eat only >>>>> vegetables and such, she always asks that the serving utensils she uses >>>>> to serve herself be separate from the utensils used for the dishes
    containing meat. Apparently she doesn't want to ingest a molecule of meat.

    Her behavior seems way beyond a "don't like" preference. And I guess >>>>> this behavior is fairly common among vegetarians, even those who are >>>>> atheists.

    It strikes me as very closely parallel to some kosher regulations.

    -- - Frank Krygowski
    Most vegetarians I know are vegetarians because they oppose against
    the way how the meat is produced not out of some kind of religion. I
    can understand that.

    I know a couple who made that same choice based on environmental
    grounds. The choice if fine with me, whatever the motivation, although
    I do eat meat.

    But "not one molecule of meat on the spoon" still seems a bit weird
    and illogical to me. It seems quasi-religious, but (usually) without
    any theological justification.

    If you were at a dinner where cat meat was being served. Would you
    partake? If not, would you want whatever you were eating served with
    the cat meat utensils?

    Apparently meat from carnivorous animals doesn't taste good. How about
    horse meat?

    I recommend it, it's very good.

    https://www.italymagazine.com/featured-story/changing-tradition-eating-horse-meat-italy
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 24 16:01:56 2023
    On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 06:19:07 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Well, to throw a little religion into the conversation, if God created
    man then he was created, based on tooth structure, to be omnivorous.

    The tooth structure and digestive system of an omnivore is a joke.
    It's like a compromise between a carnivore and a herbivore, where the
    resulting man is inefficient and clumsy with both meat and plants. I
    guess(s) that's a fair definition of an omnivore. Actually, omnivore
    is wrong because man can only eat plants and meat. What about adding
    plastics, any type of hydrocarbon, and eating energy sources directly,
    such as radioactive rocks? Chemical energy conversion (digestion) is
    grossly inefficient.

    If God created man, he sure made a large number of anatomical
    mistakes. He didn't include sufficient support for a rather fragile
    back and left out the armor (turtle shell) back protection. The
    average lifetime of the system is only 76.4 years, while the universe
    is at least 13.7 billion years old. God forgot to include any
    offensive or defensive weaponry, such as fangs, claws, stingers, etc.
    The data sheet indicates a very limited range of operating temperature
    because God forgot to include thermal radiators and insulation (fur).
    Most of the internal organs do not include any form of redundancy.
    While an upright position seems to be the ideal working position, just
    about everything else is done while horizontal. That's because man
    evolved from a horizontal swimming fish.

    I could go on itemizing design defects forever. As a designer of self replicating organisms, God is a lousy designer. A biologist and a
    gene splicer could do better on the first try. Which would you
    prefer? The current version of man, or a nuclear powered super-man,
    with amazing powers, magical abilities, distributed intelligence, self
    healing sub-systems, replaceable parts, and many other features
    currently found only in science fiction movies and video games?

    So, please don't get hung up on analyzing mans tooth structure. There
    are plenty other things about man that could immediate improvement.



    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Sun Dec 24 17:25:45 2023
    On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 17:51:32 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    (...)
    Kosher was an early attempt at sanitation and avoiding parasitic
    infections. In biblical times, due to a shortage of microscopes, this
    was done by observation. It didn't take much for an observant
    individual to notice that those who ate pig meat soon developed
    trichinosis (roundworm):
    <https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/trichinosis/symptoms-causes/syc-20378583>
    Since no cures for trichinosis was available, the best solution was
    simply to not eat pig meat.

    The biblical Hebrews also suffered from a shortage of thermometers and
    therefore did not notice that cooking pig meat above 160 F (71 C)
    would kill the roundworms. Rather than risk infection, they banned
    all forms of pig meat instead of banning just undercooked pig meat.
    That was the correct policy as even today, there are problems with
    parasites due to the uneven heating found in microwave ovens.

    Plenty of wildlife in human comestibles then besides
    trichina worms:

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/ancient-toilet-unearthed-in-jerusalem-shows-elite-were-plagued-by-intestinal-worms-180979436/

    Yup. The ritual bath (mikvah) for ritual purification was the
    biblical way of demanding that people wash their hands before prayer
    and eating. (Hebrew prayer is often accompanied by eating some food
    that symbolized some event). They couldn't fail to notice that those
    who ate with dirty hands, bodies or clothes were the one's who would
    become ill, while those who washed their hands did better. Of course,
    there was a blessing of thanks associated with the procedure: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asher_yatzar>
    Note that phrase "do my will", which meant "relieve thyself", is still
    with us today in the form of "last will and testament" which refers to
    the bowel movement that occurs at time of death.[1] However, I'm not
    quite sure how these fit in with "doing God's will".

    The Arabs did one better by demanding that people should eat only with
    their right hand and wipe their posterior only with the left. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_toilet_etiquette>
    That was a major achievement in a part of the world where water was
    scarce, expensive and often polluted.

    Of course, once the authorities were successful by codifying the basic
    rules (10 commandments) and various sanitary procedures, they decided
    it might be fun to codify just about everything. Anything worth doing
    is worth overdoing. So, Judaism is bless with 613 Mitzot (blessings). <https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-613-mitzvot-commandments>
    If you're concerned about todays governments meddling in your personal
    affairs, please note that it was much worse in biblical times. 1654
    more (with some duplications: <https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/ejat/all.html>


    [1] I once worked in a mortuary as an "assistant embalmer" also known
    as a floor sweeper.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 24 17:47:03 2023
    On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 07:24:44 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 16:01:56 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 06:19:07 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Well, to throw a little religion into the conversation, if God created >>>man then he was created, based on tooth structure, to be omnivorous.
    (chomp)

    So, please don't get hung up on analyzing mans tooth structure. There
    are plenty other things about man that could immediate improvement.

    Ah but the reference to the biologist and gene splicer isn't logical
    as before you can have the biologist you must have the man :-)

    That might be true before AI. We will soon be able to take anything
    capable of operating a keyboard, add a hefty helping of AI, and be
    able to create a functional biologist. Today, we have faulty
    self-driving cars. In the near future, we will have faulty
    biologists. Progress blunders onward.

    And as for the lousy design? The dominant species in the world is a
    lousy design?

    At this time, Man 1.0 is the dominant species. In the near future AI
    and gene splicing could create an improved species. If Man 1.0 really
    want to remain on top of the food chain, he had better improve his
    design and construction with Man 2.0 or he will likely be replaced by
    something radically different. For starters, Man 2.0 should be more
    efficient than Man 1.0. The planet is not going to be able to sustain
    an omnivore with an food to energy conversion efficiency of less than
    5%.
    <https://www.eia.gov/kids/what-is-energy/laws-of-energy.php>
    "Food gives a person energy to move, breathe, and think. However, the
    human body isn't very efficient at converting food into useful work.
    The human body is less than 5% efficient most of the time. The rest of
    the energy is converted to heat, which may or may not be useful,
    depending on how cool or warm a person wants to be."

    Swell. So Man 1.0 makes a fairly good room heater. Man 2.0 will need
    to be far more efficient to survive or he will consume all the
    available fuel (food). At the very least, a standby option
    (hibernation) needs to be added to Man 1.0 so that he doesn't consume
    as much energy doing nothing.

    It's really difficult for someone to see a problem when they are the
    problem and they are in need of improvement. Instead of looking at
    the problems and prospective improvements from the point of view of
    Man 1.0, think of them from the point of a non-human alien observer.



    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joy Beeson@21:1/5 to frkrygow@sbcglobal.net on Sun Dec 24 21:15:36 2023
    On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 13:20:41 -0500, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    But "not one molecule of meat on the spoon" still seems a bit weird and illogical to me. It seems quasi-religious, but (usually) without any theological justification.


    How do you feel about eating a stew cooked in a scrupulously-cleaned
    chamber pot?

    --
    Joy Beeson
    joy beeson at centurylink dot net
    http://wlweather.net/PAGEJOY/
    `

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to frkrygow@sbcglobal.net on Sun Dec 24 22:13:57 2023
    On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 00:08:50 -0500, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 12/24/2023 8:25 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    [1] I once worked in a mortuary as an "assistant embalmer" also known
    as a floor sweeper.

    OK, I'm betting you and I are the only two here who have watched an
    embalming first hand.

    Probably true for a first hand experience. However, embalming seems
    to be a popular topic for YouTube videos: <https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=embalming>
    Therefore, I suspect that there might be some 2nd hand viewers in RBT.
    I wasn't directly involved in the embalmings. As I vaguely recall, I
    might viewed parts of maybe 3 embalmings. I don't recall losing my
    lunch during an embalming. However, I had problems dealing with other procedures. I'll spare everyone the details.

    Incidentally, the great Hebrew invention of the biblical era was
    portable written rules an regulations. Prior to the Hebrew tribes,
    the laws and most everything else were inscribed on stone or hardened
    in clay. These had the advantage of being somewhat long lasting, but
    were not very portable. Instead, the Jewish laws were written on
    parchment (calf, sheep, goat or lamb skin), which was far more
    portable. If it was properly tanned and kept dry, it was also long
    lasting. So, the old "cast in stone" laws didn't travel to
    neighboring tribes, while the new and improved parchment writing
    traveled fast and far. It was much like the recent transition from
    desktop computers to laptops and now to smartphones. Portable writing
    has many benefits.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid on Sun Dec 24 22:37:31 2023
    On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 21:15:36 -0500, Joy Beeson
    <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> wrote:

    On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 13:20:41 -0500, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    But "not one molecule of meat on the spoon" still seems a bit weird and
    illogical to me. It seems quasi-religious, but (usually) without any
    theological justification.

    How do you feel about eating a stew cooked in a scrupulously-cleaned
    chamber pot?

    I feel about the same as my mother did when she caught me cleaning
    carburetor parts in her favorite cooking pot. She declared that it
    wasn't worth the risk and demanded that my father and I replace it
    immediately with a similar but new cooking post. I repeated the same
    mistake a few times until I finally got the clue that it was a bad
    idea.

    Incidentally, the imagination can play tricks on the senses. I used
    to serve coffee and tea in cups that were adaptations of Pyrex
    chemistry glassware. The Pyrex cups had never had anything in them
    except water, coffee and tea. Yet, when my guests drank from the
    cups, they swore that the coffee or tea had a "chemical" taste.

    I forgot where I stole this:
    "Add a drop of wine to a glass of sewage and you get sewage. Add a
    drop of sewage to a glass of wine and you still get sewage".



    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to frkrygow@sbcglobal.net on Sun Dec 24 22:26:41 2023
    On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 00:07:48 -0500, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 12/24/2023 4:29 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    Kosher was an early attempt at sanitation and avoiding parasitic
    infections. In biblical times, due to a shortage of microscopes, this
    was done by observation. It didn't take much for an observant
    individual to notice that those who ate pig meat soon developed
    trichinosis (roundworm):
    <https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/trichinosis/symptoms-causes/syc-20378583>
    Since no cures for trichinosis was available, the best solution was
    simply to not eat pig meat.

    The biblical Hebrews also suffered from a shortage of thermometers and
    therefore did not notice that cooking pig meat above 160 F (71 C)
    would kill the roundworms. Rather than risk infection, they banned
    all forms of pig meat...

    I've heard and thought of that, of course. But ISTR in reading about
    Judaism (maybe _Jewish Literacy_ by Telushkin?) a claim that the
    trichinosis motivation was absolutely untrue; that instead the pork >prohibition was simply due to a commandment by the Almighty.

    Hard to know at this point!

    Today, such dietary warnings are issued by the FDA and USDA. For
    example:
    <https://www.foodindustrycounsel.com/recalls/year/2023>
    Whether these government organizations are the work of God of the
    Devil is subject to some debate.

    If the source can be identified, it's fairly easy to determine if
    something arrived as the "word of God". Two party messenger service
    from God to the multitudes is reserved for patriarchs, prophets and a
    few dreamers. If the "word of God" wasn't delivered through one of
    these, it didn't come from God. Of what I've read of their writings,
    they were far more concerned about important things like mass
    migrations, wars and lines of succession than about mundane things
    like bathroom etiquette and dietary matters. I think it's safe to say
    that the pig ban did not come directly from God.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Radey Shouman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Mon Dec 25 10:39:48 2023
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 12/24/2023 4:38 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    I know a couple who made that [vegetarian] choice based on environmental >>> grounds. The choice if fine with me, whatever the motivation, although
    I do eat meat.

    But "not one molecule of meat on the spoon" still seems a bit weird
    and illogical to me. It seems quasi-religious, but (usually) without
    any theological justification.

    Most of those who chose their food using logic left no descendants,
    because they died of poisoning. Food choice is, well, visceral.

    If you were at a dinner where cat meat was being served. Would you
    partake?

    Hmm. Depends on context, I suppose. It seems an unlikely situation,
    unless we were in some starvation event.

    That's exactly right. You are unlikely to rub elbows with people eating
    cats, or dogs, or donkeys, or waterbugs, or grasshoppers, or putrified
    meat, or the stomach contents of animals, (all enjoyed by people
    somewhere) or anything else that you or people like you consider too
    disgusting to be food.

    Which means that perhaps you don't quite understand how it is to risk
    being served something that just seems, according to your upbringing,
    that it shouldn't be food. I'm sure some of the behavior of vegetarians
    is performative, but some is also sincerely motivated by disgust. Logic
    has little to do with it.

    I used to work with a Chinese woman, who seemed to believe that cheese
    of any kind was really just a bad joke played by Westerners on
    proper-eating people. She had no religious or ethical objection, she
    just thought it was really disgusting. Any time we went to a restaurant
    she would interview the waiter at length on just which foods might have
    some cheese in them (it hides in surprising places). If someone had
    served her food with a utensil dripping with cheese I'll bet she would
    have sent it back.

    When you think about it, cheese is a pretty strange product. It's made
    from milk, a body secretion intended to feed the young of domestic
    animals, which is kind of weird already. Then it is curdled and aged
    and sometimes left to mold. To enjoy it properly one should be from a cheese-eating culture.

    If you study accounts of religion and culture before the evangelical
    religions took over the world (Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, Bahaiism, Mormonism &c), for example of native Americans, you see several things.
    Every tribe or group of tribes had its own gods, and no one expected or
    wanted outsiders to worship their gods. Almost every tribe had some
    food taboos. They also had sex taboos, and many particular ways of
    living that made the gods happy. In fact the line between religion and
    culture was pretty hard to draw: Do we not eat frogs because God said
    so, or is it just something that our people know to be wrong?

    Conveniently, of course, completely taboo foods were always things that
    were unlikely to be eaten, but they were often things that neighboring
    people might eat. Which suggests that they often arose by a process of schismogenesis, particularly to differentiate the good people, God's
    favorites, from those others who speak incomprehensibly and eat noisome
    things. If you don't believe that God actually told the Israelites not
    to eat pork then I don't think you need more of an explanation than schismogenesis. The Israelites were pastoral people, and pigs just
    didn't fit into their lifestyle anyway.

    Food taboos only became difficult in a modern industrial society, where
    it is normal to eat food with which one has no acquaintance besides
    paying for it and eating it. For almost all human history we or our
    family members had to find, or grow, or raise, or catch whatever we would
    eat, and prepare and cook it. Going to the cafeteria and being fed bits
    of animals and plants without any idea of where they might have come
    from or what might have been done to them is just not something our long evolutionary and cultural history has prepared us for. But here we are.


    If not, would you want whatever you were eating served with
    the cat meat utensils?

    Honestly, I think I'd be fine with wiping down the utensil. Or
    probably less.

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)